petitioners going door to door in richmond searching for signatures. why one man says their tactics are alarming. >> and from the kpix 5 weather center, good morning, everyone. we have a big change in your weather forecast today. yeah, it will be cooler. but the weather feature you need to know about coming up. >> and we have roadwork this morning in san rafael. northbound 101 approaching 580. i'll let you know if it's slowing down traffic and give slowing down traffic and give you a complete ,,,,,,,,,,,, we live in a pick and choose world. choose, choose, choose. but at bedtime? ...why settle for this? enter sleep number... right now all beds are on sale. sleepiq technology tells you how well you slept and what adjustments you can make. you like the bed soft. he's more hardcore. so your sleep goes from good to great to wow! only at a sleep number store. right now save 50% on the labor day limited edition bed, plus 24-month special financing. hurry ends monday! >>> wednesday, 5:09. high temperature 78 degrees. i'm looking ahead to thursday. are you rea

petitioner versus arizona. >> arguments number eight team, broke the way. >> madison is the most famouscase this court never decided. >> judge here it existed as of late people here on my end where slavery was not legally recognized. >> putting the decision into effect would take presidential orders in the presence of federal troops and marshals and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that change the direction and import of the court and society can also change society. ♪ >> so she told them they would have to have a search and mrs. snape demanded to see the paper into reader. which they refuse to do, so she grabbed it out of his hand to look out of and thereafter the police officer handcuffed her. >> i can imagine a better way to bring the constitution to lay the natal in the human stories behind gray supreme court cases. >> great core monster boldly opposed the internment of japanese-americans during world war ii after being convicted for failing to report for relocation, mr. kana to take his case all the way to the supreme court. >> in her most famous decisions are on

>> so this is another area in which i think the petitioners brief is a little ambiguous and i think at the reply stage exactly or position the implications for the u.s. house of representatives but right now they have said you shouldn't rely on the federal analogy even if it had a different population rule. so that's what they are coming in position is that they haven't actually said whether they think and you can correct me if you read it differently they have actually said what the rule is for the house of representatives. you could draw a distinction based on the specific text of the constitution but the specific text of the constitution is only telling you about how to apportion representatives among the states and not have the state should draw lines. you could draw a distinction based on that but you could also just say if one person one vote is about voting the same rule to apply. >> i agree with everything you said with one caveat which is that under current law there is a difference between how person one vote applies to congressional and throughout this we talk about equality

. >> they paid professional petitioners two are providing really false information. >> reporter: richmond city councilwoman beckel says it is not clear who they are. she thinks it is landlords and lobbyists who have the money and land power to repeal the law that she says protects voters from massive rent increases. >> without this ordnance in place, we would have a lot of families that would be displaced. >> zach ware has seen the petitioners all over richmond and says the tactics are alarm. >> they are raising the alarm bells because this is a form of voter suppression. >> reporter: they are anding out fliers telling people not to sign the petition. 4,000 signatures could push a vote on the ordnance back to 2016. christin ayers, kpix5. >>> a san francisco police officer is being investigated tonight. a woman says he raped her. the victim told police he pinned him down and forced himself on her last month after she said no. the officer said he and the woman had been drinking and he can't remember what happened. >>> tonight, cal police are looking into a report that a woman was sexually a

and it's not obvious that this actually matters to any of the petitioners. but it is something that the judge pointed out. and i don't think it's a strong argument that the government has. to the extent there is a petitioner out there who really cares about having to identify their employer for the government and thereby help the government with this scheme, i'm pretty sure the justices will say the government doesn't have a justification, but that punts the case to the bigger questions which are, number one, is there a substantial burden and if so, if the government can identify itself that it's aetna or bluecross, can it require that entity to provide the cost-free coverage to employees. and we can talk, if you're interested, about how that scheme works. and in most cases it's either a benefit to the insurer or the government reimburses the third party administrators for their costs. i won't make a prediction on the merits. my views are pretty well known. i think the government ought to win. but again it's up to justice kennedy, as is becoming a theme here

they hope to stop the petitioners from gathering over 4,000 signatures by friday which could push a votethe rent ordinance back to 2016. in richmond, christin ayers, kpix 5. >>> san jose once step closer to helping its renters. right now rent can be raised 8% a year. the city council is moving forward with a new proposal to lower the amount. it the would make it illegal for landlords to evict tenants so they can raise the rent. the average rent in the city is about $2,200 a month. >>> want breakfast but don't want to wake up early to get it? there's good news. mcdonald's just announced it will begin carrying its breakfast menu all day starting october 6. mark it on your calendars. egg mcmuffins, hash browns and biscuits will be available anytime. mcdonald's officials hope the change will boost a slump in sales. you know how many times i wanted pancakes at 6 p.m.? >> a dozen? [ laughter ] >> egg mcmuffins are great and around 10:30, 11:00, they shut down breakfast. >> sometimes it's a long drive and kids want breakfast get them some pancakes and you're on the road. >> i have no idea what

. >> petitioner versus arizona. >> number 18 roe versus wade. >> madison and madison is probably themost famous case this court ever decided. they existed when slavery here on land wasn't legally recognized. the courage of children, we wanted to pick cases that change the direction and changed society. >> so she told them they would have to have a search and she demanded to see the paper and read it to see what it was. she grabbed it out of his hands to look at it and thereafter the police officer. >> i can imagine a better way to bring the constitution to life than telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases after being convicted for failing to report for the relocation he took his case all the way to the supreme court. >> quite often in many of our most famous decisions are ones that the court took that were quite unpopular if you had to pick one freedom that was the most essential to the functioning of a democracy, it has has to be freedom of speech. >> let's go to a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of 310 m

they dismissed the petitioners as unscrupulous and agitators. privately lugard admitted he believed charges of torture by the french troops but he thought as long as those states cooperated, central reports, applied to petitions, pledged their devotion to the sacred trust, the mandate commission should support them. the league's publicity apparatus sent those perceptions around the world. any. of the early 20s, the mandate system worked to stabilize the imperial settlement. so how did it come and stay to undermine imperial authority? the third part of the book, the simple edge is that germany joined the league. why was this so significant? germany had owned most of those territories. in 1919, germany had been required to surrender its colonial empire. it became, in other words, the first postcolonial great power. it didn't want that distinction. all parties in germany except the communists consider procedures unjust. all resented the argument that germany will have been particularly brutal. all were committed to recovering the territory. led by

and it's not obvious that this actually matters to any of the petitioners. and i don't think it's a strong argument that the government has. to the extent there is a petitioner out there who really cares about having to identify their employer for the government and thereby help the government, i'm pretty sure the justices will say the government stbt ha doesn't have a justification, but that punts the case to the bigger questions which is there a substantial burden and if so, if the government can identify itself that it's aetna or blue cross, can it require that entity to provide the cost-free coverage to employees. and we can talk if you're interested about how that scheme works and that in most cases it's either a benefit to the insurer or the government reimburses the third party administrators for their costs. i won't make a rprediction on te merits. but again it's up to justice can k kennedy. and it's not entirely -- i think he wants to provide universal coverage for employees of this cost-free contraception. i think his vote will depend largely on th

we represent several of the petitioners in these cases.i take issue with about 890% of what marty said. i will keep it to a few. >> that is generous characterization. >> we represent some universities in texas and some in the fifth circuit case and represent the little sisters of the poor in the 10th circuit case. just one kind of procedural observation about all this. i don't know what cases the court is going to grant here but if it were really as anxious as it seems to defer to the government's suggestion about what is the best petition in which to resolve the case then i'm not sure why they decided to pull the d.c. circuit cases from the conference which they did before the split developed from the 8th circuit. they had already decided to pull that from the long conference and reschedule all the cases until what it looks like they're doing is waiting for the little sisters and other petition out of the 10th circuit to be fully briefed which i think the government got an extension and won't actually be briefed for a few more weeks at th

and the petitioners have pointed out in this case that there are grandfathering and waiver provisions available to other surgical centers if they can show the compliance with building requirements is not necessary to promote women's health. i don't think that's the end of the case for him but i do think it raises sufficient red flag for him to want to see exactly what evidence supports each of these restrictions. and so that part of it i don't think he would agree with the fifth circuit, but where that leaves us i'm not sure. i don't think you will agree that stake in offload its constitutional responsibility to some of the state. maybe that's a pejorative way of putting it. the way the fifth circuit would put it is i think ther there's o undue burden if i can go to a facility across state lines and get the abortion that they need. will so i'm not and have never been the best reader of justice kennedy, and maybe others on the panel -- maybe others on the panel are. i'm not prepared to venture an opinion yet. so anybody else have thoughts on this particular one? any questions from the

. >>> nine people dead over 30 people are injured in an explosion, these are the latest petitioner we're getting from the scene in the yemeni capital is sanaa. we'llbury you more as soon as we get it in al jazeera. >>> leaders pledge an extra $1 billion to u.n. agencies dealing with the refugee cries. the meeting was overshadowed by a dispute over tuesday's deal of mandatory quotas to member states, to relocate 120,000 refugees. >> it is clear that the greatest tide is yet to come. therefore we need to correct the policy of open doors and windows. now the focus should be on the proper protection of our external borders and external assistance to refugees and the countries in our neighborhood. in light of this, leaders have agreed on increased help to lebanon jordan, turkey and other countries in the region. >> the volkswagen emissions cheating scandal has claimed its first baig casualty, the man at thbig casualties, ceo martinwin. sent volkswagen stock plummeting. here is rob reynolds. >> company executive martin winterkorn is out. >> part of it was the offer by dr. winterkorn to step do

now republican brothers and sisters tried to petitioner to referendum to do. we took our justice the people at the polls and we won by overwhelming margins with actions and not words. [applause] wife katie and i have four great kids. our oldest daughter grace is a first grade teacher in baltimore city public schools. [applause] true story. after her father announced for president about 100 days ago, she returned to her first grade class at walter elementary, adorable, eager to learn and one hundred percent african-american kids. a little girl came up to her and there was a buzz in the classroom and she talked to by the sleeve and she said -- miss o'malley, i am not so sure about this idea of your father when he for president because quite frankly, i kind of like barack obama. [laughter] [applause] well, a lot of us like barack obama. [cheering] we have come a long way since the wall street crash and the bush recession of 2008 when our country teetered on the brink of a second great depression, we elected a new leader and barack obama to move our country forwar

and there are accusations that the group of petitioners seeking to overturn the measures were providing false information. >> do we have rent control now? >> only 10,000 people will be affected. >> so i might not be covered? >> yes. >> it doesn't apply to the whole city?>> so if i sign this, i'll have that control?>> yes. >> that is a cell phone video showing signature rather is talking about richmond's new rental ordinance, the california organization is collecting signatures to block it, councilwoman thinks the people behind the petitioner landlords and lobbyists. >> without this ordinance in place we will have a lot of families that will be disgraced. >> the rent control ordinance would set up a rent control board annual rent hikes. the audience now need to signatures if they want to take it to the ballot. a lot of those petition gatherers, i realize it's the only way you can get things done in many respects, but they're outside the grocery store, you are distracted, how are you ever supposed to wrap your mind around an issue before you sign up for it? back were basically they give y

they hope to stop petitioners from gathering just over 4,000 signatures by friday. >>> finding a roommate and sharing rent costs just got easier. a new app promises to help residents find compatible living companions. the app developed in san francisco uses an algorithm similar to those used by dating apps. use verse to answer questions about their life, interest, food preferences and more. >>> a warning to tenants renting out their rooms or homes, will now be loud and clear, the governor signed a bill today requiring "airbnb" type websites to notify tenants they could be evicted if they sublet their homes. the california apartment association says vacation rentals puts other people in danger by bringing unscreened people into the complexes. >>> will tom brady play or not? what the san mateo native had to say about his off season. >> plus, hollywood's take on the nfl's concussion crisis. how the league is reacting to a new movie about players. >> from the kpix 5 weather center in san francisco, let's head 60 miles due south to san jose. currently 71 degrees. the winds are calm there. but

forces create that pressure to come here, create those immigrants and create those jobs, and for petitioner worse that's the challenge that the country is facing in 2016 and what we will have to deal with. >> host: steve ven in decatur, im, you have 30 seconds. >> caller: good day. i thought i would bring up -- i heard a very sad thing about legislature in missouri passing laws to restrict children who are brought here when they were very young from going to college, making their college cost three to four times more, in other words, saying we need to be less generous, less humane or less democratic. we have to single out mostly singling out latinos. who are here through the dream act and i want to get your opinion on that. it's a sad situation. >> guest: that's a fascinating question, and it's a really important divider because people look at the country and they look at the laws in two different ways. of you have someone who came here at two or three years old and spent the rest of their development as a human being in this country, speak english, been to school here, they know no other h

number 69, petitioner versus arizona. >> roe versus wade. >> march bury and madison is probably the most famous case this court has ever decided. >> dred and

facilities to promote women's health to show that that to those that propose greater risks and the petitioners pointed out in this case that there are grandfathering provisions i don't think that is the end of the case and what supports these restrictions so i don't think they will agree with that tenth circuit but i don't think it can offload the constitutional responsibilities may be for another state that is a pejorative way to put it but to go to the facility to go the abortion -- go get the abortion that i need. i have never been the best reader of justice kennedy or others but i do think it comes down but mentally see everything in this case by not prepared to venture an opinion yet. does anybody else have thoughts. >> we are getting near the end but if you would like to stick around a little longer we will do some other cases may be too to see who will stay and who doesn't but these are the two big cases so let's see if we can do that. you have tyson foods which i think looking at the amicus support that is the biggest business case this term. >> with tyson foods looking at the latest o

the honorable supreme court of the united states are admonished to give their attention. 9, the petitioner versus [indiscernible] roe against wade. >> it is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. voted againstet people here on land where slavery was not recognized. >> the president -- presence of federal troops and marksman, and of the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that changed the direction and import of the court, and then changed society -- and that changed society. them and had to have a section. she meant -- demanded to see it. she grabbed it out of his hands. a better waymagine to bring the constitution to life than by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. boldly opposed the forced internment of japanese americans during world war ii. after being convicted for failing to report for relocation, mr. kormantsu took his case all the way before the supreme court. the ones we were member other ones the court took that were quite unpopular. >> if you had to pick one freedom that was the most essential to the functioning of the democrac

that this court is not open to just the wealthy and the powerful but as we'll learn tonight for petitioners from all walks of society and that's an important lesson for us to understand. so, what i want to show you next is out of that genesis of the constitution center dinner and going back and pitching to my colleagues about the fact that we should do this. i want to show you the trailer that's going to introduce the october 5th series "landmark cases historic supreme court decisions" with c-span and constitution center. let's take a look. ♪ >> all persons having business before the honorable supreme court of the united states are admonished to draw near and give their attention. >> number 759 earnest petition versus united states. >> marbury versus madison is the most famous case. >> this couple were enslaved here on this land where slavery wasn't legally recognized. >> putting the brown decision into effect would take presidential orders. and the presence much federal troops and marshals. and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that changed the direction and import of the

number 69, petitioner versus arizona. >> roe versus wade. >> march bury and madison is probably the most famous case this court has ever decided. >> dred and marian existed on land here where slavery wasn't legally recognized. >> putting the brown decision into effect would take federal orders and marshals and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that changed the direction and import of the court in society and that also changed society. >> so she told them that they'd have to have a search warrant, and mrs. mapp demanded to see the paper and to read and see what it was, which they refused to do, so she grabbed it out of his hands to look at it, and thereafter, the police officer handcuffed her. >> i can't imagine a better way to bring the constitution to life than by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. >> fred kormatsu boldly opposed the forced interment of japanese americans during world war ii. after being convicted for failing to report for relocation, mr. kormatsu took his case all the way to the supreme court. >> quite often in our most famous

. >> caller: hi, petitioner, hi, mr. brokaw. this is a question for mr. brokaw, but before i give my question i want to say i saw the exchange of mr. mccullough and mr. brokaw and brought tears to my eyes. it was just wonderful. my question is, i'm a retired nurse, worked for 35 years. my own mother-in-law is very ill right now, and we're working on getting her some long-term help. my question is that in your book, you kept talking about a -- having a liaison or am ombudsman to navigate all the physicians and everybody that is in on the case. i am doing that for my mother-in-law, but the normal american patient does not have access to a person like that. how or where can that person -- can the people get to that person? >> guest: well, one of the things -- i think i understand the question, peter. how do you get access to the best care, find out what is going on? there are not a lot of sites. there's something called the multiple myleloma research foundation, it's a clearinghouse where you can go on and find out what this latest information, best techniqu

. >> somesome great petitioner. dave kaplan is the director of the yogi berra museum, in little falls, missouri where fans have set up a memorial. we're sorry for the loss of your friend. would you give us a sense of what his life was like the last couple of years? >> well, i.t. wa it was sad in y ways, because his beloved wife carmen had passed away about a year and a half ago. and yogi was not mobile. his mind was good. he watched all the games. he chatted with friends. but you know i think all those years of squatting sort of took a toll on him. and he was -- you know, he turned 90 in may and i think age finally took its toll. >> you met yogi 20 years ago. can you tell us a little bit about that meeting? >> yeah well i live in mont claire where the museum is and yogi has been a resident of mont claire over a half century. i know he has always been amazingly giving for so many causes here in this community. whether it be schools, hospitals, the salvation army. he was just a wonderful civic treasure, if you will. h

the pope, actors and activists and 250,000 moveon.org petitioners supporting this stay of execution. alison: a live oak at the capitol for you where the house will elect a leadership to replace john boehner october 8. right now the house is getting ready to vote on a spending bull to avoid a shutdown. they are cutting it close with the midnight deadline. >> the senate moved a step closer to avert a government shutdown. >> the ayes are 78. nays are 20. the motion to concur is agreed to. >> it will allow the lawmakers ten weeks to negotiate a budget deal. >> it has passed a continuing resolution to keep the lights on and keep the government employees paid. to paid the military and make sure the veterans get the benefit. >> it hardly is my preferred method for funding the government but it's the viable way forward. >> the future of the ability to pay the bill hangs on the house. several tea party republicans vowed to vote against any measure that didn't defund planned parenthood. >> they are passing a budget. that is the responsibility. >> the speaker of the house will be elected next w

. >> petitioner versus maryland. >> number 18, wrote the way. >> madison is by the famous ca case. >>isted as in slate people here on land where slavery wasn't legally recognized spent putting the brown decision in tibet would take presidential orders come and the presence of federal troops and the marshals, and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that change the direction and import of society and also changed society. >> so she told them that they would have to have a search warrant, and she demanded to see the paper and to read it. which they refused to do so she grabbed it out of his hands to look at it, and that after the police officer handcuffed her. >> i can't imagine a better way to bring the constitution to live than by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. >> he boldly opposed forced internment of japanese-americans during world war ii. >> after being convicted for failing to report for relocati relocation, mr. korematsu took his case all the way to the supreme court. >> quite often in many of our most famous decisions and ones that the

petitioner versus arizona. >> we hear arguments for number 18 road the way. >> madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >> it existed as enslaved people here on land where slavery wasn't legally recognized. >> putting a decision in effect would take presidential orders, the presence of federal troops and the marshals, and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that change the direction and import of the site and also changed society. >> so she told them that they would have to have a search, and she demanded to see the paper and read it and see what it was, which they refused to do so she grabbed it out of his hands and looked at it, and after the police officer handcuffed her. >> i can't imagine a better way to bring constitution to light by telling him stories been great supreme court cases. >> the boldly opposed forced internment of japanese-americans during world war ii. after being convicted for failing to report for relocation, he took his case all the way to the supreme court spirit quite often enemy of our most famous decisions are ones tha

petitioner versus arizona. wade. versus >> it is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. here on land slavery wasn't legally recognized. >> putting this to affect would take federal orders and the presence of troops and marshals and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that changed direction and also changed society. >> she told him they would have to have a search. they refused to do, so she grabbed it out of his hands to look at it and thereafter the police officer handcuffed her. better waythink of a to bring the constitution to life than by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. he boldly imposed the force internment of japanese americans during world war ii. after being convicted for failing to report for relocation , he took his case all the way to the supreme court. >> quite often in many of our mages decisions are ones that the court took that were quite unpopular. >> if you had to pick one freedom that was the most essential to the functioning of the democra

ernest, petitioner, versus arizona. barbara madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. judge and harriet existed as laypeople here on land where slavery was not legally recognized. >> putting the brown decision into effect would take presidential orders in the presence of federal troops and marshals and the courage of children. to take cases that changed the direction of the court in society and also changed society. >> so she told them that they would have to have a search warrant. papers. map conceded the to read what it was. once they refused to do so, she grabbed it out of his stance to look at it and thereafter, the police officer handcuffed her. >> i cannot imagine a better way to bring the constitution to like that by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. opposed the forced internment of japanese americans during world war ii. after being convicted for failing to report for relocation, mr. carr matsuo took his case all the way to the supreme court. >> quite often, in s

petitioners' conviction is hereby vacated.ll have 120 days from the date of this order to release or retry randy steidl. >> when judge mccuskey granted me a new trial, i was still holding my breath because i'd watched guys on death row get a new trial and have the attorney general appeal it and have it taken away, and within 60 days they're strapped to a gurney being executed. >> one thing i could state with a degree of confidence in this business, there's no certainty. no certainty at all. >> randy's fate would now rest in the hands of illinois's new attorney general, lisa madigan who would decide to release randy or try him again. callahan knew he'd have to get his findings to madigan now or live forever with the knowledge that he'd failed to help set an innocent man free. kaboom... get your credit swagger on. go to experian.com. become a member of experian credit tracker and take charge of your score. ♪ ♪ ♪ take a look at these bbq best cracked pepper sauce... most ribs eaten while calf roping... yep, greatness deserves rec

supply in court of the united states should go and get their attention. >> december 7 1959, petitioner versus arizona. >> it's probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >> judge harriet existed asas slave people here on land, whereized. slavery wasn't legally eff recognized. >> putting the brown decision into effect would take presidential orders. the presence of federal troops and marshals, and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that change the direction and import also of the court society and also change society. >> so she told them that they would have to have a search and they demanded to see the paper to to see what it was. when she refused to do so she grabbed it out of his hand to look at it and stare at it.ehind the police officer handcuffed her. >> i can imagine a better way to bring the constitution to life them by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. >> >> the lawsuit boldly oppose therl japanese-americans during world war ii. after being convicted of failing to report for relocation, theyte took the case all the way to t

. >> the petitioner verses arizona. >>. >> marbury madison is probably the most important case the court ever decided. >> here on land with slavery was not even recognize. >> to put into presidential orders and the courage of children. >> we wanted those that changed society. >> but to have a search warrant and demanded to see the paper and read it to see what was. she grab data in his hand to look at it and the police officer handcuffed her. >> to tell the human stories behind a great supreme court cases. >> the force and chairman of japanese americans and after being convicted for relocation he took his case all the way to the supreme court. >> most quite often they were unpopular. >> to pick one freedom is the most essential but to illustrate dramatically what it means to live it in a society that help stick together because they believe in the rule of law. r.r. mr. reid: mr. president this >> this great cemetery you call arlington for a courageous service member who gave his life in combat. he gives his life from new jersey only 20 years old. he was a muslim. and by all accounts is a

. >> number 759, ernest miranda, the petitioner, versus arizona. >> roe versus wade. >> marbury and madison is the most famous case. >> they existed as enslaved people here on land where slavery wasn't legally recognized. >> putting the brown decision into effect would take presidential orders, and the presence of federal troops and marshals and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that changed the direction of the court in society and that also changed society. >> so, she told them that they'd have to have a search warrant. and, mrs. mapp demanded to see the paper and to read it and see what it was, which they refused to do, so she grabbed it out of his hand to look at it, and thereafter, the police officer handcuffed her. >> i can't imagine a better way to bring the constitution to life than by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. >> fred komatsu opposed the forced interment of japanese americans during world war ii. after being convicted of failing to report, he took his case all the way to the supreme court. >> quite often in many of our most famous

as many of my colleagues have said so eloquently, the harsh truth of the matter is that for petitioners, companies, and communities, justice is being delayed and, thus, denied. and the same storyline is playing out in courtrooms throughout the country. this is not how our judicial system is supposed to work. and it should be, mr. president, an easy problem to rectify. right now there are 13 noncontroversial judges on the executive calendar and three more reported out of committee today. of those, three are highly qualified judges from new york, including one from the western district. i know these nominees. they're brilliant legal minds, experienced jurists. above all, they're moderate. i believe in moderation in the judges i choose. larry valardo and ann donnelly with two i've recommended and leshann dearcy hall was recommended by senator gillibrand. they should all be confirmed, but we don't know when they'll come up for a vote. all of thes these nominees excey standards for judicial nominees. in his or her own way, each brings excellence, moderation and diversity to the federal bench

versuser 759, petitioner parizeau. >> row against wade. mostdison was probably the famous case this court ever decided. asdredd and harriet existed enslaved people on land where slavery was not the recognized. >> putting the decision into effect would take presidential orders in the presence of federal troops and marshals, and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that change the direction and imported the court in society and also changed society. >> so, she told them that they would have to have a search, and she demanded to see the paper and to read it, see what it was, which they refused to do, so she grabbed it out of his hands and looked at it, and thereafter the police officer handcuffed her. >> i can't imagine a better way to bring the constitution to life than bringing the true stories behind great supreme court cases. >> boldly opposed the forced internment of japanese americans during world war ii. after being convicted for failing to report for relocation, mr. karamatzu took his case all the way before the drinker

before the honorable, the supreme court of the united states, are admonished to -- >> number 759, petitioner> arguments number 18, roe against wade. >> marbury and madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decide canned. >> dredd and harriet existed as enslaved people on land where slavery wasn't legally recognized. >> putting the brown decision into effect would take presidential orders, and the presence of federal troops and marshals. and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that changed the direction and um port of the court -- import of the court in society and that also changed society. ♪ ♪ >> so she told them that they'd have are to have a search warrant, and mrs. mapp demanded to see the paper and to read it, see what it was, which they refused to do. so she grabbed it out of his hand to look at it, and thereafter the police officer handcuffed her. >> i can't imagine a better way to bring the constitution to life than by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. [applause] >> koramatsu boldly opposed the forced internment of japanese-ame

petitioner versus arizona. >> number 18.adison isand probably the most famous case this court ever decided. existed as enslaved people here on land, where slavery was not legally recognized.putting it into effect would take >>presidential orders -- printed into effect would take presidential orders, marshall, and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that changed society. ♪ that theytold them would have to have a search warrant. this man demanded to see the paper to read and she wanted what? she they refused to do so grabbed it out of his hands to read it and thereafter the police officer handcuffed her. >> i cannot imagine a better way to bring the constitution to life than to tell the human stories behind great supreme court cases. lawsuit boldly opposed the forest internment of japanese americans during world war ii. after being convicted for failing to report for relocation, he took his case all the way to the supreme court. quite often, in many of the most famous decisions, they were once that the court to

. >> number 759, earnest miranda, petitioner v.zona. >> number 18, the roe against wade. >> madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >> existed as slaved people here on land where slavery wasn't legally recognized. >> putting the brown decision into effect would take presidential orders. and the presence of federal troops and marshals and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that changed the direction and import of the court in society and that also changed society. ♪ ♪ >> so she told them that they'd have to have a search warrant, and she demanded to see the paper and to read it, see what it was. which they refused to do, so she grabbed it out of his hand to look at it, and thereafter the police officer handcuffed her. >> i can't imagine a better way to bring the constitution to life than by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. [applause] >> boldly opposed the forced internment of japanese-americans during world war ii. after being convicted for failing to report for r

. >> number 759, petitioner versus karen homes. >> this is probably the most famous case decided >> here on land where slavery wasn't legally recognized. >> putting the brown decision into affect would take presidential orders and the presence of federal troops and martial and the courage of children. >> so she told them they would have to have a search and she demanded to see the paper and see what it was when they refused to do and she grabbed it from his hands to look at it and there after the police officer handcuffed her. >> i cannot imagine are better way to bring the constitution to life than by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. >> boldly opposed the forced internment of japanese americans in world war ii. he took his case all the way to the supreme court -- >> quite often and many famous decisions are ones the court took that were quite unpopular. >> if you had to pick one freedom that was the most essential to the functioning of the democracy it has to be freedom of speech. >> let's go through a few cases that illustrates dramatically and visually of wh

. >> ernest miranda petitioner versus arizona. >> arguments number 18 roe against wade. >> madison is probably the most famous case this court ever decided. >> existed as enslaved people here on land where slavery wasn't legally recognized. >> putting the brown decision into effect uld take presidential orders. and the presence of federal troops and marshals. and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that changed the direction and import of the court in society and that also changed society. >> so she told them that they'd have to have a search warrant, and mrs. mapp demanded to see the paper and read it to see what it was, which they refumesed to do so she grabbed it out of his hand to look at it and thereafter the police officer handcuffed her. >> i can't imagine a better way to bring the constitution to life than by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. >> fred koramatsu boldly opposed the forced internment of japanese americans in world war ii. after being convicted for failing to report for relocation, he took his case all the way to the suprem

now republican brothers and sisters tried to petitioner to referendum to do. we took our justice the people at the polls and we won by overwhelming margins with actions and not words. [applause] wife katie and i have four great kids. our oldest daughter grace is a first grade teacher in baltimore city public schools. [applause] true story. after her father announced for president about 100 days ago, she returned to her first grade class at walter elementary, adorable, eager to learn and one hundred percent african-american kids. a little girl came up to her and there was a buzz in the classroom and she talked to by the sleeve and she said -- miss o'malley, i am not so sure about this idea of your father when he for president because quite frankly, i kind of like barack obama. [laughter] [applause] well, a lot of us like barack obama. [cheering] we have come a long way since the wall street crash and the bush recession of 2008 when our country teetered on the brink of a second great depression, we elected a new leader and barack obama to move our country forwar

. >> petitioner versus arizona.gainst weight. >> marbury versus madison is probably the most famous cases court ever decided. slave people here on land where slave really was not legally recognized. >> putting the brown decision into effect would take presidential orders in the presence of federal troops and marshals. and the courage of children. >> we wanted to take cases that changed the direction and import of the court in society and also changed society. ♪ them that they would have to have a search as she demanded to see the paper and to read it and see what it was. what's they refuse to do, so she grabbed it out of his hands to look at it and there after, the police officer handcuffed her. a better waymagine to bring the constitution to life them by telling the human stories behind great supreme court cases. opposed the forced internment of japanese americans during world war ii. after being convicted for failing to report for relocation, he took his case all the way to the supreme court. >> quite often and ma

. >> petitioner versus arizona. >> the role --. >> madison is probably the most famous case this courtever decided. >> it existed as in slate people here on land where slavery was not legally recognized. >> putting the brown decision and effect would take presidential orders in the presence of federal troops and marshals and the courage of children. >> we wanted to pick cases that change the direction and imported the court society and also change society. >> so she told them that they would have to have a search warrant and she demanded to see the paper in to read it to see what it was, which they refuse to do so she grabbed it out of his hands and looked at it and thereafter the police officer handcuffed her. >> i cannot imagine a better way to bring the constitution to light than by telling human stories between great supreme court cases. >> boldly opposed forced internment of japanese-americans during world war ii. after being convicted for failing to report for relocation mr. korematsu took his case all the way to the supreme court. >> quite often and many of our most famous decis