in the words of anshel pfeffer — who i'm sure you read his work, he's a military commentator, he writesus publications, including haaretz in israel — he said there were three failed concepts at work here. one, that hamas did not want and would not risk another war with israel. secondly, the gaza security apparatus that israel has created, including electronic surveillance, human intelligence, a military fence around gaza, that gave you a level of security comfort that allowed you to believe in security. and thirdly, the palestinian conflict, but particularly the gaza situation, had become something of a sideshow, that it was no longer a focus for the israeli military because israel felt that, in essence, it had kept hamas in a place it could keep them long—term. the strategic vision failed, didn't it? well, i agree only with one part, the issue about the security issues, and i think we have to analyse what happened, why we allowed them to get so close to the fence during the riots they had every once in a while, but i don't think we were surprised by the intentions of hamas. hamas is a