frankly it will need to be resubmitted and go through the process because we have heard from the petitioners and from you know supporters tonight how carefully planned this charter is and if you carefully plan you know i'm not prepared to support it but a k through 5 it is fundamentally a different institution than a k-12 school we need to recognize this therefore i'm not support the amendment i'll be supporting the idea i'll be willing to support it as a charter so i don't want to support the procedural amendment before us. >> commissioner maufas and through the chair if i may inquire since you're sitting here i'm going to ask you why you can certainly join her. >> why you all explicit were you not advised by our staff to consider where are you going our petition and resubmitting it as a k 5 petition and were you not advised i won't have to go drove the entire process or the other chunk process i think i remember some of the conversation and those options being presented to you. >> yes. a little bit so i think it might help let me back up we start the process of designing the school we flag

taken i just wanted to just quickly recap the lengthy conversation we had with the one purpose petitioners and they definitely brought out the community supporters to the curriculum members and we have subsequent answers and many of the questions were answered in the e-mails to the curriculum community members and polygraphs we have questions will innovation and lgbt students and where it says in the chapter that how they would help provide sport services and those questions were answered and we were directed to a location in the charter to look for those and as just stated here by mr. mcgloven that all of the things and particular areas that we believe p are throughout the sfusd one purpose building they'll encompasses all at one site some questions were answered in the document and i'll make sure that document gets to other commissioners it's quite robust and speaks to some of the questions that happen at the curriculum committee meeting it was a deeper conversation what one purpose commissioners mention they received charter approval if this happens at this school district in san franci

from the curriculum committee meeting we inventing send it forward to the board. >> i thank the petitioner for the subsequent action. >> yes. this was heard it was a relatively brief discussion as commissioner maufas noted most of the information was in the curriculum portion we forwarded it back to the full board with no recommendation. >> thank you very much now open for discussion board members yes commissioner wynns >> thank you. i want to thank everyone for coming tonight those are difficult decisions the board faces i thought seriously about this i think all of us building and have experienced that we what's been happening in the mission in san francisco san francisco unified school district is something that for many of us who have been revolved for a long time has been numerously important recently, we actually see really momentum for the work in the zone and the if anything investments and the professional development investments the focus we have there and commissioner maufas and i were looking at the school map earlier this evening about the meeting and looking at the schools th

although yes as stuffing preference we get ready for our board comments that is like our previous petitioner i want to say that you all were at the meeting as well i appreciate the way that you've been able to serve many of our families that have not been able to get the real nuance support system just the way it's been we are improving by leaps and bounds but i all do it well, the natural provocation for you to have a high school are i look forward to you continuing the good work with our students and treating them with such loving care but i'm going to be watching to make sure this is an ongoing effort like our previous petitioner in the same seat i trust you'll continue to do the good work i'll be supportive of this petition. >> commissioner haney (clapping.) is that a continuance of your first question. >> no. >> commissioner norton. >> thank you, sir a really quick question primarily april is the pricing of the piecemeal new. >> yes. it's new as chair mentioned the sfusd gave the guidance that was explicitly likely to have consistentcy with serving low income and underserved students. >

retirement system and also flag extremely low cash balances year one and two in their budget the petitioner supplied changes to the petition lower the salaries for teachers across the boards and benefits to address those concerns committee forwarded the petition back to the full board with no recommendation. >> thank you with without representation. >> and to the committee the board voted to deny the petition to the full board. >> thank you commissioner maufas. >> may i have a reading of the resolution by michael davis. >> thank you president fewer resolution is foorgs authorization to grant or alternative to deny the charter of san francisco charter. >> so is there that was a completed resolution? yeah. >> that's the title do you want the whole resolution. >> do we normally have a reading of the whole resolution; is that correct no okay. that's fine i think we've all read it quite frankly many times so we have public speakers signed up a few of them so everyone is granted two minutes (calling names) you know who you are

petitioners holding up papers documenting grievances they have against the government. petitioners have been crammed into us buses and will be take ton centers in the capital and shipped back to provinces. this is what justice often looks like in china. elsewhere in the capital, most are unaware of what's going on. at the same time, china's rulers are eholding a e ining a meetine law. for people like this, that means taking on the party, an impossible task. she shows me the flat where she was detained by police two days after complaining about a corrupt official. traumatized by her experiences, she tells me her farm land was seized against her wishes. >> translator: local fishes all protect each other. courts won't help. people spend years trying to resolve their problems legally. it never works no matter what we do. officials just bribe their way out of trouble. >> reporter: china's leaders may talk about the rule of law, but when faced with catalog of complaints, they resort to repression. bbc news, beijing. >>> breaking news in the course of "gmt" today. in the last

charter school pointing he petitions is a product of board policy so the normal route a chapter he petitioner presents an entire petition that has gone through the committee process and presented to the board for an undetermination of their approval or disapproval it is, however, not without the discretion of board if there are in the petition technical aspects that the petitioner will request to change it would be within the boards authority if they deserved to entertain a people time or resubmission and enter without going through the standards committee process if the board in their opinion the changes were relatively minor. >> so i'm saying the normal process is what i think you're telling or your president me to say vote up and down and if it's voted a brand new submissions would be handled through the normal process i am also saying though because this is a product of board policy you could modify that if you so desired am i i'm questioning i think i'm - >> well, so my question general

. >> in comments so to the petitioners i want to say thank you for a well-thought-out petition except for the 512 thing and you've been responsive everything i didn't see in the petition and for the listening audience i didn't see anything about the proposal and didn't see i wanted more information about the led and the issues and felt that was a low measure of achievement for students and didn't see a measure where it was comparing really english learnings with english only students around xhuchlt i feel we'll also have a gap and in the many meetings just everything ami i've asked you for you've been quick to respond with the precise answers i think the one thing we're grasping with the the ability to present a stable k c 12 curriculum and our school is designed for k through 12 penal dynamic a fan of a k 12 model in vision 2025 we're creating citizens that are confident enough to go out into the world when you go from an emergency room to a middle school in our district you go from a smaller you know cancel school to a larger school and once you've done that user you have this confi

it differentiates arkansas from every state mentioned by the petitioner and the united states. >> but you have no example of that ever happening. >> i have no example of a -- well, let me say this -- in our brief on footnote 13 and page 26 of the 18 states amicus brief there are examples. >> examples of what? >> of interprison identification problems with an escape happening in the prison, a beard being used for identification, and -- >> you have that same concern with the prisoners who have a very short beard for medical reasons? >> no. and let me explain why. there is confusion here as to what this so-called medical beard is. there is no exception in practice of a quantitative matter for medical beards. it is a means of shaving exception. in fact, our policy change to reflect our actual practice about a year ago. what the practice is, is when a doctor's order says the person has a skin condition or some other scarring or condition that needs to shave they use barber style clippers, electric clippers without a guard and they're used directly on the skin. and the result is a very clea

a term executive directors see congressional leaders congressional representatives legislators petitioner of students altogether see above the service of leg age. >> is there any additional public comment four or five seeing none, public comment is closed. >> president chiu. >> i have a number of amendments to ask the competent to adapt and hopefully for consideration next week. >> so in terms of the amendments president chiu has offered i mean, i'll support them subject to more information from the departments to see if we need to tweak any of those amendments but subject to it that request i'll support them today colleagues we'll take that without objection. >> i also want to clarify supervisor wiener made an additional amendment. >> i almost forgot by my own amendment we'll take that without objection. the amendment is adapted and mr. gibner those are not subjective. >> right. >> can i have a motion to forward item 4 to the full board with a positive recommendation. >> and to continue with to the call of the chair once upon a time . >> having you have two items and can you my apologies

do want to point out one thing that's when this charter was did understand the first thing the petitioners came to us and said we're not going to have a negative impact we're going to recruit all over the community so we won't be effecting our financial situation i think so there are lots of you know sort tensions to consider all those things but you know and i will take one second to say that's why i don't think that charter schools some participate in the fair uses i'll be quick so, i mean i think i haven't had an opportunity to come to the school i know we were trying to find the time what commissioner maufas said and dr. murase and president fewer said about how glerpsz makes me feel excited this school exists other than the site and had secretary and progress when the site and school was moving lecturer there was a lot of concern from our community to see it flufrn and your excited about the future of it is hopefully as a strict i want to xhupd commend you for what was not an easy transition at that site for reasons that are already been been discussed the fact unify moving in the rig

and it just makes sense to me for which all of the petitioners will be here in the room with the advocates to hear the report out. and it happened at the curriculum meeting and because it was, i think that the conversation was needed, and i believe that it would be better served if we report that part out and at the full board meeting, on september 23rd, if that is okay, with the board members, and our staff. >> and i will leave the rest of the report out to you commissioners. >> well it was an honor to serve last night as a deputy chair or your chair in training. last night. >> yeah. >> and she is my obi one of it. and so we had three items that we actually had, and it was a very long meeting that we are here to almost 11 last night and so thank you to the all of the staff and the members of the public who stuck with us through most of that. we had three informational items which were all really important and informative and the first was that we heard an update on the summer stem and steam activities that took place, and it was really an extraordinary and i think ground breaking, summer

there is focus on the petitioners religious practice. one is a convicted felon, he said his religion rights are infringed on prison requirements that he cut his beard. and a woman was discriminated against wearing a head scarf in a job interview at a major retailer. elections, fair housing and illegal fishing. one case comes from an amazon warehouse worker who said he should be paid for the time it takes him to clear security screening the company requires after he finishes his 12-hour shift filling orders. and there is an interesting free speech case. the court has been asked to determine if the threatening language a man aimed at his wife and posted on facebook constitutes a true threat. the woman felt her life was, indeed, at risk. >> the new supreme court term this time on the program, how will thee new cases fill in the over all picture in this new court. it's philosophies of nine members and leadership of the chief justices thomas roberts, and how could the decisions change the rules of the game in american daily life. joining us f

longer than observeing and learning i'm going to go supporter as you've heard from the previous petitioner i also at the end not to think poster of something new i think you're doing a great job my daughter struggled electro this school system i'm really kind of giving it a second chance with any granddaughter that's 3 years old now i'm watching closely but i think you've proven user and served the students and served them well but to the folks that came to speak from king i said earlier in class i didn't see alex but it's exciting i appreciate our energy i meandered through my comments i'll be supporting you will all from the surrounding area because i believe there is a restrictness of academic excellence among the residence i don't live in the bayview by live down the street not longs ago there for 10 years i believe in the bayview and the valley and know you're going to serve them well. >> commissioner wynns. >> thank you okay. i'm not going to support f this i have to say i was kind of stunned by the answers that the budget committee about k 12 essentially we have for profit companies

. >> he's the main petitioner in a challenge to the license renewal of wwxxfm. a sports radio station licensed to red zebra run by redskins owner dan snyder. in the filing he argues the fcc wouldn't sanction stations using racial slurs on the air. >> treat it exactly like you do the n word or the word for hispanics or asians or jews. >> in a response the fcc red zebra says the objections amount to nothing more than a frivolous attempt to goad the commission into banning the team name of washington d.c.'s nfl franchise from the nation's air waves. red zebra argues the debate should be decided in the marketplace and not by the fcc. "such a viewpoint based regulation is subject to strict scrutiny under the first amendment and is almost universally condemned by the supreme court." native american groups have added to the fcc file on the issue. some of the commissioners have made statements the redskins name may be on beingable. >> this is an issue already -- objectionable. >> this is an issue already before them and yet they are speaking out in my favor. >> it doesn

norton said i will postpone my report until the next regular board meeting with the petitioners b will come before the entire bfks a brief update for the school quality improvement system the u.s. department of the education has approved our waiver to continue the implementation of the quality improvement all succulence were approved for a one year extension and sfusd staff continues their work in meeting the waiver requirements which is included the work in implementing the core common core standards in our smarter assessments and working in in conjunction with the other core districts to put together the interventions and the next report will be on the updates will be the accountability system and the dates and locations will be post on our website so, please wwwsf e d u and i think you can put in the search s qi s and get the information if you're watching it at home. >> thank you very much any other board reports and commissioner wynns and i want to announce there's no rules committee meeting this month they're not really my referrals to the committee maybe it's because we're waiti

. >> it please the court, arkansas security objectives are undermined by the petitioner spared becausee it to alter his appearance and ken do this in our maximum-security unique environment. >> i thought it was conceded that the present could take a photograph at intake. >> your honor, that is not on the record and i can see that that was not addressed with standard in this case. the record testimony was not satisfactory. let me get to this. >> there are two points and one is identification within the prison itself and i want to give that up in one second. and one is the screw. her testimony on that was not engaging in the question and there's no record testimony regarding that. so let me get the identification >> what about the testimony on questions such as that? if you are claiming that if he escapes he can shave off his half-inch beard and thereby alter his appearance, and the responses just take a photograph of him before he takes the time to grow his half-inch beard, why do you need that evidence on that point? it seems to me that it obvious. what prevents you from taking a photo

our petitioners were arrested and intimidated on and on, so we compiled this major pre-fast in the federal elections commission to investigate and they turned it down and never sent a brief to in effect the defendant. and if they paralyzed agency because it is three-three enabled break free-three in deadlock. so i would really urge the complete abolition of it and then start new in a much more effective than simpler manner because there are bad behaviors between parties and candidates that have to be dealt with. not the way the fcc has been doing for even been avoiding do anything because they're totally deadlock. any major accusation against one party or the other. >> i will just say this brings up exactly my skepticism. this organization doesn't work. it's been captured by the powers, so let's scrap to make a new one. it sounds to me like lucy pulled the football away from charlie brown last time, but this time they will hold it. saying it almost suggests the problem with something just in this particular government institution and if we can just wipe it clean and make a new government i

you're all interested in international affairs, or you are students of international affairs or petitioners. you know that this is not always a given. this is something we had to sustain through our own red ability, but it is also something that was clearly a choice. this was throughout the ukraine crisis and throughout many in the regions, and that is quite unique. equally so, member states put their resources and assets where they were needed. this is one of the few, i think, u.n. operations, in particular, that was not short of funding. this was never the question, and i am looking at a colleague of mine in the audience. often, we are not in this privileged position, so it was interesting indication to me, as well, of the importance. resources. technology. the fleet. other information. whatever was required, it was provided. oath in a multilateral setting and through the joint mission but also bilaterally, and the chinese -- people's republic of china invited assets also bilaterally to the syrian, as did the russian federation, whatever was required for the success, at least to do as muc

for the regular person to lose five petitioner in five days that's a big deal.rs are talking about now is where is the bottom. they don't spend so muuh time trying to actually pick the bottom. on the contrary, heard a lot of them talking about the fact that you buy throughout and then you even it out. in the mmantime it's pretty tough to stomach these big news. take a look at goldman sachs. down 2.7 percent. at the moment. particularly with the bond trading revenue. that was good news. the big picture we were down over 200 points today and it's the 19th straight day of volatility. i know you know we've had some month of october and october is already one of those months that makes people nervous because it's 1929. perri: tell me exactly whaa you think of this maybe you don't advice people to buy, the -- the big financial institutes have been the ones complaining that they needed volatility to make money on trades perhaps it's the really blow it out of the water. just because something is down today, doesn't mean it will be down later. >> the volume -- today no d

those petitioners, significantly include 20 pulitzer prize winners -- bungled cia operation in iran that appeared in his 2006 book state of war. we are pleased and honored that james risen who's still under threat of prison could be with us today. the national press club presented mr. risen its domestic freedom of the press award in 2012 for a career of reporting material the government would prefer to keep from public view, from warrantless surveillance to the botched program to give iran flawed nuclear weapons designs and he was also -- for getting them to reveal his confidential sources. i'm proud under the leadership of john donnelly has continued to support mr. risen as well as today's petition. i would like to introduce norman soloman, co-founder of brooks action.org and executive director of the institute for public accuracy, is author of a dozen books on media and public policy and is a recipient of the annual ruben salazar journalism award as well as the george or well award. >> thank you. thanks. here we are in the -- and i think it's very fitting because it was 60 years ago th

there are needs of the docket and should be put above the need of petitioner. >> this is my response.ment request, because other cases falling during her maternity leave. not that this case came up three times, and continued, continued. >> she took this case a month before. should sheave taken the case? do you see a problem with that? >> i don't see a problem with. that you're saying to pregnant women, can you earn your keep. >> should a person leave their baby in hands of someone else and went as far as to ridicule here, not for bringing the baby to the court house but exposing germs to the court house. he was pretty harsh. >> she called her pediatrician. i don't know what to do. my husband is truck driver. he is on the road. judge ordered me to court. the pediatrician said keep her close to your body, facing you, you should be fine and the judge ripped into her. >> we found him. the world's only living heart donor is that judge. >> pregnant women, they could have some crazy, cravings sometimes. you have heard of pickles, ice cream. but when it comes to chocolate, one study says ther

you talk to investors, let me have a ten petitioner pullback. here is your 10 percent pullback now take advantage and buy into it. charles: the oldest axiom is buy low, sell high. when it's getting low, people are afraid. >> you might see too some of the younger investors that are getting comfortable getting into the market and last week and today is going to give them a little scare. they don't know what to do. so -- charles: you're the guy, you believe the markets -- you don't try dictate the markets as much as follow the markets. you're a young investor. you got into this recently. you bought x, y, z, what do you do? >> the shorter the time horizon, the more difficult it is to make money. certainly when you get to the day -- interday trading. i think you should try to go to vegas at least get some free drinks out of it. when you're talking about regis in the morning and selling in the afternoon, ugoing to lose money. you want to be looking a couple weeks out. and ideally a couple years. when i'm wrong, i'm a trader. i'm an investor when i'm r

those petitioners, significantly include 20 pulitzer prize winners -- bungled cia operation in iran that appeared in his 2006 book state of war. we are pleased and honored that james risen who's still under threat of prison could be with us today. the national press club presented mr. risen its domestic freedom of the press award in 2012 for a career of reporting material the government would prefer to keep from public view, from warrantless surveillance to the botched program to give iran flawed nuclear weapons designs and he was also -- for getting them to reveal his confidential sources. i'm proud under the leadership of john donnelly has continued to support mr. risen as well as today's petition. i would like to introduce norman soloman, co-founder of brooks action.org and executive director of the institute for public accuracy, is author of a dozen books on media and public policy and is a recipient of the annual ruben salazar journalism award as well as the george or well award. >> thank you. thanks. here we are in the -- and i think it's very fitting because it was 60 years ago th

our petitioners were arrested

out of the shadows here is what i believe will happen that the red forint and those who are his petitionershe fates base community will unite with the democrats i think we started off fighting for nicaraguans i believe that she will fight and everybody in this room is ready for that kind of fight just imagine the president of the united states makes it announcement we get ready to register and the publican majority decides to obstruct the process that will be the end of the republican party as a national party in the united states of america. not because they did not act it is the last pact understand this. we all understand the house and did not come through. better health care. they did not come through. better education we get all of that this is different concrete example of justice for our community of people so i am ready for the president to act and whoever attacks a decision of the president could be justice and fairness to millions of undocumented immigrants i am ready for that fight to join everybody in that room to win that fight. [applause] >> don't lose hope the value of the su

our petitioners were harassed and intimidated on and on so we compiled this major revamping of the federal elections commission to investigate and they turned it down and never since the brief to in effect the defendants, it is paralyzed agency because it is 3-3 and the will break 3-3 in deadlock, three republicans, three democrats so i urge the complete abolition of that and start new in a much more effected and simpler manner because there are bad behavior is between parties and candidates that have to be dealt with but not the way the fcc has been doing or even been avoiding. they are totally deadlocked. any major accusation against one party or the other. >> i will just say this brings up exactly my skepticism, when you say this organization doesn't work, it has been captured by the power so let's scrap and make a new one. it sounds to me like lucy pulled the football away from charlie brown last time but this time -- it almost suggests the problem with something just in this particular government institution and if we can just wipe it clean and make a new government institution that w

our petitioners were harassed and intimidated on and on premise of the compiled this major brief, asking federal elections commission to investigate and they turned it down and never sent a brief to and affect the defendant at the paradise agent because it's going to break through with, three democrats. i would urge to flee you are is a new manner because there are candidate would have to be dealt with. but not the way the fec has been doing it. they are totally outlawed. any major accusation against one party or the other. to this brings up that way myself is your sister. let's make a new one. it finds to me like lucy pulled the football away from charlie brown last time, but trying to say it almost suggests the problem with something just in this particular government institution and we can just wipe it clean and make a new government institution, that one won't be captured by the powers of the industry and that is always for my skepticism pops up. they got captured last time. it will be captured this time. it will become that again. >> i also worried about that, too, tim. but i don't

you're all interested in international affairs, or you are students of international affairs or petitionersyou know that this is not always a given. this is something we had to sustain through our own red ability, but it is also something that was clearly a choice. this was throughout the ukraine crisis and throughout many in the regions, and that is quite unique. equally so, member states put their resources and assets where they were needed. this is one of the few, i think, u.n. operations, in particular, that was not short of funding. this was never the question, and i am looking at a colleague of mine in the audience. often, we are not in this privileged position, so it was interesting indication to me, as well, of the importance. resources. technology. the fleet. other information. whatever was required, it was provided. oath in a multilateral setting and through the joint mission but also bilaterally, and the chinese -- people's republic of china invited assets also bilaterally to the syrian, as did the russian federation, whatever was required for the success, at least to do as much