and under petitioner's theory -- justice ginsburg: yes, but i asked about the colombia? if the crime is committed in florida against florida residents -- mr. hawkins: well, your honor, my hypothetical i am making assumes that there's some sort of colombian law against trafficking drugs out of that country into another country. we can certainly imagine that being the case in many scenarios. other practical concerns that would arise, as my friend from the department of justice indicated, would involve races to the courthouse and competition between states and the federal government, rather than cooperation, all to the detriment of law enforcement. and even setting aside these practical problems, there are a number of other concerns that petitioner's view would raise. first, under petitioner's view, courts around this country would be for the first time asked to apply blockburger across the federal and state divide. that is no easy thing to do. this court has experienced a taste of that in its armed career criminal act jurisprudence where the court has tried to do something

if petitioner prevails, i believe, though petitioner's brief don't say that all of their arguments translate not just from the preact offender clause but also to the preimplementation clause and if that's right there will be no federal duty to register in the 32 states that haven't substantially implemented. as a matter of federal law, more than half the country will be sex offender registration free zone. in the remaining 18 states they won't pick up new preact offenders who come into contact with the justice system because there will no longer be a duty to register. our best estimate we will lose a couple of thousand people out of the registries every month. and that's not even including tribal areas where we wouldn't be able to get at nontribal members and of course some substantial portion of the 4,000 convictions at issue would be in jeopardy of being vacated either on direct or collateral review. sorna's efficacy if petitioner prevails will not just be sharply curtailed, it will arguably be thoroughly gutted. as a matter of how this federal law works. and if it is possible, and we thin

the reason why people centralize and why they become petitioners in washington is because they can eitheres, they can get tax breaks. there are ways of dealing -- mark: smoother their competition. >> sure. mark: let me ask you this. how does any of this benefit individual liberty? >> i think it has the opposite effect. it makes it very difficult for people to live lives, free lives as individuals, as social, as social citizens, in other words in civil society institutions, churches, all kinds of associations that are nonpolitical, nongovernmental. those kinds of associations have been co-oped really -- mark: let me cut to the chase. what you are describing to me, is really a soft form of a slow-growing tea tyranny. >> that's right. mark: is that true? >> i'll tell you how i got interested in. this. when i first started writing this question about bureaucracy, i was intressed in it from the point of view of view of what is centralized administration. and he said centralized administration is the form that democratic societies are going to have to fear. and the term administrative state, wh

the reason why people centralizedded and why they become petitioners in washington is because they cant subsidies. they can get breaks, tax breaks, there are ways of dealing with -- smot or their competition. sure, sure. so let me ask you this. how does this benefit individual liberty? >> opposite affect it makes it very difficult for people to live lives free lives as individuals as social, as social social citizens in other words in civil society institutions. churches, all kinds of associations that are nonpolitical and nongovernmental. those kinds of associations have been coopted really. >> let me cut to the chase. what you're describing to me or what took from my call is really a soft form of a slow tyranny is that true? >> that's exactly i'll tell you how i got interested in this. when t i first started writing about this question of what we call bureaucracy, i was interested in it from the point of view what centralized administration is. and he said centralized administration is the form of that democrat societies have to fear . . and the term administrative state is when i fi

petitioners should actively monitor the area under our control in an effort to prevent the loiteringpersons on any property adjacent to the licensed properties. these conditions were signed as of may 16th. >> can you explain the issue to me between a 7:00 a.m. opening and 8:00 a.m. opening? >> that was our recommendation is to have them start. >> it is hard understand why you need to be selling alcohol in the tenderloin at 7:00 a.m. >> it is difficult for us to agree on this as well, but working with a.b.c., ultimately they hold license, it is a state license. we just provide our recommendations and after looking at, you know, the letters of support that came in the fact they are in the community and they do operate at a good level what we expect them to operate under, we were able to agree on the 7:00 a.m. start time to help them out being that they are part of the community and they do well for everybody there. >> thank you. >> supervisors, this was pretty much heard the other day, i want to say if we could have the overhead, what we have here is one of the good players in the tend

it is a boot with a rifle and a helmet and it is cited in the petitioner's reply brief on page 17, they refer to a cross in louisville, north carolina and it is not across. they cite crosses on private land like counted about 15. i would say this comes closer to 10- 20 that is inclusive of crosses that are quite small. with respect to history, there are a lot of reasons why religious minorities and christian dominated societies would not feel safe challenging and actively used war memorial that is the town's most prominent symbol. my clients have been threatened, i have received death threats and i bet it was a lot safer 90 years ago than it is today. i don't think this is a passive display that people don't take note of. look at the letters of people and how people are processing a moment moment monument like this. there is an association between being christian, having valor, having courage and what message that sends to the minorities. >> that is one of the main criticisms of the lemon test, different people are going to process that in different ways. you heard from one of your frie

this is where the shammar leader meets petitioners,s, allies,ndd otheher shkhs. together witith his advisosorse decides onon issues affefectine shammar'r's future. he alslso mediates i in dispus between members of the tribe d didistrites aiaid the needy. tell alo i is a long wayay from damascus. that'slwlways affordeded the shammar a a certain autotonomn their dedecision-makining. the tribal leaders even acasas a susubstite foror ctral governmement. the sheikh's's revenues cocomem the region's oil fields an lls s levi on trtravers. they payay for his mililitia d support t for tribal m members. humaydi's s fighters haltetede adnce e of the self-prococlaimd islamic state, just short of tell alo. a hastily erected wall of earth near the village is a reminder of how close the front line came. it was used for cover, and as a barrier against islamistate trucks packeked with explolosi. the milititia is led by y humas son bandar. they call thseselves t al-sanadid forces, or forces of the brave. for a longngime they fought alongse e the kus agagains their common e enemy.

this is where the shammar leader meets petitioners, allies, and other sheikhs. together with his advisors, he decides on issues affecting the shammar's future. he also mediates in disputes between members of the tribe, and distributes aid to the needy. tell alo is a long way from damascus. that's always afforded the shammar a certain autonomy in their decision-making. the tribal leaders even act as a substitute for central government. the sheikh's revenues come from the region's oil fields and tolls levied on travelers. they pay for his militia and support for tribal members. humaydi's fighters halted the advance of the self-proclaimed islamic state, just short of tell alo. a hastily erected wall of earth near the village is a reminder of how close the front line came. it was used for cover, and as a barrier against lamic stat trucks packed with explosives. the militia is led by humaydi's son bandar. they call thselves the al-sanadid forces, or forces of the brave. for a long time th fought alongse the kurdagainst their common enemy. i.s. wanted absolute power o

what do you do you cover it up with the top you know the top that they were going to do this lead petitioner natalie mcgill when you started this. why don't you just because our world is dark i don't know if we. can apparently filled with people who can't find better fake names than john smith married and yet . they were would. never have existed if we grew up with all over the rights of someone and there are millions of people there to see it does it make a sound for more on this raging controversy we go to redact a correspondent i only care of on. the t.v. show cops on air for 30 years is the most successful reality show mystery yet how real is it. the answer about as real as my respect for meghan mccain is so distorts reality by exploiting vulnerable people sometimes illegally come to me behind the scenes. but i still phone me an ex cops officer recalls how producers told him how to fill the show's 7 minute segments i was making my arrests in like 2 or 3 minutes so they basically go you have to get this guy out of court can't do a little bit she if you could you know maybe drag this out a

what do you do you cover it up with the top no then the top that they were going to say this lead petitioner not only mcgill you started this. why don't you just because our 7 world is dark and awfully. apparently filled with people who can't find better fake names than john smith now to get. a horse was never an issue if we trample all over the rights of someone and there are millions of people there to see it doesn't make a sound for more on this raging controversy we go to redact a correspondent i only care of on. the t.v. show cops on air for 30 years in the most successful reality show history yet how real is it. the answer about as real as my respect for meghan mccain but i still phone me an ex cops officer recalls how producers told him how to fill the show 7 minute segments i was making my arrests in like 2 or 3 minutes so they told me basically joe you have to get this guy out of court can't do a little bit she if you could you know. drag this out a little bit so we could use this episode i didn't think the interactions between citizens and the representatives of the state were subj

parenthood's favor saying it demonstrated that immediate and irreparable injury will result if petitioner'sense is allowed to expire. >> all right! >> reporter: so far, nine states have enacted laws severely limiting abortions in 2019. if this planned parenthood lost its license, missouri would become the first state in the country without a single abortion clinic. >> they're required to meet with me. >> reporter: while lawyers argued in court this week, cbs news was given rare access inside the clinic. staff here sees between 50 and 150 abortion patients a week. >> it's not about the health and well-being of women and the population of people we take care of. this is about politics. this is about misogyny. this is about a patriarchal system that wants to see women not have control over their lives and their bodies. >> brennan: mireya, what's going to happen next with this court battle? >> reporter: so, the court ruling actually bought some time for the clinic, but in the end, they will be back in court on monday to argue over a new permanent injunction. on top of that, the clinic will be f

attacks on criminal and criminal prosecutors of journalists, lawyers, writers, bloggers, dissidents, petitioners, and their family members. interference with the rights of peaceful assembly and freedom of association. as well as severe restrictions on religious freedoms. i hope we can take an opportunity today to honor the victims of the 1989 tiananmen square massacre, highlighting that the chinese people still know very little about what transpired that night. i also hope we can have a continued conversation about the current communist chinese party's authoritarian and oppressive tactics that's continuing to violate the basic human rights of the chinese people, and i hope this is just the beginning. i hope this is just the beginning of the conversation. china is a clear and present danger. they have been in an economic war, information war. they are -- they have been at war with the west, particularly the united states, for the last several decades, and it's high time that the american people wake up. this should just be the beginning. i thank the makers of this resolution for doing so, but i h

it's about petitionism. we will go where the facts lead us. we will insist on the truth. we will build on an ironclad case to act. >> laura: they were screaming impeach. >> of this is now the center of thee democratic party. it has moved to the left and it's going to be a challenge to move back after the election. but this makes perfect sense. this is the primary voter. the caucus voter so i'm not surprised that they are that emotional andot passionate. >> laura: you had to push through the needles and the human waste to the streets to get there. >>> we're going to introduce you to a word war two hero who's making sure his story and the legacy of his comrades is never forgotten next. when we started our business we were paying an arm and a leg for postage. i remember setting up shipstation. one or two clicks and everything was up and running. i was printing out labels and saving money. shipstation saves us so much time. it makes it really easy and seamless. pick an order, print everything you need, slap the label onto the box, and it's ready to go. our costs for shipping

and he pointed out that by proceeding with his preferred course -- this is at page 556a of the petitioners' appendix -- this may eliminate the need for the census bureau to have to impute an answer for millions of people, specifically about 22.2 justice kagan: but -- just do not appear in the secretary's the fact that sg lawyers can come up with 60 pages of explanation for a decision, that's all post hoc rationalization. the question is, what did the secretary say? where did he say it? when did he say it? what does it mean, other than just ipse dixit and conclusions? general francisco: sure. your -- your honor, i -- i'm tempted to pocket the compliment and sit down, but i won't do that. (laughter.) general francisco: i think the secretary fully acknowledged that there was an upside to the request, and the upside was the one the department of justice set forth in his letter, that having citizenship data would help improve voting rights act enforcement. he fully understood there was an alternative using administrative records, and he analyzed that alternative in the language that i just read

first, she used a ravel -- raffle to create petitioners and second, she gave a couple dollars to a homeless man to sign the petition. third, the reporter caught them filing the petition twice. one person was misled and wanted to cross it off the petition forms and rose pak refused to allow her to cross out their name. rose pak and the chinese commerce -- i don't like her name at all. >> commissioner: thank you very much. next speaker, please. >> clerk: what are you trying to do, sir? >> play a video. >> clerk: just start speaking. your time is running. >> my name is ethan lao. i want to play the video of the supervisor speaking. [indiscernible] >> commissioner: thank you very much. >> thank you. >> commissioner: next speaker, please. >> clerk: joel lang. sabrina lee. zang long. >> good afternoon, everyone. i'm joel lang. a forge -- father of four. if we name the station after someone he or she must be an honorab honorable person that's a role model. rose pak is not such a person. according to an fbi report she was not as low income as she claimed not only did she not qualify for below marke

actually worked against the petitioner. the nra was much of a model. they do not copy over the critical feature. it is the provision that grants jurisdiction. ignorance review to the court. that goes on to say. there is no jurisdiction over issues not visual to the board. >> they do not recognize this type of exception. the recognize any kind of rule. the agency's decision. the losing party before the agency to get a day lawsuit in district court. >> when they make the jurisdictional? >> congress certainly good. this court addressed in mcneil. they began by saying subject to the provisions of title 28 which includes the resentment requirement. satisfies the first statement role. and involves only claims federal sovereignty immunity. >> what he said the chief justice concern. >> i know you're going to tell me immediately. besides that argument, what national do you think support is doing so.>> it was about reflecting ascertaining congress's intent. the severe consequences including that means they must raise it. we can wipe out litigation. the means jud

petitioners claim the show "makes satanism appear normal, light and acceptable," "mocks god's wisdom,s "voiced by a woman," frances mcdormand. well, okay, that's where they're wrong. god isn't voiced by frances mcdormand. god is frances mcdormand. ( applause ) as it says in the famous poem, "when you saw only one set of footprints in the sand, it was then that i was on the set shooting 'fargo.'" meanwhile, in booze you can use news, "dave matthews, who's had his own line of wines for years now, recently unveiled the new addition of a california roseÉ." according to matthews, it's a "waking up wine," a roseÉ so "delicious" that people should "get out of bed and drink" it. ( applause ) should they, though? because drinking first thing in the morning means one of two things: you're a 26-year-old at brunch, or we're a half an hour into dave matthews' episode of "behind the music." we'll be right back with a performance by incubus. ♪ ♪ ( applause ) we'll be right back with a performance by incubus. ♪ ♪ ( applause ) there's two of them. they're multiplying. no, guys, its me. see, i'm real.

alexandria daydig with the petitioner use a leading the effort to recall eric garcetti.es him for letting the homeless crisis spiral out of control. >> environmental crimes that are illegal in california. this mayor is committing crimes every day. we don't have shoe leather on our streets taking care of this problem. people are allowed to just commit crimes while the taxpayer has to step over a homeless guy to get to the office he is forced to pay taxes to to continue the situation. it is outrageous. >> we had a 75% increase in homelessness in the past 6 years under the leadership of eric garcetti. there is no question who is to blame for this increase. he needs to be recalled. heather: los angeles has the nation's largest outdoor homeless population. let's switch gears. air force one will fly over the national mall on 4 july. the president does not plan to be on board at the time. the celebration is salute to america, will honor nation's five service branches with music, marching bands, floats and of course fireworks in washington dc. donald trump is expected to speak i

in his 25 years of experience, having searched for additional cases and no case decided by the petitioner outside of this case in regards to a violation, so the history is limited here. the question is what to do in a case like this? how much does the specter of those prior violations come into play in the analysis in this? i think it has to be looked at. i believe the trial -- jus. sotomayor: is it just the specter of the violations were there not the cases overturned in which prosecutorial misconduct -- at least the first was overturned on prosecutorial misconduct. they didn't even reach the challenge. ag davis: yes, your honor. jus. sotomayor: doesn't it tell you something about this man's passion? i don't need to call it anything else. doesn't that tell you how you should be looking at this case? ag davis: i can't speak to his passion. i can speak to his pursuit of conviction in the sense of the six trials in which there were -- jus. sotomayor: i understand he didn't ask the attorney general to step in, which he could have, to prosecute the case, but i understand he lobbied to legisla

in his 25 years of experience, having searched for additional cases and no case decided by the petitioner outside of this case in regards to a violation, so the history is limited here. the question is what to do in a case like this? how much does the specter of those prior violations come into play in the analysis in this? i think it has to be looked at. i believe the trial -- jus. sotomayor: is it just the specter of the violations were there not the cases overturned in which prosecutorial misconduct -- at least the first was overturned on prosecutorial misconduct. they didn't even reach the challenge. ag davis: yes, your honor. jus. sotomayor: doesn't it tell you something about this man's passion? i don't need to call it anything else. doesn't that tell you how you should be looking at this case? ag davis: i can't speak to his passion. i can speak to his pursuit of conviction in the sense of the six trials in which there were -- jus. sotomayor: i understand he didn't ask the attorney general to step in, which he could have, to prosecute the case, but i understand he lobbied to legisla

. >> i believe the petitioner's council presented the a.l.u.'s. i don't have any objection if we move it until later or move forward if it is the will of the chair. >> i think it would be good for us to give the a.l.u. an opportunity to show. i mean there is a time constraint on this item and i think it's important that we act on it at this meeting to ensure our 90 days don't expire. i think just to have completeness, and partly because i do not understand why the a.l.u. is not here 20 minutes into our meeting when they said they would be here. i think we should hold up for them and wait for them to get here. i don't want to keep folks waiting for a conversation about e-cigarettes. you're fine either way. so, i think we should continue this to later on in the agenda but before items 5 and 6. is that something we can do? can we do that without objection? great. mr. clerk, please call the next item. >> the resolution supporting california state assembly bill number 1076 by phil ting. >> great, thank you mr. clerk. i think we have derek here from sup

and one of the arguments that the petitioners madein trying to get them to take thecase, if it's allowedto stand there are crosses at arlington that might have to come down. so i think that pushed the court to grant review. anotherthing that struckme,justice kaganjoined he majority but alsohad a separate within and -- opinion and she kind of went out of her way to comp mr. president justice alito on how well written the opinion was. and david suggested,there is a court of prerogativesand then you saw in the separateopinion, the four justicesthat havenot quite gotten on boardwith being the team player. they had an opinion questioningwhetheror not inthis casethey had standing tobringthecase. >> the government have a sign endoursing -- and you have have no injury because you're looking at the sign and the offended observer, that's an extreme position. and thomas does not believe in the establishment clause. >> >> he would also say, it only applies to things that are course of like making you reset a prayer, but putting something sup not particularly coercive so -- >> the other two on the othe

>> so, your honor, if you look at secretary ross's decision memo, the predecision memo in the petitioner's appendix, i couple of to a things. first of all, i would look to on pages 55-a with he problems diminutive -- administrative therds and they do not have data set for the entire population and that points out preferred asking the question and getting actual 22.2 million people ith 98% accuracy because he didn't have records for the 90 million people. same s on to say on the page, more than 10% of the american population, some 25 voting age people would eed to have their citizen age imputed by the census bureau. e pointed out that by proceeding with his preferred 556-a of his is a page the appendix, this would lead not have to impute whomswer, 22.2 million for the bureau told him he would get actual answers. >> when you think about those statements, it is conclusionary. it is like this would eliminate modeling because we could ask the question. he question is why is asking a question better when you know that asking a question is going to result in lots of and in lots of false reporting

then, there is china, petitioner coming out with laws that might prevent u.s.ad, which is what 31% of yo students who come to the u.s. from china. david: which benefit us in all different ways. the administration has been concerned, and i am sure there is some espionage going on with some of those students. quite possible that they are taking some information back with them. alix: what we have learned is that there will be some tit-for-tat in some capacity regarding the trade war. we are well off the lows of the session. s&p futures down on the. six points. the dow has struggled the last few days as yields continued to grind their way lower as well. but 10-year yields, 2.12 is where we sit, just don't one basis points. crude is on a different story, up almost 2%. they have a worker strike in norway that could imperil oil production. and we are still a little risk off, just not as bad. david: crude is up? that is different. alix: yeah. david: time now for the morning brief. president trump has been saying. that she is in the u.k. right days ofe started meetings,

attacks on criminal and criminal prosecutors of journalists, lawyers, writers, bloggers, dissidents, petitioners, and their family members. interference with the rights of peaceful assembly and freedom of association. as well as severe restrictions on religious freedoms. i hope we can take an opportunity today to honor the victims of the 1989 tiananmen square massacre, highlighting that the chinese people still know very little about what transpired that night. i also hope we can have a continued conversation about the current communist chinese party's authoritarian and oppressive tactics that's continuing to violate the basic human rights of the chinese people, and i hope this is just the beginning. i hope this is just the beginning of the conversation. china is a clear and present danger. they have been in an economic war, information war. they are -- they have been at war with the west, particularly the united states, for the last several decades, and it's high time that the american people wake up. this should just be the beginning. i thank the makers of this resolution for doing so, but i h

and researchers and health care petitioners continue to discover emerging agents. this report was able to underscore a fact many of us have believed to be true, now it's further validated, that 10% to 20% of patients suffer from persistent symptoms which are chronic and disabling. in other words, chronic lyme. the diagnostic tests, this is again where the research dollars can make a difference, are also often inaccurate. the report points out that about 50% or more of the cases when someone does the blood test it says you don't have it, and it is a false negative, you do have it. there are other tests that go deep entire the bands to discover. this very expensive. we need a world class diagnostic tool. there are also, i would point out to my colleagues that the disproportionate number of people who are affected are children. they're out in the back yard. this report points out, most people get it in their own backyard. if you play sports or you're a hiker or out in the wilderness, you are also further at risk. this increases it by $ million. it's a modest amount bu

ceo of walmart doug mcmillon here weighing in on consumer impact, a joint news conference with petitionertay with us for that first a special update from the tennis channel. et. >> welcome back to another at an i will say channel court report kwrt finals set french open reaches end in paris, djokovic with a comfortable statesets win over germany world number one first man to reach quarters at roland a -- garros. >> pleased with every aspect of game coming together beautifully motivated to fight for the trophy, yes i mean that is why i am here. but still long way to go. >> moved on with impressive victory. 26 winners americans meet australia ashley in semis tennis channel live daily coverage hits air 5:00 eastern. 2,000 fence posts. 900 acres. 48 bales. all before lunch, which we caught last saturday. we earn our scars. we wear our work ethic. we work until the work's done. and when it is, a few hours of shuteye to rest up for tomorrow, the day we'll finally get something done. ( ♪ ) rather than worry about how to pay for long-term care. brighthouse smartcare℠ is a hybrid life insurance an