peter papadopoulos with the commission economic development agency, and i want to thank you for hearing this item today, and thank you supervisor ronen and your office and all of the sponsors who have been doing a lot of work behind the scenes on this lemgs lation, so it's exciting we're bringing this forward today. we think this is a critical step towards addressing the pressures that our neighborhoods are facing in terms of their unique cultural heritage with the character and the diversity of our communities under really strong threat at this point, we think it's critical to stablize our nonprofit organizations, our vulnerable residents, our arts organizations, our cultural organizations, many of which we're hearing from today, the unique events they hold in the neighborhoods which are critical to their identity, and the small businesses that which we're talking about also who will support and are supported by these communities. we also appreciate some of the language changes we notice here and particularly in regards to the tourism element, which we think is a nice improvement, and

peter papadopoulos with the mission environmental agency. we do think that this is a time to set a new precedent where we do in fact say we're not going to continue to reward or bad actors, and we don't think it's accepting responsibility so say oh, no, this unpermitted rollout is not the problem, it's our people are the problem. it's the neighborhood impacts are the problem. it's all one system, and they're responsible for all of it, and we're all responsible for all of it. so i think that the other thing we want to think about is let's -- let's take our time and do this right. we don't need to keep moving on the planning schedule, right? these are not our urban planners. you're our urban planners, right, and the planning department's our urban planners. we want to move on our timetable and do things right. this is going to be a pilot program, typically, it paves the way for what comes next pretty thoroughly, right? we all see this over and over, so what we want to do is start with what is our real overall equity framework on every level. l

peter strzok. people don't like to point out that the papadopoulos information came through peter strzok and lashed into a fisa application to spy on american citizens as the consequence of a dossier paid for by the dnc and hillary clinton and cure rated we need to call it what it is. and to give it dignity by having the president sit in a perjury trap would be terrible and i hope that he does not do that. lou: much of the country would agree with you. yet giuliani has again taken a stark reversal here in this one. he's surprising a lot of people. and it's just curious, the direction he really does intend if it is not -- well, i hope that the president has plenty of off-setting counsel up. i'll put it that way. let's turn to the fisa meeting you mentioned. trey gowdy and devin nunes, we'll see if they get to see those documents. we were basically assured they would. what do you think? >> i don't know that they're going to see the documents. i hope they do. there have been other circumstances where the fbi and department of justice will just brief on the documents. they won't actually provide them b

papadopoulos. the issue is he acknowledges there's a human source. peter strzok, he opens up the counterintelligence investigation the summer of 2016, what does he do the next day? he goes to great britain and hee goes to london and he's meetinge with people. how the heck would you do that if you just opened the investigation that day? h i think in that kind of, the london, christopher steele, glenn simpson axis is probably the individual we are looking at. we need to know whether this individual was spying or not. i have grave concerns about it but i think we can get those questions answered when the justice department ponies up the documents. >> tucker: you're absolutely right. are you suggesting or do you believe that this is someone who was pressured into cooperating with the investigation, or someone who freely sent information over about the campaign? >> i think it's the latter, tucker. i think this would be someone, potentially could have been paid by the fbi, like steele was. there was an agreement to pay steele. we need the answer to that. did the

papadopoulos tip from him popping off at a bar. there was no credible intelligence on that two-page document. this is petertrzok, the ina news fbi agent who said we can't afford the risk of a trump presidency and need an insurance policy. judge jeanine: let's move to the house judiciary that you are on. you have been asking for 1.2 million documents for a year now. whenever you get close rod rosenstein runs to the white house to make sure people's names are redacted. how many of those 1.2 million documents do you think you have got? >> maybe a quarter of them between an agreement between the relevant chairman and rosenstein. i don't know that we received all of those yet. judge jeanine: do you want to tell me why your committee is so impotent? >> when you set a deadline the next day you need to set a contempt hearing for rosenstein. if he doesn't turn over what you want, you hold him in contempt. judge jeanine: not you, but it's not being done. you need to do it. judge jeanine: why can't you do it? >> i support doing it. i am not a chairman. judge jeanine: therein lies the rub. >> i'm supporting chairman m

papadopoulos, whoever he is. the f.b.i. was also going after general michael flynn and paul manafort from the get-go. major intelligence operation. finally the unnamed sources tried to spin that peter strozk/lisa paige text messages what they were talking about who we now think is andrew mccabe about the so-called insurance policy in case the unthinkable happened and donald trump won. they are absolutely claiming now, "they said anything the f.b.i. did publicly would only give fodder to mr. trump campaign claims that the election was rigged." mr. strozk countered even if trump's chances of victory of low, lie dying before you are 40, the stakes are too high to justify inaction. well, that is laughable and it proves our point. the deep state, the top players not rank and file desperately trying to spin all of this damning, all of this incriminating evidence. another new breaking story to tell you about tonight. anonymous government sources have been repeatedly leaking to the media details about the f.b.i. informant who did spy on the trump campaign. at the same time, they are accusing president, republican, even people like me of putting this informant's life in danger. i have known

papadopoulos, whoever he is. the f.b.i. was also going after general michael flynn and paul manafort from the get-go. major intelligence operation. finally the unnamed sources tried to spin that peter strozk/lisa paige text messages what they were talking about who we now think is andrew mccabe about the so-called insurance policy in case the unthinkable happened and donald trump won. they are absolutely claiming now, "they said anything the f.b.i. did publicly would only give fodder to mr. trump campaign claims that the election was rigged." mr. strozk countered even if trump's chances of victory of low, lie dying before you are 40, the stakes are too high to justify inaction. well, that is laughable and it proves our point. the deep state, the top players not rank and file desperately trying to spin all of this damning, all of this incriminating evidence. another new breaking story to tell you about tonight. anonymous government sources have been repeatedly leaking to the media details about the f.b.i. informant who did spy on the trump campaign. at the same time, they are accusing president, republican, even people like me of putting this informant's life in danger. i have known

peter. >> sandra: meanwhile, as the russia investigation is about to enter its second year, we're learning more about george papadopoulosampaign operative. rush limbaugh claims papadopoulos was set up and trapped by the f.b.i. >> all trumped up, folks, no pun intended. none of it is real. all of it was made up. it was simply created to permit an investigation. just like comey telling trump the dossier existed served as the mechanism to get the media in the clear to report on the dossier. this thing is more fake, this whole investigation is more fake and more phony, more conniveed, than usual possibly imagine. >> sandra: arizona congressman andy biggs sits on the house judiciary committee and a member of the house freedom caucus as well. thank you for being here this morning. what do you think of that theory? that this is just all a setup from the beginning. >> well, you know, americans all across the spectrum love conspiracy theories. here is one where i think is probably a real conspiracy. you have people at the highest levels of government, the dnc and hillary clinton working with the f.b.i. to get a warrant to spy on

papadopoulos, whoever he is. the fbi was also going after general michael flynn, paul manafort, from the get-go. this was a major intelligence operation. finally, these unnamed sources also tried to spin the petertrzok-lisa page text messages, what they were talking about, who we now think is andrew mccabe, their so-called insurance policy, in case the unthinkable happened and donald trump won. they are claiming now "they said that anything the fbi did publicly would only give fodder to measure terms campaign claims that the election was rigged." mr. strzok countered that even if mr. trump's chances of victory were low, like dying before you are 40, the stakes are too high to justify inactio inaction. that's laughable and it proves our point. the deep state, these top players, not rank and file, desperately trying to spin all of this incriminating evidence. another new breaking story to tell you about tonight, anonymous government sources have been repeatedly looking to the media details about the fbi informant who did spy on the trump campaign played at the same time, they are accusing the president, republicans, even people like me, of putting this informant's life in danger. i've known thean

papadopoulos. what else was happening? carter page spoke in that area. so, maybe peter not yet launched. but those are the questions that are going to be answering -- asking. steve: maybe it's such a high level investigation that a guy that high goes himself as opposed to someone else. brian: they also looked at this investigation, trey gowdy did and said i'm looking at this informant and the role the informant played. i'm seeing these people they are focusing on, sam clovis, papadopoulos and carter page. i'm saying to myself in one way i don't mind that the fbi did. this in the other, the president should feel good about it listen. >> it was president trump himself who said, number one, i didn't collude with russia but if anyone connected with my campaign did, i want the fbi to find that out. i am even more convinced that the fbi did exactly what my fellow citizens would want them to do when they got the information they got. and that it has nothing to do with donald trump. pete: an interesting take that, hey, trump wanted it to be found and if it was there and they fo