that is peter strzok and lisa page that i am talking about. i need to know if the fbi signed off on this lawsuit. and then i need to know who signed off on it. did you sign off on it? >> i absolutely did not and would never -- >> de christopher wray sign off on it? >> i don't believe that he did. nor do i think he would have. >> you need to let me know who signed off on this if anyone at the fbi. it was merrick garland who agreed to do this? >> i do not know. >> someone had to agree to it. a client has to agree to it. you are the client. >> understood. i'm going to direct him to the department of justice. >> get me that information if you would. mr. rowe, help me understand this. the assassin crooks fired his first shot. as i understand it at 6:12:00 p.m. he was about 140 -- 150 yards away. it has been reported that the snipers, the government snipers saw him on the roof 20 minutes before. not 2 minutes, 20 minutes before. is that correct? >> senator, that is the first time i am hearing this. that is not correct based on the information that i

. >> fbi just settle two lawsuits, one holy one in part, in which the fbi agreed to give peter strzok 1.2 million. and ms lisa page, $800,000 it's my understanding center to that the department of justice was involved in that, not the fbi. >> the fbi had nothing to do with it. >> there may have been consultation with our general counsel's office, but did use the fbi have to sign off on it? >> i don't know the answer to that. i don't believe so, but i would want to confirm that i would like you to this would be the same lisa page, who said to mr strzok, quote, trump's not ever going to become president, right? >> right. to which mr. strzok said, quote, no, no, he won't. we will stop it as some peter strzok and lisa page, i'm talking about i need to know if the fbi signed off on this lawsuit. >> we will get that answer for you. the center. >> and then i need to know who signed off on okay. >> as senator kennedy goes off topic, let's turn to a congressman who is serving on a similar committee on the house side congressman mike waltz of florida it's bipartisan task force to investigate th

. >> joining me now is peter strzok, former fbi deputy assistant director. peter, donald trump disavowed project 2025 just two days ago after roberts made these comments about a second american revolution. trump took to social media to call parts of the plan, quote, "absolutely ridiculous and abysmal." and, says he has nothing to do with the group. however, trump has signaled that he wants a second administration filled with loyalists which expands his authority, basically adopting some of the plans laid out in project 2025. and today, the biden campaign issued a statement saying that trump is lying and trying to hide his connections to project 2025 and that it should scare every single american because it would give trump limitless power, how concerning is this? >> i think it is extraordinarily concerning. first off, trump said he knew nothing about stormy daniels, he said he knew nothing about carol. he knew nothing about the trump tower moscow deal, he said he knew nothing about the exploding number of covered cases during his first administers and. the pr

that's peter strzok thing, a desperate measure because desperate times call for the senate didn't goalong of course i think he is a single worst kind of sector in history of america because we will beginning with the catastrophe that the engineer, the internet the open borders. we will be digging with this for decades to come. president trump acip he wants to start the largest deportation effort in history. we need to find these dangerous people, but here's the problem. we will not be able to locate all these people because do you justify keeping track of their whereabouts as you know. it is completely subversive and anti-american and anti-immigrant because the people who follow the law under the right width of the most upset about this. that's what you're seeing the demographic shift in the electorate as well. this is the thing to me that is so maddening. i've asked the present about this. one of one, president biden, vista president, why would you do this? he doesn't have an answer. these interest groups that encouraged him to do it and he has an answer. or how he could fix. it. he

. >> as the best economy in the last ten years -- [laughing] -- >> peter strzok supremacy i will acknowledge acknowledge that. >> no, because this is really important. it's like we've always felt and you are feeling it now that we are like a like a race ca parachute on the back. the federal government is a parachute and they can't do simple stuff like this. >> do you think you can have an influence? >> it's a drag. >> and you as a governor have influence on this particular and pass? >> if i could boot it's a long time ago. >> look, again, you were talking to people who are not interested in fixing the problem. not all of them. there are great people in congress. i don't mean to disparage all of them but, but look, i know, it's 90% of congress against the other 1% i really bad name. [laughing] it's really hard when they're not interested in listening to anyone. >> the only thing i would push on that only a little bit by cepi sang i do think it's important to not underestimate the voices of governors. the collective voice that governors can speak on and why it's become so important. because i

this agency is inept at the top, and this reminds me of the fbi, under james comey, peter strzok, mccabeer echelon does not care, deep state, whatever you want to call them, the guys below them, they work their tails off and were ready to give their lives. this top layer has to go. >> jesse: remember when cheatle said they didn't put a counter sniper on the roof because it was too sloped? now you see the assassin just gallivanting around the roof like it was a track meet. >> harold: this was, i agree with you, jesse, this was a catastrophic and fatal failure. you have a man killed. you had a father killed. and he almost had the former president of the united states killed. i don't over the life of me, you said it well, tyrus, what should bother everyone is, for me, after a couple of weeks of this, i would have imagined that the acting secret service -- and i'm not, you have a strong theory of that, judge, you may be right -- i was most disappointed in him, him not coming before that committee and saying, look, here's what i've done over the last few days. here is how we are going to prot

the secret service, gordon huddle and former deputy of the fbi's counterintelligence division, peter strzok. gentlemen. thank you both for being here this evening. the world has so many questions and i want to begin with you here, gordon. i wonder from your perspective, what is the most pressing question the secret service needs to answer at this very hour well, laura, good to be with you tonight. >> thank you. you know, in the wake of the recent attempted assassination oprah of candidate president trump au secret service is facing some very pressing questions director cheatle and her team face a critical week if it were just the attempted assassination of former president trump the pressure on the secret service would be more than enough. however, tomorrow the republican convention kicks off, followed a few weeks later by the democratic convention. these are designated national security events the secret service has the lead agency for the design and inflammation implementation of the operational security plans for both conventions, they've got a lot on their plate but i can tell you that

the secret service, gordon huddle and former deputy of the fbi's counterintelligence division, peter strzok, general thank you both for being here this evening. the world has so many questions and i want to begin with you here, gordon. i wonder from your perspective, what is the most pressing question the secret service needs to answer at this very hour. >> well, laura, it's good to be with you tonight. thank you. you know, in the wake of the recent attempted assassination of candidate president trump well, secret service is facing some very pressing questions. director cheadle and her team face a critical week if it were just the attempted assassination of former president trump the pressure on the secret service would be more than enough. however, tomorrow the republican convention kicks off, followed a few weeks later by the democratic convention these are designated national security events the secret service is the lead agency for the design and inflammation implementation of the operational security plans for both conventions, they've got a lot on their plate. it but i can tell you th

peter strzok a former fbi deputy director of the counterintelligence division and joins us on the newslineg ahead here, peter, for any number of people, what is your take on what you have a heard thus far in terms of the decision? >> well, i agree with eamon and likewise in reading this from a high-level perspective it's highly unlikely we're going to see this case in d.c. in trial prior to the inauguration, let alone the election. i think reading through it some interesting points. you know, the decision notes that the president is absolutely immune from prosecution for the alleged conduct involving his discussions with doj officials, so the question is, you know, in terms of his charged conduct, the court is very clear that when it comes to what he said with doj officials, again, this is not folks like, you know, john eastman who are outside of the government, but doj folks, are off the table. i think there's some question whether or not even if that cannot be charged, whether or not that information can be used in the context of proving his state of mind with other charges. but, this is

accounts in 20 20 were being suppressed on top of take it by your silence messages, unlike peter stroek st strzokm not getting a pay out. the fbi in march of 2020 verified auth enticity of hunte biden's laptop. why was the fbi meeting on weekly base with big tech warning big tech they may be victims of misinformation, disinformation campaign regarding joe and/or hunter biden. when the laptop story was broken by new"new york post," companie like twitter and facebook went to the fbi and the fbi verified the laptop and asked, is this what you are warning about or is this story true? the fbi knew it was true and did not answer it was true and did it as in-kind campaign donation like they used hillary clinton's dossier as means to get four f fisawarrants. they were organized by winking tony blinkin, knew nothing about hunter's laptop and lied to the american people. we have a deep state in this country that is putting their entire organization's weight on scale of an election. >> brian: how about rewriting headline from 2021 to make it seem like she was not the border czar. nuts. i will watch your sho