whereas phyllis schlafly coming out of the same era but a movement that historians generally now would call the new right really beginning in the 1950s, but coming to a kind of national consciousness in 1964 with the berry goldwater campaign. and here we have phyllis schlafly arguing from a very different perspective that women grounded in their roles as mothers in the family and as she says in a judeo-christian framework acquire all of their place in in society their status and even their equality different than men because of those differences as women and so again within two years of each other we've got through comparison a sense of the debate regarding the women's movement during this period but another thing we do when we when we look at these two documents is to apply contextualization. so that as students are probably aware 1970 and 1972 are within the context of all the social changes that are happening during the 1960s. and those social changes are not only on the left the new left the anti-war movement the civil rights movement and the counterculture but there are also chang

. >> narrator: as ginni lamp was growing up, phyllis schlafly was a role model. of schlafly's group. >> the american women do not want e.r.a., they do not want abortion, they do not want lesbian privileges, and they do not want universal child care in the hands of the government. (audience cheering and applauding) >> what she saw in phyllis schlafly and her mom was "no excuses." you don't need affirmative action. you don't need women's kind of special accommodations. you make your own fate, you create your own path, and you lean in. it doesn't have to be the liberal way. you can also do it the republican way. >> narrator: they were waging a battle against the e.r.a., equal rights amendment. >> this one woman, schlafly, pretty much singlehandedly stopped a whole movement and killed the equal rights amendment. really was an example of what you could do as a conservative woman leading a crusade. >> and we can build this into a mighty movement that can set america on the right path. then conquer we must for our cause it is just, and this be our motto: in god is our t

multiple times on the 1948 i guess revenue act he then later ran against a do nothing congress and phyllis schlafly who i used to work with used to say that was the was the do something congress they passed the constitutional amendment for two terms of the president they passed a revenue that and a lot of things did a ton and truman lied. i mean i'm josh but and but here's what i want to ask about that that revenue also had the first time that you could file jointly married couples because of a problem that they assessed across the states and we're watching in hungary poland pro-family tax. and as much as i would love to see a flat tax, i'm for it. all these kinds of major changes this white house won't that they might sign some things that are pro-family maybe maybe they won't but i think we can argue our colleagues are friends, our neighbors on policy are there are there when you see taxes have consequences, how can you envision creative anti what else is out there for a pro-family policies would art actually spur the economy not just be shifting. i i think that that's something time is coming to