but regardless, you have a petitioner was blue and the respondents read and there are about 60 pages each and a yellow one of about 30 pages from the petitioner and the government follow a great briefs, governments always pray and then you can file one, amicus curiae, light green for the petitioner, dark green for the respondent and usually there about 10 to 20. there could be 100. hundreds pretty tough, but i'll read all those briefs. i grant you that if there's 30 or 40 briefs, i begin to see if it's repetitive which it is. and i'll look through but i'll look through both and then i get into my law clerk, the h2 presets, item 12 sets in oral argument. it's usually 12 and they'll write a memo and i'll read the memo and will discuss it and so all that's happened before the oral arguments. so the oral argument is really for us to ask questions and it's very hard for the lawyers because you know, they aren't sure what it's going to be and one judge starts off and the others frowning and oh my god so is very hard. what is a really good question, a good question is i don't know the answe

my perspective is, if the petitioner suffered a financial loss, it's not the b.i.c.'s responsibility to make her whole. it's the person who demolished the building without a permit. if she feels she's entitled to money, she should take legal action against the person who demolished the building and result in the imposition of the stipulation. >> president mccarthy: next speaker. seeing none. public comment closed. >> rebuttal? >> yes, we did get the engineer's report but that came six months after the fire damage. we do have a system in place for fire damage buildings that require demolition. demolition permit can be approved with engineer's report and application and it goes through the proper channels. it is actually something that can be obtained. i'm going to show you the engineer's report. if you look at the highlighted part what it said, this is only thing that we got from the engineer. there's no pictures how the fire was. the date is actually februar february 6th. the original report was in 2018. unlawful demolition was no november 2018. there's loss couple of

but regardless, you have a petitioner and the respondent and there are 60 pages each and a yellow one, about 30 pages for the petitioner and the government might follow, gray, the government is always gray and you could file one. amicus curiae i of light green for the respondent and usually, there are 10 to 20. there could be 100. it is pretty tough. i will read all those briefs. i grant you, if there are 30 or 40 mica's briefs, i might see if it is repetitive, which it is. look through. i give them to my law clerk, they do three sets, i do 12 sets in an oriole -- oral argument. they will write a memo and i will read their memo and we will hasuss it and all that happened before the oral argument. so the oral argument is for us to ask questions. it is very hard for the lawyers. for the lawyers. because, they are not sure what it is going to be. one judge starts to nod and the other is frowning and oh, my god. what is a good question? a good question is, i don't know the answer when i ask it. but i think the lawyer can help me out. i believe that it is relevant to the decision in the ca

in some states, the petitioner will never be seen by the judge or opposing counsel. they can make a telephone call at an ex parte hearing and then immunize themselves at a later hearing from cross-examination by simply filing an affidavit. states that thwart cross-examination promote unnecessary no-notice, no-knock raids and leave innocent victims without a civil remedy for false or malicious petitions and should not be rewarded by federal funding. federal funding should support best practices and not the worst. thank you. chair graham: thank you all. it gives us a lot to think about. cher bradshaw, if the law that -- sheriff bradshaw, if the law that exists in florida existed before the parkland shooting, do you think it would have mattered? sheriff bradshaw: yes. although it didn't happen in palm beach county, we actually dealt with the brother of nikolas cruz the next day. he had made some statements, made some gestures that he was going to go back down there and finish what the brother had started. the deputies responded to that location, contacted him, my behavi

and he pointed out that by proceeding with his preferred course -- this is at page 556a of the petitioners' appendix -- this may eliminate the need for the census bureau to have to impute an answer for millions of people, specifically about 22.2 million people for whom the bureau told him he would get actual answers at 98% actual accuracy. justice kagan: if i may say, general, when you think about those statements, i mean it's just conclusory. it's just like, well, this would eliminate the need for modeling because we could ask a question. but the question is, why is asking a question better when you know that asking a question is going to result in lots of non-responses and in lots of false reporting? and so you can't just go back to i'd rather ask a question. you have to say why you'd rather ask a question and what benefits it has to ask a question. general francisco: right. justice kagan: and if i may say , a lot of your argument your , briefs are extremely well done. but a lot of your argument just do not appear in the secretary's decision memo. and the fact that sg lawyers can come up

number two, petitioners shall actively monitor their area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons on any property adjacent to the licenses premises as certified on their most recent ab-253 form. and no noise shall be audible at any nearby residents. i've just now spoken to them about agreeing to these conditions, and they have. >> chair mandelman: so the conditions have been agreed to, and they're done. i don't see any questions or comments from colleagues. is the applicant here? come on up. if you want to. >> so we've accepted the conditions from john over there. the epicurean trader, we're a husband-and-wife run business, independently owned. our current markets are well reviewed and they're widely accepted in the neighborhoods in which we currently operate. in hayes valley, there are 5,296 residents in the immediate vicinity of the location, as well there's location. since we've aunited states noed our plans to open the location, we've received overwhelming support from the hayes valley. we've designed the protection with the neighborhood in mind and fe

mayor middle account over for good only if i simply sat like the petitioner but it sure lets my fellow be a. homo clone or that i have to as i have to and i mean that i'm at the verge of those police and i was only ok i don't know quantity is real yet or was genuine then what do you know i said what i want you nick what the etiquette that's what i do. and the thing over the last. chick at sea i don't get lolo you got me a car coming to see me go get a cold or even not a cause i haul her daughter ashley judd just on my we don't know but as we looked off a little bit to see. that a door or not that he saw he left if they never said. and that's just that they're all the way it's all my theory. we're lucky i'm under twenty but it goes that that's what i love it that's what he thought and i was that was this was the. role model of this should have just going to be such but how are you going to let anybody just all be toward that and i thought i had spoken so much i need got to be a serious thought to have it pointing out what i dug up was that i got exactly so much i wanted to keep up with

petitioner shall monitor the area under their control in order to prevent loitering of persons on their property or adjacent property, and third no distilled beverages should be sold in a bottle less than .15 liter. >> supervisor mandelman: thank you. is there any public comment? >> thank you. we keep the neighborhood nice and clean, you know, try to monitor if there's anything wrong, and contact the police, and thank you very much. >> supervisor mandelman: any comments or questions from my colleagues? so thank you. and is there any public comment on this item? okay. seeing none, public comment is now closed. so colleagues, i want to thank the applicant for working with supervisor fewer's office, and with the a.l.u. i think if anyone has comments, concerns, questions, we're at the point to direct the clerk to find a resolution and seeing no objection, we will approve that. thank you. clerk, please call the next item. [agenda item read]. >> supervisor mandelman: go ahead. >> good morning, supervisors. museum of ice cream have approved for a type 42 license, and if approved, this would al

for the purse of conferring with or receiving advice from the city attorney in which the city is petitioner and the pacific gas and electric company is adverse party. >> president yee: public comment has been taken during general public comment. we will now convene in closed session. we ask that you exit the chamber and the supervisor sheriffs to >> president yee: ready? okay, we're now back in open session. may have a motion that the board finds it is the best interest of the public that the board elect not to disclose its closed session deliberations. motion by supervisor fewer, seconded by somebody? supervisor peskin. and -- okay. so we have a motion and seconded. i think we need to take roll call. do we need to take roll call? on the motion not to disclose the activity in the closed session, supervisor yee? aye. brown? brown not present. fewer aye. haney not present. mandelman aye. mar absent. peskin aye. ronen aye. safai aye. stefani aye. walton aye. there are 8 ayes. >> president yee: motions passes. could i have the motion to file this hearing? >> can we -- all the councillors are go

so the tipping of the scales is pretty easy for the petitioner. >> 14 states and the district of columbias law, and 21 have proposals. more than 200 counties nationwide have vowed not to enforce, with 132 declaring themselves second amendment sanctuaries. in colorado, half the states counties have said they will not enforce it. it passed both chambers of the colorado legislature without one republican vote. >> colorado really took a step forward in protecting the public, trying to prevent future gun violence. >> the colorado governor has said that sheriff senator in on a lawmaking position, but in a law enforcement position. harris, as you mentioned, they are expected to sign this bill into law. >> harris: thank you for the latest on that. now a new reaction to the growing controversy around former vice president joe biden. two women now alleging that the former vpn appropriately touched on. will this mean for biden's potential 2020 run? the power panel slides in. ♪ thanks to priceline working with top airlines to turn their unsold seats into amazing deals, sports fans are seeing more awa

openness to visit academia if you like him here you know see one when in the us you can also lose the petitionerlive or believe that anthony or those that are open look ellie ever who it could recruit upon the pillow of course will amaze where the video teeny you have all of the dyson amazes silliness around about my yellow phyllis's feet of me and i've been all that unfunny devastates it does act as a go to market in particular but the most. the why there might include is that a myth about. ok is different for what it wanted by for this means. you know the commitment of by for the just means in it with your scope it i am since i live. seem a bit strange together you know i think i've read he's. an account. by fourteen the romance of teenie was definitely over and resists concerns may elsewhere. it's quite an embarrassment to your parents like say for instance. you know this guy's been seen each other and you don't even have plans for getting married and you got pregnant or something high embarrassing is that your parents. since moving back in with her parents visitors found them to be a lot mor

light green for the petitioner, dark green for the respondent and you see there are 10-20. there could be 100, 100 is pretty tough. i grant you if there are 30 or 40, i might begin to see if it is repetitive, which it is. i give them to my law clerk. they do three sets, i do 12 sets. they write a memo and i read it andemo and we discuss all of that has happened before the oral argument. us toal argument is for ask questions and it is hard for they are notecause sure what it is going to be and one judge starts and the other is frowning and it is very hard. what is a good question? a good question is i do not know the answer when i ask it but the lawyer can help me out and i believe it is relevant to the decision in the case. usually, that is what you are getting. i might ask a question which is the opposite of what i am thinking at the time because i want to find out what the other person's best answer is to the best argument over there. that happens a lot. you might ask a question sometimes to signal to your colleague where they are coming from, so you pick that up sometime

because there is a lot of social media as petitioner comes with it. again, a complex of this theme of data analytics and the volume of data we talked about before. just askano: let me you about recruitment. the f.b.i. has always attracted talented young persons to its national security and law enforcement missions, but it is now finding it more difficult to compete with industry, particularly when it comes to technology skills. as a result, the f.b.i., like federal agencies, is trying to train current employees to fill certain positions. what is the current skill gap the f.b.i. faces in this regard in terms of category and positions and numbers of personnel and what is the f.b.i. doing to close it? director wray: certainly, we're trying to be more focused on recruiting employees with s.t.e.m. backgrounds, for example. we have a variety of programs where we start reaching out to kids at a much younger age to get them interested in careers at the f.b.i. we have created positions like the data analyst and computer scientist positions. but you are correct

respondent is red, and they're about 60 pages each and a yellow one of about 30 pages from the petitioner, and the government might follow, gray brief, government is always gray. .nd then you can file one light green for the pear, dark green for the respondent, and usually they're about 10 to 20. there could be 100. 100 is pretty tough. but i'll read all those briefs. now, i grant you, if there are 30 or 40, i begin to see if it's repetitive, which it is. and i'll look through. but i look through all of them and then give them to my law clerks. they each do three, and i do 12. an oral argument period is usually for 12, and they'll write a memo. i'll read their memo, and we'll discuss it. see, all that's happened before the oring argument. so the oral argument is really for us to ask questions, and it's very hard. for the lawyers. because, you know, they aren't sure what it's going to be. and one judge starts to nod and the other is frowning, and oh, my god. so it's very hard. now, what is a really good question? a good question is i don't know the answer when i ask it. but i think the law

. >> if you look at secretary decision memo, and the petitioners appendix, up to a couple things. first of all, look to his discussion on pages 555 a, problems with administrative records, the bureau is still evolving and the bill does not yet have complete administrative record data set for the entire population and that.out why he preferred asking the question, getting actual answers from 22.2 million people at 90% accuracy because he simply didn't have administered records or 35 million people in the bureau had not yet how to do that estimation. he goes on to say more than 10% of the american population from 25 million putting age people would be to have their citizen h by the census bureau so he is making clear heat rather go with actual counting then imputation and he pointed out by proceeding with his preferred course, this is page 566a, this may eliminate the need for census bureau to have to impute an answer for the needs of people specifically about 22.2 billion people from the bureau told him he would get actual answers. >> when you think about those statements, it's jus

order, which the court would issue immediately, based solely on information and testimony from the petitioner. coleman said some of her republican colleagues took issue with this portion of the bill. gun rights advocates also took issue with it." mary from south carolina, republican line. caller: good morning. i am a 72-year-old woman. never owned a gun, never shot a gun. i want our gun rights kept. i do not intend to keep a country where people are terrorized by communists. cuba or any of that kind of stuff. we won our freedom, god, guts and guns. them, runningt of for office this year, sound like they are socialist. i don't want no communist government. i tell my grandkids, buy guns and plenty of ammo, because you may need them someday. host: dawn on the democratic line. happen gun control can by intercepting drug dealers and drug factors that sell to inner-city kids. pharmaceutical companies and newspapers owned or pharmaceutical companies that contribute to media outlets will not print what these mass gun shooters are on or what they were on before the shooting. this is a big problem in t

there two days of service and fairly a physician has a mid- level petitioner. the department, the eastern division in kansas has announced the closure of it. one would expect me to be angry about the closure. i am hopeful that with the closure and conversations with the va that the mission act now provides additional opportunities for care for veterans because we go from a physicianh often no and one mid-level to an opportunity for a multitude of community resources being available to those veterans in the area. i'm going to meet with your folks in kansas. what message would you like for the missionr about can provide? the mission act is about veterans and centered care. it is not about protecting the institution or guarding the status quo. it is about giving the veteran the option to be the garden of his own or her own future. and for rural america, offering a wide as aperture possible of access to medical care, meeting the attention of this committee and as long as we keep veterans health at the center of everything we do, the system will work. >> i will conv

implementation part of it and we have a very distinguished set of parted it and have a very wish petitioners, long tenured, really i think a good have a lot to say and hopefully produce you cap but they only in you here are ascussion way maybe a bit of debate and in the panel was on and i discussion here. our theme particularly in this panel is focused on prioritizing prevention across the u.s. government, at a think saw on the previous panel, we heard, argued, while we defeated terrorists since 9/11, we haven't stemmed the tide of terrorism overseas. her hair andversee year increased i and affect the number of terrorist attacks per year has increased fivefold since then. we also heard in that panel discussion that there is a really strong case for adopting a comprehensive just prevention strategy. jati the term as we know, the go will whole of government approach, is key to responding government approach approach, is key to responding is key to responding to to this growing threat. and al one that obviously is going to require really a new way of thinking instruction, and executing u.s. for