no noise should be audible at any nearby residents and petitioners should monitor the area under their patrol and in an effort to prevent loitering of persons own any property adjacent as depicted on the abc 253 and it should be noted that the conditions were agreed to and signed by the applicant on september 17th. >> great. thank you. i believe is a representative for the applicant here? yes. >> members of the committee, supervisor mandelman, thank you for tearing. and supervisor haney, who i don't see here, as our district supervisor. thank you for considering our application. anthony bourdain once said, anyone who doesn't have a great time in san francisco is pretty much dead to me. it is a two fisted drinking town it is dirty and nasty and wonderful. i think mr. bourdain articulated what we all know. san francisco is an incredible city. is full of contradictions. its beauty is undeniable and so is his legacy as a great all time-barred town. several iconic cocktails were created or achieved fame here including the martini, the punch , how's cappuccino, the list goes on and on. today

arlington residents petitione the county saying they didn't like the idea that theay resi former leeigh school changed its name to washinon alexandria, just a mile downd the the highway named to ok an opinion fromt entoal to say that counties chaou ce as w. virginia delegate mark levine was instrumental in pushing for thaty constituents it'sin as hdred a county that welcomes people, that welcomes our diverspopulation, that does not support the person who fought for slavery >> reporter: now, arlington county says the new signs will stretch of what was formeayhey will also have to update their drs reol they'll still get mail if it goes to the old address. sign changing at 10 o'clockis this morning. f the signs will be replaced over the next few days. all right, that a and you, thanu metynie. a montgomery high school is telling teachers they can no longer give orstudents zeros on homew even if the student't d do it.ch winston churl high school in potomac bucking the distri t's polhat teachers can give a zero if the student doesn't bother to do any work. th new policy isng already stirri

something i find really fascinating about this petition is these are petitioners from the district of columbia. at this period in time, 1877, when this petition was signed, there were no voting rights in the district of columbia. something else that's really interesting about the petition as it is signed by two of frederick douglass's children, including frederick douglass jr., and rosetta douglass sprg. all of the documents we looked out so far are in the holdings of the national archives, and the national archives preserve them for future generations. i think it's really spectacular that a petition you send to congress today just as these african-american petitioners did in 1877 becomes part of the national archive holdings, and we are really fortunate we have it here today to help tell this story. we have seen lots of petitions on this tour. really, when women were pressing for their voting rights, they only had first amendment rights available to them to press their government for their rights, and political change, but one of the other rights that suffragists used, the freedom to

finding two, the petitioner's unlikely to successfully implement the proposed material revisions set forth in the petition, because the renewal petition lacks a description of new requirements of charter schools and how the charter school met those requirements, as required in code section 476-0782. once again, the recommendation charter school represents an unsound educational program for the students to be enrolled for the petitioner's unlikely to successfully implement the program set forth. the petition does not contain reasonably comprehensive descriptions of certain required elements. in order to deny the petition on the grounds for the, the district staff recommends that the board adopt these findings of fact as its own, alternatively the board may choose to approve the material. >> thank you mr. davis. we have it separate votes. the public comment cards that i have only indicate speakers for the first renewal. so, if you are speaking on behalf of new school in the first or second vote, i'm just going to read all the names i have and you will come up now. we will be voting on

we wanted to modify lighting as needed to improve visibility, work with the petitioners, the 3500 people who signed the petition to keep the trees to create a stewardship program. and overall reduce trauma wherever possible by a gradual approach, no stumps, increase green wherever we can, and replace any lost trees with evergreens, such as redwoods or lindens. so we did research that issue as requested, and found that those trees were meant to be evergreens. so we started from a position similar to ms. boler's and by working together we have addressed many of those problems. could i have the laptop. so we've come up with a working draft tree management plan together. this is a view of the ficus from the main entrance. we've got from looking at it as individual trees to a grove. we've gone from being adversaries to becoming a working group. we've gone from working with problems, lots of different problems, to treating the situation as one of creative opportunities, problems such as perception of safety on the one side from the library and on the other that we should never remove any trees

somewhere in there the petitioner writes as well. then you get the founding of our country 1776. in that train you see this presentation of rights. there are a few examples of this. there is an explicit statement that whereas we are being screwed in this ways therefore we claim or reclaim these rights. or assert these rights. that is in the spirit of the book. it's in the spirit of the defense of the republic. how to keep it. and i'm kind of saying at the end of the book. if you been with me if you think that maybe you don't have a complete picture about america that it's not as free as you think it is because Ãb or you thought it was, because indeed you are paradigm has been filtering the information you collect about it. if you been with me on that and you feel that we have lost a lot of freedoms and talking from freedoms perhaps back in 1215 the balance asserted their rights against the sovereign it might be time for reassertion. in the spirit of magna carta and of course i wrote another for the 800 anniversary from magna carta i think it was useful for the united states and u

. >>> nor does the court except the petitioner's argument that it has shown irreparable harm here from the potential that the opening of this navigation center may subject its members or the public.>> reporter: neighbors who have been leading the charge against the center say the shelter will further deteriorate the quality of life in the neighborhood. >>> looking at the way the city has run other navigation sensors we don't have confidence the city would be able to run this one well. without negative consequences for the neighborhood.>> reporter: city attorneys released this statement. we are pleased the court has denied this baseless request to stop construction. san francisco has a homeless crisis on its hands. we are doing something about it.>>> in addition to the possible appeal the save embarcadero group is considering their lawsuit at this point. they will take further consideration once they see the judges written ruling. which should come out in about a week. >>> up next a fire broke out in your neck of the woods how fast could you escape? white neighbors in one community may

. >>> nor does the court except petitioner's argument that it has shown irreparable harm here. from that potential that the opening of this navigation center may subject its members of the public. >>> save embarcadero set the port and the city did not arrange for a lease a fair market value for the land. >>> our appraiser valued it at $90 million. the city's appraisers valued it at $60 million. tax revenue alone to the people of the city of san francisco the state of california the city estimated $2 million a year should be getting from this. right now it is getting pennies.>> reporter: leading the charge against the sensors said he won't move. but is not optimistic about the future of the neighborhood. during the potentially four- year and long tenure of the center. >>> looking at the way the city has run other navigation sensors. we don't have any confidence the city will be able to run this one. without negative consequences for the neighborhood.>> reporter: city attorney slipped out without talking to reporters. san francisco mayor issued a statement via twitter. we are mov

the position, as i understand it, is that the complaint from the petitioners is that the advice given i understand that. the decision of her majesty to prorogued cannot be impugned. 0n impugned. on my part it would be helpful if between you and lord pannick you can work out and gives a clear formulation of what you say or are prepared to undertake. iam prepared to undertake. i am prepared to speak to him to see if we can agree. without that we would have to rule on your bill of rights point. indeed, sir. to respond to my lord's question that the, no undertaking. with the undertaking of parliament an opportunity to decide whether it wishes to pass new legislation before that happens? my before that happens? my lady, it must be for the decision—maker to decision declaration made by the court and to ensure that it proceeds lawfully thereafter. cani thereafter. can i ask lord keen what the status is to be of the order in council granting prorogation? 0r doing prorogation. the order in council is the intimate by which the lord commissioners are engaged to prorogued parliament but it is mer

advice from the city attorney regarding the following existing litigation, in which the city is a petitioner, and pacific gas & electric co. is an adverse party this closed session can occur today, this afternoon. it was pending approval of a motion that was approved a moment ago by the board of supervisors. public comment actually did occur on that motion during general public comment, but i understand you were going to just ask for public comment on this item one final time. >> correct. before we convene closed session , are there any public comments? >> the california's -- you're putting aside california state funds and taxes, $21 billion to pay off lawsuits that have been filed against pg and e. for the destruction of personal property and wrongful death lawsuits with the fires that the transformers have caused throughout the bay area and causing well over 50 people on or about to lose their lives. those people got on repairable harm, and for gavin newsom to sit up there and take funds to pay off their lawsuits, is a disgusting and an insult on everybody's intelligence. and by the same r

the prorogation of parliament by borisjohnson was unlawful and as tommy sheppard, one of my co—petitionersointed out, for now every moment that parliament remains macro to the british government are breaking the law, so we as politicians are calling for parliament to be recalled, so that we can get on scrutinising what this government is up to in relation to brexit. that call, to allow mps back into parliament to sit, echoed by scotland's first minister, who said that the prime minister's behaviour had been outrageous and reckless. that means in my view parliament should be recalled immediately. and i would call on the prime minister to do the right thing, bring parliament back from its unlawful prorogation and allow that important work of scrutiny to continue. labour welcomed the judgment. normally, judges do not go into this space which is about the motivation of politicians for their decisions that they make so i can only assume that they make so i can only assume that the judges felt the evidence against borisjohnson was the judges felt the evidence against boris johnson was overwhelmi

[applause] >> and counsel for the petitioner electra. [applause] >> counsel for the respondent orestes from the constitutional accountability center. [applause] >> and in just a moment, we will welcome the members of the esteemed bench. they will be called to the bench by the marshall, and presiding in the supreme court of athens for the scenario will be united states supreme court justices ginsburg and breyer, from the united states court of appeals for the third circuit, and from the united states district courts from the district of columbia. thank you for being with us tonight. enjoy the trial. please, marshall, take the gavel. >> all rise. [applause] >> the supreme court of athens is now in session. please be seated. >> the supreme court of athens will now hear arguments in the case of orestes versus electra. and we will first hear from the council representing electra and seeking to overturn the judgment of the courts below. you may proceed. >> madam chief justice, i would like to reserve five minutes of time for rebuttal. king ore

but the vast majority of petitioners for compassionate release are denied, and so was frank. >> frankg? i'm from nbc, lester holt. >> oh, yeah. we had a nice conversation. >> frank, do you think you should go home? >> soon i know that. >> it helps my throat. >> yeah. i can open that for you. let me open that for you. there you go, frank. all right. i'm going to let you rest. okay? well, he's a human being. i'm not here to judge him. but i don't know how you not have compassion. >> a few weeks later, i learned that frank died in his hospice bed alone. back in my cell, i had a lot of time to reflect about everything i've seen. >> i have personally wrestled with this question of is prison punishment? because if it is punishment, it's pretty bad. is it a place of reform? you can certainly see efforts to reform here. i can't help thinking as we're, you know, talking to men incarcerated when they were teenagers i think of my own self at 16, 17 years old and it is all complicated. >> and now the two men i met that committed murders as teenagers, henry and clifford, are about to find out if t

please first welcome united .tates supreme court marshall [applause] >> and counsel for the petitionerlectra. [applause] >> counsel for the respondent orestes from the constitutional accountability center. [applause] in just a moment, we will welcome the members of the esteemed bench. they will be called to the bench by the marshall, and presiding in the supreme court of athens for the scenario will be united states supreme court justices ginsburg and breyer, from the united states court of appeals for the third circuit , and from the united states district courts from the district of columbia. thank you for being with us tonight. enjoy the trial. please, marshall, take the gavel. >> all rise. [applause] >> the supreme court of athens is now in session. please be seated. >> the supreme court of athens the now hear arguments in versus electra. from thell first hear council representing electra and judgmento overturn the of the court's below. you may proceed. justice, ichief would like to reserve five minutes of time for rebuttal. king orestes is not pleased that he is unpopular in the p

we clarified that the sediment was for petitioner claims for attorney fees and the committee record for consideration by the board in the 23rd. agenda items 6 and 7 were also recommended as committee reports to july 23rd board meeting. agenda item number 8 was a recommended asper usual business. >> thank you, mr. clerk. do we have a motion around the closed session proceedings. >> clerk: we would take a motion to disclose or not disclose the deliberations in closed session. >> i will make a motion not to disclose. >> can we take that without objection? >> thank you. >> any further business. >> clerk: there is no further business. >> this meeting is closed. . >> shop and dine the 49 . challenges residents to do they're shopping with the 49ers of san francisco by supporting the services within the feigned we help san francisco remain unique and successful and rib rant where will you shop the shop and dine the 49 i'm e jonl i provide sweets square feet potpie and peach cobbler and i started my business this is my baby i started out of high home and he would back for friends and coworkers t

. >> on behalf of the petitioner. >> reporter: inside a can francisco courtroom, neighbors ask the judge to temporarily block construction of the two bed navigation center. the judge declined to block construction for now but agreed to have both sides to return to court september 23rd to debate the issue. >> i don't have any showing of irreparable harm, and that is not only a critical component but essential component to the court granting emergency relief especially for a restraining order. >> reporter: he said crime is already up in the area surrounding the navigation center. he's arguing the center has not received approval from the state land commission to build it. >> it is violating law every day for proceeding with construction of this project for a law they did not draft. >> reporter: they read in part quote we're pleaset that the judge in part denied construction for this shelter project. it has undergone review, and all land laws were followed. he says it will have a negative impact on the area. >> my concern is that it is a shelter, and it will bring in drug abusers, mentally

we clarified that the sediment was for petitioner claims for attorney fees and the committee record for consideration by the board in the 23rd. agenda items 6 and 7 were also recommended as committee reports to july 23rd board meeting. agenda item number 8 was a recommended asper usual business. >> thank you, mr. clerk. do we have a motion around the closed session proceedings. >> clerk: we would take a motion to disclose or not disclose the deliberations in closed session. >> i will make a motion not to disclose. >> can we take that without objection? >> thank you. >> any further business. >> clerk: there is no further business. >> this meeting is closed. >>> good morning. welcome to the san francisco county transportation authority meeting for tuesday september 10, 2019. the first meeting back since summer recess. our clerk could you please call the role. (roll call)

. >> and counsel for the petitioner, william a a of the firm covington and burling. counsel for the respondent, orestes, the constitutional accountability center. and in just a moment we will welcome members of the esteemed bench and they will be called to the bench by the marshall ambrose lighting in the supreme court of athens for this scenario, supreme court justices ruth bader ginsburg and stephen g breyer. the united states court of appeals for the dc circuit, judge patricia millet, united states court of appeals for the third circuit, judge stevens and the district court for the district of columbia, judge jackson. thank you for being with us. please take the gavel. [applause] >> all rise. [applause] >> oh yea oh yeah, the supreme court of athens is now in session. please be seated. >> the supreme court of athens will now here argument in the case of orestes versus electra and we will first hear from counsel brickman who is representing electra and seeking to overturn the judgment of the courts. you may proceed. >> may it please the court. i would like to reser

the applicants and the petitioners are inviting the court into for bid and territory , and into what is essentially a minefield, and ill-defined minefield -- an ill-defined minefield. the courts are not properly equipped to deal with this. i turn from there to some of the particulars of the appeal in the -- the case at hand. the first point i wish to make is simply this. it may have been noted by the court already. in his submissions, the prime minister new and made no attempt whatsoever to respond to criticisms that i have made of the reasoning of the inner house or indeed, to defend a particular and inconsistent approach taken by the inner house, in the determination of that case. ,n my submission, the reasoning the reasons i set out before, is unsustainable and it must follow the the issues in that case are for this court to determine. which they may do properly by reference to the documents. i should also note, the suggestion from mr. o'neill that a concession was made in the inner house about justify tifiability. i have spoke with mr. webster and lookednston, and i have at mr. w

erin murphy is counsel forthe petitioners in that case . joseph blocher has filed a friend of the court case in support of either side but before we get into the details of that, i'd like to start with a broader question both erin and joseph. the supreme court has said that the second amendment includes an individual right, but it is not unqualified and some restrictions are permissible . given that how should courts determine which gun regulations are constitutional? erin? >> good morning and thank you for having me here. it's great to be in misery, i haven't been up to this part of the country before given the position that i will be taking in discussing these issues it's a delight to be in a state that continues to respect and protect second amendment rights. that's something we're always looking for in all of these cases and all of these states where i litigate. as john mentioned i've been involved in many cases and many of the cases that will talk about have litigated these cases on the side, and all the cases i've been involved in on

greta anand the other petitiones spoke at the unicef headquarters. >> my name is alexandria. i am 14 years old. i am from new york. i am here because 30 years ago, the world signed a contract bebetween generatioions that t e present worlrld uldd leave a world woworth inhnheriting g te future. and today i want to tell the world, you are defaulting on that conontract and we are hereo collect. [applause] >>>> hi, my name is carl smith. i am fromm alaska. i am 17 years old. i am here because climatete changes affecting the way i live . it hasas taken away my home, the land, and the animals. >> [speaking foreign language] i am 17 years olold. i am from the e marshall island. i am here because climate change is destroying my islands through sealevel rise and storms. >> [speaking foreign language] morning. i amam 17 years old and i am frm argentina. i am here today because i have things to say and i'm here today on behalf of my peoplele. argentina suffering from the climate crisis. side weto decide which are on and we need to do it now. [speaking foreign language] hello, my name is

stated now existing is anti-republican in character and therefore avoid it i note also that the petitioners were a majority of women. there were 28 women and the men were the six ruling elders and the six trustees. year,rly in 1866 the same the north carolina equal rights late called for the repeal of all laws and parts of laws that make distinctions on account of color. the passage of the black codes and unreconstructed southern states were designed not only to create a subjugated working-class, but to force that class to endure she million nations in every corner of their lives public and private. to vacate black people's right to a private life. woman talk about the reconstruction laws, one of the things i'm interested in seeing how this played out on the --und and so for example, the faster late laws were applied to free people in which they were applied to white people. after the civil war, former slaveholders claimed the right to the labor of black children and they made this claim in many ways. one was to gain access by resting fathers and obliging those fathers to other give up thei

for very practical terms and health, etc we also have substance between petitioners citizens and fundamentallyis article in the atlantic looks at how both sides gained something from the good friday agreeement. concessions by the british side meant nationalists were able to feel irish, within the north. and the ira ending its campaign of violence benefitted britain and the unionists. tom mctague who wrote the piece points out that the brexit negotiations don't seem to offer the same sort of opportunity for a win—win outcome. bear in mind two things: brexiteers insist the uk must leave the eu's single market and customs union. secondly, the eu says if there's going to be no hard border. northern ireland needs to follow the same eu rules for goods as the republic to the south, which will stay inside the eu. what does that mean for the two communities in northern ireland? well nationalists are determined to prevent any further separation — any new barriers — between the people in the north, and the republic to the south — because that would threaten their identity as irish. and unionists insist b

why didn't they accept the petitioner as the resolution?if they would accept it there wouldn't be a single refugee. all the territories they would have it and more. they would have today but they didn't even consider why did lebanon syria, jordan, egypt, saudi arabia, why did they all invite israel in the beginning? we have no conflict with them. we had no territorial dispute so, why? and then what did they do during 19 years between the role of independence in the six-day war besides the terror attack. they didn't even think about it because the source of the violence and hostility towards israel is not the outcome of the six-day war, this is the excuse, this is not the reason. the source of all the evil is the unwillingness to accept our right no matter what orders and this is the reason. this is the reason we are not -- not even in the partition with borders. when we see beyond those maps and when they are educate their children that we have the right to live in this country then may be we will have civility to talk about this. and from

two, petitioners shall actively monitor the area under their control in an effort to prevent loitering of persons on any property adjacent to the property. number three, no noise shall be audible at any nearby residence. it shall be noted that as of 7/24/19, these conditions were agreed upon by the applicant. >> chair mandelman: great, thank you. and the applicant is here. come on us. >> hi there. i'm sabrina. i am nunovi llc, this is what we were just talking about, the abc conditions which i was told to bring in total, i did sign. totally, totally fine. we currently have a restaurant over in the financial north beach area. we've had it for 7.5 years. it's a tapas, wine bar, restaurant. we run it ourselves and we tend to do the same thing over at ora. we want to bring something to that neighborhood where people feel welcomed, where everybody is invited. i don't -- i'm not looking for chaos either. i want it to be a very welcoming and inviting place, and that is what i do, which is what we've done over at basque. all the conditions that we were given, we are totally fine with. we're ju

this action was taken by me and my co—petitioners, not against the queen. court has now ruled it was unlawful. this is not a criticism of her majesty in any way, it is a criticism of boris johnson and the government. that was not my intention to you. what i was getting at was could you see the queen potentially being drawn back into this. convention says that she isn't, but in these extraordinary circumstances, could you see the queen being drawn into this argument further? well, i think the queen has been put in a difficult position to make position by borisjohnson. it would not be my wish to put her in a difficult position. the matter is in the hands of the courts and the courts have ruled. borisjohnson like any other citizen has to obey the law. i am calling on him to respect the decision of the scottish courts. i am dismayed from the briefings from ten downing st suggesting this is a political decision. i can ensure the scottish tradition judiciary decision. i can ensure the scottish traditionjudiciary are independent. iam traditionjudiciary are indepen

i would favor a version of red flag laws that enable a coworker or family member to petitioner judge,you could get in front of a judge in 6 hours in this country saying this guy has a history of violence, exhibited violent tendencies, carry around a list of people he would like to kill, he talked about his admiration for osama bin laden and spoken favorably of islamic jihad. these are trigger words. get in front of a judge and see whether it holds up and if so, usually these guys have sick guns at home. take the guns away by all means before something happens and that is going to come closer to solving the problem than other solutions which are aimed not at that population but at everybody. >> we are nearing the halfway point of the debate. we asked some republicans and independents what they thought of the republican party under trump and how it will look going forward. [crowd] >> relish like this one in new mexico filled with energized voters with the start of republican dreams when they lost barack obama in a landslide in 2012. the rc published not out of the other republican party