phillip klein is that editorial writer for the washington examiner. conversation with the dnc chair last night and he wanted to come in to respond to her accusations about reporting. of course we said, yes, come on. phillip is going to watch what she said in my interview along with you and me, and then respond. >> if you look at what "the examiner," which is a conservative blog site. so it is not surprising that they would deliberately misquote me. i'll reiterate they did deliberately misquote me. first they took only the first line of what i said and then they cut it off. and so you haven't played the rest of what i said. and what they did was they reported that i said that republican policies were dangerous for israel. and actually that's what ambassador orin commented on. i never said that republican policies were dangerous for israel. in fact that's the opposite of what i always say. what i always say and what i said in that event -- and it is very important that we understand that israel should not be a political football. what the republicans ar

here's what she told me about phillip klein, who reported her remarks in the washington examiner. >>t what the examiner, which is a conservative blog site, so, it's not surprising that they would deliv deliberately misquote me. they did deliberately misquote me. first, they took only the first line wof what i said and then ct it off. so you haven't played the the rest of what i said and what they did was reported that i said that republican policies were dangerous for israel and that's what ambassador orrin commented on. what i always say and what i said in that event and it's very important that we understand that israel should not be a political football. what the republicans are doing -- they are suggesting that there is daylight between the parties on israel. >> okay, do you regret anything that you have said if -- would you say anything differently? >> no, i would not. i regret that the examiner has taken what i said out of context. if they had printed the entire quote and if they had actually told ambassador orrin what i said, i think his response would have been different. >>

and phillip klein from the examiner, joins frus d.c., good to see you, sir. >> good morning. >> dave:t's the latest update? is she sticking to her original word. >> she tried to clarify what she said, but still claiming that i'm the-- the washington examiner is a right wing paper and so forth, so she's sticking to that. >> dave: why? i mean, she knows the proof is in the pudding. the tape is out there. why in your opinion is she stick to go that story? >> well, she feels that she meant to say something else, which i would have expected her to say, in the immediate aftermath when she was asked about it when i was kind of surprised when she immediately jumped to saying i deliberately misquoted her. >> dave: is there a pattern her or a one time mistake by the dnc chairman? >> well, i think it's pretty clear that you've seen a pattern of her, you know, playing with the truth. we saw that last week, not just with me, but also when there was a lot of disagreement among delegates, the democratic convention, over whether god and jerusalem said there was no for it on the convention floor and s