secretary pfannenstiel, i hope you can help me better understand the fiery range on guam. i expressed the location for the firing range on guam. the marine requirements seems to have shifted since the beginning of the eis process in 2006. and as such, why are these individual qualifications needed to be met on guam? has a cost benefit analysis -- and i think we talked about this earlier, been conducted to determine why the island may or may not be feasible? >> we have looked at the island and, in fact, we'll be doing some group training there but the individual qualifying needs to be on-site close to where the marines will be. we've looked at the ability to move the marines as it would be required -- to move them to tinian, often to support them there, to move them back. you end up not just with a lot of additional expense, you reduce the time that they have to train. you reduce the through-put of training for them. given all of that, we've concluded that the training needs to be on the island of guam and we have sought for -- since we have been doing the process to find a