petitioners make here, is very very broad. the lower courts have upheld buffer zones around political conventions, around circuses, around funerals. idea that you could defeat those buffer zones by simply saying i would like to have a quiet conversation with the delegates as they go into the political convention, would wipe court after of piece decisionings and the kind of buffer zones that this court, the lowerand that courts have found are needed. you think what do you think a state legislature or find in order to to establish a zone around some of facility, at which evidence that there have been some disruptions and some obstruction. >> so -- >> an example, i think it's a some place,ce there's a buffer zone around fraternal lodgings. not aware of the history of fraternal lodges. >> what would they have to find, or slaughter houses, or sites where there are strikes. example, innk, for the slaughter house or what they found around circuses and conventions is the idea that there is massing of people that andents the orderly in

the arguments that petitioners make is broad. the lower courts have uphold buffer zones around political conventions, circuses, funerals. the idea that you can defeat those buffer zones by saying, i would like to have a quiet conversation with the delegates as they go into the convention would wipe out a number of court of appeals decisions. >> how far do you think and what you think the state legislature or congress needs to find in order to establish his own around some category of facility which they have some evidence that there have been some disruptions and instructions in in front of? there is a real ordinance somewhere that there is a buffer zone around fraternal lodges. >> i'm not aware of the history. >> what would they have to find? for slaughterhouses or sites where there are strikes? >> what they found around circuses and conventions is there is massing of people that prevents the orderly to and from with the facilities. this was not an isolated this is -- an isolated incident. they had tried other things. they had t

california drivers saying using those factors to determine insurance rates is illegal under prop petitioners say they be based on driving records and driving experience. the trade group disagrows saying under 103, customers are able to give discounts if they're averaged broadly among drivers under a group plan. >> this evening a warning from nutrition labelled at the grocery store, shoppers may in the take time to read fine print. big words may not represent what sin side of the packages. >> if only reading the front of the package, many times, they're not. and they where use those to catch our attention. >> the words wheat may not mean whole grain bread just because it has words light on it, doesn't mean you can eat anymore of it. also, steer clear of the words partially hydrogen yated oil. >> really stay away from fully high drone yated. >> yes. >> that is worse. >> it's all bad >> thank you. >> we're finally talking about rain. >> here you go. >> skies look threatening. and there are light showers, taking a look now you'll notice a little bit of a break. and looking north there is drizzle

the petitioners and those consolidated superior court cases, the knob hill association and knob hill coalition and five neighbors. they consent to the 2013 conditional use and support the eir. that settlement includes all conditions of the approval and limited to 54 events per year. as president chiu inquired, this should be an appeal of the conditional use permit and not the eir. they were not able to contain the signature of not a single homeowner. the merits to the appeal itself. first of all the client states a stipulation that limits it to special use. that was wrong. it was issued by determination that the 1953 approval was for entertainment use, not institutional use held by the court's. next appellants argue the planning code is not for approval. the planning code is not applicable because the property is in the knob hill special use district. even if they were right, it would have no impact on the adequacy of the eir because the eir analysis the physical impacts of a project, not the type of approval. on the merits, the appellants are simply wrong. the argument they made was

still another bit of a negative start time that we did see big declines as he mentioned that the petitioners on monday does have a look at the opening levels for january seven for this tuesday here and as he said the declines here in the first few minutes of trading. so we're continuing the losses of esau from a monday. we both indexes lower them as you can see almost half of the sinful than a k a the nikkei was down three hundred and eighty two points or two point three percent yesterday monday. that's a bit tells the biggest decline in more than two months and it ended below sixteen thousand yesterday also for the first time since december twenty fourth out given the near fifty seven percent rise in the nikkei for two thousand and thirteen some profit taking is to be expected and as you said i use all that in all the global indexes as well traders also showing a letter that a hesitation this week with that key trading cues are coming out of the us will be at the trade i did earlier today in the us then of course the fomc minutes up from last month's meeting which is due out on wednesday in

now the president that unocal which should accept as petitioners reports the opposition demanded the resignation of the prime minister for two months sixty six showed me the laws on of us to be relieved from his post. all because of the threat of instability caused by the two months of unrest according to him he did it for the sake of a peaceful solution to the conflict in the country according to the constitution of ukraine the prime minister's resignation automatically entails a dissolution of the entire cabinet of ministers was out of how the post since two thousand ten. the president victor unocal was appointed him right after winning the elections being one of the muslim supporters of the president he supported the decision of unocal which to renounce the association agreement with the european union despite the fact that it was his government which promised the citizens integration with the eu during the year the rejection of the agreement sparked mass protests in ukraine and the opposition demanded oz of his resignation in response bypassing the voting rolls the rada adopted a

this one mr said he discussed tomato with the commissioner mr has been quite supportive of the petitioner's position that point i freeze up on that day. allegations that the good news that the commissioner had caught the accounts committee he didn't have time to tidy up the heat and examination. it lets me down. commissioner in a statement this evening said it's important for office for the integrity of the that the have confidence in that the penalty points is to be fixed charge of the system he also said the doggie that would be fully cooperating with the ombudsman's investigation and that interest me enough that line this is actually the sixth investigation into the penalty points system with a view of our inquiry of it the perfect started inquiring we also got the expected looking at the system that are due to the report of the biggest or the next few weeks that we've also had the almost at the ad the accounts committee looking at it now and i along with the head the ombudsman's inquiry is the sixth inquiry into the sand beside the hall was thinking to much to be thankful for provoking

the arguments that petitioners make is broad. the lower courts have uphold buffer zones around political conventions, circuses, funerals. the idea that you can defeat those buffer zones by saying, i would like to have a quiet conversation with the delegates as they go into the convention would wipe out a number of court of appeals decisions. >> how far do you think and what you think the state legislature or congress needs to find in order to establish his own around some category of facility which they have some evidence that there have been some disruptions and instructions in front? there is a buffer zone around fraternal lodges. >> i'm not aware of the history. >> what would they have to find? for slaughterhouses or sites where there are strikes? the are people that prevent this to and from the facilities. what the state was doing what was not an isolated incident. they had 15 years. they had repriced it. nearer zone.d a it was not working. measuring hard time consent. >> al qaeda record did they need? >> can there be a law t

couldn't take a few minutes to come down chap let me summarize the thousands of comments of the petitionerswho've signed it have me very cogent once instead frankly they're putting up a stone wall they want the story to go away and i want to die yeah i mean it is amazing and kind of you don't even give you the time of day to really listen to the voice of over thirty thousand consumers and potential readers of the washington and it's a very odd thing because he's turning down this is again the top editor of the washington post one of the premier political newspapers in the world he's refusing to grant media interviews to even talk about this so how does somebody who oversees hundreds of journalists doing hundreds of minutes every day tell other journalist i don't want to talk about this you can't interview me bizarre we have about thirty seconds left but what do your advice for people who kind of still think of these stablish media publications as the only. credible sources that they can widen the ecology of your media don't take anybody as a gospel and understand that corporate funding and

in response to the petitioner company spokesperson denying the allegations. it's only natural that facebook does not collect or track any content that people have chosen not to post. me the sound coming from the same company but under fire for another privacy complaint. just before the new year facebook was slapped with a class action privacy while seated the lawsuit claims that the social network is scanning users kind of message is don't earn a profit from your data. in other words if you send a private message that includes a link to another website this book form and my sister into our private post as the light for that company and that means that you're planting communications all the sudden become . the main problem is that the news is that facebook has been misrepresenting the primacy measures around personal messaging. the seats as facebook mind to any and all transmissions across its network including those in labels prevent you were to gain any and all morsels of information they can about its users. the social media site will likely argue that ther

benson are blind see the aid will only get back to when i say shows meanwhile some very graphic petitioner's appeal mine purportedly showing the altona of a mindset that carried on by upgrading point is to have but never strongly in the country and some may say as if the vehicle age has made it into all this. in other states provided of legal assistance to jordan to sci and threw them into turkey to the opposition but the opposition is is is fragmented being capable at what's happened is that the pee out the more radical elements principally the odd that the um the foreign fighters have taken over the opposition in terms of the fighting. consequently those weapons of god knew their hands they become emboldened they become they've gotten better weapons as a consequence a getting the surface to air missile to get our pj's and unbearably what will happen is that if you pick to start the past weapons to the opposition. it is inevitably will fall into the hands of extremists because they're just much more up the dinner. in addition to be a more radical eyes there also. more fear spiders and they

petitioners can and do protest abortion in massachusetts.aces. >> this is not a protest case. they don't want to protest. they want to talk to the women who are about to get abortions and try to talk them out of it. i think it distorts it to say what they want to do is protest abortion. if it was a protest, keeping them back 35 feet might not be so bad. they can scream and yell and hold up signs from that distance. what they can't do is talk the woman out of the abortion. it is a counseling case, not a protest case. >> i would say it is a congestion case. certainly they can have those conversations right in front of the abortion facility. they are moved back a few feet your >> 35 feet is a ways. from this bench to the end of the court. if you imagine the chief justice as where the door would be, as most of the width of the courtroom. it is pretty much this courtroom. that's a lot of space. >> as a factual matter, i did want to point out that in boston, the door is recessed. it is a private entrance. the 35 feet aren't from the door. it is on

it sounds like justice scalia districted his skepticism at petitioners today.ning? >> it is probably frightening for a lot of union supporters that the person who has their future in his hands is scalia. what scalia was doing is he was questioning what the union does is truly political speech. that may reflect his discomfort with extending free speech protections or categorical treatment over union activities, but many people were sort of surprised. just when kennedy was coming out very strongly against the union position and it was scalia who came out and questioning the right to work advocates about how they were characterizing it. the big question is whether in fact that case from 1977 should simply be overturned. to get there, the right to work advocates were saying this is political speech. you shouldn't have forced dues. that's when scalia showed up rather unexpectedly in oral argument and said, i'm not sure if i agree with that. >> if this is ruled in favor of the right to work folks, there are a lot of projections of the effects this could have on organ

regimes to me the proposed by the petitioner is more manageable. if it goes beyond the words of readingract, and you're into something it doesn't say, policy.matter of state i can work with that. but you're asking me to go through each of the 50 states, by one, to decide, oh, which of these are really trying to intent of the parties and which ones aren't. especially since you're the intent of the parties by simply saying parties communityapply standards and there's different community standards in every state, presumably. states are more honest than others, right? >> justice scalia i have two to that observation. first is, i don't think the state-by-state analysis is unusual or difficult. there has to be a state-by-state analysis any time you have a applying state law. there are variances among states in their contract law. second part of the same response is, i don't think the is aard we're articulating particularly difficult -- >> there are variances but not an ineffablesuch question as to whether this is to discern thet real intent of the partie

his international policy is in disarray with the fall of fallujah to al qaeda, petitioner bergen mentioned there's now the largest strip of al qaeda controlled inert its history, from syria, fallujah, iraq so al qaeda is resurging, so your seeing a foreign policy drop and his legacy does not look like it's going to be good. >> something that robert gates pointed out in a book, -- he didn't stand by the mission when it came to afghanistan. the president has for the first time responded to those charges. we are told, and that tape should be coming in very shortly in the next minute or so. but, jamie, that will be a big problem with the president? disspelling that's folks' notion that robert gates has it right. >> robert gates has a lot of credibility on both sides of the aisle in this town. the president kept him because he thought he was an effective defense secretary as a holdover from the bush administration. that doesn't happen very often. now him coming out and criticizing the president's passion for sending the troops into battle with not maybe believing it can be won, that's a serious

it seems to me the regime proposed by the petitioner is much more manageable. if it goes beyond the words of the contract, and you're reading into something it doesn't say, it is a matter of state policy. i can work with that. but you're asking me to go through each of the 50 states, one by one, to decide, oh, which of these are really trying to discern the intent of the parties and which ones aren't. especially since you're discerning the intent of the parties by simply saying parties intend to apply community standards and there's different community standards in every state, presumably. some states are more honest than others, right? >> justice scalia i have two responses to that observation. first is, i don't think the state-by-state analysis is either unusual or difficult. there has to be a state-by-state analysis any time you have a contract claim applying state law. there are variances among states in their contract law. the second part of the same response is, i don't think the standard we're articulating is a particularly difficult -- >> there are vari

they are more interested in them and they might suggest also that petitioners dual threat from physical talent. i'm one of the time he had things to come on season seven seven percent of french people. i believe it is a private affair to foreigners looking and that does seem surprising when denise use pricing if you think of it in time for and well known french terms mean. also known as the movie night and i don't have the mother of his four children he didn't marry and make him a lot of these four young to marry they act as gk either. on sale. you've got in front of difference idea about its back to little maniacal to denise's new sites if someone crosses quite good thoughts in terms of accepting also some interesting family relationships with the multiple children from different parents. all together. so i think it's a long long long one level this is a unit. what's the big deal he's tilting one will double for another unit said at the other thing that which is which is very important is that. it was all on himself is the middle of the devil and he went out and told y'all i want to be

these protesters have about 27,000 petition ne petitioners.y are going to deliver the petitions and a message saying, if you want to continue this relationship with seaworld, it could have an impact. there are going to be some passengers that are not going to be comfortable with this relationship, because they don't like what seaworld does with their animals. they have come out and said, we have an agreement with seaworld and we are going to be good partners and continue that agreement. they left the door open saying we are also in the listening and learning phase. they are clearly going to pay attention to this. right now, they say it is going to have no impact on their relationship with seaworld. so, stay tuned. >> you are not kidding. martin savidge, many thanks. we have one of those protesters joining us now. he will be protesting at southwest dallas headquarters today. good morning. >> good morning, carol. thanks for having me. >> why do you feel so strongly about this? >> southwest has been a cheerleader for animal abuse through the dang

petitioners are accusing justin bieber of reckless and destructive behavior.ber is not going anywhere. they say under federal law, only violent crimes and a sentence longer than a year would review of a person's immigration status. >>> super bowl fans are looking for souvenirs to the big game but not all of them are authentic. customs officers say they are seizing thousands of boxes of counterfeit jerseys, hats, banners and other items with the logos of the seahawks and broncos. the items appear real until officers look at details. most of them don't have a hologram seal on them and many are lower quality than nfl approved items. >> for example, this is plastic. this is all plastic. it shines like plastic. it looks like plastic. you can see the stitching, the way the stitching is. >> customs officers say this is not a victimless crime. they say property rights owners lose money creating an economic loss for u.s. companies. you can watch the super bowl right here on ktvu this sunday. our coverage goes all day long. the kickoff, the most important thing is at 3:

number 4, the petitioner shall be responsible and maintaining free of litter of the premise for which they have control. loitering is prohibited on any sidewalks or property just in case graffiti shall be removed from the premises and all parking lots within 72 hours of the application if the graffiti occurs on a friday or weekend or holiday the . the interior lighting shall be sufficient to make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons and patrons in the portion of the premise where alcoholic beverages be consumed. the exterior of the premises will be equipped with lighting. the appearance of persons on the premise and additional ly shall not disturb the normal privacy. thank you. >> thank you very much. do we have any questions for our police department? no questions. thank you very much for the presentation and why don't we now open it up to public comment i haven't received any speaker cards but i'd like to open it up to any member of the public who would like to speak on this item. if you could please come forward and you each have 3 minutes. >> i'm a personal