i'll talk to clinton cash author peter schweitzer. plus, get ready for street justice. i'll take the pulse of voters. and some future voters. >> donald trump is out to destroy the u.s. >> he is? and is hillary trying to -- >> yes, she is. >> all right. look at the skyscraper here. who the hell built it? not hillary. "justice starts now. >>> hello and welcome to a special sunday edition of "justice." thank you for being with us tonight. you know, newly released e-mails suggest the power of the state department was used to show favoritism to the donors of the clinton foundation. and in case you missed last night's "justice," you will hear my open and take on those newly released e-mails later in the hour but joining me now is author of "clinton cash" peter schweitzer. all right, peter. good evening. listen you wrote this book, "clinton cash" well over a year ago and we are now just finding out that some of the stuff that you wrote about in the book is being released by the state department in e-mails as a result of a federal judge requiring the state department to release

peter schweitzer, thank you. let me turn to lanny davis, former white house counsel to president bill clinton. first of all, i'll give you the chance to respond to what you heard from peter schweitzer. >> mr. schweitzer does speculation. i do facts. so lets go back to the facts about these two e-mails and the three individuals you just mentioned on national television. e-mail one involved a young person who is a volunteer in haiti, and doug band forwarded his name to two friends from the clinton white house days and from friendships relating to their work for the clintons. one, huma abedin, and another, i believe -- it was just humana in this case, saying take a look at this kid. he's done work in haiti. and that's all that i know. and there's never been the slightest suggestion of any quid pro quo or wrongdoing involving that e-mail by doug band. secondly, there was an e-mail referring mr. shegory to the state department, because he had information to impart to the state department. that e-mail sent by doug band

there is a very natural question that comes up after the conversation we just had with peter schweitzer. and if they're conceding that it's not okay to have it as secretary of state? >> let's talk about your guest, the fact is the book he published and the movie he did after that, the documentary, supported by breitbart, a right wing organization. and i would add, let me make one more point. his film, so-called documentary, was also a partially funded document by stephen bannon, who is now trump's top adviser and nobody has disclosed it. so let's not look at him as an independent arbiter, as for hillary clinton, she did not blame colin powell for what she does, she asked him for guidance. >> no, she essentially said he did it and he said it was okay if she did it. she is suggesting there is parallels to the way they operated as secretary of state. but they point out there is very clear differences between hillary clinton and colin powell and the way they operated their e-mails. clinton had exclusive e-mails, powell did not. clinton had a private e-mail server at her house, powell did no

by peter schweitzer. a full length movie of the same name. >> these companies will give money to the clintons even in the form of speaking fees or in the form of donations to the clinton foundation. and the clintons will then, in effect, do their bidding before the halls of power in africa. and they will go to foreign governments and encourage them to do business with individuals who are putting money in their pocket. >> again, no evidence to back up those allegations. but the man behind the clinton cash movie and the book, perhaps most responsible for spreading unsubstantiated claims about the clinton dealings is helping the trump campaign as its new ceo. steven bannon, despite never had, it was essentially a critic of republicans in the 1990s and why they failed to stop bill clinton despite impeaching him. bannon's idea was they had gone over the cliff, so to speak. they had propagated these wild and ridiculous conspiracy theories that vince foster murdered himself or what have you. and by doing that, t

here now, peter schweitzer is the author of "clinton cash" which has now been adapted into a graphic novel. peter, what did you learn by looking at these 44 new e-mails? >> well, i think judicial watch did a great job of getting them released. what it does is it's further confirmation to what we have been talking about for more than a year. there's been pay to play at the clinton state department related to the clinton foundation, and the clintons have failed to deal with any of the substance of these issues. heck, trace talked about the agreement that hillary clinton had when she wept in to become secretary of state. part of that agreement was that they were supposed to disclose all donors to the clinton foundation. they still haven't done that. there's more than 1,100 foreign donors that we don't even know the names ability. this is further confirmation and the new noose is tightening. >> they put those 30,000 e-mails out there and said that's it, nothing else to see here. here, 44 new e-mails that reveal a lot about what was going on at that time. where is this going to go? are we

joining me now, both points to president bill clinton from 1996 to 1998, and peter schweitzer is the ton cash." this just came out in graphic novel form. peter, let me start with you. first question is, isn't this all too damn confusing to permeate the consciousness of voters? this is not watergate, which was a break-in, we all get that. this is more whitewater, which was much more confusing. >> yeah, i mean, complexity is a problem here. but in very simple terms, this is the way that people need to think about it. we all know that in politics a guy on wall street raises money for a candidate, sometimes because they want access and they want favors. but federal law prevents foreign nationals from doing that. if you're a guy like gilbert shagori, you cannot put money in a campaign to get access because we don't want foreign entities getting access and influencing our policymakers. the clinton foundation and the bill clinton speaking fees are a way around that. that's why you have guys like gilbert and others sending them large checks. so now we have influencing our policies and getting

lou: clinton cash author peter schweitzer joins us next. stay with us. have asthma... ...one of many pieces in my life. so when my asthma symptoms kept coming back on my long-term control medicine. i talked to my doctor and found a missing piece in my asthma treatment with breo. once-daily breo prevents asthma symptoms. breo is for adults with asthma not well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. breo won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. breo opens up airways to help improve breathing for a full 24 hours. breo contains a type of medicine that increases the risk of death from asthma problems and may increase the risk of hospitalization in children and adolescents. breo is not for people whose asthma is well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. once your asthma is well controlled, your doctor will decide if you can stop breo and prescribe a different asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. do not take breo more than prescribe

by peter schweitzer.er followed by a full length movie of the same name. >> these companies will give money to the clintons even in the form of speaking fees or in the form of donations to the clinton foundation. and the clintons will then, in effect, do their bidding before the halls of power in africa. and they will go to foreign governments and encourage them to do business with individuals who are putting money in their pocket. >> again, no evidence to back up those allegations. but the man behind the clinton cash movie and the book, perhaps most responsible for spreading unsubstantiated claims about the clinton dealings is helping the trump campaign as its new ceo. steven bannon, despite never having run a single campaign. bloomberg business week proclaimed him america's most dangerous political operative in a cover story last year. i'm joined by joshua green from bloomberg business week who wrote that star on steve bannon last year. one of the things i think is fascinating in a really excellent sort

here now, peter schweitzer is the author of "clinton cash" which has now been adapted into a graphic novel. peter, what did you learn by looking at these 44 new e-mails? >> well, i think judicial watch did a great job of getting them released. what it does is it's further confirmation to what we have been talking about for more than a year. there's been pay to play at the clinton state department related to the clinton foundation, and the clintons have failed to deal with any of the substance of these issues. heck, trace talked about the agreement that hillary clinton had when she wept in to become secretary of state. part of that agreement was that they were supposed to disclose all donors to the clinton foundation. they still haven't done that. there's more than 1,100 foreign donors that we don't even know the names ability. this is further confirmation and the new noose is tightening. >> they put those 30,000 e-mails out there and said that's it, nothing else to see here. here, 44 new e-mails that reveal a lot about what was going on at that time. where is this going to go? are we

i'll talk to clinton cash author peter schweitzer. plus, get ready for street justice.e voters. >> donald trump is out to destroy the u.s. >> he is? and is hillary trying to -- >> yes, she is. >> all right. look at the skyscraper here. who the hell built it? not hillary.

. >> clinton watch by peter schweitzer, shows how they used it to enrich their family at america's expense. she gets rich, making you poor. >> reporter: they have come under scrutiny while being in contact with the state department. >> as hillary clinton apologized for turning the state department into a pay-for-play operation where favors are sold to the highest bidder. >> reporter: the clinton campaign denies any pay to play allegations. >> we have so much that we are proud of, and i will put that up against any of the innuendo and accusation coming from donald trump. because the work that has been done has garnered accolades and appreciation from every corner of the world because it has been so far-sighted, visionary, and effective. >> reporter: but republicans jumped on the new announcements. rnc releasing a statement saying if everything was aboveboard while hillary clinton ran the state department as the clintons have said, why change a thing? and also mr. clinton, who already stopped giving paid speeches, said he would keep it that way if elected. the clintons have a a massed $1.5 m

. >> pat you can enjoy its v-neck smile be talking with clinton cash author peter schweitzer.s fisherman about to really in a big catch in a remarkable way. we have a video for you here if you need advice for your business, legalzoom has your back. our trusted network of attorneys has provided guidance to over 100,000 people just like you. visit legalzoom today. the legal help you can count on. legalzoom. legal help is here. [announcer] is it a force of nature? or a sales event? the summer of audi sales event is here. get up to a $5,000 bonus on select audi models. lou: donald trump campaign chair today denied that he has lost control of the republican presidential nominee. >> the candidate is in control of his campaign. that's number one and i'm in control of doing the things he wants me to do in the campaign. the turmoil and this is an another clinton era that she put out there that the media is picking up on. in the last week we announced a record amount of money that we have raised in july. mr. trump is -- crowds overflowing in the streets of the campaign is in very good s

mark, you did tweet me interviewing peter schweitzer, and i don't know if you took the time to read thek, but i thought it was well substantiated. and his reporting was built on by abc, by "the washington post," by "the new york times," not exactly institutions looking to do a hit job on the clintons. >> no, they certainly reported on it, but when you read the articles, they don't come to conclusions, they just report on what he wrote. i'll give you the perfect example. he talked about the iranian deal, right? he made a big deal that there was a big pro quo and she sold the rights to yuranium, et cetera. he didn't say there are nine agencies that had to approve the deal, including the treasury department, the department of security and others. he didn't talk about what their response was and it didn't seem entirely like it was secretary clinton's decision. and there's reporting that said she was not involve in the decision. >> mark, i like you because i think you're an independent thinker. you say liberal things. that is what i do. i don't know anybody so robotic that they see the world

bill clinton's impeachment hearings and a close associate and legal advisor to the clinton, and peter schweitzerthe author of clinton cash. peter, let me start with you. what is the significance in your eyes to this week's revelations? >> well, i think the a.p.'s story is hugely important. and i find the clinton defense quite bizarre. the question is not who she meets with when the german chancellor requests a meeting. that's part of her duty. the question is who does she choose to give access to, who does she choose to allow to have access to her ear? and it's pretty clear based on the a.p. evidence. when she has choices, she's choosing a high proportion of clinton foundation donors. the e-mails that have come out also reveal that we have now gone from the point where we had a strange pattern of behavior where people were donating money to the clintons and seemed to get favorable action. we now have e-mails that show the clinton foundation as the conduit. if you're a crown prince or a billionaire in nigeria and want access to the highest levels of the state department, you don't need to go thro

peter schweitzer is the author of "clinton cash," speaking on fox today about how this is all tied togetherike puzzle pieces that we're now seen falling into place. >> when you're engaging in pay to play on a global scale as you were with the clinton foundation, you need a means of communication and e-mail is the way to do it. you can't do that on the official government network because it might be detected, people can file freedom of information act requests. so you need to set up a private server. these two scandals are connected. >> but it worked, and there's nothing, jay, that's illegal. whether it may be questionable, there's nothing illegal that's been found, what difference does it make, as someone has asked previously? >> it begs the question whether there was actually illegaltivity here. the clinton foundation in and of itself is entitled to raise money from foreign individuals and governments. one of the principals of the clinton foundation happened to be the secretary of state and is now the democratic nominee for president of the united states and may end up being president of t

mark, you did tweet me when i was interviewing peter schweitzer.n't know that you've taken the time to read the book. "clinton qua "clinton cash." i thought it was well substantia substantiated. >> not even close. >> by abc, by the washington post, by the "new york times," not by institutions looking to do a hit job on the clintons. >> no, they certainly reported on it. when you read those articles, they continedon't come to concl just report on what he wrote. i'll give a perfect example. he talked about the uranium deal, right? and so he made a big deal that there was this quid pro quo and that she sold the rights to uranium, et cetera, et cetera. well, what he didn't say, there are nine agencies that had to approve that deal. including the treasury department, the department of homeland security, and others, right? he didn't talk to anybody to see what their -- what their response was or interview them to see what their involvement was. he made it seem like it was entirely secretary clinton's responsibility to make the decision. and there's repor

joining us again peter on a few weeks ago, peter schweitzer author of the book, executive producer ofon cash." good to have you back. a lot more has come to light in the last couple of weeks. i've been looking more closely at the details of the book. some of the narrative of what happened around it. i go back to the stephanopoulos interview and i kind of see what he was saying, because the clintons are both lawyers. they are so smart that maybe the reason they are above the law is because they always stay like a millimeter above what you can actually prove. stephanopoulos, god knows what he was thinking but he was right to say that to you, that in the entire book it's so damming and smells so bad and so obvious what was going on but there's nothing there that will stick. is there? >> well, i think if the hope that clinton critics had that there's an e-mail out there that says i will do this for you in exchange for that money, that sort of e-mail is not going to exist. the clintons are too smart to put things in writing in that regard. that said, and i responded in this way to george s

next one or contemporary extortion by peter schweitzer. it's been aroun around a while. i read it a few years back but i'm going to give it another look. what are the politics broken? and went back and seems to think there is this left wing right wing war going on between the parties, factions and the right-wingers and left-wingers to i talk to bernie sanders at a white house christmas party and he shared my view that's not the case, that most of the case has to do with maybe the medal and doling out $4 trillion to the insiders and cronies appear in d.c. that i think is a strong explanation for the want of politics is broken. i think he pursues that pretty well. money correlated with elections, correlated with committee assignments, correlated with everything, voting record commit center. the next one is a shameless plug, it's called american underdog by a congressman named david brad, available june 28. i am plugging my own stuff. it's wide-ranging. i had a friend help me put together but i said in previous books of the together, lecture notes over 20 years without the

unlike peter schweitzer's book. throw them all out, the extortionate he's written some good books about what's wrong with this government and i wish every american could read those as well. "one second after" was a "new york times" bestseller about the e&p threat that most people don't even want to think too much about in this country. about 20 good nonfiction books that i've read this year so far and recommend them all. >> booktv wants to know what you are reading this summer. tweet us your and your apple tv or post it on a facebook page, facebook.com/booktv. >> next, look at how climate change is affecting building design. speakers include a landscape designer, a climate expert at a representative from the national parks service. and look at what communities can do to adapt to environmental changes and the potential costs. no, national building museum, this is just under an hour and a half. >> good evening and welcome. my name is chase and a pleasure the executive director of the national building museum. i'm deli