when a petitioner calls and says how can i protect my business? i suggest cameras. it kind of diffuses the situation if there is an allegation of misconduct by an employee. in fact we had one nightclub there was a homicide and that video was able to prove it was a justifiable homicide. we are going back to as what the supervisor said that we are crafting the language and softening the language and we are looking forward to doing business with any applicant in the future as well. the bottom line is it's been a big help for the police department. we are a progressive police department. there has not been a situation where we have requested video without a police report. if you don't give me video voluntarily i'm going the correct way with a search warrant. we ask that you provide the tape when it's applicable. >> unfortunately, you have been outranked, as you leave your seat i would like to introduce to everybody -- never mind. deputy chief of field operations has showed up who was originally supposed to have that seat. i guess you must have been doing a good job and

petitioners say momentum is on their side. >> we'll get at least 100,000. people can't wait to sign it. >> reporter: people are fighting back. >> something had to be done and here in maryland we stood up. >> reporter: we have an exclusive look at the new ad campaign launching this week claiming it reduces gun violence by getting the guns out of the hands of criminals. >> it will work for maryland and it could work for the entire country. >> reporter: the nra has decided to support a court challenge to overturn the law. the petition organizer doesn't want to leave the fate of the gun law up to the courts. >> i thought this citizens of maryland deserved a voice on this issue. >> reporter: so for now the gun battle rages on. the backers of that referendum have until the end of may to gather about 18,000 signatures. then they have till the end of june to gather another 38,000 signatures. >> derek valcourt live for us tonight, thank you. the referendum, if approved, would help in 2014. >>> parents at sandy look elementary school continue their fight to ban the s

and you flip the page here and another allegation is that -- i'll read it to you, the petitioner has full custody with no visitation for the respondent and the responsibility is ariel castro. nevertheless, the respondent frequently abducts daughters and keeps them from the mother. these are allegations of abuse and abduction against ariel castro. we do have to say that these charges were dismissed later in that year. a court official familiar with the case tells us however that that does not necessarily mean a finding of guilty or not guilty. there were several instances where ariel castro did not show up for court. and finally on one of the bigger days of these proceedings, the lawyer for gramidla was not able to be present and the court determined she would be at a disadvantage so they dismissed the case against him. according to a court official familiar with this case, that was not necessarily a finding of guilt or guilty or not guilty with regard to these allegations, ashleigh. >> and, again, brian, we should remind our viewers these allegations come for protective order, but no

but this one says the petitioner shall utilize electronic equipment to record inside and outside of the premises and must be kept for 30 days and made available for the police department. that is pretty big brother and i will tell you why. i think berry is right. if there is some reason to have that surveillance, it should be made available. if you don't want to give it up, then a judge can get it from you. however, my job is to save my clients money

for one petitioner, it means regarding her own health. our reporter reports. >> reporter: she practices medicine in a southwestern village. her husband drives her to patients' homes. the husband always travels with her because of her chronic leg ailment. here she visits a farming family. she is checking up on an elderly woman who can leave her bed. she visits almost every day. >> translator: i can't walk so the doctor's house calls are a tremendous help. i'm so grateful. >> translator: it's not easy traveling all the way here. but when i see the villagers' smiling faces, it feels worthwhile. >> reporter: about 3,000 people live in the village of xihe. two of every three residents here are in their 60s or older. so a lot of them find they need more medical treatment. she's been the village's only doctor for more than 20 years. after acquiring her doctor's license, she returned to her home village to open a clinic. when she was 8 months old, a congenital illness caused her left leg to become paralyzed. at the time, the village had no hospit

one handwritten notation was particularly interesting to us, it read "petitioner has full custody with no visitation for respondent." meaning castro. "nevertheless, respondent frequently abducts daughters and keeps them from mother." that case, scott, was ultimately dismissed. >> pelley: finally, bob, two of castro's brothers were arrested with him yesterday. what about them? >> well, the police explained today they did pick up those men at the same time they grabbed ariel castro but prosecutors are taking a hard look at the evidence and say there is no evidence that pedro and onil castro played any role whatsoever in the abduction so they're not expected to be charged but investigators asking a lot of questions, trying to understand how one man could possibly hold three captives for a decade in the middle of a city without anybody knowing anything about it and one more thing, scott. we're now told that police also looking at another house, searching the house just down the street for other possibilities. >> pelley: bob orr in our washington newsroom. bob, thanks very much. we've heard

forminger irs petitioner who preceded doug shulman emerson.e in 2012 to talk about how the irs might be enforcing new tax regulations we are going to face under obama care the new taxes we are going to pay. many of us under obama care? he was talking about the need for the irs to be and to appear independent of the white house. here is how he put it. great deal of independence from other agencies. i worry direct participation of the service in a major nontax administration initiative has the potential to erode the historic independence of the service. and let me be clear here, i have nothing but the highest regard for commissioner shulman and his team. i'm not suggesting i have seen things but i just think when you bring a service in closer to the white house and to other agencying agencies you run the risk of eroding that independence. >> megyn: shulman went 159 times and that guy we just saw went once? >> once. and by comparison i believe that the director of the fbi, robert mueller went maybe five times over that same period. a scant number

first question, the amendment said that once an immigrant files an application for status as a self-petitioner, the secretary shell, grant, employment authorization either on the date they the application is approved, or by a date set by the department not later than 180 dais after application is filed. so the question, does this mean that if dhs fails to act on the tu or petition within 180 days and an immigrant is automatically entitled to work authorization even if the petition turns out to be fraudulent? >> it is -- what we're doing is encouraging them the bureaucracy to move as quickly as they should be able to in this. the work authorization, of course, is only temporary should they find it can be peedly withdrawn. we haven't had much evidence. it's only good for one year. there's not evidence of fraud in this area, abuse person seeking work authorization. the bureaucracy can handle it within that time, and should. this is to put as we have done in a number of other areas in here to put some requirement for the burke to work quickly. and if it determined it was immediately withdrawn. >>

question, the amendment says that once an immigrant files an application for status as a tu or self-petitioner, the secretary shall grant employment authorization either on the date the application is approved or by a date set by the department, not later than 180 days after application is filed. so, the question, does this mean that if dhs fails to act on the tu, or vowa petition within 180 days and an immigrant is automatically entitled to work authorization even if the vowa petition later turns out to be fraudulent? >> it is. what we're doing is encouraging them to, encourages the bureaucracy to move as quickly as they should be able to in this. the work authorization of course is only temporary. should they fine fraud, it can be immediately withdrawn but we have not had much evidence of fraud. it is only good for one year. we, they tell me there has not been evidence of fraud in this area. abused persons seeking work authorization. the, bureaucracy can handle it within that time and should. this is to put a, as we have done in a number of other areas in here to put some requirement for the