conditional use permit we were shocked when we got the enforcement notification to see the planning department said there are additional requirements and the conditional use authorization permit that was with the enforcement notification contained additional conditions beyond those set forth on the planning department website we've nerve seen investing in the restaurant of $2 million we don't believe it had to be closed at mint the information priority by the planning department didn't indicate there was restrictions the operation from 12:00 a.m. is of critical importance it is the majority of jones total steerj and it makes us unique we would not categorically not made the investment in jones had we known the planning department might compass a midnight closing when we have had been led to building by the available public records 3 we would be permitted to operate until 2:00 a.m. would frustrating our operations and have severe effects on our funds it will industry an otherwise business that is a more vibrant place to live in considering our petition to revise the item of our cu i ask that yo

map to add the divisadero street ncd and deleting the divisadero street rud, affirming the planning department's california environmental quality act determination; and making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, city clerk: item sf 31234 agenda4.120814[planning code, zoning map - establishing the fillmore street neighborhood commercial district]sponsor: breedordinance amending the planning code to establish the fillmore street neighborhood commercial district ncdd along fillmore street between bush and mcallister streets; amending various other code sections to make conforming and other technical changes; amending the zoning map to add the fillmore street ncd; affirming the planning department's california environmental quality act determination; and making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, city clerk: item sf 31234 sf 41234 noor supervisors kim, mar, tang, wiener, yee, avalos, aye, supervisor breed, aye, supervisor campos, aye, chiu, aye, supervisor cohen. there are 11 aye

they're not opted to where the garage it the planning department is where the issue is we have the planningepartment with their precipitation and the board resolution 731 dash 04 and the two never seem to be able to meet may i see it, sir? that's one issue the other issue is the quality of life we're going to have one hundred and 12 new units with probably around 2 persons per units or those residents are going to use ralph as a viable open space one of the quality of life we don't have open space so the result is ralph if so garage is on ralph it will be denser and in the acceptance that open space will be much diminished so keep in mind i think this is a good way to end is the garage on fulsome will 0 have no impact on fulsome street fulsome can easily handle the traffic ralph could not. >> thank you. next speaker. thank you, commissioners jim follower chair of the western selma task force the departments decision to dump 70 or 80 more cars into ralph represents another broken promise to the accept it after assurance by the planning department that additional protection would be put in pl

>> sure, what we can do is give you a link to the language from the planning department. this is something that will be going to the board of supervisors because it's legislation. yesterday it passed at planning commission and it will be going forward to the supervisors. i'm sure the planning department and the supervisors also appreciate hearing support from the disability community when that hearing takes place. it's titled "reasonable modifications to the housing element". >> when that actual board of supervisors meeting will be you can go to the site or the standard. >> i think we can put a link on our mod site but i'm going to ask donna if she will report on that. >> they actually didn't give us a specific date on which they will hear that but i will follow up up and inform the council on that update information. >> that would be great because anytime you can empower the public about this new legislation it will help things to get built much faster and smoother. thank you. >> good morning council. in the months of august through october our office received 189 inquiri

the commissioners, my name is gill kelley and i direct the city wide planning division of the planning department for the city. let me just first of all say that this is a great moment, and it is good to be in this partnership with the school district to do forward looking planning and it is something that should happen and it is my understanding that it has not happened in the past and so this is a great moment for the listening audience and i am not here to present the results of a planning process and we are at the first step and so my role today is to give you a bit of an overview of the growth projections that we see for the city and our work today has been to look at really the long term projections meaning the 20/40 projections basically derived from the abag, and the one bay area plan. and then, to begin to land those on the ground in areas where we have done the land use planning and see where the gaps are. and we look forward in the future to in our process to kind of breaking this down by decade or by five year increments to allow the five year planning that will be useful for the scho

world cities is not a notebook and cranny country but paris i appreciate this warning to the planning department and staff mr. kelly to really take a board and anymore comprehensive look at this juncture i don't think that the central selma plan can pass which indeed address what was presented as you're looking across the city the one neighborhood you didn't mention was chinatown the closing of the empress of china with no mitigating idea yet presented it will fall within a legacy registering rather than considering building replacement that is inphantomable and chinatown as a co-he has state of our heritage is an speedometer into the future i know there are other issues but some suggestions being made that the empress of china joins the registration of cultural importance and i hope that you and other presentations will mention chinatown because while they're still many living owners probably generational changes go as much in the making we need to help to address this and front on and overall possible techniques for this to go throw the proper process. >> thank you for appointing the empress o

ask victor the boards legal assistant and boards that have cases scott sanchez represents the planning departmentnning commission and senior building inspector joseph is here mr. pacheco if you would please go over the board guidelines and conduct the swearing in board requests you turn off outline electronic and boards rules appellants and permit hollers and representatives have 7 minutes to present their cases and 3 minutes for rebuttals people affiliated must include their minutes within the time and parties not affiliated with the parties have up to 3 minutes and to assist the board in the preparation of minutes members of the public are asked to the required to submit a speaker cards e.r. business card when you come up to the podium shakespeare's and pens are available it on the left-hand side of the podium the board windshield wipers our comments there are customer satisfaction forms ton the left side of the podium if you have question, please speak is to the board staff or wall the cod office it's located at 1650 mission street between debuts and van ness this is abbreviate live on sfgovtv

the tenant called dbi and the planning department approved the permit and ms. miller appealed the permit and it was substantially suspended the board permit hearing it was currently pending the board of permit is preponderance of the evidence the outcome of the plan for the review issues raised if the b r application don't pertain to the guidelines it was determined the mayors policy applies to property with 3 or more legal units also the chiu legislation the only avenue of legal cottage will need to be initiated by the property owner and have to be eligible for prescreening as stated earlier the subject owner died in july 2013 and handled by an unrelated neighbor neither party is ready to navigate of the process they found it hard to have the people participate in the legal process that concludes my presentation. i'm more than happy to answer questions and dr esquire requester. >> the dr requester present. >> okay. >> evelyn miller is not here any public comment supporting the dr requester project sponsor. >> you have to come to the podium to speak. >> i'm the

, supervisor wiener, supervisor avalos, there are reporting requirements and actually the department of planning has stated we have in our report that although they will be reporting later on in the year in terms of enforcement it's up to the departments involved to do the enforcement. i know of no follow-up in terms that that comes back to the board of supervisors, but i think that there are procedures in place to enforce the requirements of both the rehabilitation and the on-going maintenance. again, we have not, we are not involved in that so it's up to the departments to enforce that. >> can we get a response from departments? >> committee members, tim fry again. the department -- first of all because all the properties are landmarked the work outline i still requires a permit from central permit bureau, so that is one way that we track that the work is occurring according to the plan. the second is, as mr. rose mentioned, there are reporting requirements within the mills act legislation. one is that the department conduct a site visit every 5 years that's a recent amendment to the program.

commissioners the citywide distribution we are which asked to focus on the planning department and planningommission roll in helping the mar and these working group we will be doing an update every 5 years and this year we want to understand where we are and crop with the mayors implementation measures like the many that kate talked about the policy will be similar to the policies and also a lot of the initiative that kate discussed the cytodistribution and the planning department are leading we're looking forward to ongoing communication with this commission on those pieces and finally, there's we're really interested in findings what is our role in the 10 thousand units through the entitlement process first one we did was take a look at how long does it take for long term and middle units from the environmental review to the construction we take a look at basically 50 units size projects those thresholds are at the time set for that if we want to produce the units on time the largest project will be entitled to the planning department in 2016 and starred construction in 2018 this helps us

in conclusion, for the reasons stated in above, the planning department [speaker not understood] uphold the planning commission decision and deny the appeal. thank you. >> thank you very much. colleagues, any questions to the planning department? okay, supervisor yee. >> just a quick question. the buildings that were there, i guess 18 years ago, do you know the square footage? >> through the chair, i don't have that in information in front of me, but we can see if we have it in from the file and get back to you. >> would you be able to get it like within the next 15 minutes? >> i should be able to. >> thank you. >> i've got a couple quick questions. there have been a number of contentionses raised around the blocking of public view corridors. i know you alluded to they have, but i'm wondering if you can address the specific project on views. >> sure again. elizabeth wady with the mr. th. the residential plans and guidelines do not protect private views. thea are view we see throughout the city from one property to another. it also does not protect property. it does protect view from wit

captured by the neighborhood commercial district the rest of the block is zoned residential planning department approval the conditional use authorization demolish those at a supplied vote of three to four with commissioner wu and commissioner moore voting against the authorization and in favor of saving those affordable unit departments analysis in this sustains is simply wrong the may or may not finding this project is necessary and desirable for the community can't possibly be sustained there's an overwhelming policy and humanitarian mandate by the affordability choice so the board should deny it and help the existing affordable housing unit are those my words, no the departments words i invite i to look at the departments analysis that has a merger under section 317 please review the attachment as exhibit 3 and 4 which are the departments analysis in exhibit 3 from july of this year and the merger of 3 units on third avenue in the richmond district and exhibit 4 from this year for the merger of two flats at 812 on green street if you read those are analyze done by the department the departm

and be it the planning department, or the fire, and the environmental health and dpw and if we go out and we see the violation for that particular department, we may be even be taking concurrent action and we make a referral to those agency and they do the same. so that is one area that we will be helping them, but again, the current legislation has a tremendous amount of moving parts that the planning department is trying to put together regarding the registry and things of that, things that are related to that. >> and that is something that they are doing. >> is there a current requirement for the applicant for this license or whatever it is? to have a legal unit? >> i mean, have it be up to code? egress? all of those things? >> you know, it is not clear to me the way that the legislation is actually currently proposed, regarding that, i will tell you though, that if planning sees a space that is being used for residential use, where this type of complaint has come in, they would make a referral, to us as they do right now. and that will be a little different, than a dwelling unit t

of the new residents with the young children, 0 to 5, are there any considerations that the planning department is making in order to help with the planning work? >> thanks very much for focusing on that question and i raised the same question and the truth is that we have not done a lot of that survey work and we need to. bun of the difficultis in that and it is only a challenge and not a reason to do it, and the best answers comes from the people who have left the district and where they went and what caused their move and different ways that you can do that and that is one of the reasons that we look forward to dealing with the details in the school district and the team, and it has a consultant team that i think is potentially being engaged that we want to work closely with to see how we best get at that question that you are asking because it is important to know other than the quality of the schools themselves what is causing people to stay or leave when they have kids. >> right, i can imagine the challenge that it would be to have or survey the former residents that left the city to unde