a lot of politicians. >> is there a difference between "the washington post" teaming up with peter schweitzer or teaming up with groups like propublica or groups that have a partisan viewpoint? >> that's a tough one. what our editors have said is that schweitzer's background is a relevant point, but it isn't one that would necessarily exclude us from considering the fact he has put together as a basis for reporting. and that's what the paper did, in a piece we published this week is it essentially took a look at what he had put together and then did our own reporting. i will point out, that was separate from the reporting that i do covering clinton as a candidate. it was our investigative team. >> and that "washington post" story looked at all of the overlap between clinton donor -- clinton foundation donors issued say, and speaking fees to bill clinton and things like that. >> right, very complicated. >> as somebody deals with a lot of sources, you've worked with organizations like "60 minutes," it's pretty common is it not for reporters to cultivate all kinds of sources and some of them are

. >> peter schweitzer is the new author of the book "clinton cash" where he talks about the snarl and personal interest that came to characterize the clinton's interaction around the world. "clinton cash" is published by harper collins, a sister company to fox news. >> shortly after the earthquake took place, the ambassador in haiti sent a memo entitled the gold rush is on. it was about businessmen showing up in haiti trying to seek lucrative contracts. >> it was the job of the ihrc to oversee this process and to ensure no one took advantage of the situation. but what if it was part of the problem? >> a number of members of the ihrc actually wrote a letter expressing their concerns they were not involved in the process, that all the decisions were being made by clinton and belaree, and they argued that the national priorities of haiti were being totally disregarded by the decisions that were being made. >> as haiti dug itself out of the rubble many projects were initiated often with u.s. money and a connection to the clintons. for instance there was the haitian mobile money initiative

peter schweitzer thinks he knows.with hillary clinton's brother. >> tony rodham meets the executives from this company in september of 2012 at a clinton global initiative seminar. three months later, the haitian government grants the gold exploitation contract to bcs mining. within the year tony rodham is placed on the board of bcs mining. rodham has no background in haiti or mining. >> tony rodham did not return our phone calls. we did speak to the ceo of bcs mining who maintains there is no connection between the permit and rodham's seat on the board. of all the projects the one that probably made the biggest splash was caracol industrial park. in the end, it may have been the biggest disappointment. it's located about 85 miles north of port-au-prince. according to the state department caracol was designed to create up to 65,000 jobs. in october 2012 bill and hillary, along with haitian heads of state and several celebrities, were there for its launch. >> the plan was enormously ambitious. it was to build a textile

peter schweitzer says the smoking gun is on that server. it is in those e-mails on that server. >> i was disturbed by what he said. the evidence is in a pattern of behavior. last i checked we don't convict people or even accuse them based on patterns. he would want people were prosecuted for insider trading based on a hand of behavior. >> there had been more evidence than a pattern of behavior to convict them. given the second circuit's decision it is a lot tougher to prosecute people for insider trading. i think you would agree with me. stuart: do you think we will get to those e-mails. >> that is a different question. we are moving from patterns of behavior is e-mail. i don't think you'll get the e-mails. they did a search with search words and made a decision to exclude 30,000 or more e-mails based on their own internal search. stuart: good of them to do the search. >> you probably won't get them. stuart: e-mails were sent to people and they are on the other servers. you think we will get an? >> maybe they will that hillary is hoping. st

i've met peter schweitzer myself.urnalists in washington. and he has an ideology certainly, but i wouldn't say he's an ideaologueideologue. what we're seeing consistently from the clinton world there appears to be no criticism of her leadership of the former president's leadership that is legitimate. and that is going to be a real problem going forward. because they're basically saying off-limits. anything you want to say, anything you want to report about their background you're biased. you have an ax to grind and you're part of the vast right wing conspiracy. >> i have to ask a question. because i had somebody -- >> it's your job joe. ask the question. >> and i open it up to anybody here. i had somebody that runs a major network call me yesterday and say, joe, i got a question for you. because you know "morning joe," it's where america leaders start. so who are you going to call? >> you want to know anything you call joe. >> in this guy right here. anyway, he said why is isn't anybody running against hak? there are

be up to half of america's uranium. >> and can you catch more of bret baier's interview with peter schweitzer in clinton, tangled web. it airs on the fox news channel tonight at 10:00 eastern. and tomorrow at 6:00 eastern on the fox business network. schweitzer brings up a businessman named frank justra justra slammed that article writing and highlighted in bold, quote, this is not about me but an attempt to tear down secretary clinton and presidential campaign. the white house press secretary josh earnest said there wasn't evidence to back up the accusations, and melissa, characterizing this as a political attack. melissa? melissa: plenty of evidence blake thank you so much. i want to bring in political experts for the reaction byron is a fox news contributor. we also have richard fowler a democratic strategist and host of the richard fowler radio show. richard start with you, because the clintons are screaming that you know, this is a political takedown. it seems like there is so much smoke and there is so much circumstantial evidence that it can only be solved with an investigation from th

particular focus on "the new york times" and "washington post" teaming up with conservative author peter schweitzer. and diane sawyer's sit-down with bruce jenner about becoming a woman. 17 million people watched that thing on friday fight. we'll talk about that as well. >> yeah that was something. that is great that you're going to be talking about that. we'll be there. we'll be there at the top of the show. thanks very much. there is a new candidate jumping into the head of the pack of republicans eyeing the white house in 2016. we'll have more with our panel on that as we look ahead on "sunday morning futures." back in a moment. when a moment spontaneously turns romantic why pause to take a pill? and why stop what you're doing to find a bathroom? with cialis for daily use, you don't have to plan around either. it's the only daily tablet approved to treat erectile dysfunction so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. plus cialis treats the frustrating urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and

here is brett bare and clinton cash author peter schweitzer. >> in this particular case we're talking about uranium. we're talking about things that relate to the nuclear industry. we're talking about the russian government. >> which already provides equipment and material to iran. >> that's correct. the problem is that hillary clinton's family foundation the clinton foundation was receiving tens of millions of dollars from shareholders in uranium 1 who wanted the russian government to acquire them because it would be a financial landfall. >> tonight, democratic veteran strategist robert zimmerman is here. also mark thissen, writer for george w. bush and fellow with aei. we begin tonight with mark. mark it's hard to digest. they're talking about a lot of foreign countries, and i don't want to dive too deep because it's going to make my viewers' eyes glaze over. but at base, she accused of helping approve a deal that shifted massive amounts of american uranium to russia's control, and the quid pro quo here would be what? the millions in donations to her charity and the $500,000 speakin

and top clinton defenders have taken to the air waves to blast the book's conservative author peter schweitzer, to promote his book in advance. >> i'd be happy to come back. if i'm wrong about it i'd be happy to say it but i think this is a political put up job and i can smell it a mile away. >> chelsea clinton insisted the foundation would not change its practices. >> the work will continue as it is. i think that's the right choice for the people who are being affected by that work. >> according to tax documents though the work most affects foundation employees. not people across the globe in need of charity. irs forms covering the year 2008 to 2012, indicate the clinton foundation spent $110 million on employee salaries and benefits. that's more than the $75 million the foundation spent on charity program grants. asked about these ratios, the clinton foundation did not respond. over the weekend the clinton foundation admitted to making mistakes an how it disclosed some donors and the foundation's acting chief executive said the foundation would refile some of the forms. quote, yes can he mad

this is before peter schweitzer's book comes out. tom: nothing passes the smell test.is the problem with all this. the irs has a statute of limitations that unless there's fraud or unless there is 25% or more of an air which is why there is a supply is it is a three year deal going back means the error was bigger than 25% or there was fraud involved. liz: we know the clinton foundation has a lot of people on the campaign. should the irs, this is by the way an internal audit not yet an irs audit. the irs take a look at this non-profit? should the federal election commission look at this nonprofit? those are the issues as well. tom: the law was lerner group's not only knows what operates. liz: it is the dodge city of tax policy. tom: stocks bounced back after disappointing economic numbers we are up 42, a little bit of a gain, not much, it has the plus sign in front of the. we get the nasdaq, this is trading above its all-time record close. that was in 2000 so we are back above 5044 which we will see if we can stay there for the trading day, disappointing sales and new h

in peter schweitzer's new book there's likely there won't be one piece of evidence that nails them toall but it's such a convincing and repetitive pattern over time that shows these entities were given preference that we do have to ask questions do we want this sort of cloud to surround our commander in chief because the foundation's not going anywhere. >> and certainly no quid pro quo has been established at this point in terms of a direct link to mrs. clinton, but at the same time we have a fox news poll if we could put it up there on the screen for our viewers to see, that shows that she in terms of honestworthy you can take a look at the numbers, 45% yes, 54% no. you can see in the public eye at least this story has some legs. it's not going to go away anytime soon and she can't just claim that the right wing media that's going after her because you do have others like "the new york times," reuters and "newsweek" all probing into this and looking for answers. >>> absolutely. and the poll numbers are showing the public didn't exactly trust her before even before the stories started

david: peter schweitzer got a lot of flak yesterday for saying you don't have a smoking gun here you lot of innuendo, and schweitzer said look it's not my job to get a smoking gun. that you get with a subpoena w a prosecution. >> correct. correct. but the smoking gun may very well have been destroyed when she wiped the server clean. now we know why she wiped the server clean. by the way a lawyer can lose her license to practice law when she destroys evidence that she knos is about -- david: by the way, those 30,000 e-mails all dealt with her yoga class. >> i think there were some hairdresser appointments as well. david: judge napolitano, good to see you. [laughter] >> thank you. david: so the mainstream media does claim there's no smoking gun connecting a hillary clinton foundation contributor to a state department favor, but every e-mail she destroyed was received by at least one other person. and if you got an e-mail from a secretary of state who was about to run for president would you destroy it? that's what the power players call a chip, something you hold on to in a big game. on

>> because peter schweitzer has done ground breaking work that almost changed legislation. example, political intelligence on capitol hill where hedge funds and wall street shops for gaining political intelligence to front-run trades. also there was a crackdown on congressmen in their a own accounts and their own financial affairs, whether or not they were benefiting from political intelligence. so he is he's detailed he's thorough, he is at the hoover institution. they are saying he's a right-wing individual but he is extremely detailed in his research. ash ash the basic claim in this book is that foreign entities are pouring money into the clintons' foundation and in return they're getting favors, and they have some examples. a free trade agreement in colombia that benefited a major donor and so on. and he has very, as you say, very exact records, tax documents government documents. the hillary campaign is very adept, if you like, of squashing these saying these are just conservative hits on hillary, but this seems a little more detailed. >> yeah. there's distortions and

. >>> so far we've seen stories of the clinton blur as often as peter schweitzer puts it wheeling and dealing to mix politics and l in this process the clintons allegedly use their influence to raise funds for both themselves and causes supported by their foundation. all while skirting the rules by doing favors for their benefactors. these favors aren't just shady deals. with the clout of the clintons they can have far reaching effects on the international scene. >> consider the stunning case of kazakhstan and how american uranium ended up in the hands of the russians. remember businessman and clinton friend? he eners the story. >> bill clinton winds up in it kazakhstan where a canadian investor has been trying to get control to buy a couple of uranium mines. he became really partners in a way with bill clinton working on philanthropic activities. >> i came up with an idea about creating an initiative to alleviate poverty. >> furthermore he has been involved in helping to facilitate speaking engagements. >> bill clinton were with the presidential palace of yasir bias in kazakhstan. it

they are pushing back because peter schweitzer was on tv this weekend and the campaign is trying to jump on the fact that he said he does not have direct evidence that hillary clinton herself signed off on that uranium 1 deal. specifically brian fallon the spokesman for the clinton campaign put out this two-page memo that says "we believe we have he a turned the corner as the author himself conceded multiple times on national tv that his conspiracy theories lack any evidence." they're referring, in part to the fact that there are multiple federal agencies that have to sign off on a foreign deal like that. but republican rand paul said today hillary clinton shouldn't have been involved at all, regardless if other agencies were involved. listen. >> had she stood up and objected the sale wouldn't have gone through. but now the russians own 20% of our mining and then it turns out that the people who owned the mining company were giving over $100 million to the clinton foundation. >> now larry davis a long-time clinton ally was also on fox news sunday. he claims these were just inadvertent er

clinton cash by peter schweitzer is interesting. it really pushes the story forward. we'd already heard about foreign contributions to the clinton foundation foundation. this goes a big step further by alleging there were big actions taken by hillary clinton to help some of those foreign donors to the clinton foundation. she's here on ground. new hampshire today, so far hasn't taken any questions from voters, kissing babies in a bakery, all the things you would expect someone to do at the beginning of a campaign but these allegations threaten to kind of derail the start of all this. you had already heard about the e-mail trouble for example. now more allegations about the clinton foundation. just a couple moments ago, josh earnest at the white house briefing was asked about these claims. remember at the beginning of the obama administration there was a mem bum of understanding that these big foreign contributions would not be coming in to the foundation while she was secretary of state. he said he can't knock down every false claim that comes in but you can bet there

peter schweitzer author of the book "clinton cash" spoke out on fox news sunday this morning, while clinton's insider lani davis offered a defense of the couple. doug is tracking it all. >> one of the issues raising serious concern about the nextus of the donations to the clintons is how fees paid to the former president for his speeches abroad escalated dramatically after his wife became secretary of state. the fees were often paid by governments and foreign entities with crucial business with the state department. the author of clinton cash said the former president was rewarded at least 11 times with speaking fees of $500,000 from foreign entities after 2009 when his wife was in the position of secretary of state. is it coincidence in a pattern we see repeated dozens of times where large clinton supporters are -- have business before the state department make large payments and favorable actions are taken? i don't think that coincidences occur that frequently. >> clinton supporter and long time defender lanny davis told chris wallace that the former president and his wife religiously had a

>> first of all, i know peter schweitzer and i want to say he is a fair and balanced. his institute has gone up. he got work with "60 minutes" when they went after and exposed both parties in congress how senators and congressmen were using inside trader information. neil: right. >> he did big stuff. he's done other big things and i think the republicans get theirs. look, he and i talked about the fact that corruption in washington is the biggest issue that is not discussed. it is like the novel in the kids' books "harry potter" the word that may not be spoerngs which is in this case corruption. it spreads in both parties. pay for play, i take care of you, bribery as a defined crime is never executed. it's usually with winks and nods and what have you. and by the way if robert menendez is being indicted war in he did, most of which is again circumstantial you wonder how hillary clinton will avoid investigation. but the republicans ought not to get in this. what this does, i've done polling for several years when you ask people to rate corruption among a series of issue

i think it's because a lot of people are deciding that one, peter schweitzer's book does not contain in and of itself a smoking gun and he's rileying on us reporters to do a lot of legwork for him and, two too much is at stake for the democrats. so i think now you've got a kind of democratic rally except for the normally sympathetic pro-democratic press and the sides are going to be clearly drawn here. >> this has made it so much harder for her to just dismiss, how by the right wing conspiracy. you cannot do that with "the new york times" editorial board calling you out. >> no. that whole strategy has been utterly obliterated. they haven't come up with a new one short of answering questions. when i covered the clinton white house and there were lots of scandals involved monica lewinsky and other fund-raising one of the things the aides would do is try to embarrass them and say instead of covering this you should cover the latest proposal on school uniforms. >> that's classic deceptive behavior. go ahead. >> right. but at least they had some other story to tell. hillary's entire campa

this is based on the book clinton cash by peter schweitzer, we have an exclusive interview with him. and starts with a trip by president clinton and one of his friends to kazakhstan and develops into a uranium deal. that explodes and tens of millions of dollars to the clinton foundation from one company, also big speaking fees to former president clinton from this. and all ends up with a russia reset that perhaps is more than anyone bargained for. consider the stunning case of has expanded at how americans uranium ended up in the hands of the russians. >> september 6th, 2005, bill clinton shows up in kazakhstan, where a canadian investor has been trying to get control, to buy a couple uranium mines. he became partners with bill clinton working on philanthropic activities. >> came to me as an idea about creating an initiative to alleviate poverty. >> frank shoes that has been involved in helping to facilitate speaking engagements for the clintons. >> they're whisked to the presidential palace in cassocks and and it is a fascinating story because everybody walked away from the table th

peter schweitzer.mist of the heritage foundation and senior political editor of townhall.com. great to have you here. these allegation revelations, very serious, how is this going to affect the clinton run for the white house, guy? >> that remains to be seen. important to recognize the book's coming out in a few weeks. if they have the goods. if there are dots clearly connected with evidence that show quid pro quos and who benefitted and how. i think this is yet another major major problem for team hillary, and the one thing i'll point out is not just fox news but the "washington post" and the "new york times" are taking this pretty seriously. >> i know it's the full-court press here. steve to you, i want to give an example. guy said is this going to prove it? there are lots of examples in the book. one involves the keystone pipeline, and while the state department was reviewing keystone canadian backers gave a maelz to the clinton foundation. to be fair here kerry was the secretary of the state depart

obtained a memo that's being passed around byy the hillary clinton campaign blasting the new peter schweitzer book that they're saying they're widely discredited. here's author of the upcoming book the silencing, that's kirstenn powers. also joining us is tammy bruce. author and panelist pamela geller. a littleam choppy because of the delay. we trieded our best. what's your reaction to her? >> well clearly she lives under the sharia. she's a devout muslim. and she supports it. so this idea of freedom is -- >> it's alien. >> it's alien. and of course she found your remarks offensive. >> too bad. >> well no no but you're insulting the sharia.ns you're insulting islam. by the way, that's blasphemy.e i also believe that she was subdued, because when you shut that cutoff switch off, she's still there. the saudi government is going to watch that interview, sean. and she doesn't want any repercussions at the same time. >> that's a's great point. >> look this is a society where she knows that it will be watched and judged. she also i think, when you have a dynamic like a stockholm syndrome there's a

. >> this officer, peter schweitzer is a very detail-oriented person. >> he a, news proof, and b, makesese accusations that are a partisan-fueled fiction.

particular focus on "the new york times" and "washington post" teaming up with conservative author peter schweitzerdiane sawyer's sit-down with bruce jenner about becoming a woman. 17 million people watched that thing on friday fight. we'll talk about that as well. >> yeah that was something. that is great that you're going to be talking about that. we'll be there. we'll be there at the top of the show. thanks very much. there is a new candidate jumping into the head of the pack of republicans eyeing the white house in 2016. we'll have more with our panel on that as we look ahead on "sunday morning futures." back in a moment. the real question that needs to be asked is "what is it that we can do that is impactful?" what the cloud enables is computing to empower cancer researchers. it used to take two weeks to sequence and analyze a genome; with the microsoft cloud we can analyze 100 per day. whatever i can do to help compute a cure for cancer, that's what i'd like to do. >>> welcome back. he is the one to watch, florida senator marco rubio is surging ahead of the large group of republicans vying fo

peter schweitzer's soon-to-be released book exposed several clinton wrongdoings. "the new york times" decided to start digging deeper into the book's findings and what the paper found in exchange for helping the russian government buy the company that owns several u.s. uranium mines, key players involved in the deal donated millions of dollars to the clinton foundation and also paid bill clinton a $500,000 speaking fee. the end result is 2013 russian newspaper headline quote, russian nuclear energy conquers the world. the clinton campaign responded to the allegations releasing a statement that reads in part, quote, no one has produced a shred of evidence that hillary clinton ever took action as secretary of state in order to support the interests of donors to the clinton foundation. to suggest the state department under then secretary clinton exerted undue influence in the u.s. government's review of the sale of uranium is baseless. here to help us unfold in the big board experience is ed henry. good to see you, sir. >> how are you? >> it's very complicated here.

so peter schweitzer the author, the conservative awght owas sort of following joe becker. >> woodruff: and, carolyn ryan, i want to ask both of you this question, is there a sense at this point of the political implications for hillary clinton's campaign? >> well, i think the timing is not great because i think though many people thought that she had a good campaign roll-out, she's really trying to present herself in a way that blunt the elizabeth warrens of her party as a sincering messenger for the message of economic mobility economic inequality. and i think these stories they're intricate and sometimes hard to understand, these stories have a way of underscoring the international orbit that the clintons operate in which is sort of a world awash in money and connections and a very privileged place. >> woodruff: and jonathan allen, to you, a sense of the political implications? >> no, i mean i-- i-- i-- agree with what was said. un i think in the case of the problems on these forms, earlier reporting we did that found this transparency agreement mrs. clinton signed with the obama ad

there is a new book out, of course, "clinton cash," by peter schweitzer who's getting all kinds of publicity thanks to us and everybody else talking about this book. but the book raises a lot of good questions about the money coming into the clinton foundation and whether or not as that was happening while hillary clinton was at the state department some of these foreign donors were actually able to pay for access. what is your take on this? how damaging is this for hillary clinton and should she be worried? >> well, number one i think the book is actually not out. >> yeah. >> and even before it hits the stands -- >> it feels like it's out. >> it certainly feels like it's out because of the media coverage and some of the special deals it has gotten with media. however, every allegation or piece of innuendo that it has put out there it has been struck down. even the author says there is no evidence here of wrongdoing. and i think that's an important thing for everybody to remember. he suggests that she was able to get the colombia free trade through because of a donation to her husband's foun

it comes as peter schweitzer author of "clinton cash," defends his reporting. other international deals show a clear pattern of -- and you said they even broke the law. i think that's the gray area where the clintons -- >> there was a concern about this when hillary clinton became secretary of state. another concern that the obama administration and the clintons devised and elaborate set of rules that were supposed to govern. and now it is clear on at least some occasions that those rules were thrown out the window. as to whether or not they broke the law, i'm not as clear about that. but even just by the stipulations that they had with the administration, those have been broken things were not disclosed. and as we were saying earlier, president clinton's post post-presidency has been harked by a carelessness and some degree of greed. >> so ruth marcus writes foreign donations leave hillary in a cloud. the foundation could have done the prudent thing and kept the existing restrictions in place. instead the foundations quietly freed itself from the limitations c

betty: the allegations from her new book -- from a new book by peter schweitzer.rofit of a dollar 34 a share three cents better than estimated by analysts surveyed by bloomberg. dupont is facing a challenge from mountain health. plans to break up the company. it is a new world this morning for businesses under google search rankings. all mobile google searches will favor sites that are mobile friendly. that could lead to changes in how websites are ranked and hurt smaller businesses. that do not have mobile from the sites. bird flu is discovered on an iowa farm with more than 5 million chickens. the u.s. department of agriculture found the virus. it means the hands must be destroyed -- the hens must be destroyed. i will produces about 1/5 of the nation's bigs. -- eggs. it takes a village or maybe just the help of a billionaire. we will hear from a children's tv producer who is working with warren buffett to mold young minds around money. happy birthday your majesty. the queen of england is 89 today and she got a 41 gun royal salute. she may get a more -- prince wi

author peter schweitzer raises questions whether the donors benefitted from their relations with thentons. according to a copy obtained by the cbs news former president bill clinton was paid $1.4 million by a nigerian news media group to give two speeches there while hillary clinton was secretary of state. schweitzer says the group's founder had close ties to the country's president. it also raises new questions about long time friend and major ben faker to canadianbillionaire frank juice extra. including the fact that they supported the trade agreement because it helped boost his business trs. in another example "the new york times" repeatedly declosed the $2.35 million from a mining company looking to operate in the u.s. that required approval by the state department among other agencies. on thursday campaign press secretary brian fall len pushed back. in one memo he specifically targeted "the new york times" story and he sent a three-page letter to clinton supporters calling it a smear project. the bottom line is the book fails to produce a shred of evidence supporting the theory

author peter schweitzer -- offer peter schweizer. have been several statements from the clinton camp. i want to read part of the statement from the acting ceo of the clinton foundation. she says there were mistakes. "our error was that government donations were mistakingly combined with other donations. those same grants have always been properly listed in our audited financial statement." you have brian fallon go on and refuse each claim. peter: the facts do not correspond to that. bloomberg this morning, and the washington post reporting that we now have 1100 donations that ended up at the clinton foundation that were never disclosed. part of the memorandum of understanding with the obama transition team is they would disclose all donations, including donations going to this entity. that statement, they are behind. betty: you say that is erroneous? peter: it is not been verified by the post that you have these 1100 donations that they never disclosed. there were supposed to disclose all of them. if simple requirement that president

erik: the reporting is beginning to dribble out from this book that will appear on may 5 by peter schweitzerere is a story that you know about in the new york times the others may not have seen documenting the flow of funds into the clinton foundation to president clinton himself in return for giving speeches that may have had some connection state department approval and government approval in general of the purchase of some u.s. uranium assets by a russian company. how much of an impact might this have on hillary's campaign? are people talking about that right now? mark: they are. even if you just take the known facts, the clintons operated a world where they helped work with people around the world doing great work for the clinton foundation took money from rich people from around the world. often, they traveled with those people or in one case she took a large check from a group like that and some of those companies would occasionally get help from the u.s. government and sometimes from the state department. the appearance of that is not great. if you want to avoid any appearance of co-m

book clinton cast published by harpercollins and as the same majority and has this network, peter schweitzer baier. listen here. >> we are talking about uranium, things that relate to the nuclear industry we are talking about the russian government which already provides equipment and material to iran. the problem is hillary clinton's family foundation the clinton foundation was receiving tens of millions of dollars from shareholders who wanted the russian government to acquire them because it would be a financial landfall. >> there is a businessman who was named as having profited along the way he slammed that article, wright lighting--highlighting in bold this is not about me but an attempt to tear down secretary clinton and her presidential campaign. you can catch more of bret baier's interview in tinkle clinton web tonight on the fox news channel at 10:00 eastern and again tomorrow at 6:00 p.m. eastern on fox business. that special brings into question contracts that were awarded in haiti after the devastating earthquake and the influence the clintons had over that process and one exampl

clinton cash by peter schweitzer alleges that hillary clinton traded political favors in exchange forg fees. the author lays out a number of incidents where interests of big donors fell under the purview of then secretary clinton. >> there has been no evidence presented that suggests that somehow donations to the clinton foundation had any impact on any policy decision that's were made by secretary clinton or anybody knells the state department. >> the clinton team defends saying there's not a shred of evidence. that is because all the evidence was shredded. >> some experts say there's a possibility that the justice department or congress could begin looking into the accusations. >>> mrs. clinton is planning a fundraising trip to the bay area next month. the san francisco chronicle reporting she's scheduled to visit may 6th and 8, as part of a statewide fundraising swing that also includes events in southern california. tickets are expected to be $2,700 a person. >>> the plan to build a new wildlife rehabilitation center in south lake tahoe cleared its final hurdle. on thursday the ag

and peter schweitzer admits in the report that it doesn't have the smoking gun. >> it does seem likeding on his research and digging a bit more. but here's the question long te to mean for hillary clinton? it's the average american average voter going to pay attention to this? are they going to care? >> here's what i feel about it anna. we're talking about 19 months from now. we're in april of 2015. you are talking about november of 2016. do i think people are going to go in the voting booth and say, you know i really department like the speech that bill clinton gave half a million dollars in russia just before the youruranium deal. no. some people in the middle independent swing voters may -- it may add to the perception that there's a lot of clinton baggage, do we want to go back to these days? as we see in the clinton email scandal, her ratings for honesty and trustworthiness took a real hit in the last month or so. >> you went to the white house correspondents dinner last night. what was your assessment? >> it was fun. i'm exhausted today. i'm really strict about not going out on

peter schweitzer is the author and he joins us this morning. >> good morning. >> let's put it bluntly. are you hoping this book and the issues you raise in it torpedo her candidacy? >> this is not really motivated to her candidacy. i've done two previous books that looked at corruption and looked at people in both political parties. what we have with the clintons is a unique arrangement where you have a powerful you know, public figure who's involved with all these foreign entities. >> if a person believes every word in yo book wouldn't that be disqualifying with everything you're saying. you say people donate and get favorable treatment by the state department run by hillary clinton. >> certainly the evidence i think is pretty shocking and could have that implication. but really the motivation is consistent with my previous work to look at the whole issue of corruption. >> do you have any specific instance in which hillary clinton directly intervenes on behalf of donors to the clinton foundation? >> it's a great question. what we have is a pattern of behavior. i was not in any of the