more recently sarah palin's going rogue and america by heart and currently a book by peter schweitzer who has been on the bestsellers list for many weeks. with many these authors i have published multiple books. dinesh d'souza and i have published five or six books together. i have been reunited with many these people as i have moved around from house to house. it's one of the nice things about longevity as an editor. as an editor your stock is a list of authors and your list of authors is very important and you hope that they will move with you and follow you from house to house and that's largely been the case. it's very gratifying. it does require patience. i always say editors have to be patient people because it sometimes takes years to get a book out of somebody. a good example is arthur brooks head of the american enterprise institute. i met arthur five years ago or so or six years ago where he was made president of aei. he had already published a number of serious and interesting books with basic books. i was very interested in him. we had a long conversation and he became an

"wall street journal" report, peter schweitzer, they were both inconclusive in the end.issa: what is inconclusive. >> it is not pay for play. melissa: how do you figure. >> there was no evidence it was directly linked. melissa: what would be evidence to you? you looking for email, listen hillary if i give you a million dollars will you shove this through and approve it she says yes. >> would be nice. i would love to see that email. what i'm saying there is a murkiness about it. the clintons have for decades operated in the gray where things are not completely black and white. melissa: it is not gray. it is definite. i mean it is clear. got a million dollars in their own personal house from someone who was lobbying -- >> -- clintons are those type of people. those are very serious claim to be making. something that hillary clinton would change u.s. policy just so her husband could make $500,000 or a million dollars. that is really what you think? melissa: absolutely. 100%. >> that is not how i feel about it. melissa: the evidence says exactly that. what do you think james