pivovarskyi , were entered into the register in 2016. it was still there under the previous authorities, that is, they have been investigated for a long time, they just came out on suspicion, it’s the former director of the boryspil airport, so recently there was a freak on him, and this case was in court for a year and a half and all these for a year and a half, the case was heard, the evidence was examined, the witnesses were questioned, and the fact that the verdict has now been reached does not mean that a special trial was predicted when there would be suspicions of mr. kovalerskyi , mr. kobelev. who are perceived by a large part of society as reformers and who came to power in order to change the country there for the better, but we should not completely exclude the possibility that certain individuals there are reformers or were reformers the absence or presence of any illegal actions, that is, at the moment, for example, i will try to commit fraud , it is only a suspicion. the facts, mr. volodymy well , we cannot but ask you about the next judicial somersault of the poltava mayo

. and there is news about this, for example, that the former minister of infrastructure andriy pivovarskyi is now in custody for him, they made a deposit in the amount of 10 million e-e hryvnias , people helped to deposit this money, and then they watch. it is also possible to collect some e data, that is, the court case continues, he is not, he remains a suspect, what is happening with the other cases? well, maybe with the pivarsky case , you and i spoke yesterday. so i strengthened myself even more in the position that i will take in this case eh well, sap prosecutors proceed from their own understanding of state interests criminal proceedings, here, here, here, in the povarskyi case, it is more obvious that they simply call it formally that the state gave the right to a private company to take a part of the fees raised from porto in order to improve the port itself, here, well, they called losses losses that the state, let's say , did not take for itself exercise in the pocket. the money that was later to be spent from the left pocket on the state well, she gave the very right to a priv

more case , well, it is related to the former minister of infrastructure of ukraine, er, andriy pivovarskyiand there is such a similar situation that the government made the decision there was a law, and on the basis of that law, by-laws were adopted and the minister signed this by-law act and , according to the investigation, he caused damage to the state. also, there is currently an election. as far as i know, it is a preventive measure and has he been told what is necessary will pay the money at the next court hearing on the sixth of march, the same situation, or is it different? well, here the situation is even easier for me. from the point of view of the law, he is more protected, that is, even the legal side of the case is not so problematic, so i am sure that well, yes, this case will be solved normally, on the side of justice, or not. i don’t know what to even call it, because it is in this story there where brewery signed well, what did he do? he ordered that on-board fees, well, half of the port fees should be received by a company that is really, well, engaged in the improvement

good morning. or suspicions of other former e-top leaders of ukraine , in particular, andriy pivovarskyi was the subject of the former minister of infrastructure, e-e , there were statements about persecution. to be unfair to the former deputy minister of health and so on. and i was also very alarmed by the news about the dismissal, well, a formal transfer to another position, but still the dismissal of the head of ukrzaliznytsia p kamyshina, is it not working or do you think that something is happening? it's not the same with our personnel policy and with court cases. well, we really have something going on with personnel policy a-ah and we see that uh-uh well , actually we see now that people who tried to make some changes they a-ah now well, let's say that our courts and law enforcement agencies have become the focus of interest, whether it is good or bad , well, in principle, i thought about it. well, it's not that you can't laugh, but in principle, trust in the judicial authorities is low in ukraine, and this is just an indicator of how people, how we evaluate what is happening, tha

kobolev, the former head of naftogaz of ukraine, and about andriy pivovarskyi, the former minister of infrastructure of ukraine, by the way, in last today, as far as i know, there will be another court hearing, what is happening in these cases, how has the situation developed in a week, well, there was no bavarian development . today, it is here that the most difficult thing is without a meaningful one, that is, according to kovel, there is at least some public demand, or the populists have been creating an image for him for a very long time of a bad person because of the bonus and the detectives could not give in to this pressure, ah, respectfully, there is nothing there at all. well, that is, the person is accused because he fulfilled the law, and this is a very, very plus. let's see what will happen in court today. we can still hope that the administrator is an anti-corruption court . will correct this mistake and send this suspicion to where it belongs, and the male was promoted, suddenly the appeal ordered that he has, well, that is, the first station of the anti-corruption court

this is a case concerning the ex -minister of infrastructure and scoops of the vog company andriy pivovarskyid you know it. it is important to talk about it here because we are dreaming that they will give us money. then after the victory that we will achieve and there will be some reforms, this money will be invested, everything will be built , but andrii povarskyi, there were certain actions of his that gave a certain plus, but for that order, he is now being tried in 15 days, in what year, and we have to look, that is, there is already a question. if so will be judged and tell me a little more about this case and about the reasons for actually attacking this person, please, the story should be divided into two and if i don’t like both of them, if it is based on the fantasy and on the process, yes. if we talk about the factage, then there really is a worldview issue, i.e. if the prosecutor and investigators now look at the cases of pivovarsky from the angle, then in our country it turns out that any deregulation or any liberalization of tax legislation is clearly a second reason for a crimi

court postponed the election to march 15 preventive measure to the ex-minister of infrastructure pivovarskyi, the prosecutor asked for uah 20 million bail and imposing a number of restrictions on the suspect, such as communicating with as witnesses, the defense considers the suspicion to be unfounded in addition to the suspect. former and current officials are ready to take bail, among them the ex-minister of ecology shevchenko and people's deputies accuse pivovarsky of abuse of power and official position, which caused the state more than 44 million dollars in losses. in 2015, he divided the ship's collection into desks in a proportion of 50 to 50 between the state and the business of gas, thanks to which i attracted foreign investments, i am accused of signing the order that was approved by the cabinet of ministers and passed consent, all possible consent to the state authorities, they accuse me of causing damage to the state by my actions, but where is the damage if all the money is absolutely, they did not go anywhere in the first place to the culprit, the car with the use of their water

anti-corruption bodies that we support , but i think everyone knows this topic about kobolev , about pivovarskyii have no idea how in the next political cycle, when would he it hasn't started, we will be able to attract quality professional people around there. i'm not saying that i'm so directly good. good, but we need people from the corporate sector. we need people who have management experience and they simply won't go to work . that's where it ends. i believe that the chairman of the parliament of a european country cannot receive a salary of $2,000, well, this is very little. there are millions of companies that are registered there, well, this is my personal point of view. let's talk about the mares, mr. fedorov. let's talk about the kobolev case. let's talk about your attitude to the decision of the vax appeal. regarding this huge pledge of 229 million uah. although considering his premium, it is not so huge. it is less than the award and in that wave of information that began after yesterday's court decision p . reformism and people who are trying to change the ukrainian economy to clea

hmm , the leadership of the national anti-corruption bureau in the case of uh-uh there kobolev pivovarskyi see that public control will simply need to be strengthened, so none of these is intended except for sure attempts transplanting the dbr to nabu will pose some significant threat, but i would really like it not only not to do so, but also not to stop those positions that are in the national anti-corruption bureau. yaroslav, i remember how on one of the tv channels where i worked it was a long time before the full-scale invasion, but the nabu had already been created, and our journalists did such an experiment, they went to the people and took photos of some heads of departments or, well, there were photos of artem sitnyk, for example, there were photographs e of the then speaker bozhechki rumzkova, well, that is, they simply showed photos without captions, who is this, what is this, and asked people who in their opinion, who heads what, er rumzkova, people wrote to the minister of education , probably by last name, somehow, there is intelligence, education , well, it looks like this b