it is worth taking a pause to ink about what the petitioners are saying. they say that legislature means a species of state law that is existed.y -- has literally never state law making unconstrained by state constitution that founders intended to create at al surely someone would have said something. the blast radius from their theory on a two track system with several short federal wants, case after case will wind n this court with the political parties on either side that will put in -- this court in a difficult position instead of leaving it to the 50 states. >> what you spend some time on -- you spend some time on discushe stores -- source of the state election law involved? i understand the court is greeted by the constitution but this is a federaer. think that palm beach basically said there is some sort of federal issue here with respect think the state court got it right and did not violate the elections cla but we think that is the sourcethority here. and justice thoma in two decades of arguiore you, i have come forth on this case because it spea

justice thomas: but petitioner's arguing, i think, a bit more. petitioner's also arguing that it has the spillover effect of chilngrotected speech, not just that this is protected speech. w, how would you respond to that? mr. weiser: since watts, the majority rule in the overwhelmingurdictions, 50 years, has been an objective standard. and during that time the only prosecutio ty point to, the case you mentioned, was actually a case that was under a specific intent standard. we haven't seen in the last 50 yearwi this objective rule types of harms. and moreover, we point tth time of the founding that threats were prosecuted without regard to intent. justice thomas: but he also argues tt u wouldn't see, necessarily, the chilling effect because those cases would nobe before you. that's what i'like you to respond to. mr. weiser: thank you, justice thom. justice kagan got to a critical point. the type of the speech that remains after the objective, context-driven inquiry, is speech that doesn't come close to contributing to the maetace of ideas. as was

i think it was had by petitioner counsel that hars doing using as greatference as ever did. over time, has harva found that it has become less necessary to use race conscious means or not? here is the assumption i want to have baked into this. i take pner's to be saying it does not matter if some pathe reason for adopting race neutral approaches is to achieve racial diversity. i think they very clearly said that. i'm not understand why given their legal arguments but i think they very clearly said that. so assume that you can sit down out what race neutral mechanisms to use and part of the goal is to achieve racial diversity, what is harvard doing to answer that question ant any closer? >> i have firmly in mind the if i don't answer the first as please remind me. for decades, harvard has beenhat taking steps than the conscious -- other than consciousness to increase the level of diversity including ethn racial diversity and these are discussed in the smith committee report and dean smith testimony and in the findings. if for example inhe wake of substantially increased the a

justice thasbut petitioner's arguing, tnk, a bit more. petitioner's also arguing that itashe spillover effect of chilling protected speech, not ju that this is protected speech. now, how would you resndo that? mr. weiser: since watts, the majority rulinhe overwhelming jurisdictions, 50 years, has been an objective standard. and duringhatime the only prosecutions they point to, the caseouentioned, was actually a case that was under a specific innttandard. weav't seen in the last 50 years with this objective rule types of harms. and moreover, we point to the time of the founding that threats were prosecutewithout regard to intent. juste omas: but he also argues that you wouldn't see, cearily, the chilling effect because those cases would not be before you. that's what i'd like you to respond to. mr. weiser: thank you, justice thomas. justice kan t to a critical point. the ty othe speech that remains after the objective, coexdriven inquiry, is speech that doesn't come close ctributing to the marketplace of ideas. as was said by justice barre

insaf has condemned this arrest and the petitioner was arrested on the same charge last month, which was followed by violent protests in pakistan and thousands of people were arrested in these protests. ethnic violence in india has left 80 dead in one month, the government needs to resolve it. disputes have been resolved, but the violence continues. al jazeera reported about this. indian women demanded action against the kuki fighters. they accuse the fighters of attacking their homes in the subaru district of manipur . maranta messingh is a retired soldier. kuki fighters attacked with war bullets despite the peace agreement. we were living in our houses thanks to the presence of baran peace committee . suddenly they attacked at 2 am . they have priority in access to land and jobs in a part of manipur. 4 weeks before the start the majority of the region demanded the access of the minority to tune in to the upcoming cup. goethe and his family are from a small minority who fled the region. he lost his son to a shooting a few days ago. they killed my only son after they shot him in a pi

petitioner now seeks to impose a specific intent elemenon this inquiry. that's required neither by history nor ecent. doing soou enable more harm and less valuable discourse. that's because a serious exeson of an intent to cause unlawful physical violence directly causes life-changing has. and does not contribute t marketplace of ideas. mr. weiser: regardless of what the perpettor was thinking. requiring specific intent in cases of threatening stalkers would immunize stalkers who are untethered from reality. itou also allow devious stalkers to escape countability by insisting that they meant nothing by thr harmful statements. this matters because threats made by stalkers terrorize victims. and for good reason. 90% of actual or attempted violence murr ses begin with stalking. the cot low followed this court's teachings from wattsnd black that context is critical inonstituting a true threat. the robustness of an objective, context-driven inquiry means that this ston't criminalize a joke taken the wrong way. politil vocacy or hyperbole. ithuprotects statemen

as a representative of the republic the petitioner questioned trump's performance in opposing the results of the 2020 elections and said that trump is not qualified to be president with such a record. welcome to the world today, we will start today's program with the news of the opening of the iranian consulate in jeddah in a ceremony attended by iranian and saudi officials . opening ceremony iran's flag is raised in saudi arabia, the train of agreement between iran and saudi arabia has arrived at the station. one day after the reopening of the iranian consulate general in jeddham, it resumed its work. congratulations on the great day of abi do chesht, i wish them pride, i wish them great history and progress of saudi arabia. iran is an important country and their relations are socially, economically and politically influential and the integration of the islamic world was suddenly increased. it was very gratifying . it was a long time wish to establish relations between iran and saudi arabia, and this will increase the capacities of the islamic world, including in the economic direction.

petitioner bears a heavy burden in this case. because we are in a situation where stare decisis considerations apply. i think it would be destabilizing for its courts to turn back on precedent here. i think what can undoubtedly be id about history, although there ar complications in the reco, t is undoubtedly true is that petition has not been able to point to any clear history sport the notion that racial classifications would invariably be unconstuonal. >> is there some connection between how race is being used in the concerns that some of my colleagues have about the amount of time? what i'm trying to get at think about is whether >> it was a set-program. there were 1 seats set asi for underrepresented minorities and tre the concerns about perniciouss and being problematic, we want it to end. we don't want t going on forever. when you have a situation in holistic review, other people are getting pluses in th system, no one is autolly getting a loss in the system, i wondere urge to end it -- what is and it? it is to include rac

but, tr brief actually reflects the record in this case there were no claims developed by petitioner involving the asian american students. and i think that was one of the first brief, is that theyth the conflated their arguments against harvard, which mr. waxman will, you know, equately defend shortly, but those arguments conflated the issues. there's no racial balancing claim against unc. there's no alon of quota. there's been a lot of taut quota in this case. there's no claim about that. there's no claim against unc involving the intentional discrimination against asian american students vis-a-vis white students or other students. so that record actually doesn't exist. justito: so what is your response to the simple argument that college admissions are a um game? and if you give a -- falls within the category of underrepresented my but not to somebody else, you're disadvantaging the latter student? mr. hinojosa: and -- and, your honor, know, that's a -- that's an but the record actually bears out about how -- in this case, how the holistic admissions plan does end up operating. an

here's a personal matter for it is the letter petitioners to be relieved already. i'm already read on that, and i haven't heard anything terribly persuasive to change my mind on the english would be a nurse working at the georgia immigration and customs enforcement ice facility leveling, honestly ghastly allegations. the complaint alleges the facility lacked protection against corona virus for detain. democrats. we didn't have anything to sanitize, we didn't have the proper p p. the 1st case of co within the facility it was called is not here in the facility. and the voice tele owens a part time, hey, they want them at a day, you know, when k i blow probably come in date so, but i that's good to see on s i e e d, hold us the comment that it okay will stay this on instead of the see end of the state and scipio in the front of it, the women in the facility minor, women say that a doctor was performing procedures for which no medical indication exist. it would go down to how to treat. i said, nobody informed me that i'm going to do what i get up to and i know they wen

it is a personal matter for it is the letter of petitioners to be relieved already. i'm already agreed on that, and i haven't heard anything terribly persuasive to change my mind. the english will be a nurse working at the georgia immigration and customs enforcement. i special leveling, honestly ghastly allegations. a complaint alleges the facility, lack protection against corona virus for detain. democrats, we didn't have anything to sanitize. we, we didn't have the proper p p, the 1st case. so co within the facility it was called is not here in the facility. and the voice tele owen papers, hey, they want them at a day, you know, we can blow probably come in date so, but i that's good. this your nice i. e e d who of us? he commented ok was status on the status of the see end of the state and scipio in the front of it. the women in the facility murder, women say that a doctor was performing procedures for which no medical indication existed. in the day of the surgery, i said nobody informed me that i'm going to do a bird g o something i get up. that's what i know. th

the judiciary will treat them according to justice, that is , the most important expectation of a petitioner, respondent, plaintiff, and accused is that when he enters the court, he will feel safe. come means in this sense someone who he has the right to say that until now i had not approached the judiciary, but now that i have approached and my case has been placed on the judge's table, i feel calm . who entered the judiciary, shake to meet the expectations until this expectation is established in a favorable way, we have a long way to go, and there should be some culture building, and i say that it is not in my hands at all , the lady wants, she wants to try, the events that should happen, i will give an example there. what is in our hands and what people really expect is that our colleagues treat litigants with love from the plaintiff and the defendants . he takes from our colleagues from my colleagues, whether it's my job or what i should say, whether he's a judge or a secretary, i go to the prosecutor's office as a workshop and ambush . i really don't know how much my colleagues are try

i think that petitioner bears a heavy burden s case because we're in a situation where stare decisis considerations apply, and i think it would be destabilizing for the court to tn s back on precedent here. and i think wh c undoubtedly be said about history, although there arso complications in the record, what is undoubtedly true is that petitioner has no been able to point to any clear hiory to support the notion that racial classifications were automatically and invariably unconstitutional. justice jackson: andfinally, is there some connection between how race ibeg used and the concerns that some of my colleaave about the amount of time? so what i'm trying to or or think about is whbakke, for example -- bakke was a set-aside program as far as i understhat there was actually 16 seats in a class of aside for underrepresentedset minorities, and, therefore, obviously, the concerns about perniciousness and being problematic and we want it to end, 't want this going on forever. but, when you have a situation talking about a holistic review, other people are getluses in the system, no on

petitioner and it is the responsibility of the defendant, the plaintiff, and the accused to feel safe when he enters the court, which means that someone who is right will tell him that i had a problem until now. i feel calm. now, later, if i have the opportunity, i will tell you how much distance the person who is not right should tremble when he enters the court, so that our expectation and estimation will be fulfilled in a favorable way. it 's not in our hands, it doesn't want to try, it wants to happen it should be an example, where it is in our hands and the people really expect the right , is that our colleagues treat litigants with love, both the plaintiff and the derivatives . okay, he may have been sentenced to death, but i don't have a judge. the life court will give my muslim wife the crown of her life. it really takes away this peace from our colleagues, but what should we do in order for us to have peace of mind? one of the most important issues that we are always looking for. bodhim is the issue of decriminalization and reduction of criminal titles we have been looking fo

seyyed mahdi, the court issued the death sentence , ayatollah montazeri in a letter to the petitioner imam preventing the implementation of the illegal demand sentence, which was impossible to agree to, after the execution of seyyed mehdi ghayatollah montazeri, he remained silent for a few months, but it was clear that others were not the same montazeri as before. ayatollah montazeri, more than a year after the effects of these new changes, after iran accepted resolution 598 on july 27, 1367, korak of the hypocrites with the support of saddam's regime is ready to enter the territory of northern iran . he encouraged himself to after entering the territory of iran from qasr-shirin border, he traveled the route of kermanshah, hamedan and qazvin to reach tehran, and then he said that along the way there are forces that will join them. especially in west islamabad, they have not shown any mercy to the sick and wounded in the hospital, they are being shot at, but their advance from islamabad west did not last more than a few kilometers and finally they were destroyed in the ambush of islami

she writes, the first amendment does not entitle petitioners to a special exemption from a state law that simply requires them to serve all members of the public on equal terms. the first amendment like wise does not exempt petitioners from the law's prohibition on posting a notice that they will deny goods or services based on sexual orientation. let's me bring in kimberly atkins stohr to weigh in on this as well. your thoughts on what we just heard from carrie severino and this argument from justice sotomayor. (. >> yeah, so first of all, i agree that this -- let's put it this way. this is a free speech, but what it is essentially doing is expanding the free religious exercise realm of constitutional law in a way that sort of uses speech as a venue, so what sotomayor points out is what it was objecting to is creating same-sex marriage websites because she herself believes that same-sex marriage is, quote, false. that is dangerous because same-sex marriage is legally protected and constitutionally protected in this country. so to say that i'm not going to serve someone who are part

shopping center confirmed to us that they notice on the territory of the complex without ceremonial petitioners out of the mall in the event of aggression, these citizens are transferred to police officers for further fate, transferred by a representative of law enforcement agencies to violators of public order , the security service, however, in addition to aggression. here there are other reasons to worry about begging children involved. and it already looks like a crime. lawyers say treating children is criminal a crime and prohibited by law falls under article 151 of the criminal code of the russian federation if children are systematically involved in begging, this is an unconditional basis for paying attention to such a family, including guardianship and guardianship authorities, and these are still the few ways to truly punish begging begging has long become criminal by business, the market is clearly divided between its own to defeat the mafia of the poor. organizers of such activities, but this law has not yet been adopted, as you know, it is impunity that gives rise to permissiveness,

shopping center confirmed to us that on the territory of the complex they notice without ceremonial petitionersiately enter from the shopping center in the event of aggression, these citizens are transferred to the police for further fate, transferred by a representative of law enforcement agencies of violators of public order to the security service, however, in addition to aggression. here there are other reasons to worry about begging children involved. and it already looks like a crime. lawyers say is criminal. a crime and forbidden the law falls under article 151 of the criminal code of the russian federation if children are systematically involved in begging, this is an unconditional basis for contacting such a family with attention, including guardianship and guardianship authorities. and so far, these are the few ways to truly punish begging for earplugs . begging has long become a criminal business; the market is clearly divided among its own to defeat the mafia of the poor. once it was already issued in the soviet union with tough, but effective measures in russia, deputies already so

official request to the administration of the shopping center, we were confirmed that unceremonious petitionersritory of the complex. such persons immediately get out of the mall in case of aggression. these citizens are handed over to the police for the further fate of the law enforcement officers handed over to violators of public order, the security service does not follow, however, in addition to aggression. there are other reasons for concern here. children are involved in begging. and it already looks like a crime. lawyers say that involving children in decorations of a substance is a criminal offense and is prohibited by law falls under article 151 of the criminal code of the russian federation if children are systematically involved in begging, this is an unconditional reason for addressing such a family to attention, including guardianship and guardianship authorities. and these are the few ways to truly punish the beggars. begging has long become a criminal business. the market is clearly divided. between his own to defeat the mafia of beggars. once it was already possible in the sovi

or any time the premise is providing entertainment the petitioner provide at least one uniformed security guard on the premise and maintain order and prevent any activity which interfere with quite enjoyment of the property by nearby resident or community. the license uniformed security guard must be licensed by the state of california consumer affairs. >> thank you officer. any questions? i understand we have representatives of the applicant present. you like to approach? >> hello. thanks for having us. i'm john, the general manager of the independent, been the general manager there 10 years and been working 5 years before that. we are about to celebrate our 20 anniversary in february, been at 628 divisadero and diligently and great respect to the neighborhood and neighbors and laws of the city have done our best to honor all our responsibilities as license holders for 47 license we would really love to get your approval on this 90 license because for us it allows us to compete further in a ever growing competitive market that is a lot of not independent players and like we are true to o

does the judge view things in the round or do they work on separate petitioners, prince harry, look at and then the next. or does he take it as a group? he next and then the next. or does he take it as a group?— take it as a group? he takes it in a row to start _ take it as a group? he takes it in a row to start with. _ take it as a group? he takes it in a row to start with. looking - take it as a group? he takes it in a row to start with. looking at - take it as a group? he takes it in a row to start with. looking at the l row to start with. looking at the general approach the mirror have adopted on their tactics and then applies it individually to see what happened. it's perfectly possible that prince harry was sacked but one of the others wasn't, but in reality probably your four were, but we will have to wait and see and that's the decision of the job in a couple of months�* time. decision of the 'ob in a couple of months' time._ decision of the 'ob in a couple of months' time. stay with us as we continue to _ months' time. stay with us as we continue to watch _ months' time. stay

president of the petitioner assigned such and professor at the university of edinburgh.the university of edinburgh. thank you. a lot more on this story if — edinburgh. thank you. a lot more on this story if you _ edinburgh. thank you. a lot more on this story if you go — edinburgh. thank you. a lot more on this story if you go to _ edinburgh. thank you. a lot more on this story if you go to our _ edinburgh. thank you. a lot more on this story if you go to our website. i this story if you go to our website. you can go to the bbc news website or, of course, you can find us on the act if that is your thing. so plenty more on that study about napping and all the other stories that we are covering here on bbc news. thank you for staying with us here on bbc news. prosecutors in romania have charged the controversial influencer, andrew tate, and his brother tristen with rape, human trafficking and forming an organised crime group to exploit women. two associates of the brothers have also been charged. andrew tate was first arrested at his home in bucharest in december. the four

petitioners idea that state legislatures created by the state constitutions are independent of them ised by the articles of confederation, rejected by the early state constitutions, rejected by the founding practice, especially new york, where judges vetoed federal election bills. it's also rejected by this court in cases such as smiley and hildebrand. >> back with us, neal katyal. neal, i don't want to use any of your instruction time with us, with the standing ovation that you deserve, and i am wired into this chair, so it would be hard for me to send. i invite everyone at home to give neal the standing ovation he deserves. what should we now feel going forward about our elections as a result of this case? >> first of all, lawrence, what a privilege it was to argue this case, on behalf of common cause and a whole team of lawyers, including judge luttig, who helped me so magnificently, what a privilege it is to be on your show and talk about it. so, what happened today is that the u.s. supreme court, by a 6 to 3 decision, rejected donald trump in the republican party's legal theories.

. >> the petitioner in that case, you would have to look it up to see the relationship to singer beinga says that this violates a federal law. that's quite an accusation. what is alito saying about that? >> alito says, look, at the time the gift disclosure did not cover private jets for social trips. and that has been an issue in the clarence thomas case because the administrative office of u.s. courts came out and clarified and said, well, now it does. but that's the big question here. ethics people are really raising that flag. of course, poppy, it is so unheard of to have a justice of the supreme court pen a "wall street journal" article defending himself even before propublica published it. propublica went the supreme court said, we are working on this story, we'd like comment and they got no comment. before they knew it, alito had gone forward. he had written this unusual op-ed defending himself with his own byline. >> thanks so much. >> thank you. >>> federal judge has overturned a ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth in arkansas. in an 8 #-page ruling, the judge sa

is everybody so petitioner gets involved with donald trump is damaged?oncern about my reputation is with the people who i, respect my family, my lawyer, and i am perfectly comfortable with my reputation with them, sir. >> you know what really stands out there to me, chris, he is taking heat from republicans, and democrats, which is really not i think what anybody expected at the end of this process. >> well, the question i have is, why did jim jordan the chairman of the judiciary committee call him up because if he thought he was going to score points against democrats, he really didn't. remember, dermis and pointed by bill barr during the trump administration to investigate the investigators, mystically to say, why did they spend all these years at both the fbi, and the special counsel, and investigating the idea of collusion between the trump campaign, and russia. they have russia, russia, russia, former president calls it it was not a -- he spent four years, he fought three cases, one miner, and the fbi pleaded guilty and the two big cases he brought

as for the conservative majority, six of them chose to side with the petitioner, in both of today's cases. students for fair admissions, which contrary to its name is not actually students. but rather a group led by a man named edward bluhm, a conservative legal strategist who for many years has been bent on killing consideration of race in college admissions. well, he finally got a court majority that would give him his way. but according to chief justice john roberts' majority opinion, nothing in this opinion should be construed as prohibiting universities from considering an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it from discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise. i mean, so long as apiring students write about the way race impacted them in their college essays exactly the way john roberts tells them to. and with today's death blow to affirmative action, one justice in particular seemed to revel in pulling up the ladder behind himself. justice clarence thomas who has acknowledged he has benefitted from affirmative action. in a frankly gleeful concurrence, he wro

the petitioners in this case and my firm was one of bo's in the case opposing that.he commissioners in more argued that most -- all these practices that were look forward by the other side -- and embraced by cheap justice roberts and his opinion could be understood as consistent with the independent legislature. theory. it is a more complicated argument than just saying the term legislature is we are and nothing else matters. i think your broader question of how you know whether something is clear and then how does that prevent you from having to go to historical evidence, it is a very good methodological question. it is one that justice kavanaugh before he got onto the work, he gave a lecture and i think he published a piece in harvard on this as well. arguing against methodologies that rely on how clear or how ambiguous is a text before resorting to something else or whatever because he says it is difficult to figure out whether something is sufficiently we are. that can lead to all sorts of line drawing problem. and so i suspect that justice kavanaugh if you were

do you know who had the exact same argument as biden was the petitioners.oint was you can use non-racial means of achieving diversity. remember, the compelling interest is not racial diversity. a lot of folks think it's racial diversity must be achieved. it's overall diversity. supreme court said so very clearly it's not racial diversity. it's overall diversity and whether you can use race to achieve that overall student diversity. that should include socioeconomic status, nationality, overall diversity. so ultimately universities will have a challenge in achieving that diversity, but they always had that challenge. can they use other means of achieving diversity? absolutely because these -- this line of cases really only deals with race. if you want to choose any other factor that puts -- that makes it easier to get into college, then as a university you presumably can do so. >> at the same time every single college that has been involved in this they say this was never the only factor we were considering, but the qualified applicant pool and this was one

uh, the americans act as petitioners. in general, an increasingly familiar role for them now.. uh, already, in the united states of america, president biden called the dictator well, how did you find out it was an improvisation or not? well, let's listen to nbc. senior us officials say they were caught off guard when president joe biden. called chinese president xi jinping a dictator just a day later. after secretary of state anthony bylin kent visited beijing and it seemed. reached a breakthrough, in the tense relations between the countries, officials privately tried to make clear to the chinese that biden's description of xi jinping is not a new topic for discussion or a change in the administration's official policy, rather than believing that this dispute will not become a serious obstacle to the progress made in feed us progress one of administration officials, downplayed baidan's remarks, said he made a comment about dictators. on the whole, i do not mean specifically the chinese leader. biden tends to speak more freely behind closed doors by wealthy democrat donors tha

, all that will do is end separation of powers and basically say that the courts, not because a petitioner or plaintiff has gone in but because the congress wants to intercedes and wants the court to stop lifesaving regulations that can be helpful to the american people. so i know that we have to do our duty and be here today. i honor again the men and women who served in the united states military, and particularly those at normandy of which i had the privilege of being there years ago but i end my remarks by saying the american people need us to be serious. texans need us to be serious and no one's gas stove will be removed from their house or apartment but will offer to you the ability and instruction to make sure that everything in your home is safe. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlewoman's time has expired. gentlewoman reserves. the gentleman from kentucky. mr. massie: how the reins act originated. one bill that would do the most to restore the constitutional balance of government. it was an idea from lloyd rogers, a quint of mine and grew up in an orphanage and met the girl who wou

the idea is to allow a broader range of petitioners or the legislation name reference. to seek assessment of people who have a very specific cest conscience as defined in the legislation. you can seat language there sits schizophrenia or other. it is done in phases. there are early aadopters of which we are one of 7 counties. and then a year and change later in december of 23, the all other counties implement. we are in the process of really designing the program procedural, we are collaborating with city partners including our partners in the judicial system or in the housing system. and in order to estimate the number of potential care courts participates withhold be eligible. we have -- a staffing developed a staffing model and i think one of the questions here is includes the work flows moving from the court process. the care court statute creates reporting deliverables. they include process measures importance upon participating drafk everdemographics housing place ams and so forth. our outcome measures that are of interest to the program and to ourselves include i

petitioner's of students for fair admissions argued those cases when it comes to racial discrimination especially gives asian american applicants and it goes on from there but also talks more about how military institutions and conservative institutions. you can find more of that at military times.com. we go to diane in connecticut on the independent line. caller: hi. i went to yell law school for -- yale law school. i was the first black woman they ever hired in the law school to be secretary to the professor. i had to qualify -- more than qualified. add to be better than those already there. i was told that. they hired me and i got promoted and i lasted 32 years. while i was there they only hired one more black pricing. -- black person. i hired her. i got promoted to supervisor and i hired her because she was black but she could not make it. --she lied to me and said she ws going to do something that she did not know how to do. i feel as though all black people who apply to colleges and universities should be qualified, not only that -- host: what makes you assume that they are not?

petitioners plead this court to set aside icwa on its face what undermine those vital protections thathave wo well. by 23 states, showing sts enactment, it greatly undermines this court's indian jurisprudence by carving up core's plenary power in discrete categories which this court sever recognized and what undermine the reliance of congress, of , of individual members and states on congress's exci of power. >> the plenary power has no limits than there isn't any article one issue for us to decide. does it really have no limits in your view? >> t ce of the test has to be rationally related to the fulfillment of congress's ique obligations to indians so in that, and implementation of status and protection, whether that is just for the indian ce clause or the amalgamation of congress' various powers but it has to be in the service of the obligations to the indians and this court said it has to be reasonable and rationally related to congress's fulft of these powers. there is reasonableness there but this is at the core of it. >> rationally related. is that our usual rational bast? >> co

the idea is to allow a broader range of petitioners or the legislation name reference. to seek assessment of people who have a very specific cest conscience as defined in the legislation. you can seat language there sits schizophrenia or other. it is done in phases. there are early aadopters of which we are one of 7 counties. and then a year and change later in december of 23, the all other counties implement. we are in the process of really designing the program procedural, we are collaborating with city partners including our partners in the judicial system or in the housing system. and in order to estimate the number of potential care courts participates withhold be eligible. we have -- a staffing developed a staffing model and i think one of the questions here is includes the work flows moving from the court process. the care court statute creates reporting deliverables. they include process measures importance upon participating drafk everdemographics housing place ams and so forth. our outcome measures that are of interest to the program and to ourselves include i