>>it depends on photosynthesis which is the only free lunch in nature. [laughter] >> right that's true, still. >>and so we we've taken this system, it's kind of weird though i mean food you know growing something, if you go back before 1940, if you put a calorie of fossil fuel energy into a farm, and you know calories right are just measures of energy whether you're talking about food or oil, for every calorie of fossil fuel energy you put into growing food, in the form of diesel for your tractor or whatever, you got out 2.3 calories of food. that's the free lunch; that 1.3 calories is the bonus that's coming down every day. >> yeah. >>well now when you in eat industrial processed food or or feedlot meat, it takes 10 calories of fossil fuel energy to get 1 calorie so of food so that is a there's unsustainability, there's a very good definition. you can't keep doing that very long. so squeezing the oil out of the food system is... >> is a national security goal and an environmental goal. >> now i'm assuming climate change ties back to agribusiness. is tha

of course it's photosynthesis, and that's the bottom line now. this statistic is numbering.ings, we have 7 billion of us on the planet. but we only represent one-half of 1% of all of the living biomass on the earth, one-half of 1%. and we are currently this morning using 31% of all the photosynthesis of this planet and that's unsustainable and takes my breath away. we're moving from 7 to 9 billion people. this just won't hold. we have three issues on population. food. energy. water. and then the question, the ecological footprint i would say, and those are the things that we need to examine carefully. the food issue is interesting. the question is, can we feed 7 billion people. we have very little land left for agriculture and 850 million people in harm's way, and not getting a full diet and some are on the verge of starvation and others are hungry, and 40% of the human race is making less than $2 a day. but one-third of all of the agriculture land in the world today is being used to grow feed grain for animals to the export to the developed word, and not food grade for huma

plants questions during the debate. [ light laughter ] [ imitates rooney ] "why do they call it photosynthesiser ] never got that." pro -- watching mitt romney and rick perry get into a heated exchange. con -- over which shampoo is better, vidal sassoon or garnier fructis? [ light laughter ] >> steve: yeah. >> jimmy: pro -- it's too bad chris christie dropped out of the race because he could've been the big winner. con -- he could still be "the biggest loser." [ laughter and applause ] i don't understand that. i don't understand that. on yeah, yeah, yeah -- on the nbc -- it's a hit show? >> steve: oh my gosh. i just got that. >> jimmy: me too. [ laughter ] >> steve: that is just something else. >> jimmy: that is just -- that is -- you didn't have to do that. >> steve: no need for that kind of -- [ talking in high pitch ] he's a respectable man, he's the governor of my state. >> jimmy: [ talking in high pitch ] you didn't have to do that. >> steve: [ talking in high pitch ] why would you go there with a fat joke? you just didn't have to do that. [ laughter ] >> jimmy: all right. >> steve: all r