you are on with peter schweizer. >> caller: hi peter. i would like for you to speak to the fact that people like makia and george stephanopoulos just attacking you personally on your ability to do research on the clinton project and looking for personal attacks and i would like you defend yourself there little bit. thank you. >> guest: i don't feel the current conversation is a personal attack. i think it's fair to raise questions about the research of a project that i will say the stephanopoulos interview this week was a little bit -- and that george is often opposed works for the clintons. he was part of the clinton campaign and he of course mentioned for four months i was a speechwriter in the george w. bush white house. but he certainly served the clinton administration much longer than four months. so i thought that was a little bit of an interesting decision on the part of abc news. i don't mind having a vigorous conversation. what is troubling is the allies james carville and engaging in vicious personal attacks against me. they t

from media matters, peter schweizer admitted he omitted key information about donors peter schweizer's acquisitions have no evidence. is there anything you think hillary for america or media matters has gotten right about an error you made in this book? >> no. what is surprising is they say the book is a dud but their actions don't indicate that is what they really believe. if you look at a list of the errors and i am glad to go into detail on them. it one of the things they put out was the statement in uranium deal the shareholder shared the shares before hilary clinton became secretary of state. i point that out in the book. the problem is brian fallon doesn't talk about the eight other individuals giving who are shareholders and chairman of the company and giving to the clinton foundation at the very time the state department is considering this deal. they want to selectively try to steer the conversation one way without looking at the larger facts. they are hoping people want read the narrative of the book and they will take their word for it which i think is really quite remarkabl

we're talking to the "clinton cash" writer peter schweizer himself coming right up. liz: take you thrive dallas. there's the traffic, courtesy of kflw. take a look, we're coming right back. part adventure. it's part geek and part chic. it's part relaxation and part exhilaration. it's part sports car and part suv. and the best part? the 2015 gla. it's 100% mercedes-benz. multiple medications, does your mouth often feel dry? a dry mouth can be a side effect of many medications. but it can also lead to tooth decay and bad breath. that's why there's biotene, available as an oral rinse, toothpaste, spray or gel. biotene can provide soothing relief and it helps keep your mouth healthy too. remember, while your medication is doing you good, a dry mouth isn't biotene, for people who suffer from a dry mouth. . david: this is an alert, the worst u.s. bird flu outbreak in history is taking a huge financial toll. i far eggs are g love soaring. up 85% after a drop in supply forces a lot of companies to suspend operations. at least 38.9 million birds have died or been exterminated

. >>> authority peter schweizer on the controversial back of the clinton foundation. the media has dismissed him as partisan but the leaks offer the future of brian. ♪ if you're looking for a car that drives you... ...and takes the wheel right from your very hands... ...this isn't that car. the first and only car with direct adaptive steering. ♪ the 328 horsepower q50 from infiniti. [phone rings] [man] hello,totten designs. sales department? yes...i can put you right through.

the author of the blockbuster new book "clinton cash," peter schweizer our guest tonight. and do you remember those missing e-mails we were told by the irs commissioner were lost? lois lerner's lost e-mails? well, they've been found. more of them, by the thousands. that story is straight ahead. >>> turning now into the investigation in lois lerner's role in targeting conservative groups. a treasury department inspector general today announced more than 6,000 previously missing or lost lerner e-mails have wonder of wonders been recovered and will be delivered to congress. all of these e-mails are from the period between 2010 and 2012 when the irs has admitted targeting tea party and other conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status and some of these e-mails likely to be amongst the most critical of the e-mails that the commissioner of the irs himself said to congress, they're missing they're lost and are irretrievable. that has been proved to be utterly and completely wrong. hillary clinton using hirer first policy speech to talk about something that threatens her am

the author of the blockbuster new book "clinton cash," peter schweizer our guest tonight. and do you remember those missing e-mails we were told by the irs commissioner were lost? lois lerner's lost e-mails? well, they've been found. more of them, by the thousands. that story is straight ahead. flo: hey, big guy. i heard you lost a close one today. look, jamie, maybe we weren't the lowest rate this time. but when you show people their progressive direct rate and our competitors' rates you can't win them all. the important part is, you helped them save. thanks, flo. okay, let's go get you an ice cream cone, champ. with sprinkles? sprinkles are for winners. i understand. >>> turning now into the investigation in lois lerner's role in targeting conservative groups. a treasury department inspector general today announced more than 6,000 previously missing or lost lerner e-mails have wonder of wonders been recovered and will be delivered to congress. all of these e-mails are from the period between 2010 and 2012 when the irs has admitted targeting tea party and other conservati

peter schweizer?> guest: well and income you are referring i visited e-mails and the servers at a think it's a huge, huge problem. remember hillary clinton was on the watergate committee as a junior lawyer and it was of course those 18 minutes i think was that richard nixon erased. we are talking 30,000 e-mails that are just vanish. on top of that year this additional problem as i point outout in the book that hillary clinton as a condition of becoming secretary of state, this is something the president-elect obama insisted on, they were required to disclose all the contributors every year to the clinton foundation. pretty basic requirement. hillary clinton promised the same thing in her testimony before the senate foreign relations committee. bill clinton went on cnn and said we will have complete transparency. we were researching this book and went through canadian tax records we found that lo and behold that's not true that there were undisclosed donors including the chairman of this russian on ura

we'll find out what peter schweizer says. >>> remember when al sharpton said this?you ain't nothing! you're a [ bleep ]. come and do something. >> you think that was bad. wait till you hear what he tweeted yesterday. when eating healthy and drinking water just isn't enough to ease my constipation i trust dulcolax tablets. i take dulcolax for dependable overnight relief and in the morning i am back to myself dulcolax, designed for dependable relief ♪ every auto insurance policy has a number. but not every insurance company understands the life behind it. ♪ those who have served our nation have earned the very best service in return. ♪ usaa. we know what it means to serve. get an auto insurance quote and see why 92% of our members plan to stay for life. i take these out... ...to put in dr. scholl's active series insoles. they help reduce wear and tear on my legs, becuase they have triple zone protection. ... and reduce shock by 40%. so i feel like i'm ready to take on anything. fact: when pharmacists are in pain the medicine in advil is their #1 choice for pain relief

i want to read a comment from peter schweizer. he is the author of "clinton cash," who was grilled really by stephanopoulous on that sunday morning show. here is what he says in reaction to stephanopoulous. what is certain that stephanopoulous ethical malpractice of hivedden hand journalism done further injury to essential but beleaguered institution, one battling to preserve legitimacy. that is news no one can celebrate. he calls it hidden-hand journalism rich? what do you have make of this to say. i don't know if you saw the interview with peter schweizer boy, it was tough. had you known at the time there was a lot of money exchanging hands you might have had a different reaction to it. >> i think the reason stephanopoulous didn't disclose this probably just would have been so highly embarrassing, in that interview with schweizer to lead it off with the fact oh, by the way i gave them $75,000. to proceed to rake them over the coals. stephanopoulous in that interview, he was one of the first to create the standard if peter schwei

particularly upset about, the deal that happened -- you know their reaction is it's wrong and peter schweizervative. no it's not. it's all over the place in the degree we have never seen. i want to ask the question will we give away half our uranium to the russians why is nobody in washington caring enough to how that deal got done. i don't care if it was her. i'll tell you where the smoking gun is. it's in haiti. >> i wish we didn't have to take a commercial right now but we do. we'll be right back. . >>> boy, i tell you, our social media just lit up with the comment about the clinton foundation. >> pat and i usually agree on most things but having worked with the clinton foundation and helping start an anti-aids program in ukraine and a leadership program that helped save lives and empower ordinary working people i can say, like ed say, they have done a lot of good and the uranium story, pat is right, it raises real questions but in haiti it looked like they hired a respected payment company whose ceo contributed to the foundation. >> first of all, let me just say, i appreciate you saying t

here's what peter schweizer had to say.deo clip] >> all of this axis is accumulated, all of this money is flowing to the clinton foundation, and then the russian government arise. they say they want to buy uranium because they have had a long interest in cornering the market. this is a personal goal of vladimir putin. in order for russia to acquire what amounts to 20% or 25% of all uranium assets in the united states, it requires federal government approval. there is a process that requires a number of government agencies, including the state department to sign off on this deal. they do sign off on the deal. what i think is troubling about hillary clinton in the midst of all this is that no other government agency that approves this is headed by somebody who has received $145 million to the foundation from nine individuals connected with this firm. the second thing that is troubling is that hillary clinton had a history of to this point of opposing precisely these types of deals. in other words, where a foreign government w

peter schweizer joins us from tallahassee.on page 100 83, you write that the clintons are perhaps the most politically's -- of their generation. they know how things work in the corridor's of power and around the world. they know that foreign governments are trying to influence machen foreign policy and they know that bribery is rampant around the world. they have numerous avenues for making money. some of those avenues may not be as lucrative as giving a $700,000 speech in nigeria, but they would be much -- guest: one of the defenses you hear from the clinton camp is that they are unaware of certain things, or perhaps there is nothing seriously afoot with all the money flowing to the clinton foundation or to them as speaking fees. but they have been players on the international stage a long time. a lot of the people who pay for speeches by bill clinton they are not an insurance company in the u.k. or a media company in germany. these are companies that operate in places like nigeria, south america, and some of these individua

. >> reporter: that would be peter schweizer, author of "clinton cash" who never quite said that. today the poll shows ethical questions were first raised in march and the number of americans who think clinton has strong qualities of leadership has risen from 57% to 65%. but that's because the poll may have been more weighted for democrats. including yesterday in las vegas, she promised to double-down on president obama's executive actions on immigration. >> and if congress continues to refuse to act as president, i would do everything under the law to go even further. >> though at the white house, josh earnest said the president did all he could on immigration, raising questions about whether clinton's moves would be legal. >> i'm not going to be in a position to render a legal opinion. >> reporter: bill clinton who promised to take a back seat keeps taking a lead on answering questions, including one from a billionaire donor. >> other guys and none of those were asked a question what is this foundation doing, actually? >> i just work there. i don't know. >> now, at that senate h

you are on with peter schweizer. caller: hello peter.ould like to speak to the fact of people like george stephanopoulos and your host the other day attacking you, personally, on your ability to do research on the clinton project. all they look for is personal attacks. i would like for you to defend yourself there. guest: i do not feel that the current conversation is a personal attack. i think it is fair to raise questions about the research in the project. i will say that the stephanopoulos interview was a little odd in that george stephanopoulos worked for the clintons. he was part of the war room for the clinton campaign. he mentioned that for four months, i was a speech writer in the george w. bush white house. but he certainly served the clinton administration longer than four months. i thought that was an interesting decision on the part of abc news. i do not mind a vigorous conversation. what is troubling is the allies of the clintons who have engaged in vicious personal attacks against me. they try to misinterpret or dredge up a

particularly upset about, the deal that happened -- you know their reaction is it's wrong and peter schweizert's not. it's all over the place in the degree we have never seen. i want to ask the question will we give away half our uranium to the russians why is nobody in washington caring enough to how that deal got done. i don't care if it was her. i'll tell you where the smoking gun is. it's in haiti. >> i wish we didn't have to take a commercial right now but we do. we'll be right back. you total your brand new car. nobody's hurt,but there will still be pain. it comes when your insurance company says they'll only pay three-quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do, drive three-quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement, you'd get your whole car back. i guess they don't want you driving around on three wheels. smart. with liberty mutual new car replacement, we'll replace the full value of your car. see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance. making a fist something we do to show resolve. to defend ourselves. to declar

it was incumbent to reveal information especially interviewing likes of peter schweizer, criticizing her. melissa: my only question, they say he was going to be a centerpiece of their election coverage now he is not. he used to work for the clintons. i don't understand why this makes him, he was already in my mind really biased? >> i'm much less troubled about this than the speaking fees. everyone knows where stephanopoulous came from. this is money that he gave to the foundation. this is not money going into people's pockets. melissa: well -- that is sort of issue though. we don't, the question of where that money and foundation is going is the thing that he was doing interview about. >> he hit on peter schweizer pretty darn hard in that interview with his book about the clintons. the coin of the realm in the business that george stephanopoulos is in i was credibility. that is what abc management is thinking b if you have viewers at the margin pulling away from abc for that reason then those programs are going to have a big problem. that is the reality in television. so, it is credi

he beat up on peter schweizer in an interview. it was an intense interview. nt you to hear from schweizer. >> as far as coordination is concerned, you have the fact that he's a donor. you have the fact now it's coming out he's participated in clinton global events as a panelist. as a speaker multiple times. it raises the question just about the coziness. you have the finances. you've got these meetings that he's attending. how you can expect to be objective you know, is really highly questionable in that kind of environment. gerri: dan should stephanopoulos step aside from all political coverage at this point? >> i don't think so. he's taken himself out of the debate. there's too much throwing people over the side when they get into a fix like this. the problem i think lies with george stephanopoulos and abc management. if he's going to conduct the program like he does every sunday morning, he has to be a fair arbiter. he has to have credibility. and this damages his credibility in a way that i think there they should be extremely upset about it at abc. >> i w

that is something he did not disclose before interviewing "clinton cash" author, peter schweizer.abc's chief anchor apologizing for not telling viewers about that. >>> going to extreme measures, the black market, this is so bizarre, for blue bell ice cream. listeria no the included. well, maybe. >>> giseleing up the heels just in time. there is a new kind of model down the block and flying down the round way. do you have too much money or a n too many drones? will only give you 37-thousand to replace it. "depreciation" they claim. "how can my car depreciate before it's first oil change?" you ask. maybe the better question is why do you have that insurance company? with liberty mutual new car replacement, we'll replace the full value of your car. see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance. melissa: second time the charm for president obama's trade agenda. it moves forward in the senate after embarrassing defeat earlier this week. peter barnes has more from d.c. peter. >> melissa, that is right. republicans to the enough democratic votes just now to end the dem

david: peter schweizer is coming, "after the bell" starts right now. . >>> breaking down this week'shave a full house. adam sirhan of sirhan capital telling us whether or not to worry about

the author of the new book "clinton cash," peter schweizer, joins me now.d evening, peter. >> great to be on with you, judge. thanks for having me. >> the clintons became incredibly wealthy while hillary was a united states senator and secretary of state. everybody, though, uses the same line, there's no evidence. but, you know, peter, that's a job of a prosecutor. but nobody wants to look at this. why? >> well, i think it's a combination of things. i think first of all the book just came out on tuesday so people are starting to absorb it. these are not quick and easy stories. this is not like deflategate and the patriots. it's complex, it's very, very important. i think the second thing, though, and peggy noonan alluded to this in her piece in "the wall street journal" today, people expect from the clintons that you're going to get scandal. what i've encouraged people to do is look at these cases, take the name clinton out of it and ask yourself, would you tolerate this from any other political figure? i think the answer is no. >> well, you know, everybody

we'll find out what peter schweizer has to say about it. >>> remember when al sharpton said this? >> you ain't nothing. you're a punk [ bleep ]! >> you think that was bad? wait until you hear what he tweeted yesterday. it will make your skin crawl. that, and more, straight ahead. nsurance policy has a number. but not every insurance company understands the life behind it. ♪ those who have served our nation have earned the very best service in return. ♪ usaa. we know what it means to serve. get an auto insurance quote and see why 92% of our members plan to stay for life. (music) i'm supposed to tell you how it feels when you book the perfect family vacation on hotels.com. but i think he's kinda nailing it. (music) hotels.com. they don't need me right now. >>> i want to urge you to actively >>> i want to urge you to seek out the polarized gridlock places you can find. because so often throughout our history, those have been the places where progress really happens. climate change economic inequality, human rights, criminal justice. these are the revolutions of your time. and you hav

you are on with peter schweizer. caller: hello peter. would like to speak to the fact of people like george stephanopoulos and your host the other day attacking you, personally, on your ability to do research on the clinton project. all they look for is personal attacks. i would like for you to defend yourself there. guest: i do not feel that the current conversation is a personal attack. i think it is fair to raise questions about the research in the project. i will say that the stephanopoulos interview was a little odd in that george stephanopoulos worked for the clintons. he was part of the war room for the clinton campaign. he mentioned that for four months, i was a speech writer in the george w. bush white house. but he certainly served the clinton administration longer than four months. i thought that was an interesting decision on the part of abc news. i do not mind a vigorous conversation. what is troubling is the allies of the clintons who have engaged in vicious personal attacks against me. they try to misinterpret or dredge up

that video directly addressed the book "clinton cash" and author peter schweizer who detailed inflow of money to bill clinton and clinton foundation while hillary clinton was secretary of state. the video was narrated by clinton's press secretary brian fallon, that the book has farfetched and crazy conspiracy theories and written by a friend of the koch brother. >> the book is being debunked far and wide, full of sloppy research and attacks pulled out of thin air with no actual evidence. it is missing the most important thing of all, facts. >> that is some of the video. clinton's website was ready for the release of "clinton cash." it had a full-page, 10-point fact check. now clinton has yet to personally address the allegations in the book. it is possible she could today at some point during a campaign stop in nevada. yesterday, bill clinton, defended the foundation telling nbc news it had done nothing, quote, knowingly inappropriate. there are also questions about hillary clinton's potential testimony on capitol hill coming up involving benghazi and her private email server. her at

peter schweizer. so good to have you here peter. so you heard that sound. sloppy research. of thin air. not a shred of evidence. obviously the clinton machine here trying to discredit you. but even you say you cannot connect all the dots. what are people to take away from your book? peter: i think what people are to take away from the book is there's lots of evidence in this book. i'm not quite sure what interview bill clinton is saying when i admit to no shred of evidence. i show a pattern of money flowing to the clintons. and the people who sent the money to the clintons got favorable actions from hillary clinton as secretary of state. what i said is the evidence pattern here is far more compelling than in recent corruption cases in virginia, new jersey, out in oregon. my argument is that we need somebody with subpoena power with the capability to investigate this to do the due diligence. the facts are clear. they have not challenged the central facts in this book. even some of the pushback they've given is ludicrous. it's an attempt at misdirection and not focusing on th

melissa: this is after he interviewed author of "clinton cash," peter schweizer. he went after him. at the time he didn't disclose could he said out of the gate. you attack the clinton foundation. i believe it in so much, that i have given my own money for the work they do. would that is solved the problem or is he too close to the clintons? >> he is too close to the clintons and he owed the viewers explanation and the fact he didn't give it is further blow to his credibility this whole story is very interesting, veronica, because he attacks schweizer for having written speeches for four-month period for george w. bush but at the same time he obviously worked for the clintons, was the face of the clintons forever. >> synonymous with the clintons. melissa: right. >> that is interesting. i would think abc news would have real push back on that. we haven't heard so much, but their ethics department is i'm sure not happy with him. most news organizations make you sign something, at least sign something you will not donate to political organizations, you will not lobby for ones. melissa:

presidential debates, he did not disclose this information before interviewing "clinton cash" author peter schweizer. he's apologizing for not telling viewers. that's all we have for now. we hope you are making money in the market. wow. "countdown" with liz claman is right now. liz: will we see it hit a record at the close? what's powering stocks higher and how to play it. >>> bring out the concealer to cover up a huge black eye. avon cosmetics punked by someone trying to drive up the price of the company by issuing a totally bogus press release, how many people got sucked into that? >>> while investigators focus on speed and the exact cause of the amtrak train crash snarling traffic in the northeast, maybe it's time to upgrade the infrastructure and look toward a superfast new way of travel. >>> and the simpson wouldn't be the same without the lovable mr. burns. you don't hear anything because he needs a new voice! who do you think should play the cranky business owner. the last hour of trading, we're all about business. let's start the "countdown." . liz: breaking news, we've got crazy highs and o

. >> they are jumping on the fact the author peter schweizer admitted some of the speeches were not paidnot exactly correct to say he wasn't paid. there were whole series of speeches where he was paid. that was a potential conflict of interest because remember at the beginning of the obama administration the white house didn't want those kinds of speeches conflicting with business. >> they signed and agreement saying they wouldn't do just that. yesterday bill clinton said he had to find a way to pay the bills, which some people thought at $100 million, there would be extra dough. what's the new fallout from the russia deal? >> this is the iranian one deal. washington examiner has combed through the book and says one specific thing is a boeing contract that hillary clinton was pushing. you see her there in russia in 2009 pushing for a boeing contract worth $3.7 billion. what's interesting is that a $900,000 donation from boeing went into the clinton foundation. again this is one of those examples. that is big money. what the campaign said yes, she was pushing for this deal but this was a

gerri: to switch it up a little bit, peter schweizer out today defending his book about clinton moneywhat he says, essentially is that, look, the supreme court has defended what i said, which is that, here's, here's the comment right here. the supreme court unanimously upheld the ban on foreign political money and president barack obama and republicans have echoed similar themes. he is saying look it is not just me saying that foreign political money shouldn't come in to the clinton foundation or other private foundations owned and operated by politicians. this is supreme court. so fred, do they have that right? >> i don't think so. also the obama administration which at least required the clinton foundation to if foreign money came in to disclose that, and, they were, and in fact they were not supposed to take it all while hillary clinton was secretary of state. so it's funny to hear that the woman who is one of the heads of the clinton foundation talking about the watchdog group is accusing them of lack of transparency. the the clinton foundation is all about lack of transparency. t

. >> that is peter schweizer and "hannity" exclusive commenting on the scandal surrounding hillary clintonnews punishing stephanopoulos after admitting donating tens of thousands of dollars to the clinton foundation? the "new york post" said he signed a seven-year $105 million contract with the network. two weeks from now, this book is coming out. you're seeing it for the first time. adios, america, the left's plan to turn our country into a third world hell hole. it will be out june the 1st. i have the first copy. did you autograph it for me? >> yes, i did. you dictated what you wanted me to say. >> i did a little bit, that's true. let's go to stephanopoulos. you see all this. it's obvious that he always was a liberal clinton hack. and remains one. >> this is just the icing on the cake. i was looking through that birth control question he sprang on -- >> mitt romney your buddy. >> well all the republicans. and it was unbelievable. i started laughing. i posted it on my web page by the way. you should go look at it. because it goes on and on and on. it's a ridiculous issue. thank heaven rom

peter schweizer will be with limb. boys? stop less. go more. tdi clean diesel with up to 814 hwy miles per tank. just one reason volkswagen is the #1 selling diesel car brand in america. [phone rings] [man] hello,totten designs. sales department? yes...i can put you right through. sales department-this is nate. human resources. technical support. hold please. [announcer]you work hard to grow your business. [man] yes!i can totally do that for you. [announcer]our new online business planning tools will help your business thrive. wells fargo.together we'll go far. vo: today's the day. more and more people with type 2 diabetes are learning about long-acting levemir®. as my diabetes changed it got harder to control my blood sugar. today, i'm asking about levemir®. vo: levemir® is an injectable insulin that can give you blood sugar control for up to 24 hours. and levemir® helps lower your a1c. levemir® lasts 42 days without refrigeration. that's 50% longer than lantus® which lasts 28 days. levemir® comes in flextouch® the latest in insulin pen techno

. >>> authority peter schweizer on the controversial back of the clinton foundation. media has dismissed him as partisan but the leaks offer the future of brian. ♪ if you're looking for a car that drives you... ...and takes the wheel right from your very hands... ...this isn't that car. the first and only car with direct adaptive steering. ♪ the 328 horsepower q50 from infiniti. [phone rings] [man] hello,totten designs. sales department? yes...i can put you right through. sales department-this is nate. human resources. technical support. hold please. [announcer]you work hard to grow your business. [man] yes!i can totally do that for you. [announcer]our new online business planning tools will help your business thrive. wells fargo.together we'll go far. life begins with a howl, we scream shout, shriek with joy. until, inhibition creeps in our world gets smaller quieter, but life should be loud. sing loud, play loud, love loud. dentures shouldn't keep you quiet, life should be ringing in your ears. live loud, polident. when it comes to good nutrition...i'm no expert. th

the fact it was written by peter schweizer brought up its own questions ever could be flikts of interest. >> some of his previous books include do as i say not as i do profiles in liberal hypocrisy and the more sus sinksly titled and this is ream makers and takers why conservatives work harder feel happier, give more generously whine less and even hug their children more than liberals. so clearly, clearly it's hard to tell if he has any bias. >> harsh. still, the impact of the book has been remarkable. yes, there was an hour-long special from fox news owned by rupert murdoch but the book was released early to "the new york times" and "the washington post." they expanded on some of the book's allegations which fed the media beast and prompted ""the times"" to observe the book had more impact because the"the times" had given it more impact. compared to other anti-clinton book clinton cash is potentially more unsettling both because ever its focused reporting and because major news organizations, including "the times," "washington post," and fok news have exclusive agreements with the autho

. >> author peter schweizer is here to explain how deep the anchor's ties to the clintons really go.

donated to clinton foundation which he failed to mention during a scrappy interview with author peter schweizerocused on clinton foundation donations. diana, does it matter. we have the new figure. stephanopoulous admitted he gave 75,000 late this afternoon. go ahead. >> this definitely matters. we should be able to find somebody that hasn't given political contributions to either side to moderate debates. no reason anyone who has given political contributions to moderate these debates. david: carey, he just said he will not moderate any of the debates specifically because of this. should that hurt him as an abc commentator? supposedly neutral abc commentator? >> this is not breaking news. he worked in the clinton white house. he was comes director for clinton campaign. this is not shocking. we shouldn't be surprised. as to his object tivity he could moderate a democratic debate but absolutely no way republicans should not moderate republican debate. because he could throw it as candy crowley did in the republican debates. david: will not be in either of the debates which is probably best thing

partnering with this kind of weird mix of charitable political and financial interests that i think peter schweizer's book demonstrates is really a problem. and the white house correspondents dinner which i am proud to say i have never attended and will only attend if i'm ever someday president of the united states is a perfect example of what i am talking about. >> there are some good reasons why moderators have agreed to moderate events. but i do wonder in the wake of this story if some will be rethinking that. i've got to go unfortunately. but carol, jeff thank you both for being here this morning. >> thank you. >> thank you vrfor having us. >>> coming up the question for you all, did you hear that the president attacked fox news this week that he accused fox of bashing poor people? i'm going to show you what almost everybody missed in a special red news/blue news next. the pursuit of healthier. it begins from the second we're born. after all, healthier doesn't happen all by itself. it needs to be earned... every day... using wellness to keep away illness... and believing that a single life can be

after that peter schweizer. then a discussion about government surveillance and transparency.tial presidential candidate jeb bush speaks at liberty university's 42nd commencement today. he announced he would actively run for president but there is no official announcement. we will show you a portion of the speech at 8:00 eastern on c-span. >> a look at some our featured programs. this morning at 10:00 we are live from greenville, south carolina for the freedom summit. speakers include scott walker, ted cruz, carly fiorina, ben carson, marco rubio. on sunday, members of america's first families remember first ladies, featuring the daughters of jack kennedy, lady bird johnson and robertbar bush. on book-tv jon krakauer on college towns and sexual assaults. sunday evening at 10:00, her life and military career. on american history tv on c-span 3 at 445:45 eastern remembering the liberation of nazi concentration camps with a teenager who escaped and lost his parents at auschwitz and questioned hitler's personal driver. then, the 70th anniversary of the end of the world war ii. get

clinton's swing through nevada came on the same day as the release of peter schweizer's " "clinton cashters found more than 20 errors fabrications or distortions in the book. it hasn't stopped republicans from running with the narrative that hillary is "untrustworthy." carly fiorina took a swipe at hillary clinton just a moment after she announced her own run for the presidency. >> i have a lot of admiration for hillary clinton but she clearly is not trustworthy, she has not been transparent about a whole set of things that matter. >> joining me now is david brock, founder and co-chairman of the board of media matters for america. david, good to have you with us tonight. >> thanks for having me back. >> you've heard this narrative before. branding hillary clinton untrustworthy is nothing new for republicans. does it have legs in the wake of the e-mails, benghazi and everything else? it seems like there's enough there to gin up the base against her. but how many independents would it actually pull? how much of a problem is this for hillary clinton? what do you think? >> i guess the quest

didn't expose that with his interview with peter schweizer or any other person election related. have seen about me. over the last several years i made substantial donations to charity including the clinton global foundation. those were a matter of public record but i should have made additional disclosures. now directing personal donations to that foundation was a mistake. even though i made them to help the spread of aids and protect children i should have gone the extra mile of even having an appearance of a conflict. joe, effective? >> it's effective, i think. it's still a huge problem for him. look, george stephanopoulos had done something no one else i know of has been able to do. slip the bonds of acpartisan operative and become a journalist that was credibly asked tough questions on both sides. i suffered that from him on his show during the dean campaign. so having done that, for him to then risk all that by making three contributions to the clinton foundation was the first mistake. shouldn't have done that. he says that. the bigger one was not disclosing it. i think the

but what is not fine is what he did to peter schweizer when he came on the air. >> he agrees with thatplayed judge and jury and prosecutor. and it was humiliatesing. i mean if you're at abc new, you have to be humiliated by the fact that he did it that and he did not reveal that he had paid $75,000 to an organization. and then he's talking about the investigations they did. so you know but they're not going to do anything to him. let's be honest. if it happened at nbc and it were matt lauer, everybody is talking brian williams i mean if all -- if all he were doing was abc world news tonight, he'd have been gone. but let's face it, if matt lauer did that over here, everybody would be -- because that's where they make the money. they don't make money on those night news shows anymore. they make it in the morning. that's where all the money is made. but any way, at the end of the day, how surprising it all comes down to money. >> so let's get to the news. we begin with the concerns about the spread of the islamic state militants. a u.s. official tells the "wall street journal" that isis n

so it feeds the impression that peter schweizer the author is trying to create that there is something shady going on behind the scenes that hillary clinton doesn't want to disclose. and that's why when you look at polls like nbc's new polls, even though clinton polls very strongly in terms of her leadership ability, a majority of americans find her not honest and trustworthy. i think that's the problem in a nut shell. >> giustra denied any wrongdoing, but in your reporting, did you find anything else in this uranium deal and everything else? >> well, it was a little tricky. giustra essentially wanted to get off his chest what he didn't feel the media had shared in the writing about his uranium deal. he told me there was nothing untoward was going on, that yes, he and bill clinton had dined with -- >> but who around the table hasn't dined with kazakhstan's president? he's a good guy. >> we're having beginner this friday. >> the point giustra wanted to make, and i have no reason not to believe him was that he had sold out of this company two years before hillary clinton became secretary

the site attacks author peter schweizer as partisan and claims his book has already been debunked butlear eyed that that will not be the last false set of allegations flung our way." >> nick we were talking yesterday about how hillary needs to get out and talk. i think somebody said yesterday that she's had seven questions asked of her during this campaign and she's answered two. >> right. >> and just trying to go after the author. i mean you can -- peter schweizer right now, he could go off to vegas and go on an eight-year bender and it wouldn't change the fact that it's the "new york times" now that howard dean and james carville and clinton, inc. are calling "right wing operatives." the "washington post." it was the post that came up with 1,100 donors that weren't disclosed. it was the "new york times" that's come up with one story or another. it was the "boston globe" that came up -- >> the question is are those lies? >> questions that he's linked to the kochs. the truth is his book is a series of sort of correspondences. this happened and this money came in, right? he's actually

. >> right after peter schweizer who wrote the book clinton cash.t right after him even though stephanopoulos given $50,000 to the foundation to clinton cash the book. >> see if he goes after him tonight. that is what i want to see. >> not a prayer. not a prayer no way. but thank you for mentioning that. >> it was fun want to show. >> is the global economy like the titanic that is to be chief economist at hsbc steven king thinks and here's the quote the world economy is like an ocean liner without lifeboats. another resession hits it could be a titanic struggle for policy makers. charles payne is of the money show in las vegas, he joins us now, what do you make of that from the topic columnist. what do you make of it? >> what a name, steven king spreading fear. essentially what this guy is doing stuart is he's saying that the money, the federal reserve here, the esb in europe all of these money centers, central banks, they have no more tools so if something were to happen, they could not come to the rescue. but what i also think and didn't say it ex

. >> he's a nice guy you can't start that interview with peter schweizer by saying, hey, just so you> i agree with you on that point. i said he should have. >> now he is like a candidate. he's now said he made public apology. we'll see what the american people have to say. he's like the candidates he's covering. some of the republican push back on the idea of a biassed campaign debate moderator is rich after they rebuilt their debate system to say the only people who can host debates are hosts of right wing radio talk shows. they have made an effort to have biassed primary debate moderators. >> the more specific complaint that i've heard from conservatives and republicans about stephanopoulos was in 2012 when he asked questions about the whole issue of contraception. he pressed the issue in a debate. a lot of republicans felt this was a manufactured issue that he put on to the national radar that hit the candidate. they've been suspicious of him. >> could it be something he believes in. sometimes you work for people who you actually agree with. so, again, this, to me is bizarre, he i

stephanopoulos had just last month conducted an aggressive interview with peter schweizer the authorf a book about the clinton foundation. during the interview, mr. stephanopoulos seemed to dismiss mr. schweizer's reporting. in 2012, there were advisors in the romney campaign who lobby to exclude mr. stephanopoulos from the primary debates. conservatives say their fears were born out that year. mr. stephanopoulos was not asked to participate in one of the more formal debates after the convention. martha raddatz was the only journalist from abc news that was selected by the debates. michelle is in minneapolis. is there a conflict of interest? caller: of course it is. music away -- you took away my thunder. my two points, stephanopoulos was the one who asked mitt romney about the birth control and he planted that question. number two there were two callers that mentioned the benghazi situation during the debate. she's a cnn anchor. during the presidential debate, she brought up the fact that when mitt romney said obama never used the word terrorist, i believe crowley said yes he did. f

obviously this "clinton cash" become by peter schweizer has really brought it to the fore it's resumed sort of -- increased the media scrutiny of these relationships with donors who republicans allege got favorable treatment from hillary clinton at the state department as a result of their donations to the foundation. what we found is looking at the other side. looking at the foundation that these are hurting the foundation which was supposed to be a strength for hillary clinton headed into a presidential campaign and for her family's political legacy it's not working out that way at all. >> and how much talk is there among hillary's strategist that former president bill clinton should scale back his role in the foundation because he's clearly the guy who was out there, he's the face of it, the image, a big magnet in a draw. >> yeah that's right. he really built this foundation from just a handful of employees in little rock and new york to this sprawling $2 billion international enterprise with thousands of employees around the world and it's largely about him. and both chelsea clinto

the former president's comments come amid a wave for the book publicity "clinton cash" by peter schweizer to the clinton foundationing and other aspects of the foundations finances which have raised questions of potential conflicts of interest involving the secretary of state. >> if your wife is elected president, will you step down from the foundation? >> if it's the right thing i do i will. >> why might you step down if she was elected president? >> might do if i was asked to do something to the public interest i have an obligation to do. or i might take less of an executive role. you can see, so i might do that. but, we'll cross that bij when we come to it. >> one other comment from the former president. he said when he and hillary clinton moved into the white house in early 1993 they had the lowest net worth of any presidential family since that of harry truman. that comment recalling the equally controversial comment from hillary clinton last year during her book rollout when she said she and president clinton upon leaving the white house were dead broke. i am neither of these things

when he -- for instance when he was attacking peter schweizer about ten days ago regarding his book.lurality of americans say he be involved in the presidential campaign. >> the people who were polled have a heck of a lot more common sense than the news officials at abc who have looked the other way from the very day he was hired. this is one of my all time pet peeves. it's not the presence of bias that's a problem in the so-called mainstream media. it's always the pretense of objectativity. and the double standard. >> tim russert had no problem and diane sawyer worked for nixon there was no problem, that's what they went with. >> because there was full transparent honest disclosure. we've had this theater of journalism. i wouldn't mind if there were more of a balance here if people who were on the conservative side of the aisle were allowed to be main stream. >> shifting gears again, ramadi has fallen into the hands of isis now. yet the white house as we heard press secretary josh earnest say yesterday our strategy against isis is a success. >> it's working. >> you say? >> he should