that was turned to the petitioners about the legality. if there are any issues about student harm or the person is not within state lines for the country, that can be controlled. the new age of the web-based support services have caused a new angle on things. another phenomenon we have seen happening is that a lot of these companies are starting to use resources the giveaway, such as a laptop at the end of the tutoring service, to be an incentive to be recruiting families. we have made sure they understand that is legal. you cannot offer more than $50 up front, but families talk. when someone got a resource, a lot of phillies will go down this half -- a lot of families will go down this path. that is a new phenomenon as of last year. commissioner norton: wow. i apologize. i am going to ask some questions that some people have the answers to. how much money are talking about? >> is roughly 1300 to $1,400. the figure changes each year. i have to look it up on the internet, but it is around that. per student eligible. that is right. dependin

. >> the petitioners were removing party. >> that is not a self define the concept. the petitioners are the plaintiffs. >> they were the plaintiffs, and review scheme that was announced them was known beforehand. what we need to look at that? >> the review scheme says the 1986 insurance case, before this contract was entered into, the federal circuit said the mere filing of a complaint immediately vacates the contract and officer's rule. our understanding at the time we entered into this was there was a problem with a contract in officer operating, we could file a claim and make be contracting officers rule off the table. under those circumstances, it seems to me we go to the status quo in that situation, which means there is no contracting officer decision, there is no basis on which the government can make a claim for $1.35 billion. not ahought that was proper payment based on completed work. if government says that money was advanced. you had not complied with what was necessary to get that $135 -- $1.35 billion. it they say you have not fulfilled what you need to

the petitioner acknowledges receipt and understanding and shall comply with the business and professions code. next condition -- the monthly gross sales of alcoholic beverages shall not exceed the gross sales of food during the same time. the licensee at all times shall maintain records which maintain -- reflect separately the sale of food and beverages of the lessons business. that record shall they kept no less frequently than on a quarterly basis and shall be made available to the department of on demand. next, full and complete meals must reserve whenever the privileges of the license are being exercised. spirit of these last couple of conditions is we are trying to help maintain that these restaurants stay as restaurants and do not morph into clubs, which we have all seen. the hours of -- the sale of alcoholic noise is defined as any raucous sound produced in such a manner or to such a degree as to disturb the peace, acquired, and comfort of persons in the neighborhood. shall not be under the area of the licensee. no person under the age of 21 sit shallop should furnish or sell a ca

we had to bring on the on call a judge and have a hearing of petitioners in their attempt -- thank you. stay. thank you. a stay on the judgment that your commission had imposed, and an independent judge saw the evidence and cited on behalf of the commission's recommendation, -- and sided on behalf of the commission's recommendation. the other thing i want to a knowledge on behalf of the police department's efforts, and i do not know if some commissioners have seen our work product yet, but we went above and beyond in a short amount of time to give documentation, so we are just not hitting you a handful of two or three partially -- reports that do not seem to have a relation which each other -- with each other. we tried to back it up with facts, and that is what we provided. it was challenged in the courts, and it succeeded in the courts, so to me, this is not so much about the club and their name, but we vindicated. i know in the last year, the commission has been challenged a lot about its capabilities as a police department, but it can work. this does not mean that this is a tool we

the petitioner acknowledges receipt and understanding and shall comply with the business and professions code. next condition -- the monthly gross sales of alcoholic beverages shall not exceed the gross sales of food during the same time. the licensee at all times shall maintain records which maintain -- reflect separately thes

i hope that the petitioners will work this out. there's more to this than just the scoring issue. your application was very strong and very well done. i like it and i am sure that many other people like it but there were other factors during discussion that came off that did not score as high. i hope that does not preclude you from a second to go round. >> thank you. >> is there any other public comment on this item? seeing none, public comment is closed. >> i would like to congratulate commissioner harrison and the staff. it looks like a lot of work went into this and nothing but good is coming out of the other end of the process. congratulations. >> i just would like to echo your congratulations and a time of scarce resources and some challenging decisions we have to make, this is nothing but good news. this is the product of the commitment to our parks and the park spawned in which a very good decision was made to put aside a pot of money for community-driven projects. this is the first round of funding, the first fruit of that seat that was planted. i would like to thank our s

i am the petitioner. the parties agreed -- reached a tentative verbal agreement. request this matter be continued for three weeks in order to allow it to be reproduced in writing. president chiu: is there a representative of the real party of interest here today? a representative on the other side? >> they are gone. president chiu: did they provide everything in writing? supervisor elsbernd: i would love to make a motion to continue this. president chiu: we will make a motion to continue this item to three weeks from today based on the representation from the appellant. the other side has also agreed to the continuance to january 25. let me ask our deputy city attorney if discontinuance would be timely. >> a continuance is fine. deputy city attorney cheryl atoms. i just want to make it clear on the record that you have actually opened the hearing, because you have a certain amount of time to open the decision from the time the hearing is called. if you opened the hearing and continue it open, you can continue it for three weeks. president chiu: let me make it clea

. >> the petitioners were the moving party. isn't that right? >> moving party is not a self defined concept. the petitioners were the plaintives. >> the scheme was known to them beforehand. >> the review was scheme also says that 1986 -- the federal circuit said the mere filing of a complaint immediately vacates the contrasting officers rule. our understanding was that there was a problem with the way the contract in officer operated, we would be able to file a claim and immediately take the rule of the table. under those circumstances, we are asking for the status quo. that means there's no contracting officer decision and no basis on which the government can make a claim for $1.35 billion. >> you referred to that several times now. i thought that was not a payment based on completed work. the government says that of -- says that money was advanced. it distinguished the $1.35 billion that you legitimately received as a progress payment. >> what had not happened -- there had not been a final sign off by the contract officer approving it and redu

petitioners. were not playing well in the first period especially as we didn't give a rule however we tried to fight back and nearly equalized the school but the third goal was decisive do not expect us to panic the team is working hard and we hope we will soon of a home that the red and whites have won five days. out of six this year and they can expect to climb even high in the standings if they keep up there to be the same r t. now the first grand slam of the tennis season has begun to. only be a few hours old but already the first big name russian. nikolai going to germany florian mayer a massive upset for a man who had already number one the rafael nadal this season. had better luck. in straight sets. federer and meanwhile had few problems with. just five games on the way to the second stage. on the women's side. and few problems against the pair regarded as a tough. go wild. party. threw in straight sets against highlands on the. first game definitely. no match. otherwise. to be. over two hu

i am a petitioner all lawsuits under the federal statute called the religious freedom restoration act. and as the petitioner, it is my contention that is a muslim, as a member of the islamic faith, that i am being kept from practicing my face. i anderson and there is an earlier panelist that said all terrorists are muslim. clearly we do not agree with that and i feel like i should have the right to practice my face and i am going through the airport and so as you can notice i am dressed from head to toe and i am dressed head to toe every day of my life and i feel like if i go through a body scanner that violates my modesty right in my religion to not be seen on -- unclothed. so is my argument that this particular program is not the least restrictive means for the government to advance a compelling interest than it infringes upon my right to practice my religion. now i would also like to state that obviously other people have objections to this. people of other faiths who have modesty concerns within their face, and of course people that have no faith who still have modesty concerns bu

the petitioners are dem strobbably unlikely to implement what set forth in the petition and the petition does not contain reasonably comprehensive editions of the program and operationings as required by the education of code. be it further resolved that the board of education here by denies the charter school's petition. i have a comb of -- couple of notes that i wanted to highlight and then i will be available for any questions. in your pact, and it is again at the bottom of the original resolution, i wanted to note the process for review that this was referred based on first resolution and public hearing on november 9th. to the curriculum and budget committees. the second part of the process is -- it was taken up at the budget and business services and we got a report on 11-29-10, november 29th, 2010.

i am a petitioner all lawsuits under the federal statute called the religious freedom restoration act. and as the petitioner, it is my contention that is a muslim, as a member of the islamic faith, that i am being kept from practicing my face. i anderson and there is an earlier panelist that said all terrorists are muslim. clearly we do not agree with that and i feel like i should have the right to practice my face and i am going through the airport and so as you can notice i am dressed from head to toe and i am dressed head to toe every day of my life and i feel like if i go through a body scanner that violates my modesty right in my religion to not be seen on -- unclothed. so is my argument that this particular program is not the least restrictive means for the government to advance a compelling interest than it infringes upon my right to practice my religion. now i would also like to state that obviously other people have objections to this. people of other faiths who have modesty concerns within their face, and of course people that have no faith who still have modesty concerns bu

petitioners. were not playing well in the first period especially as we didn't give a rule however we tried to fight back and nearly equalise the school but the third goal was decisive do not expect us to panic the team is working hard and we hope we will soon of a come that the red and whites have won five games out of six this year and they can expect to climb even a high in the standings if they keep up their motivation is a mother of a party. elsewhere in the cage challenge and a man square to good for several styles they belorussians edging out their opponents free want. and skoll st petersburg came from two bills down to be denominated in the last man capital. to the greens finally work successfully defended his job open title seeing off overnight leaders and fellow south africans . and tom was a can also leaving his rivals no chance in sunday's round that saw him open up a three stroke lead going into the last he held onto post a fool for consecutive birdie of the eighteenth to finish four

the petitioners are the plaintiffs. >> they were the plaintiffs, and review scheme that was announced them was known beforehand. what we need to look at that? >> the review scheme says the 1986 insurance case, before this contract was entered into, the federal circuit said the mere filing of a complaint immediately vacates the contract and officer's rule. our understanding at the time we entered into this was there was a problem with a contract in officer operating, we could file a claim and make be contracting officers rule off the table. under those circumstances, it seems to me we go to the status quo in that situation, which means there is no contracting officer decision, there is no basis on which the government can make a claim for $1.35 billion. not ahought that was proper payment based on completed work. if government says that money was advanced. you had not complied with what was necessary to get that $135 -- $1.35 billion. it they say you have not fulfilled what you need to do to get that. >> there had not been a final sign off by the contract in officer of proving it, ther

this treason take numerous petitioners, going beyond this prison system, there are three new types of measures to control. china's authorities have been increasingly using in the past three years. number one. direct violence. th the direct violence against righ dissidents, human rights activist, and petitioners has increased in recent years. that people who have been doinge this local policemen or thugs hired by police. in some cases government officials are also involved. number two with, house arrest. this recent years -- in recent years house arrest has become more and more widely used as a means of limiting us the dents -- dissidents and their families. as the wife of a blind human rights lawyer or, li jing was placed under house arrest. ever since he was released after sevenning four years and three -- serving four years and three months in prison last september, the entire family has been put under house arrest. the chens, the entire family, has not -- has been cut off from all contacts with the outside world. those who tried to visit them were badly beaten. lu shah's wife has b

i despise your predecessor too much to condescend to become his petitioner here today to favor in inferiority and heaven forbid, i should ever place myself in the light of an inferred to thomas jefferson, i think this principles religious moral and political our likely wicked. that's shifting, shuffling visionary, an old woman in her dotage, our wretched, pardon me, sir, my pen does strange trick and although i often caution able to all the secrets of my heart. madison and jefferson sparred with each other and did so generally with brutal honesty. but there is was remarkable and enduring partnership. something rebecca didn't get. but on the other hand, what her letter shows is that many citizens perceived madison as someone independent of jefferson, not dependent on him. she would not have approached the new president was so blunt and opinion unless she thought she had a decent chance of getting through to him. this vignette exposes one of our central themes, which is easy enough to identify if you look at the cover of the book, and look at the type and see who gets top billing. in every hist

the petitioners or the plaintiffs -- >> the team that you outlined was known to them before and.why do we need to look beyond that? >> the review scheme also says 1986, the federal circuit before the contract was entered into the federal circuit said the filing -- the mere filing of a complaint immediately vacate the contract and officer's rule. our understanding when we enter into this agreement is if there was a problem the way the officer operated we would be allowed to file a claim and the immediately take the contract in officer's rule off of the table. it seems to me all we are asking for is to go back to the status quo in that situation which means there's no contract in officer decision and no basis on which the government can make a claim for $1.35 billion. >> you referred to several times. that was not based on completed work. that money was advanced. you cannot comply with what was necessary to comply with to get that $1.35 million. we did not distinguish the $1.3 million that you received, but just not fulfil what you needed to get to that. >> what had not happened, t

the direct violence against dissidents, human rights activists and petitioners has increased in recent arrest. this recent years -- in recent years house arrest has become more and more widely used as a means of limiting us the dents -- dissidents and their families. as the wife of a blind human rights lawyer or, li jing was placed under house arrest. ever since he was released after sevenning four years and three -- serving four years and three months in prison last september, the entire family has been put under house arrest. the chens, the entire family, has not -- has been cut off from all contacts with the outside world. those who tried to visit them were badly beaten. lu shah's wife has been put under house arrest since last year when her husband won the 2010 nobel peace prize. and her communication with the outside world has been completely cut off since october 20th last year. number three, disappearance. i also urge you to pay attention to the disappearance of chinese citizens as a result of the government's unwarranted actions. the most notorious case is shin. he has not been

different meaning it's not a playgrounds all these sensitive words would be our politicians, your petitionersust to summarize the question then [inaudible] its not being communicated to the american public who is against the wall. >> that's why i'm standing here today to try to start communicating about what we are doing and i think we are making some difference. i think we are going to make a lot of difference before we are done, and i do want the taxpayers who are paying for it to know that at least in my view as a public servant is trying to lead this effort within the embassy context and under the leadership of ambassador eikenberry, i think the money is worth it. i think it is making a difference and i think we need to persevere. on the question of the public opinion in the west, i did talk about the partnership nation outreach effort we are making that we are the embassy to afghanistan and our focus primarily on a 98% is on the afghan people. i am very cognizant of the falling and support for the troops and for what we are trying to do in afghanistan i'm very worried about it that's why

direct violence against humans d rights activists and petitioners have increased in recent years.g the people who have been doing this our local policeman ored by hired by police. ficials ar in some cases, government officials are also involved. yet years house arrest has become more and more widely used as a means of limiting us the dents -- dissidents and their families. as the wife of a blind human rights lawyer or, li jing was placed under house arrest. ever since he was released after sevenning four years and three -- serving four years and three months in prison last september, the entire family has been put under house arrest. the chens, the entire family, has not -- has been cut off from all contacts with the outside world. those who tried to visit them were badly beaten. lu shah's wife has been put under house arrest since last year when her husband won the 2010 nobel peace prize. and her communication with the outside world has been completely cut off since october 20th last year. number three, disappearance. i also urge you to pay attention to the disappearance of chinese ci

different meaning it's not a playgrounds all these sensitive words would be our politicians, your petitionersust to summarize the question then [inaudible] its not being communicated to the american public who is against the wall. >> that's why i'm standing here today to try to start communicating about what we are doing and i think we are making some difference. i think we are going to make a lot of difference before we are done, and i do want the taxpayers who are paying for it to know that at least in my view as a public servant is trying to lead this effort within the embassy context and under the leadership of ambassador eikenberry, i think the money is worth it. i think it is making a difference and i think we need to persevere. on the question of the public opinion in the west, i did talk about the partnership nation outreach effort we are making that we are the embassy to afghanistan and our focus primarily on a 98% is on the afghan people. i am very cognizant of the falling and support for the troops and for what we are trying to do in afghanistan i'm very worried about it that's why

the direct violence against dissidents, human rights activists and petitioners has creased in recent years. the people who have been doing this are local policemen or thugs hired by police. in some cases government officials are also involved. number two with, house arrest. this recent years -- in recent years house arrest has become more and more widely used as a means of limiting us the dents -- dissidents and their families. as the wife of a blind human rights lawyer or, li jing was placed under house arrest. ever since he was released after sevenning four years and three -- serving four years and three months in prison last september, the entire family has been put under house arrest. the chens, the entire family, has not -- has been cut off from all contacts with the outside world. those who tried to visit them were badly beaten. lu shah's wife has been put under house arrest since last year when her husband won the 2010 nobel peace prize. and her communication with the outside world has been completely cut off since october 20th last year. number three, disappearance. i also ur

the direct violence against human rights activists and the petitioners increased in recent years.cials that are also involved. number two, house arrest. in recent years, house arrest has become more and more widely used as a means for limiting disdense and their family. there are two typical examples. as the wife of the human right's lawyer, he was placed under house arrest and not allowed to leave the house. after serving four years in the three months in prison last september, the entire family has been put under house arrest. the chins, the entire family, have been cut off from all contact with the world. those who tried to visit them were badly beaten. the wife has been put under house arrest ever since october 8 of last year when her husband won the 2010 peace prize. her communication to reach out has been completely cut off since october 20 of last year. number three, disappearances. i urge you to pay attention to the disappearance to the chinese citizens as a result of the governments and warranted actions. the most notorious case is gao. he has not been heard from since la

. >> the petitioner as a formal matter with the moving party. isn't that right? >> well, moving party, i think is not a self-defined concept, just alito. >> they were the plaintiffs. and the review scheme that you outlined was reviewed beforehand. why do we need to look at that? >> the review scheme says that the 1986 in the case the federal circuit said the filing, the mire files of a complaint immediately vacates the contracting officers rule. our understanding at the time that we entered into the agreement if there was a problem with the way the contracting officer operated we would be allowed to file the claim and take the rule off of the table. under to circumstances, all we're asking for is to go back to the status quo in that information which means there's no contracting officer, there's no bases on which the government can make the claim of $1.35 billion. >> when you explain that, i thought that was not progress payment based on completed work. government says that money was advanced. you had not complied with what was necessary to comply with to get tha