we don't know why peter strzok is still there and what he's doing. of those things we will get answers to. >> sean: last word,d, congressman desantis. >>as trust but verify. that is why the president releases the documents, we'll get the report and decide for ourselves. >> sean: they should have the horwitz report, correct? >> that's right. >> sean:n: we are getting close. great job, all of you. when we come back i'm a report from the white house and north korea. will kim jong un back out of the meeting with kim jong un? newt gingrich, deep state development, get ready, buckle up, ig report will be very interesting. ♪ ♪ i just need some rest. i'm just worried about the house. and taking care of the boys. [ door slams ] he's still asleep. zach? zach?! [ dog barking ] ♪ [ sighs in relief ] zach! talk to me. it's for the house. i got a job. it's okay. dad took care of us. principal. we can help you plan for that. >> sean: tonight president trump >> sean: today president trump reacted to north korea's latest threat, kim jong un may pull out of those beef

people don't like to point out that the papadopoulos information came through peter strzok and lashed into a fisa application to spy on american citizens as the consequence of a dossier paid for by the dnc and hillary clinton and cure rated we need to call it what it is. and to give it dignity by having the president sit in a perjury trap would be terrible and i hope that he does not do that. lou: much of the country would agree with you. yet giuliani has again taken a stark reversal here in this one. he's surprising a lot of people. and it's just curious, the direction he really does intend if it is not -- well, i hope that the president has plenty of off-setting counsel up. i'll put it that way. let's turn to the fisa meeting you mentioned. trey gowdy and devin nunes, we'll see if they get to see those documents. we were basically assured they would. what do you think? >> i don't know that they're going to see the documents. i hope they do. there have been other circumstances where the fbi and department of justice will just brief on the documents. they won't actually provide them b

page who may hold the record for the most e-mails in the shortest period of time to her lover peter strzokrney baker are out at the fbi. why is peter s still there? what a total mess. our country has to get back to business. joining us is republican congressmachine andy biggs, congressman, good to see you. let's start with what is going on in the fbi and justice department. this has become in my opinion, a horrible tragedy. but it is also an infuriating level of corruption that is allowed to stand in the fbi and top leadership of the fbi and the department of justice. and one has no idea in the world why jeff sessions is still the attorney general. and rod rosenstein. obviously so corrupt can conflicted along with the man he put in the job, bob muller severely conflicted. >> you have the stench from the swamp that is wafted and sitting there. peter strzok, he flaunted every rule of the fbi and he's somehow in the hr department. they figure he knows how to get around the rules he is the guy to have there. it is a tra vesty. and rod rosenstein, he's supposed to be overseeing bob muller's spe

we want to know why peter strzok is there.ot of those things that well get answers to. >> sean: last word. >> trust by verify. that's why the president releases these documents, we can see and decide for ourselves. >> sean: the foundation of the horowitz report, correct? >> that's right. >> sean: we're getting close. gray job all of you. when we come back a report from the white house on north korea. will kim jong-un back out of the meeting with president trump? the deep state development, buckle up. this i.g. report will be very interesting. ♪ i just need some rest. i'm just worried about the house. and taking care of the boys. [ door slams ] he's still asleep. zach? zach?! [ dog barking ] ♪ [ sighs in relief ] zach! talk to me. it's for the house. i got a job. it's okay. dad took care of us. principal. we can help you plan for that. maui designed to respond torn on the the bright sunaii, and harsh glare of the islands, all while enhancing the view. after thirty years, we're still independently owned and the freethinking hawa

peter strzok and lisa page has been demoted and reassigned.he last three weeks. we have five of the top people who oh by the way, happen to be the same people who ran the clinton investigation and launched the trump russia investigation, that should be cause for concern. all of this points to why we need information and why we called for a second special counsel to get to the become of all of this. why now we have 25 individuals in the house of remits who support mr. zeldin's resolution. >> i wanted you to be able to get out your full case. 25, not an impressive number with how many people you have who are trying to support the president's theories, no matter how wild they are. it seems to me -- >> the chairman of the judiciary called for it, the chair of the oversight committee. >> only 25 people. >> we just introduced it yesterday. majority chip and majority leader called for it. a number of p people who have real influence are calling for a second special counsel. >> rank and file is slow on it because they know it seems to be something tha

now to get the treatment or peter strzok, maybe, i don't know, we have a good choice of people, lotsf conservatives that can interview. none of this is going to happen. we know that. we know sadly in america we have a 2-tear justice system, not equal justice under the law. while the president is targeted in a totally off the rails witch hunt, hillary clinton, james comey, andrew mccabe, all of these other deep state actors have never been charged with a crime. despite mountains of evidence that we have. despite her total exoneration from the fbi, our friend, fox news legal analysts gregg jarrett will join us, revealing multiple serious crimes that hillary clinton should be charged with. starting with 18793, mishandling and destroying documents. the obstruction of justice. remember, bleach page, deleted emails, busted up devices. no charges over the multiple crimes related to her campaign shady practices relating to the steele dossier. we will look at james comey, not under any investigation as of now production and he at least face screamed he over 18 ufc 61, the government property

you mentioned lisa page and peter strzok. when do you think we'll get the final i.g. report?ful cynic. i have very little faith in inspectors general in the first place. even in the best of circumstances they tend to shade things. they said mccabe was less than candid. if someone lies, just call it a lie. so inspectors general, i don't place a lot of hope or faith in them. that's my experience in dealing with the current inspector general at the justice department. but again i'm hopeful. so maybe they will find a spine and do the right thick and put all their card on the table. with respect to criminality. that's just in the case of hillary clinton and her inner circle with respect to mishandling national defense. but they threw the case. they drew conclusions. comey operated way outside the scope of his authority and decided unilaterally to shut the case down. it's a rat's nest. cheryl: there is another i.g. report that will talk about potential abuse of the fisa court. >> the fisa system itself has been grossly abused. the associated press bureau here in d.c. mr. rosen, for

that talked about the relationship peter strzok had with one of the fisa judges and the judge that heard michael flynn's case. why did they try to hide from congress. why did they tell congress that daniel richmond, why didn't they tell us he was a special government employee at the fib? why don't we know. we have to dig and hunt and persuade to give us information to get the documents to get the answers. why is it always so difficult. that's what we want to know. particularly, as you point out, it's our constitutional role. lou: you serve on judiciary and oversight. but th there is also great responsibility in an my judgment that belongs on the shoulders of the speaker of the house who says things like this. ryan says mueller, rosen sign should be allowed to do their jobs, when point of fact, they're not doing their jobs and they're not doing it the american way. as a matter of fact, i can't even begin to understand why ryan and majority leader mcconnell do not stand up for the president of the united states and say, end this nonsense, because every, every act -- obvious in my opinion,

the fbi sans peter strzok, the infamous peter strzok, to london to check things out.t do you know, they open up not a criminal investigation which is important, a counterintelligence investigation because for a criminal investigation you have to have hard evidence of treason or espionage. didn't have either of them. they open up this thing on four members of the trump campaign. flynn, papadopoulos, carter page and paul manafort. to this day, none of these people have been charged with anything related to collusion, espionage, spying or treason. they use these highly secretive subpoenas. they are called national security letters, very controversial. extremely secretive. to get information from computers and phone logs. they had at least one spy in their campaign. i think i know who it is. i was talking to someone today about it. there is no way i'm going to say the name. i have enough problems already. but the name will come out. it'll be very clear. to put it in perspective, the obama fbi had spies in the term campaign a couple months before an election, illegally sur

spaces >> jesse: they asked abot peter strzok. they've asked about uranium one and got no answers.hey have asked to see the dossier and the fisa applicatio application. it's not in the weeds. it's what began a lot of these investigation. >> juan: i tell you it's an effort by trump acolytes to try to undermine the standing of the justice department, fbi, and that's a tragedy. talk about thinking in the best interests of the country, that's not in the best interests of the country. >> jesse: i would argue that if the mueller investigation is looking in russia collusion, he hasn't asked for a server from the dnc. hasn't asked for john podesta's server, hasn't asked about the payments made to christopher steele and the payments were hidden. i think there's a lot of collusion on the other side. if you want to look into that, he can. >> kimberly: there is some frustration here but i think in terms of the comments by rudy giuliani that there's a real sense of calm and a practical approach. as a lawyer, former prosecutor, that's what you do. no problem. let's go over it. i think it makes t

let's look at peter strzok.ere is a guy who flaunted every rule of the fbi and then he somehow is -- he's in the hr department. i guess that's because they figure if he knows how to get around all of the rules, he's the guy to have there. this is a travesty and it continues to go on. rod rosenstein, he's the guy supposed to be overseeing bob mueller's special counsel investigation and he's conflicted. he's the guy that won't -- he's slow walking everything to congress, not giving us the facts or the truth. lou: he's defying congress. >> exactly. and he needs to go. lou: he's also the guy who gave president trump the entire rationale and basis to fire and urged president trump to fire james comey, by the way, which set off a special counsel investigation in some twisted way that makes sense to attorneys at the justice department. >> that's exactly right. it's a twisted thing that goes here. but i mean, why did rosenstein do it. i got to believe he had ambition of his own. and mueller gets there and rosenstein is

look at peter strzok and page. they hate the president. they hated the candidate.hey talked about an insurance policy. andrew mccabe lying under oath, james comey leaking for the purpose of getting a special counsel. >> also comey and mccabe contradicting each other. one of them has to be in line -- lying. i think comey is lying. i think he's a bigger liar than mccabe. mccabe is a situational liar. he's a much bigger liar. so if this were equal system of justice, they'd all be prosecuted. >> sean: let me ask you, -- >> is my biggest regret -- i'm sorry, jeff, in not having taken that job. i wanted to be secretary -- >> sean: my biggestst regret and i like jeff sessions but he never should have recused himself.. >> heer never should have appointed rosenstein. >> sean: i've never heard of somebody being appointed or confirmed and recusing themselves the next day. >> sean: did you know that rosenstein was with mueller the day he was interviewed to be fbi director? worked out,nnd turned on, then p onto the next day. >> sean: did you know rod rosenstein according to rep

. >> laura: comey decided to basically override the agents, including peter strzok. we focused on his texts with lisa page and may be as on animist against president trump, but i believe peter strzok was one of the agents who interviewed mike flynn. and we've heard this for some time, confirmed that mike flynn didn't lie. meaning poor mike flynn, they twisted the screws on him to plead guilty to a false statement, in order to, i like a lot of people do, save their families, save whatever money they have left. and in the meantime, comey is going around saying, he lied to. it's wild. why would he override the agents, that's my question? >> devin: this is not new news on the intelligence committee. this has been the problem with all these issues they keep classified from the american people. we know this very shortly after the interview took place. the interview where the bia agents went into the white house and interviewed mr. -- -- fbi agents went into the white house and interviewed mr. flynn. shortly after, that's on the record. we knew what mr. comey said, we have

>> peter strzok elusive page ohr. there is going to be very -- >> sean: loretta lynch?bsolutely loretta lynch. she was a big part of all of this. >> sean: what about people like clapper and brennan? brennan, i took it as a threat, you know, "stay tuned" or the president of united states. >> i think brennan and to some extent clapper were the two instigators of the phony dossier -- >> sean: did and they both lie>> under oath? >> well, one can argue that brennan -- clapper certainly did,ai got away with it, statuef limitations -- they were the instigators. those who i think very clearly should be prosecuted under felony statutes would include james comey at the top of the list and andrew mccabe. >> sean: will be here about susan rice? ben rhodes? will be here about cement powers basically unmasking an american a day? >> i hope we do hear about samantha powers. i don't know if we will hear about all the players.f i do have one thing to say, sea sean. brennan was in charge of the ci cia. they are supposed to deal with foreign issues. what is he doing involving himself in wh

peter strzok, a senior fbi agent explained in a text justice department officials would find it too tastyquote, i'm not worried about our side, he wrote. only about five justice department officials knew the full scope of the case officials said, not the dozen or more who might normally be briefed on a major national security case. the facts, had they surfaced, might have devastated the trump campaign. mr. trump's future national security advisor was under investigation as was his -- joining us now, one of the reporters ons that story, matt apuzzo, "the new york times" justice reporter barbara frank and nick are still here. matt, i can read every paragraph and ask you to tell me more, but let me just start with the excerpts that i read. this seems to do two things. one, give us the most in-depth look at what was actually going on inside the fbi where there are now known to have been investigating both campaigns, one very publicly and one very secretly. just to that can you tell us what your reporting lays out here? >> yeah, one of the things we found out was within the first hours of gett

is he peter strzok's boss. >> these are folks right in the middle of the hillary clinton. to be in the middle of this report. people are expecting this report to come within the next week. his testimony likely would come after the report comes out. they would be forced to answer questions about what is in this report. again, michael horowitz has been working on this for over a year looks into whether she got special treatment and they will be asked about it. ainsley: they will be asked about all of this on june 5th. we're going to try to work all this out and figure out where they fall. you were talking during the commercial break. we call it the deep state family tree. i want to know how they are involved. what they knew. what they knew about hillary clinton's email and collusion. and where they fall in that deep state family tree. brian: one the text messages refer peter strzok is out there now beginning to take shape and got me very intrigued. prestrep went to london russian meddling. question to fox news whether the trip was connected. well, let me see. what was happen

this is peter strzok, the ina news fbi agent who said we can't afford the risk of a trump presidencynd need an insurance policy. judge jeanine: let's move to the house judiciary that you are on. you have been asking for 1.2 million documents for a year now. whenever you get close rod rosenstein runs to the white house to make sure people's names are redacted. how many of those 1.2 million documents do you think you have got? >> maybe a quarter of them between an agreement between the relevant chairman and rosenstein. i don't know that we received all of those yet. judge jeanine: do you want to tell me why your committee is so impotent? >> when you set a deadline the next day you need to set a contempt hearing for rosenstein. if he doesn't turn over what you want, you hold him in contempt. judge jeanine: not you, but it's not being done. you need to do it. judge jeanine: why can't you do it? >> i support doing it. i am not a chairman. judge jeanine: therein lies the rub. >> i'm supporting chairman meadows. we need consequences. eitherwise they will trickle -- otherwise they will trick

so the fbi sends peter strzok over to london and they cook up the investigation based on gossip. >> it appears they were being lured and given information for the purpose of passing that information on from ambassador downer from australia. he turned around and reports it back over to u.s. intelligence because they are close allies of us. then an investigation ensues. this was right after they pretty much exown rated hillary clinton in a criminal investigation. >> and it's after they got their hands on the dossier hillary clinton paid for. the daily caller has a piece that seems to be asking questions hot spy was on the trump campaign. >> when you are dealing with an informant -- this is how they classify them. this came from leaks from the doj, from the fbi or from people within that closed circle in england. this is where the "new york times" and "the washington post" and others have gotten their information. based on that information that they themselves leaked. based on this information we know there was an informant. these types of informants don't just work on one case. they must

seater strong demoted and -- peter strzok reassigned. his girlfriend gone.nstitutionally the congress has to be stronger, otherwise nancy pelosi will get the speaker gavel. lou: we give on this broadcast to devin nunes the hero's position in the an pantheon. then is has been outstanding. but paul ryan has not stood tall. he has not stood loudly in support of this president or against the department of justice and the fbi. he's weak-kneed. he's a trembling figure in the twilight of his tenure as speaker. how much can the republican party stand from this man? we hear there is a discharge petition in which he is basically trying to make it look as though he has been carried across the finish line to amnesty which has been his goal for years and years and years without a quid pro quo. the dischannel petition says we are going to take a vote on everybody's immigration bill. the conservatives have the goodlatte immigration bill that end chain migration and build the wall. all the things we care about. and takes care of daca. the democrats can have their proposals.

peter strzok lost his job because he was not being a fair investigator. someone needs to look at this other than horowitz for criminality. we need to appoint a special counsel. judge jeanine: who will appoint the special counsel. >> it will be rosenstein. i am going to join with my colleagues in the house and push the system. i don't think donald trump clouds with his own government much less the russians. he is a man who does what he wants to do, who plays it -- he's very flexible. he doesn't sit down and collude. i don't believe the president engaged with a foreign government. that's not his style. judge jeanine: give me some evidence other than adam schiff saying it's there. >> president trump needs to focus on north korea and iran. judge jeanine: you think he's going to do that? should he speak to mueller? >> if i were his lawyer i would be reluctant to do that. i don't want to be his lawyer because i'm not. let, put donald trump in context. he said he would move the capital to jerusalem and he did. he said he could take the gloves off when it dime is

we know peter strzok texted to his lover the whole operation was being directed out of the white house. when they started this, they probably didn't think this would boobookerbook -- would boomerann them. charles: rob, would you be fine if these paths led back to the obama administration and perhaps knowledge within that administration of what's going on? >> i love the inspector general. i actually read the up spector general reports. it will come out that donald trump is horribly guilty. charles: of what? >> political i am pro fruits, delusions, working in conjunction with the russians. he's like the wide-up doll web's their puppet. charles: they haven't found any proof of that. >> they already have 13 indictments. >> robert mueller has been looking for a year and he found zero evidence of collusion between the russians and the trump campaign. there is collusion between the hoyle are you campaign and the russians. i think every day he looks cleaner and cleaner by the day. charles: americans are finally starting to give president trump credit for this amazing economy. we have two new p

sit of facts, and you take a look at different players, this is a -- the whole lisa page, and peter strzok affair, exchanging tens of thousands of texts is mind boggling. >> we're going have to a inspect or general report released soon, we're hearing there may be criminal referrals or notice of criminal violations, i think that ig can refer a criminal case but he can suggest there have been criminal violations, we have not been able to confirm at that fox business or fox news, do you know anything about that? whether there will be criminal investigation in ig report. >> i have no information at this time, we look at the ig report on andy mccabe. and how he was found not to have been forth coming and truthful, they are troubling allegations made or statements that were made in ig report w regarding mccabe. >> congressman thank you for being with us, vote in tonight's poll, do you believe department of justice much immediately launch a full investigation of obama administration obama administratio-- spying on trump administration. follow lou on twitter, and like him on facebook, coming up ne

department of justice and the fbi as well may have deleted text messages between bureau officials peter strzok and lisa page. that according to the inspe inspector's stream. and it once served on the russia investigation. and all turn over it congress last week. the columbia law professor worked as a fbi employee for a year and a half and during that same period he appeared in the national media to defend the handling of the email case. guiliani took aimality comey today and delivering this blunt a systemment. >> i think he is a liar. mccabe will tell you he lied. >> it was proven he lied three times under oath. and also refused to clear and say that the president was not a target when in fact he had done that to hillary clinton and botched the investigation. no one thinks that the handling was not disgraceful. and how he is put up as a model is dismaying. >> lou: my first guest. james colstrom served 30 years with the burrly and the fbi was raged by a lack of leadership and corruption under the justice department. joining me now. >> good to be here, lou. >> lou: we learned that there is surve

not peter strzok or lisa page. the congress. if the president committed a crime, the congress can put him on trial. it is impeachment. it takes place openly and the rest of us can watch and evaluate it every step of the way. there are no redakted documents. it is transparent and that is how democracies are supposed to operate. the democratic base understand this. but they badly want to impeach donald trump. the leaders in the democratic party lie about it. all they care about is power. they don't want to scare the voters and instead they use unelected bureaucrats to crush the presidency. and the worst part it is working. professor first, to you. why not just say we want to impeach the president? they do think that? that is a constitutional procedure. >> that should do that if that is their motivation. and have a trial in the senate after the impeachment in the house and have that decision. you have impeach up withs they remove from office. there is an ongoing debate on whether a sitting president can be indicted. >> tucker: the

is peter strzok next. and a offer to withdraw because she's too tough on terrorist x. high lights from melania trump's best campaign and later breaking news about the liberal new york attorney general who may be in big trouble. but breaking news opening monologue. tonight we start with what is shaping to be's horrible pad five days for robert mueller and the office of special counsel. the out of control witch hunt suffered two massive blows. on friday and the single biggest beat down i have seen. a federal judge utterly rebuked the special counsel and the investigation and slamming the political motivations and calling out the scope for being way out of the bounds and man date. the judge's is ts ellis. you don't care about mr. manafort's break fraught or what the government does. all you careabout is the information that mr. manafort can give you that reflects on mr. trump and leads to his prosecution or whatever. ellis continues, that has nothing to do with the russian government or individuals associated with the campaign of donald trump. and so i don't see what rela

gregg: comey and peter strzok and the whole gaining, they -- e whole gang, they didn't have the intelligence to justify the counter-intelligence probe. that's the chairman's statement recently. does the president, do you think, need to declassify, declassify everything that he can possibly in order to get to the bottom of this? >> i have spoke to the president since i left the white house. and i have commended him for his attitude of staying at arm's lengths from all of these investigations. of staying outside of the process which is commendable. but this has risen to the level of scandal whereby something has to happen. all the individuals implicated in this scandal, the highest level of the doj, the cia, the fbi, right now all those people who are still accessing classified information must have their clearances stripped from them. the president dock this now. so comb -- the president can do this now. comey, clapper, brennan, samantha rice, susan powers. let's start there. i want to see an investigation of what did the fbi do for political purposes? greg: here is the problem. who is going