i will come to the pfi question in a second.ur reading of this latest labour thinking on brexit? what is interesting is that they have had no substantive interesting is that they have had no su bsta ntive vote interesting is that they have had no substantive vote here on all of that, on the actual policy if you like, but we have had keir starmer laying out the labour position on all of this and i think mainly what he is doing is keeping his options open. the mood here is a bit like a party, they are buoyant, saying they are ready for a general election which they think they have a chance of winning, in which case they would be taking over these negotiations. keir starmer about a transitional period, saying he would want that, where we would stay pretty much the single market and the customs union but also that we would have to accept the rules during that time. the big unknown is what happens after that and i think maybe deliberately keeping the options open on that, there are some within the party being very vociferous about sa

mr corbyn, do we know how much the pfi bill will be?emy corbyn‘s labour, pfi would be a thing of the past. the pfi contract you announced today, do you know how much this is going to cost? i'm going for lunch, you heard the speech, you'll see all the details. there's no detail in the speech. how much is it going to cost, sir? the party says they'd buy out private contacts with government bonds or borrowing. when are we going to get more details, sir? but it's not clear how much they'd be willing to do, or how many of the existing 700 contracts they'd unpick. the devil is always in the detail. we've got to find out how much this will cost. i've got no doubt whatsoever in paying for it, it will still be better value for the public purse, for the taxpayer than letting these contracts run for the next 20 years. but do you accept though to start with, to take these contracts back in—house, that would at least, in the short term, cost the taxpayer a lot of money? of course it will do. we can borrow. there's nothing against borrowing. yet this

mr corbyn, do we know how much the pfi bill will be? corbyn's labour, pfi would be a thing of the past. the pfi contract you announced today, do you know how much this is going to cost? i'm going for lunch, you heard the speech, you'll see all the details. there's no detail in the speech, how much is it going to cost, sir? the party says they'd buy out private contacts with government bonds or borrowing. when are we going to get more details, sir? but it's not clear how much they'd be willing to do, or how many of the existing 700 contracts they'd unpick. the devil is always in the detail. we've got to find out how much this will cost. i've got no doubt whatsoever in paying for it, it will still be better value for the public purse, for the taxpayer than letting these contracts run for the next 20 years. but do you accept though to start with, to take these contracts back in—house, that would at least, in the short term, cost the taxpayer a lot of money? of course it will do, we can borrow, there's nothing against borrowing. yet this fe

do you know how much the pfi bill will be? injeremy know how much the pfi bill will be?e pfi bill will be? injeremy corbyn's labour pfi would bea injeremy corbyn's labour pfi would be a thing of the past. how much will it cost? i am going for lunch. you heard the speech. there was no detail in the speech. the party says they would buy out private contracts with government bonds, or borrowing. it is not clear how much they would be willing to do or how many of the existing 700 contracts they would unpicked. the devil is in the detail and we have to find out how much it will cost but i have no doubt that in paying for it, it will be better value for the public purse and taxpayer than letting the contracts run the next 20 years. do you accept to ta ke run the next 20 years. do you accept to take contracts back in—house in the short—term will cost the taxpayer a lot of money? of course it will do. we can borrow. there is nothing against borrowing. yet this feels more than anything a point of principle. some were badly formed contracts that have ended up expensive. you will n

we will bring existing pfi contracts back in—house. bring existing pfi contracts back in-house.as got the idea is to propel it into government. it hopes to prove not just to into government. it hopes to prove notjust to its own supporters but voters elsewhere it has got what it ta kes to voters elsewhere it has got what it takes to lead the country. eleanor garnier, bbc news, brighton. 0ur assistant political editor norman smith is in brighton. let's talk about the announcement on pfi contracts. what would it mean in practice and how much would it cost? that is a very good question. and a nswered that is a very good question. and answered at the moment, have we known. but be in no doubt this is a huge announcement in political terms. pfi has been technical but it is the way that many new hospitals and schools have been built in britain over the last 25 years. the private sector builds the hospital and then charges the state, the taxpayer, us, interest. it is sort ofa taxpayer, us, interest. it is sort of a mortgage to build new hospitals and schools. and john mcdonnell is saying

we've got the pfi announcement is being done today. put you a recent independent poll. in terms of what the public want the backing for state policies yes, people want an executive pay gap and people want tuition fees to go, only 33% considered jeremy corbyn ‘s party... a party that can deliver that. let's look at what we did in the last general election, that's the best polling we could ever do. we did lose but given the nature of the snap election, going from where we started at the beginning when that election was called and where we ended up, who could have said, if that election had gone on for another two weeks... what we're doing is continuing that campaign because that is whatjeremy is great at, campaigning, convincing people. it's one thing sounding as if it is won but as chuka umunna says there's work to be done outside and you can't deliver everything. what the public said was the more they sought jeremy corbyn the more they liked him. that is our role at the moment to give people as much exposure to him as possible. what pe

we will bring existing pfi contracts back in—house.ing to show it has got the idea is to propel it into government. it hopes to prove notjust to its own supporters but voters elsewhere it has got what it takes to lead the country. eleanor garnier, bbc news, brighton. let's cross to brighton and speak to our chief political correspondent vicki young. that pfi initiative announcement is a big deal but brexit is still overshadowing everything? yes, that is right. brexit obviously is the issue of the moment, of the next few yea rs, issue of the moment, of the next few years, obviously politically what is going to go on in parliament and what labour want to do is to talk about the disunity in the conservative party and in the cabinet and how damaging they say thatis cabinet and how damaging they say that is for negotiations. but of course they have problems of their own. there are many here who listen tojeremy corbyn, it's clear and we have seen throughout his parentry career that he's always been very much on the euro—sceptic side of the a

addressing the conference in brighton, mr mcdonnell said pfi contracts were likely to cost the public few decades and it was time to reduce the cost to the taxpayer. our chief political correspondent vicki young is in brighton at the labour party conference for us. so that is what the labour government would do but what we don't have is the detail or the cost of all this. no, that's right. the speech from john mcdonnell had a lot of policies in it, and much bigger role for the state generally, but the biggest cheer really was for that announcement, saying that he would bring back in—house these pfi contracts. there is, of course, i be? about how much that might cost. afterwards, one of labour's treasury spokesman talked about it being pretty self financing, so let's discover if that is the case. paul johnson is from the institute for fiscal studies. broadly, pfi contracts, labour say they cost an awful lot of money and some of them have been a very bad deal, so they could actually get out of them and save money in the long run. these are contracts that were negotiated between the gove

we will bring existing pfi contracts back in—house.ing to show it has got the idea is to propel it into government. it hopes to prove notjust to its own supporters but voters elsewhere it has got what it takes to lead the country. eleanor garnier, bbc news, brighton. now we can get a brighton where vicky young can put this into perspective. there was a lot on offer from john mcdonnell today, some of those promises we saw in the labour ma nifesto promises we saw in the labour manifesto and some of them proved very popular with people such as the renationalisation of railways, for example. broadly a much bigger role for the state. inevitably the immediate questions that have been asked on the government in particular are how do labour propose to pay for all of this? i am joined by annelise dodds from the treasury tea m team who can help us with that. first of all, on pfi, for example, how do you propose to get out of contracts that have been legally signed? presumably contracts that have been legally signed ? presumably you contracts tha

pfi, we know it has cost the taxpayer a lot of money. a lot of these proposals resonate with people. and i think labour, after what did exactly, it didn't win but the unexpected election showing, feels the tide is turning. 79 when mrs thatcher came, that old post—war thing, the government was good, it turned. if you talk to some of the younger people, they do feel income levels, there is a huge disparity in people earn, disparity in wealth. this may be the time, i don't know, dummett labour may have got it wrong but this may be the mood. if there was ever a time... given the unexpected. this is the mood to see to it. to do it in the way labour

we will bring existing pfi contracts back in—house.ing to show it has got the idea is to propel it into government. it hopes to prove notjust to its own supporters but voters elsewhere it has got what it takes to lead the country. eleanor garnier, bbc news, brighton. let's cross to brighton and speak to our chief political correspondent vicki young. one of the big issues being discussed is brexit. some unhappiness from the labour mps that there wasn't a more substantive vote on the issue of policy and staying in the single market beyond brexit. let's discuss that, i'm joined by the shadow foreign secretary, emily thornberry. are you stifling debate? i was thornberry. are you stifling debate? iwas in thornberry. are you stifling debate? i was in the international policy debate and there were people expressing their issues and it was passionate and sounded like a debate to me. some say the tories let labour do what they want with brexit, that you are rolling over and letting them get on with it?|j hear that but i know different. we have

,n teyail t decisonpld wl cle lfll to i ttn i intxadt thgenn >>uteouh, gvemehgou t jstce w wrkn reh pfi hkh eaeppog t crtav nsfor a honxpt 0 donnh. heltt tininll yodyoft u an fheltf at rbsh w oyfs t ieah,ouow ispennyw beaasno iw u t drat orsn agin fild tos ohfa tatoinhe eotaror spts, toscocns wn exbusfeyi lmb mnt a peso t uts dhe dpat jti c tt brg rseahe adffpiobo w? hitoicll . rthr bbbeutd otyrk r t dscg che tre rrpt bha bt ho sareenl mre lmir is wreihe wyo mhow oonal g te asfheo't ncns eonestor a aut ndr mne o r osn a tia,n ewe irrhn,hi tey eec g rol o mnts i bcae s aire m sw,5 bnsd oot eali a ten yu n i gng o nw js? > aepheusce ptnto difer ndu c e aadip smein im cnfile ve s rsow jt tw >g bc t tenf h d ts or tre reo itlgiouon,e ndpng te ccntha gvenmt lhe aags tte onh ldlhr quy th i nmn. y aet lokngnefhete oer d u aea dwn otervu scetas bnncd bet waiin t psetiseyhe roib o hdieeitti foneso anthh srn owi tto tis >wl, des'teu crte t cais a yo,e aguye weg roecte fftns a snaory unepe t li tetmntn vaouese aarhe fi dti meuet atityi tor cloh u? cur opaec thaedus ahe cseu tkls toes mb orees alod

iornt, s t pele iss re ptnsh t cole t wk atee t beon wes e del geren t beuprtg e at a i pele but t n-f-pfi seorreugy iornt ngss its poanwellom geer atasosimrtt m lebyheurvo wmewi toy,asowuc j, pe anlo istl tasan i ay tt atro thugutheor a ith unedtas d bon. wl ntueitth inasucreecer sechnd-rese llonnu fothne cplofay thwars wl akopul wiinwo ds,nds ey ocd, we n t t t sechndeseodan fuhein rovy f t suivs tre agn, tnk y, d s hor bhe a bab t suorhi a te e eraco s,he w llonnutooritth pelef texa an y. wod keo rnt erow srery co. ou.co:ha daha bn etialet spinda ayou ha hrd ofhe gerr,heic pridt,ndlsfr seetyuk thdertntf anorti isoi eryin psie suorgorn aotanth pelef tas a minavlae re an10miioinubc ppt eeth inasucreeef xa erar aromaly35 miio pdi idertntf anorti fdsvaab fo tasetenodndhe d t fcaye. tadertntasve40 gun a, ant, onheotwa ouooiningein trsiastsacupnd nng, ndg ivs r seantrksfor emp. d e del ghy mistti h bn t heto mea ndllpridg chca asstceo e xa dertntf tnsrtio wereorkingitth steo op t apo. f ayohaea, rp chst n oea,ouon iaouonob, d ctia e eng me cacy. auntemnslod ce foso mity igs. ros t iacd ea coi

pfi, we know it has cost the taxpayer a lot of money. a lot of these proposals, eve ryo ne of money. a lot of these proposals, everyone here is what laws is saying, but a lot of these proposals resonate with people. and i think labour, after what did exactly, it didn't win but the unexpected election showing, feels the tide is turning. 79 when mrs thatcher came, that old post—war thing, the government was good, it turned. if you talk to some of the younger people, they do feel income levels, there is a huge disparity in people earn, disparity in wealth. this may be the time, i don't know, dummett labour may have got it wrong but this may be the mood. if there was ever a time... given the unexpected. this is the mood to see to it. to do it in the way labour is proposing could be a catastrophe but nevertheless... that's the problem. if theyjudge the mood right, people are looking at things not working, paying a lot of money, and may feel yes, which give back to state control. pre-1979? ithink central bank policy has something to do with th

nationalisations, taking all pfi projects into public hands, a new £500 million for an nhs winter crisiss of extra billions of borrowing, and higher taxes for the rich. but how has it changed him? this is your third conference now as leader, and a very different environment. has it changed you? i'm even busier than i've been, but i've always been a pretty busy person, in my life. your critics inside the party are now behind you, because of the advance in the election. do you feel now you have won the argument inside the labour party? i stood for the election as leader, challenging the concepts of austerity, and economic injustice and inequality in this country. i was proud to stand, and pleased to be elected. you've won the argument in the labour party? well, the argument in the party has been about our role as a party, our role in rejuvenating our economy and our society. and do you know what? it's really exciting. exciting for him, exciting for many here. yet even senior labour figures harbour doubts. is this a powerful fad, or really the government of the future? the european medicine

and the top story here in the uk: the labour party is planning to take over pfi contracts should it win. it says the contracts are likely to cost the public sector more than £200 billion over the next few decades. now on bbc news, all the latest business news live from singapore. the‘s prime minister calls for a snap election, to get a new political mandate. and the smashing success. political mandate. and the smashing success. taking out their frustrations with a baseball bat is all the rage in singapore. good morning, asia, hello, world. it is the tuesday. glad you could join us on asia business report. i'm rico hizon. it is official. japan's prime minister, shinzo abe, announcing his plan to dissolve parliament and call elections more than a year before expected. he is currentlyjapan‘s third longest serving prime minister, he served one year from 2000 and has been prime minister since 2012. if things go way, he will be orchestrating his fourth term as prime minister. the election comes as the economy injapan is improving, and that is seen as proof that abenomics is indeed working. du

if we can get those pfi contracts back in—house we can geta those pfi contracts back in—house we caneview the contracts so if we can find a way to make it better then it‘s our responsibility to bring them in—house if we can do that. given you have so many contracts across so many different trusts, it will be quite a complicated programme of work, but it‘s the right thing to do to embark upon that programme of work. john mcdonnelljumped the gun? i wouldn‘t characterise his position asjumping i wouldn‘t characterise his position as jumping the gun. i wouldn‘t characterise his position asjumping the gun. he was outlining his approach, he wants these contracts in—house. it‘s notjumping the gun but he was clear that we have to review these contracts and we have to do what is in the interests of prudent management of the finances, which is why we review them. we go through each contract, we understand them properly, and where we can save money by bringing them in—house, as happened at a hospital in northumberland, then we will do that. talking about the labour conference, on sunday diane a

owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, get that son of a thbleef ) pfi irghedd .not f >>ter: after friday's speech in alabama, some trump supporters fired back. former nfl head coach rex ryan. >> i'm pissed off eiffel be honest with you. i supported drt. supported donald trump. calling them sob's you know, that's not the trump i know. >> now leads the jersey sales. >> reporter: at a popular cafeteria on chicago's predominantly black south side, the president's words were still reverberating this afternoon. >> i think it's part of his strategy. what he's trying to do is distract people. so here we have this distraction this weekend. the senate is trying the fight about healthcare. we have damage in puerto rico. nothing about those things. .> reporter: technology consultant randolph carnegie. >> we're in a place right now , ere we are fighting over simple, stupid stuff and not looking at the big picture all because of what this guy says. >> reporter: it did not escape michelle schaefer's attention that mr. trump trained his scorn on the n.f.l. and n.b.a., whose rosters are

iicenhe wi binlv idog e ia eshi-pfi ce gh prole ces he e ston c.a e neez aadomofha otsoeoe n arom ifs. t fe an ekeli, d e hermilotstd en benen thi -- mene's trieday ecs clhe acedes oiv fr h fenanweth ophaolis iexan f licafars i nto n for sd n e at d mvilos ke hes othmogi. h alic fri. othrit th e ass. h aea bn cvied o a im raal sare sen ora, mice auca retetoheam aegio th a n aste ts ia aegio ihi trl tt nar neez shi hpr.eln soe e spe w hangit hltanhun rvesbo aeg ovbiin fomniti. mli dla. ats e t b aasf isurntri. th cimhainxcngfo jetrs,ha sat menz s rkg,obinpele wiinhexetirah bacay kehidiutgo ay iaowooofridsre ey io t inits spedhath he en ies r meim th he owea oeror lo te. iautotnt hwa eltetoheene. il: d'thk at rit. thk e iesh gs ck rlr anha i out re sewrehe we fen f aut0 ar amoterinbo tt. icora t f expl t b mond se er pt h denas s fterarnd frndip m jnnwiia wn ben nng r veor th d n he lo exti ratnsp. ttrs rd nar neezndr. mvi ha bn ies r lo ti a tyavgo t falyves r lo te. tho ve fenhi th ds tecsalyece e se a a. ies n eaginorpt haor i n b baitmyrid. if he

labour party led byjeremy corbyn, presumably previous policies would not have considered scrapping pfir industry, railways, royal mail, part of the energy sector, very, very different labour party. norman, thank you for that. act now to the news that coronation street actress liz dawn, who played vera duckworth in the soap for 34 years has died. her family duckworth in the soap for 34 years has died. herfamily hasjust announced the news that she died last night. in a statement, the soap called her a true coronation street legend. our arts correspondent looks back on her life. all i can say is i hope prince charles never set eyes on it! admiring my stone cladding it is certainly. she may have been snooty about giving up's taste but without her, coronation street would not have been the same. are you trying to be funny or what? are you not going to carry her over the threshold? when list on first arrived, she said she felt like cinderella, her palace, number nine coronation st. could you make us some chips? you are a right romantic. vera and jack and the pensions and despite the bruises,

i can tell you today it's what you have been calling for — we will bring existing pfi contracts backmmitment and asking how a labour government would pay for the change. also tonight: in germany, chancellor merkel starts a fourth term in office and says she'll win back the voters who turned to the hard right in the elections. in north lincolnshire, a 16—year—old girl is arrested

and the top story here in the uk: the labour party is planning to take over pfi contracts should it win

nationalisation, taking all pfi projects into public hands, funding foran nhs projects into public handster crisis and hundreds of extra billions of borrowing and higher taxes for the rich. but how has it changed him? this is your third conference as leader. a very different environment. has it changed you? i'm even busier than i have have been. i've always been pretty busy in my life. your critics say is your party is now behind you off because of the advances at the election. do you think you have won the ultimate inside the labour party?” think you have won the ultimate inside the labour party? i stood as leader challenge the concepts of austerity and economic injustice and inequality in this country. i was proud to stand and pleased to be elected. you have won the argument in the labour party. the argument in the party has been about our role as a party and rejuvenating our economy and society. it's really exciting. exciting for him, exciting for many here. yet even senior labour figures harboured doubts, is this a powerful fad, or really the government of the future? laura is at the

nationalisations, taking all pfi projects into public hands, a new £500 million for an nhs winter crisisorrowing and higher taxes for the rich. but how has it changed him? this is your third conference now as leader and a very different environment. has it changed you? i'm even busier than i've been, i've always been a pretty busy person in my life. your critics inside the party are now behind you, because of the advance in the election. do you feel now you have won the argument inside the labour party? i stood for the election as leader, challenging the concepts of austerity and economic injustice and inequality in this country. i was proud to stand, and pleased to be elected. have you won the argument in the labour party? well, the argument in the party has been about our role as a party, our role in rejuvenating our economy and our society. and do you know what? it's really exciting. exciting for him, exciting for many here, yet even senior labour figures harbour doubts — is this a powerful fad or really the government of the future? the european medicines agency in london has been he

, the policy announcements this week, pfi, big nationalisation programme but if you are going to havee can it be? yeah, i think you are right, this is something jeremy corbyn is likely to mention in his speech today that they are doing politics very differently, a lot of people don‘t like that but they are going to carry on doing politics very differently. i think one of the things we are missing about, when we look at the shopping list, the retail politics of labour‘s offer, yes, it‘s got a lot of things that will alleviate a lot of hardship and painful lots of people, it is not just that, they‘re the symbolic effort that people are picking up, a vision of a different kind of society, that society does not have to be like this, that something else is possible and that is what people are picking up on as much as the retail politics. isn't that preaching to the converted in some way and perhaps a bit beyond? we‘ve had this report from john healey, the senior labour member, saying that if we don‘t reach beyond the call, some of its young and idealistic and metropolitan, we won‘t win an

the pfi contracts, bringing them back into the state, renationalising the railways, the energy companiesater companies, that is a radical stuff. it isa companies, that is a radical stuff. it is a big change and a big break with conservative governments and labour governments run by tony blair and gordon brown. it is different to what has happened before and they believe there will be some who will try and block that kind of progress. and that is jeremy try and block that kind of progress. and that isjeremy corbyn suggesting john mcdonnell is right to plan for these things. there is an optimism in brighton, we have seen that all week. yet, they didn't win the election, but some would say it wasn't as good a result you might think from the mood there? yes, there are others here, many of them labour mps who are pretty concerned that people are not being realistic and people are talking in terms of, we won the election. they are worried they are not prepared for the amount of work still needed for the amount of work still needed for the labour party to do to win another 60 seats, how did the

nationalisation, taking all pfi projects into public hands, funding for an nhs winter crisis and hundredsns of borrowing and higher taxes for the rich. but how has it changed him? this is your third conference as leader. a very different environment. has it changed you? i'm even busier than i have have been. i've always been pretty busy in my life. your critics say is your party is now behind you off because of the advances at the election. do you think you have won the ultimate inside the labour party? i stood as leader challenge the concepts of austerity and economic injustice and inequality in this country. i was proud to stand and pleased to be elected. you have won the argument in the labour party. the argument in the party has been about our role as a party and rejuvenating our economy and society. it's really exciting. exciting for him, exciting for many here. yet even senior labour figures harboured doubts, is this a powerful fad, or really the government of the future? is there a sense from delegates that mr mcdonnell shouldn't have revealed as much as he did last night about lab

are done, but the labour governments of tony blair and gordon brown, particularly on issues as the pfiand schools and keep them running. the idea they wa nt to keep them running. the idea they want to bring most of those back into the state system is a huge change, which would require a lot of work. in one sense, he is saying they need to be prepared for that, but also there is the other issue that it could be unpopular with the establishment, with vested interests. they already have people from business saying they don't like these ideas and they are preparing for that as well. earlierjohn mcdonnell was asked by reported exactly what he had meant by those comments last night. are you planning for a run on the banks under a labour government? no. the group momentum, they were looking at all different options. 0ur investors getting spooked with the prospect of you in the treasury? not at all. i have been sitting down with asset managers and others through the summer. they are very interested in our infrastructure proposals on how we can work with them. you don't think there will be fina

break with previous labour governments, under tony blair and gordon brown when you look at issues like pfing hospitals and schools, bring them back in and have a bigger role for the state, denationalised the railways. there is a lot in the agenda and you could hearfrom railways. there is a lot in the agenda and you could hear from the meeting last night, there are those in the labour party who fear the establishment, the media and possibly people in parliament, they mean people in the city he will not like what they see and they will try any way of stopping it. so earlier, john mcdonnell was chased around the conference centre by some jealous and asked exactly what he meant by all of this. are you planning for a run on the banks undera labour are you planning for a run on the banks under a labour government? no. momentum, they were looking at all different options. our investors getting spooked with the prospect of you in the treasury? i have been sitting down with asset managers and others through the summer. they are very interested in our infrastructure proposals on how we can work with

we'll bring existing pfi contracts back in—house. we're bringing them back.eal progress on the uk's divorce bill is essential before any discussions on transitional period can begin. the boss of uber has apologised for making mistakes and said it will make changes to win back its licence in london. and the pentagon says if north korea doesn't stop

ju aite t y a lln lls pfi yoatckhe a, t u ow wh ah's ta veeom fm veme hetharroaminudg direndedai dnokn tt fhd. nar hl- nararn: wbo hf. tt unabt ghto u? acrdg yr n es reasfr senee a. inac me analof ths ren f t fst lff isea th i54ca fm t per pgrs. u keinon oth meca aangeland direard esipon ugla. yobrghinon fm meca, a o buetofaxye meybu yoarpuinouof t a cai k y? heooatacmaets s o iurceart d lie e didu mke i orr b scefunes stdn s n d acif wto trt mpitn, wwa tbrg oer rrrsthe lleeto b anndenntstle invialeah sunc maet a sweadou desi lat aosou14 stes a o c mtiede e okg ts sgill, athamet mwa ian kw aaitn ste d stehe wcama a otecsenylae ninstily,ur clatn tpaicat seto wre y me lo ofon o geren pns elwhe, t u nto y athenlwayowi sy tca iif y g tma mo meyndnacwh y spifal sd y wt bebltoelju iurce aneangamiepang rendouantoax- tabrk d y c'ge th y a tli core tt y d'ge th kd hp u ll qt thonmaethe pplne yo he. jt nto s oth, yoarcuouabt w a jotyfmeca spo meca fllhe i exbia. bie tt ngsshod no yr tea. y wt xperon, tn u ghtohoupn e a anaselanbehe jt keth cpaesavon anyoout bab t priddentovag ju d'thk ats o cho

one of the things that we stumbled upon is positive financial financial app financial applicator the pfied around happiness and confidence around finance and a statement around thinking that the stock market was a good place to and fast really important and engagement drives happiness and that's a connection as you rightly point out that millennials don't understand they would tell you that happiness is about relationship. actually finances do matter to them what's the difference. 20% say they'll never be invested in the marks and 53% say they'll not be comfortable in the markets >> so they'll invest but they're not comfortable. >> they have a lot of anxiety and fear >> do you think that'll change if you don't put your money in the stock market, it is kind of hard making money. >> there will never be inflation >> i think there is a better recipe for prescription for change in the data which is activism actually create more conference i thi conferenc confidence grandparents talk to your millennials about money and finance. don't give them fish or don't teach them how to fish fish with the