petitioners contrary reading has a loophole allowing any employer to outsource the discrimination in order to avoid that problem to abandon that treats of them the same way. we agree to the use of federal statutes is in the ordinary way doesn't follow the title vii approach. my friend on the other side suggest with title vii precluded congress from doing the same thing. but none of those differences stop them in 1974 from doing the exact same thing and in title vii. there are slight differences of course, but what is common to them to address the problem in the same way to put governments in the definition of employer and that is the common thread. so to touch on the question that is why think the vulnerability of the argument it does not need to look at the broader issues or resolve the outer limits of that closet isn't implicated here and nothing turns on it. but bear in mind because cannot be interpretational offering because that comes to a conclusion the one thing it is supposed to do with that title vii context is to delegate discrimination but if you take the petitioners readi

of course, petitioner is not going to be able to do that. petitioner was informed in 2012 before he left custody both in writing and orally that he needed to register when he moved to new york, and that he failed to do it. so i take the point there could be as applied notice problems but i don't think there's one here. to get back to the colloquy i was having with justice gorsuch, i do think at the end of the day, this is not a provision that just lays out a general standard and then requires all of the fleshing in. that, the court has held is permissible provided you supply a general policy. but it really is inside even that, because congress set up a pretty articulated scheme, made a lot of judgments along the way -- >> do you think if there were a new attorney general who came in and said you know, i think this registration stuff has just gone overboard and i'm going to start making some exceptions with respect to pre-act offenders, i think it's just unfair to penalize them for the rest of their lives, could the attorney general do that?

and then the chief justice will call upon the lawyer for the petitioner in the first case. name.ill be called by there are lights at the podium for the lawyers making the , and when the lawyer has five minutes remaining, a yellow light goes on, and when the time is up, the red light goes on. depending on the chief justice, that could be closely observed or somewhat relaxed. when bill rehnquist was chief justice, he made them adhere to the time limits very strictly. >> you mentioned that you lineup in order of seniority. we have learned that seniority is important in the traditions of the supreme court. as the years progressed and you , wasble to move your seat anything different in the way you approached the arguments? it makes aonnor: difference in terms of what part of the line you are in when you lineup. it doesn't change anything about the argument or what you do. you are still who you are. we have justices who seldom have questions and we have justices who always ask questions. that doesn't seem to change from whatever position they are in. >> and what was your own app

it is important that the court understand the limitations the petitioner would take place as the designation of habitat would apply to the governments own landon terms of limiting the confirmation process of someone what they permit on federal land . >> can't you do what you want to federal land? >> yes, to an extent but section 7 is a framework to bring an official wildlife service and its expertise . >> so the only benefit to the federal government is that the fish and wildlife service will sit down with the other government agencies . >> there is benefit to the public and having section seven scrutiny and consultation go on before an action agency . >> at some point someone in the federal government can say with the fish and wildlife service i want you to sit down with the army of corps of engineers, right? but you don't need a statute to bring that about? >> that's true. but section 7 organizes that by setting up a consultation process so that the action agency can't go forward in an area that might harm the species or its habitat without consulting with the agency. >> i guess what i was

petitions take valuable time away from add adjudicating good cases that are properly filed that the petitioner has spent time marshaling the necessary documentation required. this is meant to improve the process streamline case handling system and has been adjudicated and had more time to handle the cases that marry it. notices to appear. on june 28 this year, uscis released the guidance to appear. now to be clear uscis has always had the authority to issue and we were delegated away in 2003 by the secretary when dhs was first created. uscis issued approximately 91,000 visits to appear in the issued approximately 58,000 in the quarter's one and 22018. so uscis has been issuing by the tens of thousands year after year. this is not a new authority but starting today, uscis will begin implementing the updated policy. we ask for the range of cases where th the individuals is inds removable and there is evidencee of criminal activity over applicant denied an immigration benefit and present in the country. through the new policy memo by uscis is carrying out the executive order enhancing public safe

petitioner veronese. >> chief, thank you for your report. you left off the most important part of your report was the last but not least you are obviously not going to leave this department any time soon until we will have the commission will have plenty of opportunity between now and then to honor you, and i want to start by saying that i did appear at the three-alarm fire on monday night. you are absolutely right, the department executed on that fire flawlessly, and it was nice to be able to go up into the building with you and check the damage. the reason for that is because it gave me a sense of the type of just utter hell that those firefighters must have faced when uncertainty they must have faced when they had to climb 16 stories because the elevator key wasn't working, and i understand part of the attack strategy is to utilize the stairs. for those firefighters to climb those stairs with gear and hoses is pretty stunning. hats off to every single engine company and truck that showed up there. if you recall the truck numbers, i think

when they take us through statements by a petitioner comments crucial in this investigation there arence that can unfold into this investigation in general. i'm not sure. tragic accusations are not tantamount to a conviction. even her women are saying they don't want the standard. that standard is bad for american society. we'll should be held to a penalty charge? >> winter during the allegations that they play a large part of it. and so it's really not necessarily be provable offense the monsters documentation where she said i'm making this all up. so frankly this kind of thing is likely not prosecutable. >> nbc is now saying they couldn't corroborate her claims because of poor people should put forward, and she provided these claims. one is deceased, two others not for comment. aforethought nbc news he didn't remember the swetnik i didn't think even socialize with her. i want your response to this. julie swetnik's ex-boyfriend is afraid of her, said she threatened to kill his unborn child and he filed a petition for a restraining order against julie swetnik. richard annecy told laur

kavanaugh wanted to know from a petitioner if a tap constituted violent force.case was defining violent force. a moment of lefty when justice sotomayor turned to justice gorsuch and pinched him before he knew what was going on to say if that was violent force. that is what this was all about. there were no protests inside the courtroom, as it's a federal offense. supporters say that the two justices, with two justices that he nominated confirmed he is cementing his legacy on the courts and saying it will help the republicans in the midterms. >> last night you saw the 69th judicial nomination under president trump. the second supreme court. the 2 sixth circuit and dozens of appeals courts. this president's legacy, somebody that has reshaped judicial branch to strict constructionists this. is huge, huge win for the president. it galvanized republicans heading into a key midterm election. reporter: republicans believe this nomination will energy their base. democrats believe the court is too far to the right. therefore it will energize their base for the midterms.

petitioner,t in and we cannot invest in schools, and the cannot protect programs we know so many folksd. we already have a jumpy. a chilean and a half cut on medicaid. $500 million to cut medicare. over $200 billion in educational grams. they aren't -- programs. the fact of the matter is, we have over 4% economic growth, that is the best way to reduce deficit and get spending under control, which is to grow the economy. us tiger administration told one and half percent economic growth was the new normal. we have more job openings in america and we have unemployment. we have the lowest rate of unemployment among black and hispanic individuals in the country ever. we have more growth in the mainstream economy. i have a plan to cut property taxes by removing the medicaid mandate on the local homeowners and small businesses. he is against it. probably because he just moved from new jersey and does not understand the burden of property taxes in new york. antonio delgado: i am against it because it is a ridiculous way to justify rolling back medicaid expansion leaving millions of folks with

petitioner . >> your argument as a critical habitat does not have to include all the elements for habitability. because you can undertake some restoration that provides for whatever is missing. the draining of this one. but if you have the ponds in alaska you could build a giant greenhouse and plant the longleaf pines and the frog could live there. there has to be presumably some limit on what restoration you would say is required . >> with the surface found here is that the restoration of the uplands could be accomplished with reasonable efforts. the central feature of the habitat . >> reasonable efforts but the land owners would have to undertake voluntarily, right? >> the land owners or if they entered into agreement with the nature conservancy or other environmental groups . they purchased land at the other location where the frog is. >> they told you they are not going to do a . >> that is true but it cannot what the subjective intentions by this time at the particular owner of this property are . the act turns on the status of the land not on the intention of the landowner . that may be

how does any petitioner who is aligned with any of the groups that judge kavanaugh might think was involved in the political opposition to his candidacy have faith that they will get a fair audience before the supreme court when judge kavanaugh is on it? do you really think given how an bring he was, -- angry he was, given what he believes was organized against him that he is going to fairly give causes aligned with democrats a fair shot before the court? do you really think that he now can say that he will be a neutral color umpire as a south justice -- as a supreme court justice? and here's why this is a precedent breaking decision that we are making. in the past we have actually put political people on the supreme court. we have. centuries ago we elected -- excuse me. we selected people to the supreme court who actually served in political positions. that was at a time when our politics was maybe a little less heated, where there was more opportunity for common ground. but in recent times that has not been the way in which we selected people for the supreme court. we traditionally select

one to the petitioner, three of the department of justice attorneys here. now there were small group of protesters outside. nobody protested inside this event. the police inside reminding folks in there to be quiet. it is a federal crime to protest inside of the supreme court. there were protesters outside. first in the back. then they came around front the supreme court, before the police shushed them away. officers set up barricade expecting a large crowd which didn't materialize. the barricades were up so you couldn't get close to the front door of the supreme court. kavanaugh's tenure is off and running. neil: thank you very much, edward. former law clerk to justice samuel alito, barbara smith. barbara very good to have you. >> thanks for having me. nothing like baptism by fire, get into the first case among many. certainly distractions judges deal with prior. how do you think he is going to fit in with the other eight justices? >> well, of course justice kavanaugh has been a judge for 12 years. he knows quite well how to participate actively in oral ar

adjudicator time away from adjudicating good cases that are properly filed that the alien or the petitioner has spent time marshalling the necessary documentation the regulations require. this is meant to improve the process, streamline case handling, this case handling system and adjudicators, as i say, have more time to handle cases that merit it. notices to appear. on june 28th of this year, uscis released updated guidance for issuing notice to appear. they've always had the authority for notice to appear, we were delegated way back in 2003 when dha was first created by secretary ridge. uscis had 91,000 notices to appear in fiscal year 2017 and nta's in quarters one and two of fiscal year 2018. so, again, uscis has always been issuing ntsa's by the tens of thousands. this is not new. starting today, uscis will begin issuing the updated policy. under the new guides, officers will issue for a wider range of cases where the individual is moveable and there's evidence of fraud, criminal activity or applicant is denied an immigration benefit and is present unlawfully in the country. through t