our opinion does not address the content of the law that governs petitioner's attention. that is a matter yet to be determined. we hold that petitioners may invoke fundamental procedural protections of habeas corpus. the laws and the competent -- -- lawn constitution are designed special law and constitution are designed -- liberty and security can be reconciled and in our system they are reconciled within the framework of the law. the framers decided habeas corpus must be part of that framework. >> that case -- >> he said reconciling liberty and security. we were at a point, some. -- some period of time after 9/11, the u.s. made significant efforts in the war on terror and trying to figure out who was involved in 9/11 and what threats they were against the u.s. this case had very significant congressional involvement. congress passed statutes giving broad wartime powers to the president and there were statutes about how you could try people at guantanamo bay. it was a difficult position to bn. there were concerns about national security, people being held at guantanamo b

a matter yet to be determined, petitioner may invoke the protections. the law and constitution are to survive and remain in force in extraordinary times. security can be rescon styled and in our system, they are reconciled within the of the law. that it s decided that law.a part of >> you're at the solicitor general's office around this time. down to what he said which is reconciling liberty and security. point, it was some period of time after 9-11, the nited states had made significant efforts in the war terror. there had been significant congressional involvement. had passed the statutes to ng broad wartime power the president and statutes how you would try people at guantanamo bay. it was a difficult situation for the court to be in. there were obvious concerns about national security. are being held at being told ay who they are enemy combatants, dangerous people. you're justice kennedy, you don't want to step on congress's the principal in and people tates hallenging the legality of their detention. that's where justice kennedy came out. fromsn't

we hold that petitioners may invoke fundamental procedural protections of habeas corpus. the constitution is designed to remain in force in extraordinary times. security can be reconciled and in our system there reconciled within the framework of the law. the framers decided that habeas corpus, the right of first importance, must be a part of that framework and a part of that law. >> that case in particular. i think it came down to what he said, reconciling liberty and security. we were at a point, it was sometime after 9/11. the united states had made significant efforts in the war on terror and trying to figure out who was involved in 9/11 and what threats there were against the u.s.. this was a case in which there congressional involvement, giving broad wartime powers to the president. as to how you would try people at guantanamo bay, that was a difficult situation for the court to be in. there are obvious concerns about national security. people being held at guantanamo bay who this administration is telling you are enemy combatants and dangerous people. there is cong

before he dared to enter the station again but he hasn't given up the fight he's now one of the petitioners pushing india's stop court to decriminalize homosexuality among the gay community the poor are the most volatile. in guevara without go along with no one at this workshop on six six wants to show their. husbands and fathers some of them are sex workers only them lead a more liberal avatar no one in my family or my neighborhood knows i'm gay. they did they call me a faggot. my family wouldn't accept me anymore as. i did spends long at the office he draws strength to speak and to spam it especially his mother who has been hugely supportive of. her india supreme court is expected to deliver on whether the dole is constitutional. is a soja pope in the gay community. that they may finally be able to step out of the shadow. played . more. history shifts interests for. the go ahead to the icon the fish and. about the man behind the dark shades. just moments in the life of a great fashion designer. that starts september. w. did you know it cost fifty cents to feed one hungry child for one ful

before he dared to enter the station again but he hasn't given up the fight he's now one of the petitioners pushing india's stop court to decriminalize homosexuality among the gay community the poor of the most bundle. in give idea of how go along with the gong no one at this workshop can seek six wants to show their. husbands and fathers some of them are sex workers only then would. have a diagnosis no one in my family or my neighborhood knows i'm gay if they did they call me a faggot. my family wouldn't accept me anymore as. i did spends long hours at the office he draws strength from the state and his family especially his mother who has been hugely supportive. india's supreme court is expected to deliver a verdict on whether the bill is constitutional. the so just hope in the gay community. that they may finally be able to step out of the shadow. plastic model turn into a paving stone. make it clearly. working anywhere and there are people developing smart solutions everywhere. let's inspire each other to environmental magazine eco africa next. european stars deliver rousing performance

before he dared to enter the station again but he hasn't given up the fight he's now one of the petitioners pushing india's stop court to decriminalize homosexuality among the gay community the poor of the most vulnerable. in guevara without go along with no one at this workshop on six six wants to show their. husbands and fathers some of them sex workers only them would lead a more liberal have a target no one in my family or my neighborhood knows i'm gay. they did they call me a faggot. my family wouldn't accept me anymore. i did spends long office he draws strength from the state and a spammer especially his mother who has been hugely supportive of. india's supreme court is expected to deliver on whether the goal is constitutional . the suit of hope in the gay community. that they may finally be able to step out of the shadow. enter the conflict zone fronting the powerful. as f.b.i. director james comey was always pretty well known when donald trump fired him last year. for proof a measure of this week he's my guest here in by the way he's promoting a book even as he faces new charges of

before he dared to enter the station again but he hasn't given up the fight he's now one of the petitioners pushing india's stop court to decriminalize homosexuality among the gay community the poor are the most volatile. in guevara's have come along with no one at this workshop on six six wants to show their. husbands and fathers some of them sex workers only them with. more liberal avatar no one in my family or my neighborhood knows i'm gay. they did they call me a faggot. my family wouldn't accept me any more as as early as i did nigga. i did spends long at the office he draws strength from the street and his family especially his mother who has been hugely supportive. india's supreme court is expected to deliver on whether the bill is constant. the subject hope in the gay community. that they may finally be able to step out of the shadow. nineteen sixty eight the end of the prague spring. on august twenty first one thousand nine hundred sixty eight the reform movement came to a bloody end. more saw back states led by the soviet union invaded czechoslovakia. the dream of socialism but if

before he dared to enter the station again but he hasn't given up the fight he's now one of the petitioners pushing india's stop court to decriminalize homosexuality among the gay community the poor are the most vulnerable. in guevara without go along with no one at this workshop concedes six wants to show their. husbands and fathers some of them are sex workers only of them would lead a more liberal avatar no one in my family or my neighborhood knows i'm gay. why did they call me a faggot. my family wouldn't accept me anymore as as he goes out the new guy added spends long at the office he draws strength from the state and his family especially his mother who has been hugely supportive. who can india supreme court is expected to deliver a verdict on whether the goal is constitutional. the so just hope in the gay community. that they may finally be able to step out of the shuttle. plane. and. events. the summer festivals and news. outlets to anyone. in this never ending heat wave by visiting cultural hotspots around the concepts are. based on. how well becomes power now you get rich putting

mysterious place that i think until this case and this is an interesting case because they have a living petitioner who is an american citizen with constitutional rights the judge actually called below the karim the one with rights in in the colloquy. the other cases all involve foreigners who has legal standing with questionable in an american court and the government makes this very aggressive if not persuasive argument that we're the only people who are really qualified to to make the determination that we need to do this because because counterterrorism is such a difficult and immediate business where you have to make split second decisions where the only ones you can make that call and judges over and over again have said yes and that in the doctrine here is called political question. essentially they're saying that this is this is a political question it's not the purview of the courts to look at. but now this judge recently made the decision but they are going to look at it this judge for the first time in what was a very big victory for civil libertarians said at the very least we're going

hours of 10:00 and 2:00 a.m., or any time that the premise are providing live entertainment the petitioner shall provide three uniformed security guards in the parking lot and/or premise and shall maintain order therein and prevent any activity which would interfere with the clientel enjoyment of the property or by nearby residents or surrounding community. the licensed security guard must be licensed by the state of california department of consumer affairs. number four, no distilled spirits shall be sold by the bottle. and, number five, to actively monitor the area under their control and in efforts to prevent any damage to the properties adjacent as depicted or in the a.b.c.253. and it should be noted that the applicant has agreed with all of the listed above recommended conditions. >> supervisor mandelman: thank you. supervisor ronen. >> supervisor ronen: yes, i have no questions, and i just wanted to mention that i did receive a letter of support from raquel radondesz with the filipino cultural district. and she is supporting this liquor license and particularly i just wanted to menti

then we might have light green for the petitioner or dark green for the respondent. by the time i finish reading them, i go to my law clerk and save these other problems that are bothering me, write a memo. i will read the memo, talk to my law clerk and then we will have oral argument. oral argument is really after we read this thing pretty thoroughly and gotten memos and thought about it. and then the oral argument happens and our main job is to ask questions primarily. the poor lawyers. it is tough, and we are not like. it is polite. it is unfortunate. i feel like it would be longer and we can be polite. nonetheless, you ask them questions. a good question is really going to shed light on how you are thinking about it. not to show you know something, or you have a funny joke. right. get this after we have heard the oral argument, we have a day or so to think about it. then we are in the conference, it begins with the chief. a book referring to the other persons in each case. the chief says the issue is, and this is what i think and then he goes to justice kennedy.

. >> these petitioners and for a time some of the diocese sought to prevent the entire report from evering the light of day. in effect, they wanted to cover up the cover-up. they sought to do the same thing that senior church leaders in the diocese we investigated have done for decades. bury the sexual abuse of priests upon children and cover it up forever. >> the report states that because of the cover-up, almost all of the abuse is too old to be prosecuted. but the grand jury has issued presentments against two priests who allegedly assaulted children in the statute of limitations and might be many more indictments in the future because, brooke, the investigation continues. one more thing, the attorney general said, you know, there's so many redactions in this report. we don't like that. we want everything to be public so they're working legally to try to make that happen. >> good. good. jean casarez, stay on it for us. thank you so much. >>> just in to cnn, a public utility spokesperson in puerto rico says power is finally restored to every one of the clients affected by hurricane ma

portions of this report, as you know, that have been redacted by the challenges of several of these petitioners, which almost led to the whole blocking of the report. >> what's the argument for that? how can you possibly argue for that to have it redacted? >> it is frankly a disingenuous argument being made by these collaborators and abusers, that they do not have a certain level of due process, even though the commonwealth and attorney general followed the grand jury statute to the letter in this investigation. they were thorough, they were accurate, and all of the information should be released. the supreme court will hear those arguments. we have filed briefs on behalf of mr. frye, who is attempting to raise the voice of the victim to the supreme court of pennsylvania and we hope that every last line in this report comes out. >> is there something unusual about pennsylvania or do we think this is happening at a similar scale across america? >> this is -- the only thing that is unusual that we can be thankful for, if there's anything we can be thankful for today, it is that those in law enfor

likely to be put into prison at least that's what we see if we look at other cases for example some petitioners who knows nobody they are detained and really nobody knows what happened to them so this kind of public is all to some kind of safe way for them what do you think you took away from the interviews that you led with activists and lawyers during your filming. i think what i mean took away is that they are so bright they are still continuing their work although they know there are risks so they are really really really brave and i don't want to. miss this opportunity to to interview them because it's it's really these people are really sure it really. journalism student debit missal thank you so much for joining us on our program and sharing your story with us. cubans are starting a debate on a new draft constitution today for the next four months people are being invited to voice their opinion on the document at hundreds of public events on the island a vote has been taken in february next year the new constitution would for the first time recognize the role of the market and the privat

was potentially saveit one person today who was potentially save it sounds very cartoonish, that petitioner there could've been a failure of the anchor blog because of the lightning hitting it. it is all out their stuff and a moment but no one is discounting anything. the failure type of the bridge was quite unusual in terms of it being unusual for a full tower to collapse. normally it mightjust be a section of the day. for a full tower to collapse, that raises more questions about why that might happen in the first place. how often does a structure like this have to be looked at and maintained to make sure that it is —— its integrity is there for more than 100,000 vehicles per day? it is interesting. because the maintenance regime depends com pletely the maintenance regime depends completely on what kind of structure it is, where it is, what use it has got, the weather conditions, the materials of the bridge, how old it is, all of those different factors will come into the maintenance regime that people carry out. i know in the uk, we have very strict maintenance regimes on key parts of in

one great thing coming out of this russian nonsense is to see how much people like petitioner strong and lisa page and this and that personal i being paid. normally the dial with the government job is, it's fun, it's not that much work, you work self-it's, absolutely can't be fired. unbelievably great health care and the pension. who gets pensions anymore? tradeoff is, your salary isn't that high. you have a higher salary in the private sector but you can be fired on a dime, your health care, you have to pay for, now it's she reverse, government workers gait all that and make more than people in the private sector. how about start with a an across the board cut of federal salaries. >> spring hill, florida, jeh good, morning. democrat. >> caller: thank you for caking my call. i'd like to point out two bits of hypocrisy by ann coulter. if you can would you please put up the statement that trump made today about manafort because i'd like for her to explain to me what he means when he says, manafort didn't break? break what? didn't break by telling the truth? didn't break by -- >> guest:

by its definition disproportionate means you are comparing the impact on the petitioner to the impacton one or more others, is that correct? >> i believe that is correct, senator. in fact, if i could say on the small refinery process we work closely with department of energy and they do the initial analysis and we work with them in providing additional analysis as well. but i committed to do and what we committed to do is provide transparency to these issues and work developing the dashboards we can put the information out publicly so people know when they are issuing a small refinery waiver and we have to make sure we take into account the company applying for the small business refinery but we want to be as a transparent as we can, including a process out to the public. >> just to confirm, are you saying that the epa compares the high cost of compliance relativr to the entire refinery industry and we have to prove that we are at a small refinery and produce less than 75000 barrels a day and that's your ticket in the door? >> senator, if i respond back to you in writing on that becau

"your petitioners, not being persons of affluent fortunes, but young men who have spent most of their time in service of their country, in arms against its cruel enemies, finding themselves arrested for doing what they believed and still believe was nothing but their duty, held to bail in a state where they were strangers, without connections, without the ability to defend themselves against a powerful, artful person, without the advantages of his office and the wealth amassed in the current war, humbly ask congress for their intervention." and that, in my view, was the turning point. on july 30, congress again and convened. they heard the evidence. enacted america's first whistleblower law, calling upon every inhabitant of the united states to call to the appropriate attention of the authorities crimes. copies of that resolution are on andcopies of that resolution are tables. but they did two other things. they voted money to pay for the lawyers in rhode island. they hired an attorney who would later become the attorney general, a brilliant young lawyer. they wanted the best. and tha

by its definition, disproportionate means you are comparing the impact on the petitioner to the impact on one or more others. is that correct? mr. wheeler: i believe that is correct, senator. if i could say on the small refinery process, we work with department of energy, they do the initial analysis and then we work with them on providing additional analysis as well. what i have committed to do and we are going to do is provide more transparency in how we make these decisions. we are in the process of developing a dashboard to put all the information out publicly so people know when we are issuing a small refinery waiver and the circumstances around that. we have to make sure we take into account any confidential business information of the company applying for the small business refinery exemption. we want to try and be as transparent as we can and put that information, including our process to the public. sen. fischer: just to confirm, are you saying the epa compares the high cost of compliance relative to the entire refinery industry? so all you basically have to prove is that you

by its definition, disproportionate means you are comparing the impact on the petitioner to the impacton one or more others. is that is correct. if i could say on the small refinery process we work closely with the permit of energy. they do the initial analysis and we work on providing additional analysis as well. what i committed to doing is provide more transparency in how to make these decisions. we are in the process of developing a dashboard to put all information are publicly so people know when we are issuing a small refinery waiver and of circumstances around that the we have to make sure we take into account any confidential business information of the company applying for the small business refinery exemption but we want to be as transparent as we can and put all that information including our process out for the public. >> just to confirm, are you saying the epa compares the high cost of compliance relative to the entire refinery industry so all you have to prove is you are a small refinery and produce 75,000 barrels a day and that is your ticket in the door. >> if i could r