pickett.> i got on near seventh and market. >> as the bus winds it way through the philadelphia streets, pickett notices the little boy. >> he was running up and down the aisle. >> pickett hears her mom tell the young boy to sit down. >> and she begins spanking him like he was some sort of animal. >> pickett leans forward and reprimands the young mom and said, he's a child, let him be a child. you shouldn't be spanking him like that. if he continues to do that, i'm going to turn you in for child endangerment. she was like, you don't know me. this is my son. i will deal with him any way i choose to. >> for whatever reason he offers his unsolicited parenting advice and he's just a little boy, that's child abuse. >> philadelphia native joe slabojen is a veteran staff writer for "the philadelphia inquirer." over his 30-year career of following court cases, he thought he had seen it all until he watches the footage captured by septa security cameras. >> she's seen on there making a cell phone call

pickett scored i the cbo over 10. house of representatives has a $940 billion bill over 10 years. that passed the house agricultural committee last week. as expected to be on the floor by the end of the summer. pass aere attempts to farm bill last year. they fail because the house of representatives do not have floor action. there is a promise for floor action this summer. looks like there is a much better chance that we will get a farm bill, which over 10 years is close to one dollar trillion. -- $1 trillion. host: tell us about the snap program and where the funding levels are for that. guest: the supplemental nutrition assistance program, that is what it was renamed in the 2008 farm bill, more commonly known as food stamps, is the largest amount of that budget. 760 billion dollars estimated over 10 years. it has especially increased in the past few years with the economic crisis. spending in 2007 was the $5 billion a year. last year it was $80 billion a year. it is the lion's share of u.s. -- usda spending. as we l

has harassed a number of pro-life aoups, including at least one pro-life group not pickett planned parenthood in order to have or keep their tax exempt status. it points out this statistic. in 2012 the i.r.s. requested additional information from 90% of the terms claiming the adoption tax credit, and went on to actually audit 69%. more details can be obtained from the taxpayer advocate. it's really outrageous. and it's pretty clear to anybody familiar with political process here in washington that most people that are very supportive of adoption are not in favor of abortion. so if you want to go against, as an i.r.s., if you want to go planned response of parenthood, you want to go after the opponents of killing babies utero, then if you go after parents that adopt children, a ry, very costly process, you can have a very chilling or freezing effect on those parents who just want to adopt a child. adopt children, give them a loving home. and this i.r.s.'s morality as the article points out because of the current leadership that is now under scrutiny, go after these middle income folks who are