and then, requiring a court order, by the pfizer court.e nsa wants to get in and do the second step of the process which is analysis of the data. we are not talking about the end of data, meta data as an important tool for the nsa. law enforcement all over the country, state and federal level uses it routinely. we are talking limits to protect, the u.s. average citizens under the constitution. >> peter, is it your sense, now with your experience having talked to people at the nsa and putting this together, that they would appreciate clarified guidelines about exactly what they should be doing and how they should be doing it? it seems the way they're working now has to a certain extent evolved without so many formal procedural decisions having been made over the course two of presidencies. >> there has been an evolution over time. many programs came in after 9/11. the wiretaps people have criticize the. over three, four years there has been more compliance structure. the court chastised them and put in a series to respond to it. i think the

and reforms to the top secret pfizer court the electronic frontier foundation which has been fighting the n.s.a. in court released this statement in response to the recommendations quote we're disappointed that the recommendations suggest a path to continue until spying mass surveillance is still heinous even if private companies servers are holding the data instead of government data centers supporters of edward snowden are arguing that these recommended changes compound with monday's court ruling that the n.s.a. bulk phone metadata collection is likely unconstitutional justified edward snowden's decision to spill the n.s.a. secrets will continue to follow this new development. meanwhile the man who brought edward snowden's n.s.a. documents to the world glenn greenwald testified today in front of a european union parliament committee looking into n.s.a. surveillance on e.u. citizens and you had some harsh words for governments working with the n.s.a. . and governments are devoted to the elimination of hard to see what is the u.s. the u.k. means three partners are clearly devoted to d

documents and pfizer court documents reveal how the n.s.a. broke privacy rules thousands of times every year in congress there was a revolt against the spy agency we're here to answer one question for the people we represent do we oppose the suspicion this collection of every american's phone records in the summer the house of representatives comes within just a few votes of defunding the n.s.a.'s bulk records collection program despite the defeat n.s.a. reformers are emboldened a flurry of legislation drops to rein in the n.s.a.'s powers the courts get slammed with lawsuits from groups like the a.c.l.u. and the electronic frontier foundation one federal judge calls the program likely unconstitutional but less than two weeks later another federal judge upholds the program the supreme court looms in the white house admits the president orders an independent review panel which later comes out with forty six specific recommendations to reform the n.s.a. if you had asked me six months ago as we were about to launch into this enterprise whether af

when she ah softball questions he said mike rogers elected me recap these programs have in the pfizer court elected me when they decided to legislate from the bench on things that were far beyond the mandate of what the corps was ever intended to do the system failed comprehensive win in each level of oversight use level of responsibility that should address this abdicated their responsibility. the events of las week a federal court ruling against the disease ball phone records collection program. the white house's review panel suggesting forty six recommendations to change the nsa speak custodians points. his disclosures over the last six months have at times made our elected representatives who were in charge of nsa oversight look pretty silly. for example this argument from october between two members of the house intelligence committee congressman adam schiff and chairman of mike rogers or disagreeing over what the committee knew when we didn't know it. regarding the nsa spying on world leaders as revealed by the edwards noted you should know this dream and we will be had as a coach dow

asked softball questions he said mike rogers elected me when he kept these programs hidden the pfizer court elected me when they decided to legislate from the bench on things that were far beyond the mandate of what the court was ever intended to do the system failed comprehensively and each level of oversight each level of responsibility that should have addressed this abdicated their responsibility to the events of last week a federal court ruling against mrs bulk phone records collection program the white house's review panel suggesting forty six recommendations to change the n.s.a. speak to snowden's point is disclosures over the last six months have at times made our elected representatives who are in charge of n.s.a. oversight look pretty silly for example check out this public argument from october between two members of the house intelligence committee congressman adam schiff and chairman mike rogers chair disagreeing over what the committee knew and when it knew it regarding n.s.a. spying on world leaders as revealed by edward snowden. be interested to know mr chairman we would be

. >> despite being authorised by the pfizer court. >> the ruling was not in front of the court, but it was able to do an independent constitutional analysis on whether or not the section 215 program, the metadata was constitutional. in the ruling the judge said: >> now, jim, part of me has to ask how intrusive is it really. the information is out there. telephone companies have it, the irs has more information than the phone records will give anyone. you are right to say there are all sorts of entities. certainly in the private corporate world. much is given voluntarily. we need to be clear, from a public poll city stand point it's a question of abuse. when governments know who you are talking to, or the phone numbers that you are calling. that creates the potential for abuse, a potential for blackmail. folks say that would never happen, yet we know, i have two words for those people, richard nixon, who used private information to blackmail political opponents. it's troubling. i know other folks collect data, not to the extent that n.s.a. does. it's an issue of scope without regulation

you could argue that google and horizon and at&t and anybody who has received a warrant from the pfizer court and turned over the data, can essentially be charged with exactly what the u.s. government is charging huawei has done and what they would say, this is the mirror into which the government of the u.s. has been looking and projecting or assuming and they have never been asked by any government anywhere to compromise its goods or services or others to facilitate in this activities and hasn't happened and what didn't. and it would be -- we had a witness testify in congress last year and the expression he used was it would be commercial suicide to do so. and as you pointed out, in the wake of the edwards noted revelations, what we read now on a daily basis that these companies that work on trent were compromised unwillingly in many cases, that they are experiencing a rather devastating impact on their current business. and it's a rather remarkable demonstration of why you shouldn't do this. it does reflect the potential for corporate suicide and exactly the thing that huawei would not let

although his opinion obviously delivers from rulings on the pfizer court, were taking those into account. the question we're going to have to ask is can we accomplish the same goals that this program is intended to accomplish in ways that gift the public more confidence that, in fact, the nsa is doing what it's supposed to be doing. i have confidence in the fact that the nsa is not engaging in domestic surveillance or snooping around but i also recognize that, as technology has changed and people can start running algorithms and programs that map out all the information that we're downloading on a daily basis into our telephones and computers, that we may have to refine this further to give people more confidence. i'm going to be working very hard on doing that. and we've got to provide more confidence to the international community. in some ways what has been more challenging is the fact that we do have a lot of laws and checks and balances and safeguards and audits when it comes to making sure that the nsa and other intelligence agencies are not spying on americans. we have less legal

pfizer court judges over the last ten years going back to 2006 have said the nsa may spy on its constitutionalunction, no case of controversy before them. this is the first case there was a case of controversy. somebody sued the federal government and ask the judge to stop the government from spying. it is unconstitutional and it doesn't work and i will stop it from spying but i will stay my decision until the appellate court to rule. stuart: used as vehicles for the spying the nsa went through to record all of this stuff. they represented at the white house meeting today. judge napolitano: some of our not happy. stuart: getting sued. judge napolitano: some were intimidated by the nsa and compensated by the nsa and some were spied on by the nsa after they partner with that. stuart: the president has some in the white house. judge napolitano: after the gulf spill. work with us. i will come after you. these craven ceos will probably collapse and say i will work with you. i hope i am wrong. happen, was times in the past. stuart: arthur brooks, the star of washington d.c. in our personal opinion i

says, the records to be demanded have to be relevant to an ongoing investigation and the way the pfizer courteted that at the behess of the administration is everything is relevant. you might find a needle in the haystack, which is to say every phone call is relevant. which rubs it of all meaning. they have not been good on this state secrets act or the state secrets act which basically has been used be think administration as by the bush administration to stop every lawsuit alleging violation of rights simply by saying this is a state secret, you can't even try the case. so i think that there is going to be a lot of push back. both from the liberal leaning democratic party and the libertarian wing of the republican party against this and the key recommendations of this committee, especially that the dragnet under surveillance stop you need a court order to look at any particular person's phone data is going to have to be adopted. by the way, this all expires t. legislative authorization expires if 2015. if it is not changed in this respect, it will not be extended. >> so that's, the reportin

we're hearing all this is constitutional and always pfizer court judges overseeing all of fisand all efis court judges overseeing this. when the president's experts look at these programs in a thatehensive way they find there are a lot of big changes that need to be made to ensure these are well calibrated to protect security without leading to potential abuses of civil liberties. host: the president does indicate he wants to make changes. what does he face in making this change is? enormousobably an amount of pushback from the intelligence community itself. their 40 some odd recommendations in this report from his surveillance review. one of the agents said they do not intend to follow these. the responsibility for cybersecurity should be split off from the responsibility for spying, which makes sense. we have seen that there is a tension there. on one hand they're trying to making occasions more secure, but that is in conflict with the mission of being able to spy on everything. last night there was a report about how the nsa was trying to undermine the security of one very widely u

has beenn, teva fighting to get the rest of pfizer's patent invalidated. the courtismissed requests by teva. as part of a settlement between these pharmaceutical companies, teva will be able to market generic copies of viagra in the united states. it will have to pay patent royalties divisor until the overall patent expires in 2020. also worth noting that generic viagra is already available in most of the european union, where the patent expired in june. rex a rare bit of good news for teva. it really failed to prop up the shares. >> they spiked about one percent higher in the u.s. yesterday and .3% in israel, where they have begun trading today. so shares are up ever slightly. if you look at this company on a five-year basis. investor confidence has been ebbing away. the big issue is that a could face generic competition for its selling drug, a multiple sclerosis treatment. it is actually double the value of what pfizer gets for viagra every year. viagra is notof going to make up much of the ground. teva has a new ceo after the last one left and they're laying off

he took it out of the secret court of the pfizer around and put it in the open light of day. the judge said exactly that. he said this is a program that if you look at it there's no way it passes muster under the fourth amendment. it is a really interesting turn. a question of whether or not he should be viewed as a or an activist was doing something out of a sense of duty. >> it does. withudge is likely to side the constitution. courts are supposed to be open. it may be an interesting thought as well. jeffel o'reilly and barton. thank you very much. still to come, should companies be able to use facial recognition technology to target you with advertisements? it works, and all about facial recognition next. ♪ >> major companies are looking into facial recognition technology. it can be used for targeted ad to security. they'll also be working in regulation, taking part in meetings early next year. this means they can do what ever they want. it is interesting that this is happening at once. they're working with similar technologies. with no standards in place. >> what the comm

pfizer's patents invalidated. yesterday we got the decision in the u.s. courts.out teva's request, but it's part of a broader agreement between the two companies. teva will start being able to sell generic versions of viagra in the united states from december 2017, so in four years' time. under some conditions it could even be earlier than that. from 2020, it will be able to sell generic versions without having to pay any royalties to pfizer because the patent will have expired by then. it's also worth noting the patent for viagra expired in europe earlier this year. in fact, since june, teva has been selling generic copies of viagra in many countries in the european union. >> elliott, it was really a rare bit of good news for teva, but the stock didn't get much of a lift. >> no, investors have been a bit despondent with teva. we saw a 1% spike in the u.s.-traded shares, and that's pretty much what they're doing today on the israeli-listed shares, teva being israel's largest listed domestic company on the stock market here. as you look at a five-year view of teva