way but with the due respect to petitioners it's ambiguous and you can read our way that insufficiency only means some errors, not all of them, only some things make in order insufficient and this error just made it overbroad that insufficient. regardless if you screw that that you can sever the mistakes in the orders here were not insufficient to authorize the interception of these medications inside kansas and that's the only evidence relied on in this trial. if no further questions, i asked the court to affirm. >> thank you, counsel. four minutes. >> thank you. the district court exceeded its power under title iii by authorizing and effectively nationwide wiretap issue. in doing so the district court entered orders that under the statute simply lack the power to order. the orders issued here were [inaudible] for the government concedes that the government did not comply with the jurisdictional requirements but instead it argues of the medications could've been lawfully intercepted the district court had only entered narrower orders. if in fact that is sufficient to avoid suppression

we agree with petitioners, the answer is no. it needs to be in the same judicial district. >> i'm sorry. do you agree that the order has to be within, for interceptions within the jurisdiction some except for a mobile device -- >> yes. in order for the district of kansas, we need to -- >> are you taking position that the order does not have to say at all that it is within the jurisdiction -- >> yeah. that's absolutely our position will. >> that's your position. >> yeah. that's straight from the text of the statute. >> so you're saying only a violation of those four of subparagraph 4, even though the full process of ordering is premised on it being an order within the jurisdiction of the court. >> well, so this is obviously an order from the kansas court. i don't think there's any dispute about that. the question is where do we put our wire room. >> that's such a strange position though. that you would have an order that wouldn't tell you where you could do this. >> i think it just informs. it is a back ground rule that follows f

as i was saying to justice alito, the forty -- fourth amendment rights are personal, and here petitioner like other unauthorized drivers, simply has no connection to the car at all. he is a stranger to the relationship between budget and reid -- >> you keep saying that, but as a matter of property law now and forever, the possessor would have a right to exclude other people but for those with better title. so someone in this position would have a right, i think you'd agree, to exclude someone who's attempting to get in the car to hijack it, car jack it. you'd also have a right to throw out a hitchhiker who had overstayed his welcome. so i think you're having to argue that the government has a special license that doesn't exist for any other stranger to the car. >> i don't think so, your honor. i don't think this court has included the idea that even the illegitimate possessor of an item may be having some sort of trespass action they could bring has incorporated that particular rule into the fourth amendment -- >> but that's been the common law property forever, right? >> well, your hono

injuries the israeli supreme court completely ignored the broad factual basis presented to it by the petitioners which includes multiple testimonies of wounded and reports of international organizations involved in documenting the killing and wounding of our non protesters in gaza at least sixty two palestinians were killed in one day of violence and several hundreds were injured the the. the. the. the. the adding fuel to the fire is the fact that what has now emerged online are several videos that show israeli soldiers cheering as they fire. ah good luck with. the telegram. now human rights groups are not the only ones who are mad at israel the united nations the european union france and germany have all called for an independent investigation into israel's use of force against what they say what an armed protest is we use this kind of decision is why the is read the article system this is not the first time to be on the side of the military system against the civilians we have this many times and we are now we're we have very serious concerns about the lives of the severely you more and more.

injuries these really supreme courts completely ignored the broad factual basis presented to it by the petitioners which includes multiple testimonies of wounded and reports of international organizations involved in documenting the killing and wounding of our known protestors in gaza at least sixty two palestinians were killed in one day of violence and several hundreds were injured the the the car was found in the the. don't know what. was. the. work there. the adding fuel to the fire is the fact that what has now emerged online are several videos that show israeli soldiers cheering as they fire. over the cloud. now human rights groups are not the only ones who are mad at israel the united nations the european union france and germany have all called for an independent investigation into israel's use of force against what they say what an armed protest is we use this kind of decision is why the is the red dog ticket system this is not the first to be on the side of the military system against the civilians we have this many times and we are now we have very serious concerns about the lives of th

does are going to bond off in those tunnels he does he says it's easier than others to think for petitioner just for the biology to. see it all took siege is so weak it difficult. for just accept. that he should make sure he goes through a box the need to start the next set and then finish it cannot talk. to me mobile demand textile production in indonesia is expected to increase by seventy five percent by twenty thirty. major clothing brands can no longer look away. too many victims are paid a heavy price. once a strategy of war now the conflict is long over but the abductions continue one on one east investigates why so many sri lankans disappeared without a trace on al-jazeera. al jazeera is investigative units reveals tactics used by anti muslim organizations to instigate a fear of is not on the radar universities terror the guy on the way over where they're recruiting this stuff is toxic he's a poison salesman we saw a number of attacks against women and men across the country completely skyrocket guys in front of the courts owning a gun and if they are not there's blood flowing all ov

you get one on the petitioner side, responded side, you get files. then, you write 30 pages supporting the petitioner. that is what i'm doing here this week. i'm reading these briefs. i talked to my law clerks and this time, i am not just delegating to them. we had a discussion this afternoon. i said, i would like you to look this up and i have a formal -- a few more to read and then, we will have a moral argument. each site has have an hour and we ask questions. it is very tough being a lawyer that oral argument. there are nine of us and we each have different views. it is pretty tough. my lawyer sees one person smiling and another chronic. -- another frowning. then, we are back in our conference. the chief justice says, the issue in this case this. here is my. -- why. kaganit goes to justice or sotomayor. everyone listens. no one speaks twice. your item with other said. think orknow what they i will not pick up my file. justice wasief signed at the end of the two weeks and will assign the opinions to be written. -- halfay, half are up are unanimous

light green briefs, 30 pages, supporting the petitioner. dark green, 30 pages, supporting the respondent. and i and we these breeze for -- i am reading these briefs. i talked to my law clerk. i am not just delegating to them. we had a discussion this afternoon, and i said, i would like you to look this up and i have a few more to read and i will discuss it with them and then will have an oral argument. the oral argument will be 10 days from today and each side has a half an hour and we ask questions, and it is very tough being a lawyer at that oral argument. there are nine of us in each of us have different views. a lawyer sees one person smiling and the next one frowny. after that, we are back in our conference discussing it. we are alone. we have a book with spaced buy what everyone says -- we have a book with space enough to write what everyone says. goes to justice kennedy, alito,tice thomas, me, sotomayor, and gorsuch. no one speaks twice. you write down with the others say. i better know what they think. then, the chief justice will a

the israeli supreme court completely ignored the broad factual basis presented to it by the petitioners which includes multiple testimonies of wounded and reports of international organizations involved in documenting the killing and wounding of anon protesters in gaza well since the protests began at the end of march israeli forces have killed at least one hundred palestinians the. i. didn't know of course that. the or that i. was. or was that was there. with the with the we use this kind of decision is why that is read the article system this is not the first concrete undersigned the military system against the civilians we have this many times and we are now were we have very serious concerns about the lives of the civilians more and more sold this is an kind of encouragement and relighted the israeli snipers should be shooting to worsen civilians not only shooting also killing so this is the time that the international community in order to be on the side of the palestinian civilians against such a good violations committed by the israeli court and israeli me.

as part of a skakel family conspiracy to cover up the petitioner's involvement in the murder.ther suspects, the brother tommy, and a live-in tutor could have committed the murder while skakel was watching monty python, now prosecutors have to decide if they want to try it again. basically the high court is saying it should be tried again. the prosecutor say after all of this time that they do not want to go through this yet again. they have a decision to make. >> martha: you look at all of the people who were involved, somebody knows. the neighbors, the friends, people have a million theories on what happened. many people have believed that michael skakel did it, but it is chilling, because you know that somebody knows what happened to her in her garage. >> they still not have gotten justice or any sense of closure. >> martha: thank you for the update, more of that on monday. good to see you. so tonight we are getting incredible in-depth look at the story behind the biggest lottery scam in u.s. history, worth $25 million paid how a little-known man from rural, iowa managed to

groups these really supreme courts completely ignored the broad factual basis presented to it by the petitioners which includes multiple testimonies of wounded and reports of international organizations involved in documenting the killing and wounding of unarmed protesters in gaza says the protests began on march thirtieth israeli forces have killed at least one hundred palestinians. oh. about that because you are not going to be a little stunned. oh. i know what it is not. the look we use this kind of decision by the it's a great job to go system. trying to use a system against the c.v. we have this many times and we are now we have video you see this concerns about the lives the more and more so this is kind of encourage one thing greenlighted the israeli. should be should think the worst and civilians not only should think also killing this is the time that the international community in order to be on the side of the palestinian civilians against such a getting violations committed by the israeli. court and israeli military. so it's commonality international tests on shellfish in the waters

groups these really supreme courts completely ignored the broad factual basis presented to it by the petitioners which includes multiple testimonies of wounded and reports of international organizations involved in documenting the killing and wounding of unarmed protesters in gaza. since the protests began on march thirtieth israeli forces have killed at least one hundred palestinians. but not the only one to the level of the course that. the. end of it does not know there's. nothing. there. we use this kind of decision by the as red door to the system. trying to humiliate the system against the civilians we have this many times and we are now we have video you see this concerns about the lives of the sea really more and more souls this is kind of encouragement in real life that the israeli sniper has shot the shooting to was the civilians not only should think also killing so this is the time that the international community in order to be on the side of the palestinian civilians against such a good violations committed by the israeli. court and israeli military. and to most those who come on r

groups these really supreme courts completely ignored the broad factual basis presented to it by the petitioners which includes multiple testimonies of wounded and reports of international organizations involved in documenting the killing and wounding of unarmed protesters in gaza well since the protests began the end of march is really forces have killed at least one hundred palestinians the the. burden of course that. the earth. was. worth there was. the. the we use this kind of visitors why this is the road to a different system. and this trying to really use them against the sea really we have this many times and we are now we're we have really serious concerns about the lives of these three review more and more. this is unclear.

groups these really supreme courts completely ignored the broad factual basis presented to it by the petitioners which includes multiple testimonies of wounded and reports of international organizations involved in documenting the killing and wounding of unarmed protesters in gaza since the protests began on march thirtieth israeli forces have killed at least one hundred palestinians. i have. not but i met a lot of. fun to belittle the articles that. oh. there . is none of it but it's not a good. or are. there. we use this kind of visitors why this is right don't go system. on this trying to humiliate the system against the c.d.'s we have this many times and we are now we have video you see this concerns of all the lives of the silliness more and more told this is one kind of encourage one thing green lighted the israeli. should be should think it was the civilians the only sure thing also killing so this is the time that the international community in order to be on the side of the palestinian civilians against such a good violations committed by the israeli. court and is writing to her. and to

groups these really supreme courts completely ignored the broad factual basis presented to it by the petitioners which includes multiple testimonies of wounded and reports of international organizations involved in documenting the killing and wounding of unarmed protesters in gaza. since the protests began on march thirtieth israeli forces have killed at least one hundred palestinians the last. letter by letter like that. of course that. oh. there. we used this kind of decisions by the it's a great job the system. beyond the signs of the military system against the civilians we have this many times and we are now we're we have video you see this concerns about the lives of the silliness more and more cold this is kind of encouragement and relighted the israeli. should be should think the worst in civilians not only should think also killing so this is the time that the international community in order to be on the side of the palestinian civilians against such a good violations committed by the israeli. court and israeli military. still to come this hour test fun shellfish and waters off west co

groups these really supreme courts completely ignored the broad factual basis presented to it by the petitioners which includes multiple testimonies of wounded and reports of international organizations involved in documenting the killing and wounding of unarmed protesters in gaza. so as the protests began on march thirtieth israeli forces have killed at least one hundred palestinians in the last. month that plug that you are not going to belittle that. oh. yes i know it was not. there. are. there. we use this kind of decisions by the is right don't go system this is. just trying to humiliate the system against the civilians we have this many times and we are now we're we have video you see this concerns about the lives of the silliness more and more gold this is one kind of encourage one thing greenlighted the israeli. should be should think the worst in civilians not only shooting also killing so this is the time that the international community in order to be on the side of the palestinian civilians against such a good violations committed by the israeli. court and israeli military still to c

groups these really supreme courts completely ignored the broad factual basis presented to it by the petitioners which includes multiple testimonies of wounded and reports of international organizations involved in documenting the killing and wounding of unarmed protesters in gaza since the protests began on march thirtieth israeli forces have killed at least one hundred palestinians. oh. god yeah but yet not. going to belittle the articles that. oh. there. is none of it i started out there's. nothing. there. are. there. we use this kind of visitors by that is read don't go since some. of the artists trying to humiliate the system against the c.d.'s we have this many times and we are now we have video you see this concerns of all the lives of the silliness more and more sold this is one kind of encourage one thing greenlighted the israeli. should the should think the worst in civilians the only sure thing also killing so this is the time that the international community in order to be on the side of the palestinian civilians against such a good violations committed by the israeli. court and isra

the petitioner urged how they want to change some of this to potassium chloride. in addition to new labeling we need to finish our work on manual labeling. we recently issued a draft guidance document about how many labeling instruments could be qualify. how to provide calorie information on menus will soon be finalizing that guidance. on may 7 consumers can walk into these establishments and know what a glance how many calories are in the foods they order for themselves and their children. were taking steps on a new nutrition label. consumers are starting to have access of a new label and provide more information to empower them to truths healthy diets. we issued final regulations and expanded the date to januarjanu, 2020. our work is a unique challenge. were creating rules that have broader range of stakeholders than any other area. we need to consider all elements. i understand we need to remain cognizant of. the slight public engagement needs are so robust. it's crucial to provide clear expectations. a priority to make sure were communicating with stakeholders

. >> reporter: the petitioners have a backup plan. if they cannot join the new part, they would like to form their own district. but, the school district says they need to work together as a unified district. >> with more housing, there is more dollars coming into the district, and we are not surprised there is a quick desire to try and segregate the district to reap the awards of the financial windfall in that district. >> it is not fair to just single out one school. do all of the schools. >> reporter: the group has been gathering signatures on line as well as going door to door. they said they have about half of the more than 600 signatures they need. >>> a renewed push into bay area to ban gun shows at the cow palace. >> it will not stop the next santa fe, but it will stop is california from profiting and glamorizing the retail sale of guns. >> up next tonight, the new legislation introduced today and why lawmakers say after several failed attempts, this one will pass. >>> the secretary of state warns iran to change her face some

we have the petitioner side, the respondent side. if the government it is always gray.then you can write one. light green, 30 pages. dark green, supporting the respondent. here is what i am doing this week. i'm reading these briefs. i talked to my law clerks. i am not just delegating. i have read them. we had a discussion. i said i would like you to look at this. i have a few more to read and then we will have an oral argument. today. from each side has happened our. it is tough being a lawyer. very tough. the nine of us each have different views. when one person is smiling the next one is frowning. then we are back in our conference and we discuss it. in that book is the name of the case and the space to write what every person says. the chief justice says the issue is this. what i think is this. i would affirm or reverse and here is why. and it goes to justice kennedy and tomas, ginsburg, alito, sotomayor, everyone listens. no one speaks until everyone has spoken once. i better know what they think why won't pick up. then the chief justice will assign the end of the t

one petitioners says that small price when you're talking about national security.. >> thank you. an oregon student told he can't wear a pro-trump t-shirt to school. does the school have a right to ban the shirt or is it a violation of his free speech? our attorneys are ready to argue the case. you're the jury. night court is in session next. then i found aleve pm. the only one to combine a safe sleep aid... ...plus the 12 hour pain relieving strength of aleve. i'm back. aleve pm for a better am. rough if you're on vacation. but the best seat in the house if you're at outback. introducing the aussie 4-course, starting at $15.99. but hurry, aussie 4-course won't last long! and if you want outback at home, order now! (sighs) i hate missing out missing out after hours. not anymore, td ameritrade lets you trade select securities 24 hours a day, five days a week. that's amazing. it's a pretty big deal. so i can trade all night long? ♪ ♪ all night long... is that lionel richie? let's reopen the market. mr. richie, would you ring the 24/5 bell? sure can, jim. ♪ trade 24/5,

50 congressional signatures on the letter to the secretary of defense gates at the time. 16,000 petitionersrt to get one guy in. >> so when you got the exemption it was just for you to wear the turban and the beard. it wasn't just for any sikh? >> yeah, correct. so i was the first religious accommodation in like a generation. >> oh, wow. >> for anybody. not just sikhs. after i got my one-off accommodation, i deployed at the end of 2011 to a province in afghanistan. and we saw a lot of devastating injuries. >> i'm guessing none of the people you took care of when you walked in the room said i'm the doctor and said wait, you're wearing a turban and have a beard. >> no. >> nobody cares. come on. it took us almost ten years of effort. but we were able to get a policy change that now allows turbans and beards and hijabs, allows for yarmulkes and other religious expression. this is just a policy change for the army. but i was proud and really happy that we did it not just for sikhs, that we were able to advocate for muslims and jews, christian as well. if the largest employer in the united states

. >> reporter: the petitioners have a backup plan.they cannot join them apart, they would like to make their own district. the school district calls this a mistake and says the community needs to work together as one unified district. 2 with more housing, there is more dollars coming into the district, and we are not surprised there is a quick desire to try and segregate the district to reap the rewards of the new housing. >> reporter: some parents say they have concerns about what would happen to those students left behind. >> it is not fair to single out one school. do all of the schools. >> reporter: the group had the -- has been gathering signatures on line and have about half of the signatures they need. >>> a rally was held in oakland today to inspire people to get out and vote in the primary election next month. today is the last day to register to vote for the primary election, and a rally at the plaza in front of oakland city hall encourage people to make sure they register and get out and vote. organizers are trying to boost

my favorite quote, nor can your petitioner believe it to be the meaning of the law to make the wife and small children and -- entirely accountable of the husband's and father's transgressions. why are you messing with us? that is not right. the third thing she did in this petition, which you can see, she collected the signatures of 78 people, men people in her community who supported her petition. in other words, saying we agree. she is good, which is another reason why i think she was a patriot. these men are sort of lining up in support of her. nevertheless, this petition, too, was rejected. petition number three, the last one. this is the one that really, i first read it 20 years ago and it is sort of stuck with me ever since. which is kind of why i think i am going back to this small-scale project after that disaster book is done. in this last petition, spurgin presented herself as an independent, political actor, distinct from her tory husband. she, in effect renounced her marriage and described herself as a citizen, her words, and she claimed that as a citizen, she had the common

petitioners arbitrate conflict between the worlds two largest economies? no one burns on my watch!ltra strength heartburn relief chews. with more acid-fighting power than tums chewy bites. mmmmm...amazing. i have heartburn. heartburn relief from alka-seltzer. enjoy the relief. this is the story of green mountain coffee roasters dark magic told in the time it takes to brew your cup. first, we head to vermont. and go to our coffee shop. and meet dave. hey. why is dark magic so spell-bindingly good, he asks? let me show you. let's go. so we climb. hike. see a bear. woah. reach the top. dave says dark magic is a bold blend of coffee with rich flavors of uganda, sumatra, colombia and other parts of south america. like these mountains, each amazing on their own. but together? magical. all, for a smoother tasting cup of coffee. green mountain coffee roasters packed with goodness. and it's time to get outside. pack in even more adventure with audible. with the largest selection of audiobooks. audible lets you follow plot twists off the beaten track. or discover magic when you hit the open

number five, petitioner shall actively monitor the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons on any property adjacent to the licensed permits as depicted on the most recently certified abc253. and number six, any graffiti painted or marked upon the premise or any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 72 hours of being applied. noted the applicant has agreed with the above recommended conditions. >> supervisor sheehy: thank you. are there any questions? thank you. call up moses karet from supervisor kim's office. >> good evening, supervisors. we would just like to encourage the applicant to install lighting and cameras as part of their application and to help out with this, the street cleaning that will inevitably occur in front of the store front. so, those are the very simple things that we are asking. thank you. >> supervisor sheehy: thank you. could we hear from the owners now, if they are here? >> good morning. we are the owners. and we have committed with city to clean up our sidewalk. we already inst

department has indicated the department is set to change obamacare rule that would bar medical petitioners to deny transgender reassignment surgery. >> i'm not familiar with that issue. i will look into that when i get into the department. thank you. yes. >> you talked about medicare part b negotiating better prices, that is the same thing that the president -- [inaudible] >> socialized medicare. why is that okay for medicare but not for other countries? >> so the differences having entities negotiate in a competitive environment, so what happens in some of the socialist countries, i dealt with them in the past, what they do is they say you don't come into this country until you pay the low price and here is below market noncompetitive price, you either pay it or you don't come into this country and they don't really care if the people of the country don't get access to that drug and people aren't informed even that they don't have access to that medicine in these systems and so that's completely different from what we are doing, we are harnessing the power of the private-negotiating marke

in addition, he's gotten 14 petitioner letters of support. the people on cap street in support, 10, 11, are in yellow here and shown right here. the support keeps coming. most important, i asked lucas to prepare a spreadsheet of contacts. here's a three-page spreadsheet with the people he's contacted and a record of the responses. this continues, too. so when we're dealing with a housing crisis, i have to ask, what is the damage to the community from a continuance? there's always an opportunity that will be turned down, but i believe these discussions are very sincere on the part of lucas, and as you can see, he's trying very hard. thank you. >> thank you. >> can you hand that? >> sure. >> next speaker, please. >> my name is armita. >> you can pull that microphone down if you need to. perfect. >> i've lived in the 700 block of cap street since 1960 except for a number of years when i went to college. i've seen all the changes, good, bad, the mission has accommodated more than is ever possible to imagine. we've made all the sacrifices. we've a

the petitioner urged fda to consider how naming the industry to replace some sodium chloride with potassium chloride which could provide public health benefits. in addition to the new labeling work on modernizing claims and ingredient labeling, we need to finish our work on menu labeling. we recently issued a draft guidance document that provides flexibility on how menu labeling requirements can be implemented. it shows restaurants and covered establishments how to provide calorie information on menus in ways that meets various business models, and we'll soon be finalizing that guidance and on may 2018 customers can walk into these establishments across the country and know in a glance how many calories they order are in the food they order for themselves and their children. we're also taking final steps on the new nutrition facts label. the first overhaul of that label in 20 years. consumers are starting to have access to an updated label that's based on current science and provide more -- provides more information to empower them to choose healthful diets. we issued final regulations in m

. >> has what you're talking about, i assume, in that case, the petitioners were clearly already deportablethey were found to be deportable. they were deported and that's when they raise the selective enforcement defense to deportation and that's what the supreme court said you couldn't did. it isn't -- they didn't say you can't bring an equal protection claim when the agency takes action that disproportionately affects when protected group over another. >> i would think that's an even stronger case, your honor. again, the point of aadc is that there's enforcement discretion and enforcement discretion can't be challenged on selective prosecution grounds. it's even worse than what they are -- let me put it this way in aadc, you actually had conceded facts that the government was treating one set of people worse than another on protective activity. here they have a facially neutral policy and they're just saying it has a disproportionate impact and alleging it was based on impermissible motive. that's weaker -- >> so we're talking -- i think you made clear because you brought a motion to dism

. >> in aadc which is what you're talking about, i assume in, that case the -- the petitioners were clearly already deportable. they were found to be deportable. they were being deported, and that's when they raised this selective enforcement defense to deportation, and that's -- that's what the supreme court said you couldn't do. it isn't -- they didn't say you can't bring an equal protection claim when the agency takes action that disproportionately affects a protected group over another. >> i would think that that's an even stronger case, your honor. the point of aadc is that there's enforcement discretion and endorsement discretion can't be challenged on selective prosecution grounds. it's even worse that what -- he had me put it this way. in aadc you actually had conceded facts that the government was treating one set of people worse than another set of people on the basis of first amendment protection activity and even that wasn't permissible in an equal protection claim. here they have a neutral policy and they are saying it has a disproportionate impact and they are basing it's base

: i will ask you to give people a sense of what the new york times and washington post, the two petitioners were like in 1971. very different media landscape than what we experience today. floyd: there were newspapers then, and only newspapers and three television networks. the heart of the information givers in the country. there were local newspapers around the country. very often one newspaper in a town, or one newspaper in a city. sometimes if you newspapers in a -- a few newspapers in a state. newspapers were the primary place most people got their news. as i indicated earlier, three television networks, nbc, cbs and abc. from those sources, the great bulk of the information that came to the public and the world is very different now. susan: this is our first case in a series with the chief justice. what should people know about him? ted: people should know -- in the first place, this court that decided this case, there were five of the justices who had been appointed by republicans. it was a very different person than his predecessor, earl warren, he was quite famous for protecting ci

ask you to give people a sense of what "the new york times" and the "washington post," the two petitionersn this case, were like in 1971, very different media landscape than we're experiencing today. >> yes. there were newspapers then and only newspapers and three television networks were the heart of the information givers in the country. there were local newspapers around the country, very often one newspaper in a town or one newspaper in a city, sometimes it's a few newspapers in a state. newspapers were the primary place most people got their news. and as i indicated earlier, three television networks -- nbc, cbs, and abc. and from those sources, the information came to the public. and of course, the world is very different now. >> this is our first case in this series with warren burger's chief justice. what should people know about him? >> people should know, in the first case, this court that decided this case, there were five of the justices who had been appointed by republicans. chief justice burger had taken over the supreme court, appointed to the supreme court by president nixo