bring good home. >> joe martinez's appeals attorney, peter raben, believed prosecutors' key evidence against joe was deeply flawed and had unfairly influenced the jury. >> in the trial court work, i want you to imagine, like, a jigsaw puzzle box. you can arrange all the pieces in such a way that you can create the picture on the box. what you're doing at appeal is you're arguing those pieces don't depict that picture. the evidence in this case is the tape recording, but the transcript became the bible for the first jury because they couldn't hear what's on that tape. >> to strengthen their arguments, prosecutors asked detectives for their recollections of the taped conversation. >> detective conigliaro testified to all the incriminating statements that he claims he heard, and the prosecutor asked, "were you confident that joe had confessed and there was no doubt in your mind that he was guilty?" >> when we were sitting in the car, it was as clear as day what we heard. we didn't hear this interference that we picked up electronically. we thought we captured it. and i gave my opinion t