as part of doj petitioner's entire policy of harsh treatment. it was not just to impose maximum pressure. it was also as we allege in paragraph 61, to keep the detainees from accessing the outside world. my friend argued that the doj petitioners cannot be on the hook for this substitute due process claim, claim that was not presented per there's no conditions claim just an equal protection claim. because the doj petitioners did not set all of the details other restricted conditions. conditions. but their order itself in paragraph 61 requires keeping individuals in solitary confinement and isolation. that's way within the prison system people are kept from accessing the outside world. it cannot be done in the general population unit. so in in order that requires solitary confinement toward individuals who are arrested in connection to the terrorism investigation but who the attorney general another petitioners know there is no nondiscriminatory reason to suspect any ties to terrorism. that is a due process claim. it's so excessive. this is what t

so if the rule were that this is petitioner's property and it was -- it certainly wasn't petitioner's liberty before it was properly or not wrongfully although erroneously taken it's unclear why petitioner's principal wouldn't apply to that same question. >> one source of the difficulty we're having it seems to me is that the exoneration act was addressed to some -- a situation very different than what we have here. it was addressed to someone's wrongfully imprisoned for 20 years and the state felt some obligation to remedy that at least in the symbolic way, but in order to qualify for that you do need to show all these other things and is it completely settled i guess we had the decision from the colorado supreme court that that same act applies in this -- strikes me as a very different situation? >> mr. chief justice, i agree with you that the substantive right encompassed by the exoneration act is very narrow and it doesn't cover the claimed right that's at issue in this case and what the colorado supreme court told us is that there is no other statutory mechanism for the kind of c

that was part of doj petitioner's entire policy of harsh treatment. it was not just to impose maximum pressure. it was also, as we allege in paragraph 61, to keep the detainees from accessing the outside world. my friend argued that the doj petitioners cannot be on the hook for this substantive due process claim in this case, a claim that was not presented in iqbal. there was no protections claim -- there was no conditions claim, just the protection claim. protection claim. because the doj petitioners did not set all of the details other restricted conditions. but their order itself in paragraph 61 requires keeping individuals in solitary confinement and isolation. that's way within the prison system people are kept from accessing the outside world. it cannot be done in the general population unit. so an order that requires solitary confinement for individuals who are arrested in connection to the terrorism thestigation but whom attorney general and other doj petitioners know there is no nondiscriminatory reason to suspect of any ties to terrorism --

and the petitioners have a strong likely success of establishing the petitioner and other situationed violates their due process guaranteed by the united states constitution. one of several files came as travelers around the country were detained after having arrived in the u.s. after president trump signed that order. libya, sudan, syria, somalia, and yemen tprrbgs entering the united states, and stops all refugees from entering the united states for 120 days, and it indefinitely puts a stop on syrian refugees come into the country. in the last 24 hours going into affect, there was 109 travelers come into the country at the time it was signed, and the official would not say how many of the 109 are now being detained in the u.s., and how many were sent back to their home country already. in reaction to the court's ruling, the department of homeland security said it will comply with the judicial orders faithly, and implement the president's executive orders to make sure those entering the united states do not pose a threat to our country or the american people. this is important. the r

. >> those tockments obtained by entertainment tonight indicate that tarek el moussa, petitioner, asked for spousal support but once determining the court's ability to award support to christina. a source close to christina has come out firing ttll is us quote it is all a joke. they share everything so it is laughable. a rep for tarek says he is not choosing to respond. in the papers filed monday in orange county, california, tarkq asked for joint custody of their to children, taylor 6 and their son, 1. as for shooting their home restoration show "flip or flop", our source says it is business as usual. tarek and christina are continuing to film together although they are now living separately. now that they are separated, the source says, they both have been dating other people. >> bachelor continuing to search for mrs. right. just two episodes in and the biggest star, and one of his controversial contestants. >> my heart is gold but my [ bleep ] is platinum. >> i'm definitely the hottest bride. >> stirring up the drama. >> i want it punch her in the face. >> and turn up the heat. >> 24

. >> they sent out petitioners paid professional petitioners who are providing, like, really false information. >> reporter: the issue went to the ballot and 65% of richmond voters approved the measure l last november. but the fight is not over. both parties will be in court today to hear caa's challenge of the law. now, if an injunction is granted today rent control could be on hold while the lawsuit continues. lisa chan, kpix 5. >>> san francisco public schools are ditching columbus day. the board voted to replace it with indigenous peoples day. many other cities and schools across the country have decided that christopher columbus is not someone they want to celebrate. >>> hundreds of people are expected to protest outside mark zuckerberg's hawaiian estate this weekend on the island of kauai. they are angry because the facebook ceo sued them over ownership rights. zuckerberg built around the 700- acre property but some hawaiians say they have rights to part of the land. >>> time now 6:09. the plan to relocate a historic train depot in one bay area city has sparked a huge debate that appears

but that petitioner and the government are saying. but it is some benefit. we think there is substantive review. by the way, that provision says there can be procedural review -- >> but your standard is to low, so easy to meet, then you justify that and say don't worry about it because it is all in the process. but this provision, idea of what a hearing officer is supposed to do and then what a court is supposed to do, says it's not all in the process. there's a question of whether a student is receiving a fape. >> we disagree in two different respects. 34 years since rowley, almost every circuit, both government and petitioner agree, whether 8 or 10 circuits, have been applying some benefits standard and their own page 19 admits, that schools are doing fine. to the extent you are concerned about some really low standard in the courts, that's not what is materializing. you can look at case after case on the brief on page 24, citing three cases using benefit standard just from this year. judge's opinion in cb. there is case after case saying this is not some

the petitioners only need 100,000 digital signatures to force parliament to debate the proposal. and if you look now, that number just surpassed 1 million. this has been a monstrous headache for another newly-minted leader. british prime minister theresa may who became premier last summer on the back of another populist insurgent vote. a referendum for the uk to leave the european union. so ms. may is playing very careful in the diplomatic aim with donald trump. she was the first foreign leader to meet the president on friday and trump is a big fan of brexit. but we'll see who wins this cross-atlantic staring contest. the people or the prime minister? >> we'll look at that petition, it is going up every minute. it's hard to keep track of. thank you, matt bradley, from london. >>> mike pence becomes the first vice president to speak at the march for life. what he had to say to the other massive crowd gathered in washington. >>> plus, roger federer wins his 18th grand slam title. we've got all the highlights from the amazing australian open men's final. those stories and more are c

that we've heard just in the last half hour, which i'll walk you through in a minute, but that the petitioner and the government are saying, so it's some benefit. we do think there's substantive review. that's what that provision is about. and by the way, that provision also says there can be procedural review on a harmless error. justice kagan: but your substantive standard is so low, is so easy to meet, and then you justify that. you say, don't worry about it because it's all in the process. but this provision, the idea of what a hearing officer is supposed to do, and then what a court is supposed to do, says it's not all in the process. there is a question of whether a student is receiving a -- a fape. mr. katyal: so we disagree in two different respects. number one, the experience for 34 years since rowley, almost every circuit, both the government and petitioner agree, whether it's eighth or tenth circuit, have been applying the -- the some benefit standard, and that it had bite. indeed, their own reply brief at page 19 admits and says, look, actually schools are doing fine. so to the ex

petitioners on parliament's website really only need 100,000 digital signatures to force parliament toate their proposal. that number just passed 1 million. this has been a monstrous headache for theresa may. she has been playing a very careful diplomatic came with president trump. she was the first foreign lead to signatures means that parliament will have to debate postponing the visit even if they don't accept it. may has rejected calls that she cancel the state visit. buckingham palace has said nothing, as is its habit. we'll see who blinks first on this cross atlantic staring contest, the public or the prime minister. >>> news4 at 5:00 starts now. >>> right now a bobcat missing from its enclosure at our national zoo. is it a risk to you or a danger to itself? the steps now being taken to get it back to said. >>> plus, three men killed after an argument inside a restaurant. new details it wetonight about deadly workplace dispute. >>> we saw quite a bit of snow showers in our region during the afternoon. beginning to wind down now but somethg >>> first up, the white house defends pr

there are nine different standards we have heard in the that the hour petitioner and the government areing. also says there can be procedural review. >> the standard is so low and so easy to meet and you justify that by saying it is all in the process. this provision of what a hearing officer is supposed to do and a court is supposed to do says it is not in the process. there is the question of whether or not it didn't is receiving. disagree, in 34 years, almost every government agrees circuit isor 10 supplying the standard. the low standard that you are concerned about is not materializing. there are three cases that you can some that up. case after case saying, this is not some total standard. >> you are reading it as some benefit and the other side is reading it saying some benefit. [laughter] >> it makes a difference. rowley doesn't just say some benefit, it tells you what it is. the standard is certainly more minimis. you cannot take that substantial is rendered and applied in a case such as this, but it does seem to indicate that there is a substantial hundred and not just some in

. >> they sent out petitioners paid professionals providing, like, really false information. >> reporter: the issue then went to the ballot and 65% of richmond voters approved measure l last november. but the fight is not over. both parties will be back in court today to hear caa's challenge of the law. now, if an injunction is granted today rent control could be on hold while the lawsuit continues. live in the newsroom, lisa chan, kpix 5. >>> the chancellor of uc- berkeley says a troll is coming to campus referring to this man milo yiannopoulos the editor of breitbart conservative, some say his reports are hateful and unethical. protests erupted at uc-davis when he was scheduled to speak two weeks ago. it the speech was canceled after the protests became violent. but he also says annapoulos has the rig freedom of s e's scheduled to visit the school, on wednesday. >> he also said that yiannopoulos has the right to freedom of speech. he is scheduled to visit the school on wednesday. >>> the cost of a uc education is getting steeper because the board of regents signed off on the first tuit

you know, the -- one of the petitioners in our case, one of the people who got held up at jfk airportbeen working for the u.s. military in iraq for ten years. to ban people like this as so-called national security risks und risks, trying to improve national security is laughable. it's d it's -- the government is discriminating against people based on their religion. that's the only thing that explains what the government has done to all these people and, in fact, you know, president trump himself has been clear about saying that he wants to disfavor muslims and favor christians with respect to immigration. >> so omar, let me ask you this. in reading the executive order, i know you've had a chance to go through it and there's a portion where it really kind of breaks down or gives a synopsis about what may have provoked in part this policy. i'm reading saying, quote, perhaps in no instance was there more apparent than the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, when state department policy prevented officers from property sk scrutinizing several of the 19 foreign nationals who went on

standards now that we've heard just in the last half-hour which i'll walk minute, that n a the petitioner and government are saying. so it's some benefit. we do think there is substantive review. that's what that pro significance is about and that provision also says there could review.edural >> the standard is so low, so easy to meet, and then you say don't worry about it because it's all in the provision, theis idea of what a hearing officer is supposed to do and then what a court is supposed to do says it's not all in the process. there is a question provision, e of whether a student is receiving -- >> we disagree in two respects. umber one, the experience for 34 years since rally, in almost every circuit, both the agree, ent and petition whether it's eight or 10 circuits, have been applying and benefit standard it's -- at page 19 it admits and fine.schools are doing so to the extent that you're concerned about some really low courts, that's actually not what's materializing, you look after ase after case on brief page 24, it's three cases using some benefit standard just from this yea

less difficult the law is we like to brag the first of its kind in the country thank you for being petitioner of that and thank you to the executive director for putting up with me so today's amendment we established the authority to work on music development but as jocelyn mentioned the commission should be involved in the hotel venues right now you're dealing with conflict between union square and the night life venue likewise issues with jessie street and hotels are complaining through the staff they're having to refund people's room their ratings are down and your mission manages those after the cat is out of the bag or the cow and the barn or worse i don't know so your staff has to insure that the venues are in compliance working with the management of the hotel and forced to do 24 after the fact - to supervisor breed amendment good afternoon the entertainment commission to address the concerns between night life and post hotels before those hotels are approved it is a preying issue according to jocelyn a dozen hotels in the pipeline and most have night life nearby there are 3 open pipel

they were petitioners and plaintiffs filing suits against the epa and finally i'll submit an editorial where to point out that this back to the tulsa world, over the past six years pruitt's legal team has consistently shown deference to the legal expertis and professionals at deq, the department of environmental quality. this was written by the executive director. i cannot recall an instance where they did not allow us to pursue legal action when deemed necessary. and then finally from mike actuary pin who is the former chairman of the oklahoma democratic party. the job of the epa is guaranteed clean air and clean water. pruitt has never kproes miezed those critical components with any actions he has taken. senator rounds. >> enthusiasm, mr. chairman. >> welcome attorney general pruitt. i notice that you didn't have the opportunity in the time allotted for senator booker's question, would you care to finish your response with regard to the role that the state's have and their ability to either participate in a suit and whether or not they have standing would you like to finish your tho