well, the lawyer for mauritius, philippe sands. mr sandsis mauritius, philippe sands. g term friend of keir starmer's, and even reportedly campaigned for him to become labour leader. the only thing that makes sense about giving away the chagos islands and giving away £18 billion as well is, if that's the price starmer has to pay to keep his mate, the attorney general, happy and his mate, the lawyer for mauritius, happy. that's just my opinion, of course. now, if the tories did the same thing, i think they would be called corrupt. but here's 1525 00:10:26,33

now, one of starmer's long time lefty lawyer mates, philippe sands kc, has been pushing for this dealars. he represented mauritius against the uk, of course, and seems to despise britain's history. mr sands compared our legal ownership of chagos to russia's invasion of crimea. yeah. crazy stuff. yes, that's starmer's mate. equating britain's presence in our own territory to putin's illegal military invasion in ukraine. it's just utter madness. but it gets worse. mr sands, in a blatant act of defiance, entered british territory, hoisted the mauritian flag and acted like some sort of colonial conqueror. it's ironic, isn't it? well, funnily enough, he tweeted this, then deleted evidence. but it was too late because. yeah, that video was made by mauritius close ally china, who had their state owned media make a whole propaganda video on it. i wonder why. anyway, mauritian bias doesn't seem to stop there. today we learned starmer was wined and dined in mauritius back in 2013. well, he was flown out to a five star luxury beach resort to speak at a mauritian bar association conference on the