. >> just to piggyback on that, we have done a great job of looking at the current reality, but whenlook at the cause, it would be good to have feedback for what is the right route cause for alzheimer's, and what will help? if we can get to the cause -- and one of the ideas with nutrition is an alternative that would be considered an important concept, advocating a vegan or a rock diet. a book called the time that study -- that china study talks about increasing the idea of getting at diseases such as alzheimer's. >> the way to provide polio care was developing a vaccine. and i know that the bucks center in marin and a lot of scientific centers are desperately trying to figure out how to deal with they<&f disease and come up with actual disease modifying treatments. certainly, part of the interest in treatment has been dietary needs that you are mentioning. >> thank you for taking my statement. in my court needing care for alzheimer's early on, both as a geriatric facilitator and in long-term care facilities, one thing that emerges for me as a low hanging fruit, an area where we can

just to piggyback, everything we have seen so far has been essentially getting marginally better every time. hopefully we can take care of these. some things that are important are clear policy directives on a variety of different things. number one has been troubling a number of people. it is in the implementation strategy

just to piggyback, everything we have seen so far has been essentially getting marginally better every time. hopefully we can take care of these. some things that are important are clear policy directives on a variety of different things. number one has been troubling a number of people. it is in the implementation strategy. you need to be responsible for the water that goes into the system. you need to establish to make sure that they are asking you for money and that you actually have a sound basis to find a specific project. other protocols i think you need to implement is something for a hierarchy. i think the best way to think about it is to move from demand to supply. the first thing we need to be looking at is retrofiting existing infrastructure, and at the very end looking at infrastructures so you have a hierarchy of how decisions are made. a couple of other points on impacted communities -- you also have to think about habitats. also environmental qualities and inhabitants. finally, karen did a pretty good job of presenting this, but we are already faced with two different co

first is to capture again, piggybacking on don't vote -- on doug's point, there should be inherent capacity and inherently did value in the existing sites. we're going to go ahead and both program radically in terms of developing the communities with market rate housing, but also use that as a financing engine and capture the value created through that potential for the units for the public housing replacement units. on top of the property value itself, we also plan to capture -- in terms of property tax revenue, or we would not exist for the city. this is against the future tax revenues, so these in combination created cross subsidizing component. second is focusing city investment, so f8u and certainly supervisor maxwell, as well as the board of supervisors has committed local financing to this over a 20-year period to help facilitate the local peace -- piece of the public housing part. for almost a decade now, we have not been able to capture financing from the federal government, and yet, the problem continues to get worse, so, f.a.q, supervisors, for stepping up and for the city of san

. >> i want to piggyback on her point on kids. kid is a great way to bring families together. it's one of the most excellent way to bring diverse families together because children play with each other. and they go to the same school. the safety network and sunset neighborhood coalition we have worked together to prepare for the sunset community festival. one of the tools that we use is to try to make the event really run, really entertaining and try to make it culturally appropriate for the communality. one of the tools we use to try to make it appropriate is that in all of our fliers and out reach materials we try to translate all of them to the different languages that our community members use. and also we try to build relationships with our local media. i think that is one of the most effective way to let all of our community members know about our events. not only just english but media press with the local chinese narp or whatever language your community may need. thots one of the most effective way to get to community measures that may be more isolate the. and i think

to piggyback on what other parents have said, this recruitment effort is going to be complicated, long, and difficult. i really hope there will be a lot of emphasis put on helping to guide our schools through the process. thank you. >> thank you. does any member of the board have something else to say? go ahead, commissioner norton. >> for the record, if you look at the mouth of the middle schools, realistically we went into this knowing there was no way would please everyone in san francisco. that is impossible. it is absolutely impossible. we have spent a lot of time looking at this. if you look at the map in terms of number of schools, overwhelmingly it does address the issue of the concept of neighborhood schools. that one is one that we have spent a lot of time on. it is not going to be perfect. some of the comments made about everett, i need to make a clarification. the reason we put isa and others on there is that we've written a magnet grant to put those on there. we have a huge magnet grant. we're hoping to get that by september. that grant is to develop a feeder program for t

in washington let alone in sacramento of taking a simple piece of legislation and having everyone piggyback off of it. that is a bad way to do legislation. and this is simple cleanup and i see no problem wit and i have read it and studied it and hope it goes through. >> commissioners, i want to clarify the h.p.c. discussion because i attended that meeting and was involved in the discussion. we went over for article 10, we didn't get to 11, but went over point by point the various changes and had the same concerns that the items that we not make those changes because this wasn't just cleanup legislation, but the historic preservation commission asked for another chance to continue that discussion and two over the items in specifics to be clear about what changes we were making so that the changes we were making that they were convinced were not substantive. it wasn't a question of insisting on substantive changes at the table yesterday but more time to go over them. i wanted to clarify that. president miguel: i appreciate that. vice president olague: i want to thank ms. sullivan for her work

our end, there is a department bulletin that will instruct the officers around the procedures and piggyback off an existing one that had the whole trouble services involved in their, but instead, we put tarc in there, and we are encouraging officers to engage with our youth in a positive way, and intervention way, and a way to recognize that day as the officers are part of the community. basically, they connect with the youth and then make the call to tarc, as you probably heard procedurally, and then with the go ahead, take them to tarc for the intake, the assessment. supervisor dufty: thank you. could i also invite of the chief of juvenile probation? i appreciate that he came to offer his support. >> one more person that we would like to share. is that ok? >> we have claudia anderson represented of the unified school district, and she is going to share a little bit about some of the overlapping existing resources that are really tied in tarc. >> i'm claudia anderson, and i am sort of a new face to this. in the new director of executive support services, but i'm not new to this population

and to sort of piggyback on some of what we've been talking about, put yourself in the place of our consumers, our clients. we are often asking them to do things that it would be hard for anyone to do. you know, go see a psychiatrist in this part of town. go to 12-step meetings in this part of town, you know. go see your medical doctor. go to social services. hold a job without a car. you know, i think it's a good week for me if i'm able to go to the post office and the bank in the same week. so we're asking an awful lot of our folks. so again, if we're able to change the system somewhat and make it easier for people to get their services in one location, that goes a long way in their bonding and willing to come to the service and not feeling frustrated and then giving up. you know, you wait an hour for the bus and the bus comes late and then you miss your appointment and then you're not going to get your benefits. or, you know, you miss the meeting with your social worker and now you're not going to be able to see your children. so what do they do? they tend to go out and use or quit taking

china depends a great deal on being able to have big american consumption as something for it to piggyback on its own development if american consumption slows it constrains china's growth in an odd way it slows china's pace in trying to overtake the united states will of course but that's why china is now trying to change their entire outlook and try to make their own population the new consumers and i have to ask you to how much does the fact that china and so much of america's debt. come into play here so it could hurt them it's symbolically important because it's a large number but in the sense though it's the amount of foreign u.s. debt is a minority share and in majority of america's debt is held by americans so within that minority china has one of oftentimes the largest share but japan taiwan and some other economies are right behind it and so even within that minority china is big but it's not sort of head and shoulders ahead of everyone else in the pack so the debt holdings are an issue it's interesting china can't really do a lot with it in a certain sense it's a bet on american

then you have the issues when you have schools that are piggybacked next to each other or located jointly you have this massive influx of people all at one time. >> talking about primary, secondary, high schools, new drivers, seasoned drivers. >> there's one thing i don't think i mentioned or heard it, but the sun. you know that time of day, early in the morning, late in the afternoon -- >> yeah. that glare. >> the glare, it adds to that. >> you can see it on the peninsula at highway 101. most schools are 25, trace elementary, there's a proposal of 15 miles per hour. but, again, 25 miles per hour or as slow as need to do. >> thank you very much. >>> take a look at roads as you take your kids to school today. it is possible that the lines you see are temporary and may not be road safe. here's why. there is a nationwide shortage of road paint. so once a road is repaved it looks like this, nice, smooth, dark and black. then painted with temporary stripes that cost the city thousands of dollars in product and labor and they just have to be redone when the road paint becomes available. many qu

. >> well, first of all, i want to piggyback on what the mayor said.the mayor is right about the paralysis. i think the paralysis is driven mostly by partisanship and by the fall election. david walker of the peterson foundation said it best. we should still be investing in things that stimulate the economy and we can do that at the same time that we put together a long-term plan for deficit reduction. we can do both and we have to do both. for example, you have heard the mayor and i talk about infrastructure, the infrastructure part of the stimulus has worked. there's absolutely no question about it. we can demonstrate in pennsylvania and other states around the union how it has produced good paying jobs on the construction sites and back in american factories. it has worked. we should be investing more money in our infrastructure right now. we need it, number one, and number two, it's the best job creator. >> if you look back in the 1930s, the money went to infrastructure. the bridges, the municipal buildings, the roads, those were all built with sti

the next example were piggyback loans. initially they could work well for the tiny niche they were designed. as the secondary market started buying these loans and treating first loans as low-risk loans, without requiring the originator to retain slin in the game -- hopefully the check contained in the reform -- it will provide [unintelligible] i think the marketplace and the competitive nature [unintelligible] equally as important is to incentivize the right type of innovation and speaking here with the benefit of what is a failure and success. we need to think about their regulatory framework that questions, scrutinizes and monetarist products more vigorously, and treats them differently. prudent limits on [unintelligible] even in the most well- intentioned analytical tools. [unintelligible] more so than the introduction of the new products themselves. rewards for innovation stretched out on lack of rest so there is an opportunity to reap handsome rewards, but only based on -- i would like to share something. our short-t

we won a piggyback on that note by letting you know the labor department. 71,000 jobs, jobs in july privaterkers and members of growing it is a are below the 200,000 jobs that needed to be added every month to reduce unemployment rate. as a result it held steady it did not drop. they were looking for to rise slightly but it did hold steady which was good news. the big board we're seeing the dow deeply in negative territory 130 some point to the downside. we will keep an eye on this. back here the studio and i know for a live picture from walnut creek showing is sunshine sullies the far east bay getting sun not so much along the coast just yet. >> you pick the one camera shot. you can see it covering the bridge this morning and we have been seen drizzle when chilled wipers definitely necessary some spots. currently still in the low 50s. by noontime 58 high today 61 degrees. back down to upper 50s by the o'clock hour. 56 for mum view of made history san jose los gatos. continuing to keep the eddies around. noontime warming up to the '60s maybe even some '70s out there by about 3:00 all the or

solar is getting a pretty backed right off investments in cars and of the the -- else a p -- a piggyback ride off investments in cars and everything else. host: next call. caller: i'm excited that you are here, because i have called my senator and the white house. there are things that bothered me about this. we are giving the chinese, giving spain, all this money to come in. there is no manufacturing jobs coming with this. we are abusing a lot of our water, which i am worried about -- are using a lot of our water, which i'm worried about, to do this. c-span has done a tremendous job on this energy, but i like what harrison ford said -- when al gore and pelosi and the president park their planes once in awhile, it may be america will wake up. host: all right, what from that statement would you like to comment on? guest: the concern that we are creating incentives for foreign enterprises to come in and build solar systems in the united states. i am concerned about that as well. the reason that takes place is that you're not the dominant end market in the world --. not the dominant end mar

the next example were piggyback loans. initially they could work well for the tiny niche they were designed. as the secondary market started buying these loans and treating first loans as low-risk loans, without requiring the originator to retain slin in the game -- hopefully the check contained in the reform -- it will provide [unintelligible] i think the marketplace and the competitive nature [unintelligible] equally as important is to incentivize the right type of innovation and speaking here with the benefit of what is a failure and success. we need to think about their regulatory framework that questions, scrutinizes and monetarist products more vigorously, and treats them differently. prudent limits on [unintelligible] even in the most well- intentioned analytical tools. [unintelligible] more so than the introduction of the new products themselves. rewards for innovation stretched out on lack of rest so there is an opportunity to reap handsome rewards, but only based on -- i would like to share something. our short-t

solar is getting a pretty backed right off investments in cars and of the the -- else a p -- a piggyback ride off investments in cars and everything else. host: next call. caller: i'm excited that you are here, because i have called my senator and the white house. there are things that bothered me about this. we are giving the chinese, giving spain, all this money to come in. there is no manufacturing jobs coming with this. we are abusing a lot of our water, which i am worried about -- are using a lot of our water, which i'm worried about, to do this. c-span has done a tremendous job on this energy, but i like what harrison ford said -- when al gore and pelosi and the president park their planes once in awhile, it may be america will wake up. host: all right, what from that statement would you like to comment on? guest: the concern that we are creating incentives for foreign enterprises to come in and build solar systems in the united states. i am concerned about that as well. the reason that takes place is that you're not the dominant end market in the world --. not the dominant end mar

we developed new uses for so- called piggyback mortgages. the private-label market began challenging the norms for underwriting, appraisal, and down payment. as each and every for ray met with success, it was still rated aaa and it was still oversubscribed. we kept pushing the envelope further and further. they kept losing more and more share of the market. the inherent weakness in the structure came alive. the agencies were approached by a need for earnings. i agree with mark. sometimes people say a need to expand homeownership, that is true, but i think it was much more a profit motive than any political motive to expand homeownership. they lowered their standards. to further exacerbate this and to further betray their mission, they bought over $500 million of the very one that created the problem. fannie and freddie created but they were permitted to provide. we are where we are. i would also tell you that the chris dodd-barney frank's bill addresses many of these issues. there are new rules for the ratings service, transparency, capital,

solar is getting a pretty backed right off investments in cars and of the the -- else a p -- a piggyback ride off investments in cars and everything else. host: next call. caller:'m excited that you are here, because i have called my senator and the white house. there are things that bothered me about this. we are giving th chinese, giving spain, all this money to come in. there is no manufacturing jobs coming with this. we are abusing a lot of our water, which i am worried about -- are using a lot of our water, which i'm worried about, to do this. c-span has done a tremendous job on this energy, but i like what harrison ford said -- when al gore and pelosi and the president park their planes once in awhile, it may be america will wake up. host: all right, what from that statement would yolike to comment on? guest: the concern that we are creating incentives for foreign enterprises to come in and build solar systems in the united states. i am concerned about that as well. the reason that takes place is that you're not the dominant end market in the world --. not the dominanend market in