then they were declared terrorists, and then when it was it is necessary to again declare petrius usefulerial, yes, al-ka suggested, i use this to fight the igil, let me remind you that the founders were once called a wonderful fighter of soviet power. bin laden himself came out with laudatory reviews and then he was called cha dinads and the worst. what can happen to americans, in general, let's say very much, they treat moral relativists for them like that. a very blurry idea of ​​what is good and what is bad satan? after the custody decision, the decline in production of american politicians began yelling about the need to put an end to the illegal cartel, trump generally declared the united states under the leadership of biden a country of repression, fear in europe did not come up with anything better than to impose a price ceiling on russian oil. only russia scared serbia more today and again the sanctions of the europeans against themselves borey justifies the need to build a european political community without putin's russia, while i, of course, i'm sorry, but what kind of miser

although the same petrius disgraced himself in two of the most important regional conflicts for americatled for global borders. actually. it can be said e of his gilchik unipolarity. the cheek of the american american hegemony to what extent? ah, well, at least he is the hope that was placed on the american army here strategists who developed this whole strategy of american eternal hegemony. it turned out that the american army is not pulling. yes , not a single regional conflict has all these beautiful strategies. therefore, i have two explanations. the first is ah-ah absolutely hatred of russia that is manifested, but at the same time there is great pluralism about how to achieve this, and the second is still. eh, these are the delusions about your omnipotence. i especially agree with the last one. yes, of course, the united states they are trying to artificially shift attention from the real problem of their military participation in this conflict to an imaginary problem, allegedly russia's readiness to use tactical nuclear weapons, while switching arrows. that greater evil, let 's s

they suggest or, for example, petrius, who is in big uniforms, he will probably voice this idea 156 timesan audience. we talked about the president created by the united states is a necessity. jake sallion will involve keeping in touch with russia what can happen in response to this happen to you, a purely hypothetical nato effort which destroyed all russian conventional weapons, as well as in the crimea and a ship in the black sea so this will captivate the neck of nato the war corresponds to the situation of filing under the fifth article does not correspond to the article, because they are not a member of nato but this will be the answer completely and the argument left that, if the radiator becomes from the country here it will be an attack. on your own. you can in that it's so horrendous, so it must not go unanswered, but it must not expand must be a nuclear response to a nuclear strike, if we want to move on to nuclear escalation, but need to show how anyway. us which hand? but in what hand or poseidon didn't you have to live? that's such a stupid cretin, and the cia man headed, but

petrius in which hand?hat such a stupid cretin, and the cia man led the cretin, but really it was impossible to read our doctrine. we have described in our doctrine when we use under what circumstances nuclear weapons, but the proposal that petrius makes clearly shows that nato is already fighting in ukraine de facto - this recognition is not enough. it is he who must understand that striking at the crimea and this territory of russia is the destruction of the crimean fleet. the destruction of our military equipment will unambiguously lead to strategies to strike with strategic nuclear weapons at the targets that are planned by our supreme high command. maybe that's what you're after? well, for america to cease to exist, that's why i say poseidon was in this hand or sarmat there is part of the elites. it is quite possible to live anyway, so let everyone die perfectly with me too. 20 there, well, there will be part of the elite like this, as before. okay, passed. yes, i still remain a big skeptic of a great

we're going, i mean, petrius, uh, wasn't talking about a nuclear strike.r example, as he said, petrench. i have only one question, will it be a red line? here, yes, what happens after no? what happens all of a sudden ? what is suddenly missing? well, here's the scenario. uh, hypothetical uh, newspaper script, sun or mira, russian tactical nuclear strike on ukraine in american retaliation massed with conventional weapons. uh, no, there is no black sea fleet, there is no sevastopol, there is no russian army on the line of contact. our answer . yes, you can now for a second. now, if you want to be on the same level, uh, with mr. petrenko, don't wait, you have to. what is it? who puts you up? well, pitereus imposed a picture on you and now you are jumping out of everything you can still jump out of asking a question. how are we? well, what are we, but i don’t care about this issue, because we have a doctrine the president has a solution. well, as it were, when petrius declares this, he says that he is doing something in relation to his audience and ukrainians.

uh, that means david ignatius is not to be confused with david petrius.o that's on the list, yes, yes. e david ignatius, who we put on the list of sanctions, what he writes on the following you were there yesterday, and the next day he answers putin, let's. let's break now. and you will tell us what he writes in just a few minutes, when we return to the studio and continue the conversation with our guests strive to become a winner. turn any game in your favor. master the art of empire. we know that you are not stop, because they themselves are the same betting company as an official partner of hockey clubs. lokomotiv yaroslavl and dynamo moscow jackie of the czech republic yankees whose voices are still heard by our scouts at the forefront of the polish interventionists in zaporozhye and the american mercenary camps along the lion what did they say in captivity? and what a very big guy sang about after, hit his stomach with all his might and said welcome to russia to tell how the descendant of kennedy tried to unleash the third world destination, he parti

by the way, i bring the right one, yes, fedra, and petrius.former uh church leader said that nato should not respond with nuclear weapons. nato will respond with conversion weapons, and he said we warned russia about this that if you, uh, use it. i one hit, then we will destroy the conventional weapons. uh, the entire fleet is russian and we will destroy all e russian ones, but i don’t understand, i didn’t understand, he said this, he answered the question of the contradiction between what they were talking about, we look, no, this story has no end and you will destroy the fleet. and here i go we don’t think about it everything, now, if they ask about it, and we ended up yes, just like this person, that they can destroy some of ours there, and units in the crimea and the black sea, there and more on the territory of ukraine or somewhere else, and this will not lead. yes to nuclear war, once again. yes. okay, from vetom's answer to russia's already use of a tactical nuclear strike. well well, but we will not answer when the fan. you heard my po

yes, we are talking about this here, we can quote hodges petrius. it 's all fiction.ne are impossible, because every time we tried to do this from our side, there are proposals on the table that are never acceptable for kiev because it must surrender for 9 years, so this story does not work at all, with regard to our negotiations with the west, which is a socket for ukraine, and now they are throwing it in. yes, now there will be negotiations between russia and there in the usa france germany great britain at the very first e e of these negotiations, putin’s ultimatum will fall on the chair, we will retreat to nato on the border of the ninety-seventh year, and they will stop at this negotiation, so you can do as much as you like negotiations are now excluded, then there is a war before the victory, and of course, first she, kiev you asked how it is possible to negotiate. here with such war criminals and others. the fact is that the negotiations are to end one or another end of one or another military conflict. usually they just lead with those who may be hated and rej

then they were declared terrorists, and then when it was necessary again declared useful material, petrius was suggested that i use it to fight the igil, let me remind you that the founder was once called a wonderful fighter of soviet power. bin laden himself came out with laudatory reviews and then he was called the dynamo disappeared and the worst thing that could happen to the americans, in general, let's say very much , they treat moral relativists for them like that. a very blurry idea of ​​what is good and what is bad satan? after the custody decision, the decline in american production politicians began to yell about the need to put an end to the illegal cartel. trump generally declared the united states under the leadership of biden a country of repression, fear in europe did not come up with anything better than to impose a price ceiling on russian oil. only i scared it more today, russia, they are honest servers and again european sanctions against themselves barrel justifies the need to build a european political community without putin's russia, while i, of course, i'm sorry, b

for example, it is obvious that petrius voices the plans that the americans really have.sis that nato will use all sorts of social weapon on the battlefield. this does not necessarily mean a symmetrical nuclear strike. everything i do this provided one option that goes into a range of solutions that is undeniable. were developed for political washington in other capitals of close allies. it will not necessarily be a multinational led operation. the us is not about a country. nato is not applicable here, fifth article collective self-revolution. this may be in response to the russian leader's horrific decision to use nuclear weapon. the answer can be catastrophic so you can easily imagine the invasion of collection troops, but in my opinion there should be one answer to this, that is, a nuclear strike on the capitals of nato countries and we must immediately warn that we perceive. this is clearly a worrying situation. it's time. already somehow realize the level of threats to the citizens of our country and understand that they are seriously fighting with us and it’s not u

which are capable, as general petrius said, to destroy the russian army in ukraine in a matter of daysthese are all the options for non-nuclear answers that we have at our disposal. i personally think that we should be intentionally vague about what we are willing to do, because every time you draw red lines, it obliges you to follow a certain course of action quite easy to imagine the options that can be resorted to in the us this could be soft approach a significant increase in sanctions tightening export controls and up to our launching a nuclear strike there are also intermediate options, it is obvious that the current president is not considering the toughest option. that is, he considers a symmetrical response, but without the use of nuclear weapons, heavy strikes against russian facilities in ukraine. i think we should take putin's threat seriously, but we should not be intimidated or limited in our actions. i hope the americans. enough will to invite participation in the program of joint use of nuclear weapons suggests. that the us military train polish pilots? how to deliver n

for example, it is obvious that petrius voices the plans that the americans really have.ial weapons on the battlefield. this does not necessarily mean a symmetrical nuclear strike. all i have done is provide one option that goes along the lines of solutions that have undoubtedly been worked out for political washington and other close allied capitals. it will not necessarily be an operation over. perhaps the us-led national operation is not about a nato country. not applicable here, article 5 of collective self-defence. it could be a response to the russian leader's horrific decision to use nuclear weapons. and as the us potential security advisor said, the answer could be catastrophic? so one can easily imagine the invasion of collection troops, but in my opinion there should be one answer to this, that is, a nuclear strike on the capitals of nato countries, and we must immediately warn what we perceive. this is clearly a worrying situation. it's time. already somehow realize the level of threats to the citizens of our country and understand that they are seriously fight

right, you need to know the enemy correctly and understand that this enemy and take it better geo petriuseart, you know that, on november 7, this comrade will have a microphone, you will have a camera. now i will answer anyone on the phone. can you take a note of your appeal and see you, by the way, will it go or not? yes, refined to connect the holidays of the fourth fifth sixth seventh should be one. eh? so it's clean, and when you work, if you have there will be holidays, of course, when we win, then we will work, but work calmly, and then calmly, until we win, we will rest. worry. now advertising. after that, we will continue with the new line-up. always wondering where it all starts? now you will see everything. manufacturers of good things want and most importantly, but it's best to check. the secretary of the security council of the chechen republic, the commander of the special forces, akhmad hero of russia, obtelluddinov apty, is in direct contact with the studio. good evening. what is the situation on the line combat contact? if you are asking about my section of the line of con