and we want to say to price's pregnancy centers along the lines of petitioners here. we do adoption. we do not do family planning or abortion. and the state thinks that would be a good system. because when a woman goes in to either one of these kinds of places, they'll know what's there and they'll know what's not there. and why would that be problematic? >> well, i think because once it's no longer tied to the specific goods or services that the clinic or center or whom environmenter is providing, then the more we ought to be worried that there making you just advertise what other people are doing. and this case is even one step beyond your hypotheticala. it's saying, look, we want people to know about service that's the state provides. >> how is that different than casey? in casey we require doctors to hand out state created materials, telling the women about what services the state and others provided. i think they're not doing procedures. but i don't know what an ultrasound is if not a procedure. i don't know what a pregnancy test is if not a procedure. i don't kn

petitioners are challenging in 1992 supreme court decision that says taxes can only be collected by businesses with the physical presence in the state. this is one hour. >> we will hear an argument first this morning on case 17 494, south decatur versus wayfair. >> mr. chief justice, there are two very significant consequences brought about. --st our small businesses on main street are being harmed by the unlevel playing field. out-of-state

to be really getting into everything that the petitioners are saying to assess it. as opposed to requiring a two-sentence notice that mostly obviates the need for that because it gives women the information to protect themselves and make informed decisions in the very limited time that they have available. simply by seeing the notice to call the government. >> the one requires to you compel speech from someone else. that implicates first amendment concerns. the second is, puts the burden on government to prove that someone has abused their free speech rights. justice gorsuch: and this court's normally pretty jealously protective of speech. why isn't, again, that latter approach preferable? mr. klein: for the same reason that it wasn't a necessary step in kacey -- casey. in the regulation of professional speech, the government, given the close and reliant relationship that the patient has on her physician, can require a certain amount of speech to ensure that the patient makes informed decisions about very important matters. the main difference from casey is how much

the petitioner argued some consumers associate chloride with chlorine bleach. the petitioner urged the fda consider how renaming might change -- replacing sodium chloride with potassium chloride, which could provide health benefits. we need to finish our work on labeling. we recently issued a guidance we recently issued a guidance document that provides flexibility on how labeling requirements can be implanted. it shows restaurants and establishments how to provide calorie information on menus in ways that meet various business models. it will soon be finalized. beginning on may 7, 2018, consumers who walk into these establishments across the country and know at a glance how many calories are in the food they order for themselves and their children. we are taking final steps on a new nutrition facts label. the first overhaul of that in 20 years. consumers are starting to have access to an updated label based on science that provides more information to empower them to choose healthful diets. we have proposed extending the compliance date to january 1, 2020. our

some of the petitioners had substantial motive, and i had very little. >> reporter: nathan carman turned of murder onto his aunts in a court hearing scheduled to stop him from gaining a family inheritance by digging up information on two unsolved familiarity deaths. in 2016, linda carman, nathan's mother, went missing during a boating trip. nathan carman was found and rescued eight days later. >> i want to thank the public for prayers and continuing prayers for my mother. >> reporter: three years later his grandfather was found shot to death in his connecticut home. carman allegedly owned the same caliber rifle used in his grandfather's murder and is the suspect in the cold case investigation. his aunts believe their nephew is responsible for both deaths and that he was fueled by a $7 million inheritance. carman chose to invoke the fifth amendment when questioned about the gun and his role in the family deaths. attorney dan small is representing the family. >> he refused to answer questions and take a polography exam. that's not someone who cares deeply about his grand fiancee and wants

a number of petitioners were filed in two circuit courts and now they have been transformed back to the dc circuit i would imagine that in due course they will make a decision. i don't have a particular timeframe on that but we'll see how it goes. >> this issue has gone back and forth and do you think the ultimate answer will lie in congress perhaps legislation that would deal with this issue once and for all? >> that is ultimately where most people would like to see it end up and i have consistently said that after the rejection of the previous piece net neutrality rules in 2014 that the ideal solution would be to turn to congress and let congress update the rules of the road to match the digital era. we are now operating based on a statute those first developed in 1934 and even the most recent pronouncement by congress was in 1986. this is the era of altavista and cd-roms in mail and net modem and this is an era which we are crafting these rules and said to me it would be great for the elected officials of our country to say we agree on certain basic principles we don't want companies

. >> i'll say that some of the petitioners have awfully substantial motive, and i have very, very littlescribed as a person of interest by police in the unsolved murder of his grandfather. the wealthy real estate developer shot in his home in 2013. according to court documents. carmen the last known person to see him alive and allegedly owned the same caliber rifle as the murder weapon used. >> it is prudent for me to plead the fifth relating to question as but firearms. >> carmen's mother, linda vanished at sea presumed dead. nathan spent eight days floating in a life raft, told the coast guard, his fishing boat, experienced engine trouble and stanning. >> nathan we believe is a cold, calculating killer. >> representative for his aunts. >> beth crimes were done are you taking the tissue test? yep, and my teeth are yellow. time for whitestrips. crest glamorous white whitestrips are the only ada-accepted whitening strips proven to be safe and effective. and they whiten 25x better than a leading whitening toothpaste. crest. healthy, beautiful smiles for life. i just want to find a used car

it was only involving particular petitioner, in this case, incident members of the public were not subject to surveillance. the only one instance that's happened that was testified to the tape recorder involved was a sere owe type, had two tapes a and b, and they did not in fact listen to the conversation of the innocent party. >> what did you see? you say this was a reasonable search. >> what i'd say is under this court as opinion, i think the wo words were ceased. >> and the admissibility, the admissibility of that evidence, those conversations from reasonable into that search, and one of the roles of certainly search under role 41, search for evidence. and you think the words over the telephone were the truth -- >> certainly i think in this case they were the means of the crime. the crime is to transport wagering information or wages over the interstate, so as the telephone. >> would you help people decode how the justice's questions and how effectively the solicitor's general office was answering. >> the hard thing about this case we haven't quite gotten to yet in this discussion was c

only involving the particular petitioner and that -- in this case.ne instance, which has happened and the agents testify that the tape and quarter involved was a stereotype that had two tracks. they could control which conversations they would listen to and they did not listen to the conversation of the innocent party. reasonablethis was a search because of a what? >> i would say that under this court's opinion, i think the words received. admissibility of that evidence in the conversation depends upon that surge. is you can'tles search through the evidence. you think the words through the telephone was a true story? the actual means an instrumentality. the crime is to transport wagering information over the interstate telephone. >> would you help people decode how the justices question and how effectively he is answering it. >> the hard thing about this case is, can you seize intangible things? we took a look at the fourth amendment and think about it as protecting these places. the court had just been developing this doctrine of whether you could s

petitioners are challenging in 1992 supreme court decision that says taxes can only be collected by businesses with the physical presence in the state. this is one hour. >> we will hear an argument first this morning on case 17 494, south decatur versus wayfair. >> mr. chief justice, there are two very significant consequences brought about. --st our small businesses on main street are being harmed by the unlevel playing field. out-of-state remote sellers are given a price advantage. >> is an the problem not will, but the fact that you do not have a mechanism? it is not the merchants paying the taxes. >> we believe we have a right, because we have a statutory scheme in place that is nondiscriminatory. --have about your concerned scheme. i am concerned about the overlying questions. here there are some significant laws. you are not retroactive but your adversaries point out there are many states who have already made this collection retroactive. we have that question. with questions about what is the contact. decided undero balancing, how much contact is enough to justify placing this obligatio

. >> comes now the petitioner, clarence earl gideon, a citizen of that united states of america.t the time of the trial he asked the lower court for aid and counsel and the court refused this aid. the >> pencil butters were stamped 890 miscellaneous. the a hundred 90th case to go on the miscellaneous docket that had begun in october 1961. gideon's papers were placed in a large red folder and dispatched by a dumbwaiter to the file room. the case was on a separate file card. this would be the docket. the history at a glance to everything that happened from that case and then on. on june 4, 19 62, the supreme court sent to mr. clarence earl gideon of copy of the order of the day, announcing he could proceed in former poppers and -- the supreme court had decided to take up the case. the case began here in panama city, florida. it is a county seat with motels and lodges, good fishing, some of the finest beaches in america. the man who was to lead such a lasting imprint on the lower left little imprint on this town. panama city was gideon's home and this was the scene of his alleged cr

so we expect these leaders to get a berth sense, get petitioner clarity about the president's willingness take a harder stance towards moscow. >> jeff, i'll see you at the white house in a little bit. associated press who i say court ericaly lucy and anna pam palmer are here. the president is going through there play book of playing up m immigration right now. why? >> he has been on a twitter scare for several days. attacked everything in sight from amazon to daca. congress is out right now so we're in a -- >> congress isn't on the hill. >> there isn't going to be a meeting on doaca. i'd proposed it'll be difficult for them to do anything before the election. >> over the the weekend he spent the weekend at mar-a-largo with his supporter, watching t.v. shows, dealing with this. we know he was frustrated with the spending bill that didn't include all the things he wanted on immigration and a border wall and he seeps to be lashing out. >> could that backfire? he's blaming the democrats. is that a risky strategy or does t play well with his base? >> a lot of his calculation is dealing with hi

>> all in favor of granting the petitioner's request and incorporating the -- incorporating the contributions from march 27th, directing the commission staff to make the final determination within five business days and making that final binding and nonappealable. am i missing anything else? >> also in terms of the staff determination which would be made on may 2nd, a determination would also be made by noon. >> yes, by noon. all in favor? okay. all right. >> there's additional public comment. >> calling agenda item number four, public comment. is there any public comment? none? okay. move to adjourn then. we're adjourned. transportation authority meeting for today, tuesday, april 24, our clerk, if you could please call the roll. roll call, commissioner breed absent. cohen present. fewer present. kim absent. peskin present. ronen present. safai present. sheehy absent. stefani present. tang present. yee absent. we have quorum. >> last week, schools and families celebrated bike and roll to school week, thousands of youth and adults rode in bike trains, rode with parents and teachers and used th

some of you may have encountered a few people gathering signatures outside of warner on friday for petitionerrt of this treaty. i mention this only to highlight that the history, some of which is so easy to think about as far away from us. especially when you see images of the turtle, schoolchildren decking and covering under their desks, this is still with us in important ways. that might be a good way to transition to my third story, which is what to do with nuclear waste from both military and civilian energy products. what that is? there is a small caption so it helps. it is yucca mountain. it tells us just a little bit about the project. i thought we might revisit it, as a way to extend these lines about risk, about scale and american relationships with science. what is yucca mountain? it is a proposed site to become the nation's high-level repository for nuclear waste. there is a lot to this story and i am not at all going to do it justice. in broad strokes, spent nuclear material needs a place to rest until it is no longer harmful. the timeline occurs in geologic rather than human time

petitioners are challenging in 1992 supreme court decision that say taxes may only be collected with businesses with a physical presence in the state. attorneys present oral arguments on tuesday. this is one hour. >> you will hear arguments in case 17494, south dakota versus wayfarer. >> mr. chief justice, may it please the court, there are two very significant consequences brought about by quill. first, our states are losing massive sales tax revenues that we need for education, healthcare and info structure. second, our small businesses on main street are being harmed because of the unlevel playing field created by quill where out-of-state remote sellers are given a price advantage. >> i'm sorry, isn't the problem not quill? but the fact that you don't have a mechanism to collect from consumers quest markets not the merchants paying the sales tax, it's the consumer. they are collecting it for you. so, find a way to collect from them. >> we believe we have a right because we have a statutory team in place. it's a fair scheme, it has safe harbors in place to allow our state. >> i'm n

and seizure, it was a very careful -- it was carefully limited to only involving one particular petitioner. in this case come innocent members of the public were not subject to surveillance. theagents testified that stereo had two tracks, a and b. they did not listen to the conversations of the innocent party. is a this was a reasonable search of a what? >> i would say under this court's position, the warrant was valid. >> the warrant was received and the admissibility of that evi dence, the conversations were reasonable under the search. word of the -- >> certainly, in this case. the crime is to transport wagering information or wagers over the telephone. >> would you help people the code the justice's questions and how effectively the solicitor general's office is answering them. jamil: the difficult thing we have not gotten to is can you search or sees intangible things? -- or seize intangible things? places, these persons that can be seized have been discussed in the past and here we are talking about conversations. the court was just developing this doctrine of whether you could see o

>> planned parenthood had recruited the three patients that would become the petitioners led by dr.uxton's. she was instrumental in signing the patient's and deciding on the strategy. planned parenthood was instrumental in figuring out that once -- once the supreme court dismissed because of lack of prosecution, it was planned parenthood that was the engineer to set up a clinic so the medical director could get arrested to test the connecticut law. >> planned parenthood was operating around the state this point? >> griswold had set up a planned parenthood there. i think there have been others in the area. >> they had a number of clinics operating throughout the state and indicates that i mentioned, state versus nelson, they all closed after that case and they started setting up clinics for educational purposes. the new haven clinic is the clinic that started prescribing contraceptives. before that, other clinics were just doing educational services that were not banned by the law. planned parenthood was key in helping women get across straight -- state lines. they could get contrace

understand the petitioner's position in this case, it is that the school officials are powerless to actil the disruption occurs. sometimes prevention is a lot better than a pound of cure. next and orhey wore or alace button -- nixon wallace button, which was highly controversial and in some places inflammatory. think if it were done, where they came in with a row of proves on, it could deceptive. on -- come inme with a whole row of bands? >> no, but would there be any question that they came in with placard?e ro i think normally -- i say this, this has been extensively exploited in the press. we have a situation here where it was explosive. what do you think of that exchange? erik: i think it was weak. he is making a point that is that we need to take a preventive measure rather than respond to an actual, immediate threat. this comes up all the time. how much prevention can you do before it -- the threat is certain? he is not doing a great job of it. what he could have done better is when a fact that made them think that prevention was necessary. instead, he gets hung up in distinguishi

." >> when justice stewart delivered the opinion of the he took issue with the way the petitioner hadormulated the questions, which included whether a public telephone booth is a constitutionally-protected area, penetrationphysical of a constitutionally-protected area is necessary before a search and seizure can said -- can be said to be violations of the fourth amendment to the united states constitution. he added a couple of words in , one was the right to privacy, but the protection of a anyway,general right that is what happened at. thank you. carefulourt was very that they were not a pining on the right to privacy, they were just talking about when he closed the door the phone booth he creates the space and while it is true the fourth amendment protects people, not places, the general right of privacy, the right to be left alone that grand ice talked about in his dissent, was to be applied by states, just like a life and liberty of a person are protected by state law. so the steward opinion was very narrow. and it's also important to remember that katz was never cited in the stew

estelle griswold, in poe, the '61 case, had recruit it had three patients that would become the petitioners led by dr. buxton, dr. buxton's patients. and she was instrumental in helping dr. buxton find those patients and decide on that strategy. planned parenthood then was instrumental in figuring out that once poe -- once the supreme court dismissed the appeal from poe because of lack of prosecution, you know, no credible threat of prosecution, it was planned parenthood that was the engineer of a strategy to set up a clinic so that the director and the medical director could get arrested to test the connecticut law. >> so planned parenthood was operating around the state at this point? >> estelle griswold had explicitly set up a planned parenthood there. they had been in other areas of the state, in hartford, in new haven. >> they had, actually, a number of clinics that were operating throughout the state. in the case i mentioned, state versus nelson, they all closed after that case. and then they started setting up clinics for educational purposes and to lobby the legislature. >> yes. >>

. >> now, in substance if we understand the petitioner's position in this case, it is that the schoolfficials are powerless to act until the disruption occurs. respondents believe that should not be the rule. sometimes an ounce of prevention is a lot better than a pound of cure and i think subsequent history of such activities bear out the judgment of the school officials in their discretion. >> suppose they wore a humphrey or a nixon or a wallace button in the school which might be is -- was in many communities, highly controversial in some places inflammatory. >> well -- >> could that be done? >> i think if the court please, if it were done as i think the record in this case shows where they come in or the whole row of buttons on something of that sort that it could prove disruptive. it's a matter of dress. >> did they come in with a whole row of -- >> no. >> armbands? >> no. it would be and would there be any question if they walked in with a placard and said we protest the vietnam war? that was -- >> i think there would. there would. won't you think that would be definitely be dif

. >> if we understand the petitioner's position in this case, it is that the school officials are powerlessact until the disruption occurs. that should not be the rule. sometimes prevention is a lot better than a pound of cure. subsequent history of such activities bear out the judgment of the school officials and administration. -- and their discretion. >> suppose they were a humphrey or a nixon or a wallace button, which was highly controversial and in some places inflammatory. would that be done? >> i think if it were done, as i think the record in this case shows, where they came in with a row of buttons on, it could prove deceptive. -- disruptive. >> did they come in with a whole row of bands? >> no, but would there be any question if they had walked in with a placard saying we protest vietnam war? due to get would be different? >> normally, yes. but i say this, this has been extensively exploited in the press. we have a situation here where it was explosive. susan: what do you think of that exchange? erik: i think it was weak. that is what i think, actually. he is making a point that

have been pouring over the documents and filings and briefs that have been filed on behalf of the petitioners in the case. they will go through oral arguments today, retreating back to chambers with discussions amongst themselves, and then they will do the nose count to figure out which side will carry the majority and and divide up the writing responsibilities. >>> there was a big overnight crash, and we will tell you about the pileup on 680 that shut down the freeway for hours. >>> and the city of san francisco is getting tough on these controversial electric scooters that have drawn a lot of complaints from the public. the new rules transportation officials will put in place for the rental companies. >>> it's getting busier out there, especially in the trivalley. we will tell you more about your morning commute when we come back. >>> and in weather, a bit of a cooling trend. more low clouds and fog to talk about this morning, especially over the bay. we will talk about the wednesday forecast and possibly a few sprinkles as we head to the weekend. if you're looking for an incredible selecti

petitioners are challenging in 1992 supreme court decision that say taxes may only be collected withusinesses with a physical presence in the state. attorneys present oral arguments on tuesday. this is one hour.

. >> some of the petitioners have awfully substantial motives and i had very, very little. >> reportered him to hire counsel. >> even though you can't go to jail as a result of what happens here, obviously the stakes are pretty high for you. you can be compelled to give information in this case. you've already been served two sets of interrogatories and a request for production of documents. >> reporter: when i spoke with carman in 2016, just days after he was rescued at sea, he insisted he was innocent. >> can you understand what people see? you were the last person to see two people alive. you're either incredibly unlucky, the most unlucky guy, or you had something to do with those two deaths. what do you say to that? >> i say that there is no relationship. >> reporter: we have an exclusive statement from the chakalos family saying in part, it is the worst kind of hypocrisy for nathan to point fingers at others when he alone is refusing to answer questions about the likely murder weapon. the family want the judge to force nathan to answer questions about an assault rifle that police