first of all, you can't be petitioner's without taking action to initiate a lawsuit. when did you take action to initiate the lawsuit? i've been following this commission closely i don't think you've done so, in fact, if you've not taken action to initiate those lawsuits as petitioner's you're not parties at all if look at the petition one of the provisions for going into closed session is to discuss with your attorney as a party to the litigation. all of this would have been much more clear if you had put in the date in the agenda of the times when this lawsuit was filed it's true upper respondents in the lower court and petitioner's in the upper court now but the fact you've not included the dates is anotherfully flaw in your notes why do we appear before you to find out why you're frustrating ethics rather than implementing it the fact you're the commissioners is supposed to be your purpose not just your title. and, in fact, in ethics what had this should have been about thank you very much. >> pete war field again, the sunshine ordinance task force and pretty much

i am here to report to you on a proposed settlement with the petitioners. this is from july when you approved a purchase and a sales agreement when you, conveyed a undeveloped parcel on mission street, between third and fourth and the jessy square garage and a small air space parcel to millennium to develop as a 43 story residential tower and a 50,000 square foot mexican museum. and 5,000 square foot retail restaurant and rehabilitation of the historic building at the corner of third and mission. in addition, the garage, will be used by both public and private interests, and with with 200 of the garage spaces to being dedicated to the private use and the residential use and the rest of the 442, spaces available for the public. and this project really has had a long history. and it goes back to 1994, when the commissioner actually before that, and i guess, when the redevelopment agency first acquired the property, with what was then called udag funds, and subsequently became the cgb program and acquired most of the project area with these funds including the

prohibited on any property under the control of the licensee has depicted on the form and 5 the petitioner shall have the area in which they have control under the form. number 6 graffiti shall be removed from the parking lots within 72 hours of application in the graffiti occurs on a holiday or weekend they having shall have 72 hours to remove it. number 7 the exterior of the premise shall have lighting to make it easy to see the conducts of all persons on or about the property and deposition of such lights shall not disturb the residence. 8 the petitioner shall make no changes without written approval from the department. a signed note of the inspector who did the report had contacted on march 5 of 2013 mr. billy agreed to the conditions. thank you. great. thank you very much. officer and colleagues, any questions. no questions open this up for public comment is there any public comment if so, please come forward you have 3 minutes. seeing none, public comment is closed. again, i want to thank the applicant and thank them for their community outreach to the supervisor and i wanted to tha

some of you know me, i'm allen grossman the original petitioner of the litigation that's a agendized as number 4. i have essentially two comments of a general nature. one is over the years as commissioners we are appointed address serviced they are terms and mr. synquid and his staff including the lawyers handled all the note to routine activities for which the commission is ultimately responsible for. those activities included enforcing not compiled task forces with his hostility to open government is well known it was, in fact, quoted in the new york times and particularly has the task force as one of his objects. so in that roll he has a record of dismissing or finding in violation in other public records matter about 40 of them 40 since 2005. in my 2010 lawsuit he was forced to concede he couldn't withhold records the city paid my $25,000 attorney fees. the other point is really serious. you must be aware of gravity of many sin countries position in the article agenda 4. it is contrary to the commissions own bylaws contrary to their own bylaws and will golden gate park others cit

and finally, the settlement agreement requires that notice be given to the petitioners of any sidewalk table permit applications, so that the petitioners can comment on whether those sidewalk activities obstruct the pedestrian traffic or otherwise cause problems for the pedestrians. and the developer mill len um will donate $200,000 to the city to help to implement this and it is not the entirety of the budget, that is required, to implement all of these actions. but, that will be the subject of the city approvals, and, i might add that all of the parties, have approved this settlement agreement, with the exception of the board of supervisors. and which typically does not approve agreements, settle agreements until all other parties have weighed in and approved it, but you are the next to last step to that process. all of the others, have indeed signed off on this and so based on the fact that this settlement will resolve an outstanding lawsuit that it will provide the benefits to the community in the area that will impose no financial liability on this success or agency i recommend th

asked prosecute syncountry to send me all the briefs from the coiling the briefs on behalf of the petitioner's and the respondents which is a pretty good statement of all of the legal issues and all the legal arguments and the background regarding those issues i've made myself available and prepared to talk about it tonight i'd like to talk about it tonight. in regards to one of the members requests to me what did you get that's why what i got. i could have been gone to the coiling myself and gotten those materials instead i took the leases man's way and asked the executive director to send me the briefs that's the materials i have and they're all well auditor by good lawyers and present interesting issues. i'd like to talk about them tonight. >> i would thank you i'll make the quick point that 67.9 of the sunshine ordinance doesn't simply require a list of documents but the non privileged documents should be posted on the website and made available to the public in the same matter manner as the agenda. i share what's been said even though the bulk of the documents distributed were public docu

that is very real today.estr it's petitioner who is asking for a new rule..re asking for the application of the robinson rule, and if the court is not willing to apply the robinson rule, then primarily i think the best rule l to apply -- >> t well, but that's not quite accurate. what would you do under the robinson rule with an attorney's briefcase? >> the attorney's briefcase mayo prevent particularized problems because of attorney/client -- >> and opportunity that present the exact problem that every cell phone has? >> no.- >> i don't think that quite works for it. >> i was referring to thene privilege rule. the lower courts that haveth looked at it, this court has not, lower courts that have looked at the question have said that if a person is arrested holding a briefcase, the police can opens the brief case whethed locked or unlocked and look a it contents. they can look for evidence l that's relevant to criminal activity. and they do thatnc in a way thal is minimally invasive of privacy. they're not just doing it for wy the sake of doing it, they're look

and as the petitioner. and my discovery of sadness to the innocent enable all all stakeholders funds. and and that required me to to find my voice to speak on today stats and an inside gate. my mind for a change in the book of details to. next he goes into the street though the compost pile when it has since taken the bait but the exciting thing about this and the thing that we need to hang our head to head on is that it's attend a conversation it's coming from the perspective on the whistle that he often victimized will most often victimized and as a result of that victimization. it contains the dna on the people and had fun stitching onto future. iran is provided in the first mention cole says the issue of american troops to enter a piece of that but the elections will not find the shed but at least fourteen people killed across iraq. despite tight security with hundreds of thousands of soldiers deployed to try and prevent attacks at putting sanctions. saddles and walked on foot of our vehicles monthly me

so what petitioner example of attacking capitalism if you in fact are an anarchist socialist, as galleon's group were, than choosing wall street as your target. it was seen at the time as a horrendous agent, although compared to five are pathetic. >> host: state society and the dynamics of political violence is this subtitle. the foundations of modern terrorism is the tight. here's the cover oof the book. dr. miller, what do you teach at duke? >> guest: i teach this book in a course on precisely the title, the foundations of modern terrorism. i might add, if i have a moment to tell you that i've been teaching this subject since the early 1990s. i used to get class of maybe half dozen people until 9/11. and then hundreds came. >> host: why? >> guest: i think because everybody wanted to understand suddenly what this phenomenon of terrorism was bat. it was, as they like to say, in a way it had not been before. i thought of teaching this in the early 90s after the locker by crash. you remember that. which -- obviously conference to give a paper which is how most academics get involved in their

what petitioner did not do was provide similar information for the 500 or so other phones that are on the market and that will be on the market in the coming years so that police officers will be equipped with a manual that will probably be as thick as the new york city telephone book with the various procedures that are needed to prevent any phone from going into an encryption mode and becoming inaccessible. they don't know that at the time they seize the phone, justice breyer, and that's why exigent circumstances, unless it's done as a categorical rule, because i did not know whether this phone would encrypt, i searched it, unless you do that, then you are basically putting the officers at the mercy of technology, which will increasingly be able to defeat their ability to conduct the kind of routine searches that they have always conducted in the past. >> well, they've got their own technological front in this battle, too, and that's i mean, to the extent there are flaws in the faraday bag, i wouldn't be surprised if that's not improved over the next months or years or whatever. >>

the petitioner situ and pokemon to northam fronts as the national unemployment to get past the three million mile long snaking unfortunately all for top seed and chilling out on holiday with his then girlfriend's in departments that sharif says that you do this until they were just above the novices. during a time of crisis have an underestimate of the crisis and having made promises they can keep. they were the matches. i picked up refreshed by pain when he boarded a successful ministry intervention and moaning recruits don't like a rockstar. and the french when it's in the divine to benefit his gay marriage bill. but things looked even worse texas cool jungle long failed to keep his promise to reduce unemployment. last month his approval rating was just eighteen percent the lowest of any french president since the nineteen fifties plummeting from sixty one percent in just under two years. this group who can one really be popular when you have to deal with the economic deficit and the unemployment rates we currently know who could be popular in certain situations that nobody gets do

eleven, the petitioner shall utilize electronic video equipment that records the exterior of the premises whenever the privilege of the permit is being exercised, the recording shall be preserved for a minimum of 30 days, 12, the management is to notified the police if any incident occurred inside or in the vicinity of the venue. >> 100 feet. >> that comes later. >> oh, if there is an incident in the venue, or within 100 feet of the vicinity of the venue, the security must document the incident in addition to calling the police. >> 13. security is never allowed two parties that have been altercation inside of the venue to leave the venue at the same time. >> that is your motion. >> there is a second >> that is my motion. >> i would like to second that. >> great. >> and just add the comment that you know really the past is the past, the war is over, the space needs to be revitalized so i hope that we all move forward with that now. >> all right. any more questions or comments? >> let's take this to a vote. >> on that motion, do i need to repeat that whole thing. >> no. >> commissioner aker

with the petitioner did not do was provide similar information for the 500 faux -- or so other phones on the market and will be on the market. so police officers will be equipped with a manual as thick as the new york city telephone book with procedures needed to prevent phones from going into going encryption mode -- into and encryption mode. that is why exigent circumstances, unless done as a categorical rule. i searched it. lest you do that, you are putting the officers at the mercy of technology which will increasingly be able to defeat their ability to conduct the kind of routine searches they have always conducted. they've got their own technological front. there are flaws, i'm not surprised. mr. chief justice, it is an arms race between the forensic capability of law-enforcement labs and the abilities of cell phone manufacturers and criminals to devise technologies that will support them. they will leapfrog each other at times and there may be periods when law enforcement has the advantage. periods wherebe the others will succeed. my point is it would not be a wise rule for thi

i have more access to my money as petitioner than proprietor.g alternative investments. a internet store bring and mortar. seed money in offbroadway production will 12 angry men with all butch women. all my money in factor gear. trading out front door mattes bieber. exchange reigning rofers. also i have got my thing called crowd silencer. if you go on the internet and you guys raise enough money to make me one buck more than i make talking all the time i will never talk again. >> all right. i had another question. we were out of time. >> wait a second, i'm rolling. what are you doing? you are not going to bring that moron on again, are you? >> i don't know how are referring to. >> all of them except me. all of them. >> next week, you email us questions for the d-man. you are setting him up. you are rolland to his martin. all right? and the bolder fresher show moves into indianapolis. saturday, june 7th. rapid city, south dakota. july 25th. can't wait to get out there. fargo, north dakota the 26th. tickets make great father's day gifts. dogs eati

crimes like seatbelt violations that are on the other side of the equation for respondants or petitioner's n narrow response to cellphone searches. in a serious offense like a firearm case or in in this case a drug offense case, if the police got a warrant they would look at the same thing. the only way to execute the warrant on the phone is engaging in a search on the phone >> well they would be looking at the same thing but the whole idea of a warrant is the magistrate says you can look and has a way to limit it in whatever way they feel is appropriate and that is a protection. >> i would not go sure to say the magistrate with narrow the warrant. they say it isn't appropriate for the magistrate to prescribe the manner of the search. there is a different balance at the moment of the arrest. at that moment's society's interest are in locating evidence to the crime and arresting suspects and the suspect has a highly reduced privacy interest. >> four minutes mr. fischer. >> thank you. i think i heard 4-5 proposed rules i would like to go through. the state talked about the fundamentally diff

california i'm going to give all my money to the state because i think i'll have more money as a petitionerternet store that sells only brick and mortar. and i have money in factor gear. i'm trading out front door mats and i free spatter range rovers for would be owner who's want to look intrepid. >> all right. also, a thing called crowd silencer. if you go on the internet and you maze money to make one buck more than i make talking all the time, i'll never talk again. >> all right. i have another question. we're out of time. >> wait a minute. i'm rolling. what are you doing? you're not going to bring on moron again. are you? >> i don't know who you're referring to. >> all of them except me. all of them. >> you e mail us questions for the d-man. all right? >> thank you. >> and bold and fresher show moves into minneapolis. saturday, june 7th. rapid city, south dakota, july 25th. fargo, north dakota 26th. tickets make great father's day gifts. on deck, dogs eating in restaurants will that become a law in california? insane? you decide, in just a few minutes this is for real this time. step se

>> i think one of the interesting things that petitioner did in the riley case was upend back to hisief a couple of pictures of apple's iphoniphone five and i could goo the phone, if the phone is configured in the way was in the pictures that he took, and disable the auto lock feature. what petitioner did not do was provide similar information for the 500 or so other phones that are on the market and that will be on the market in the coming years so that police officers will be equipped with a manual that would probably be as thick as the new york city telephone book with the various procedures that are need to prevent any phone from going into an encryption mode and becoming inaccessible. they don't know that at the time they seize the phone, justice breyer, and that's why exigent circumstances unless it's done as a categorical rule because i did not know whether this phone would encrypt, i searched it, and lets you do that then you're basically putting the officers at the mercy of technology which will increasingly be able to defeat their ability to conduct the kind of routine sear

i have more access to my money as petitioner than proprietor.tments. a internet store bring and mortar. seed money in offbroadway production will 12 angry men with all butch women. all my money in factor gear. trading out front door mattes bieber. exchange reigning rofers. also i have got my thing called crowd silencer. if you go on the internet and you guys raise enough money to make me one buck more than i make talking all the time i will never talk again. >> all right. i had another question. we were out of time. >> wait a second, i'm rolling. what are you doing? you are not going to bring that moron on again, are you? >> i don't know how are referring to. >> all of them except me. all of them. >> next week, you email us questions for the d-man. you are setting him up. you are rolland to his martin. all right? and the bolder fresher show moves into indianapolis. saturday, june 7th. rapid city, south dakota. july 25th. can't wait to get out there. fargo, north dakota the 26th. tickets make great father's day gifts. dogs eating in restaurants.

the doctors, nurse petitioners, technician or is that have operated on may, that have done ultrasounds and mris, they have been terrific. the problem is the support staff, a lot of people walking around doing nothing. everyone knows that, someone needs to just put it on the table. host: ok bob, we will get a response. guest: i agree with him. there is a survey out, and says 85% of all people that are seen in a va hospital are satisfied with their care, 95% of bears -- 95% of those would go back to a va dr. that's a part of the leadership that needs to be exerted by the president and the va. our veterans are getting good care. i testified in front of congress in april, promotable dents -- preventable deaths. a congressman asked me if i would grade the va, i said the care is 85 percentile, the care is less than that. host: let me get your reaction to this tweet, too bad they can't get leon panetta out of retirement. who do you think would be a good replacement if eric shinseki steps down? guest: i don't know. i'm not in the medical field. i don't use used to be somebody who is strong in

i handled that case as i would for any other petitioner concerning adoptions. >> my time is up.thank you. >> i would like to thank all the nominees that appeared before us this morning. g. thank you for the opportunity to join what i understand has been a vigorous exchange and i like to thank senator blumenthal for chairing today. i would like to ask each of you if you would offer the comments you wish on what role you think you would have as a member of the federal judiciary in ensuring equal access to justice and ensuring a fair and balanced treatment of all litigants that appear before you and what gives us some confidence that you will make that a priority. >> as i stated, i believe that my role as a judge, if i am confirmed, will be to fairly and impartially apply the applicable law to the individual facts of each case. and it would necessitate a be fair and impartial with each person that comes before me. i believe that throughout this process, people have talked to lawyers that appeared opposite me and i think my interaction with them, to be fair in all cases to see the f

crimes like seatbelt violations that are on the other side of the equation for respondants or petitioner's n narrow response to cellphone searches. in a serious offense like a firearm case or in in this case a drug offense case, if the police got a warrant they would look at the same thing. the only way to execute the warrant on the phone is engaging in a search on the phone >> well they would be looking at the same thing but the whole idea of a warrant is the magistrate says you can look and has a way to limit it in whatever way they feel is appropriate and that is a protection. >> i would not go sure to say the magistrate with narrow the warrant. they say it isn't appropriate for the magistrate to prescribe the manner of the search. there is a different balance at the moment of the arrest. at that moment's society's interest are in locating evidence to the crime and arresting suspects and the suspect has a highly reduced privacy interest. >> four minutes mr. fischer. >> thank you. i think i heard 4-5 proposed rules i would like to go through. the state talked about the fundamentally diff

i handled that case as i would for any other petitioner concerning adoptions. >> my time is up.thank you. >> i would like to thank all the nominees that appeared before us this morning. g. thank you for the opportunity to join what i understand has been a vigorous exchange and i like to thank senator blumenthal for chairing today. i would like to ask each of you if you would offer the comments you wish on what role you think you would have as a member of the federal judiciary in ensuring equal access to justice and ensuring a fair and balanced treatment of all litigants that appear before you and what gives us some confidence that you will make that a priority. >> as i stated, i believe that my role as a judge, if i am confirmed, will be to fairly and impartially apply the applicable law to the individual facts of each case. and it would necessitate a be fair and impartial with each person that comes before me. i believe that throughout this process, people have talked to lawyers that appeared opposite me and i think my interaction with them, to be fair in all cases to see the f

petitioners,nurse technician or is that have operated on may, that have done ultrasounds and mris, theyave been terrific. the problem is the support staff, a lot of people walking around doing nothing. everyone knows that, someone needs to just put it on the table. host: ok bob, we will get a response. guest: i agree with him. says is a survey out, and 85% of all people that are seen in a va hospital are satisfied with their care, 95% of bears -- 95% of those would go back to a va dr.. that's a part of the leadership that needs to be exerted by the president and the va. our veterans are getting good care. i testified in front of congress in april, promotable dents -- preventable deaths. a congressman asked me if i the va, i said the care is 85 percentile, the care is less than that. host: let me get your reaction to this tweet, too bad they panetta out of retirement. who do you think would be a good replacement if eric shinseki steps down? guest: i don't know. i'm not in the medical field. i don't use used to be somebody who is strong in medical, or it ministration. this is a large corp

chief justice, and may it please the court, petitioner's answer to justice kagan's opening question is entirely formalistic. there is no separation in time between the public hearing and the invocation. people appear before this town board to ask for personal and specific things. our clients put shows on the cable channel. they were concerned the cable channel was about to be abolished or made much less usable. people appear to ask for a group home, parents of a down syndrome child. there are many personal petitions presented at this -- in the immediate wake of the prayer. >> but that's during the public -- that's during the public forum part. >> that's in the public forum. >> which is not really -- it's not the same thing as the hearing. >> it's not the same thing as the hearing and that's the point, your honor. >> there's another part of the proceeding that is the hearing. >> yes. >> and that's when somebody has a specific proposal. they want to -- something specifically before the board and they want relief. they want a variance. >> the hearing is a particular kind of proposal. >> a

that then the massacre not see minded folks perpetrated on may 2, where they burned they peaceful petitioners rounded up, herded into the trades union building, went in and shot, raped, strangled -- host: i will let you tell us. caller guest: the callers use of the i think this is a terrible tour -- rhetorical 10 patient we have to say people we do not like our nazis. there is no nazi party in the ukraine. to say the nazis hold four ministries in the ukrainian government is simply not true. who i do notple actually care for myself, but -- theyresent a kind of are definitely right wing populist group that is very whatle to russia and russia has done in ukraine. no surprise. part of ukrainian politics. get over it and try to understand the way in which it affects ukrainian politics today. something awful happened in odessa and we do not know what it is. i do not wreck nice what the caller is describing, the raping and strangling part of his story. it is possible that what you had here was an explosion that took place with atook group in a single building. is an investigation going on as to what

some of you know me, i'm allen grossman the original petitioner of the litigation that's a agendized as number 4. i have essentially two comments of a