we're kind of -- which is plausible.hink it's plausible phil's not good at anything but we're kind of establishing that phil's, you know, a good realtor and also kind of -- i'm liking that in more recent episodes julie and i are kind of doing sort of sharing goofy stuff. >> we are finding out where they connect. a lot of times people don't see that. we had a few opportunities last year in like the valentine's day episode and you see which was more sort of romantic and fun and now seeing that they have a love of cheesy movies. >> bad movies, yeah. >> that claire isn't always the smartest person. might be the most controlling but not the brightest. >> larry: you were 8 1/2 months pregnant? >> with twins. for the pilot. >> in the pilot. >> larry: how did you get the part? >> i thought you were going to say how did you get them out? well, larry, that's a different show. medical talk with larry king. how did i get the part? it was -- i wanted it desperately but i was quite sure i wouldn't get it. my first two auditions and me

they would consider it one unit, which seems plausible, so it cannot possibly be less than 10,000 units of housing. do not forget education is one of the top factors and the city. the defacto policy is craigslist. we essentially say, go find your own housing. if it is going to house 900 students, and i think what has been lacking is some uncertainty to the process. i have been approached half a dozen times by groups who are interested, but they always stop and say, what is the inclusion mary going to be? how does that play out? -- the inclusion going to be? how does that play out? some of the schools that have helped me put this together have said, we have got 60% to 80% of student enrollment, and a significant fraction is low income students. that is already there. >> i think what also houses we also delineated suited housing -- student housing so this is really perfect in that we have already done that in the planning process. you mentioned in boston. boston is similar in a number of ways. housing prices are higher. they have managed a way to do its. >> you could think of them as a ci

but accompanied by long-term man, plausible long-term plan for fiscal consolidation. is that something, as the new congress arrives in january, is that something you will try to get from them, if it is, one thing floated is a payroll tax holiday, that's talked about, you could to that. that would be a significant boost for short-term demand. a really sthisket boost and it would be a-- significant boost, and it would cause mabe deficit changes, is that somebody you would discuss. >> you're right. the ideal mix of policies for a country like the united states is to combine a credible set of reforms that bring the deficits down over the medium term to a sustainable level to -- with a carefully designed action that could provide catalyst to recovery now. absolutely is the right mix. that's why the president proposed in the fall these series of -- of investment focused tax changes and public investment plans that will help reinforce that argument. it is absolutely right. i think that as you look at all of these things, you have to make sure that you're not -- you're doing

those are plausible in colorado. the,y axis is number of years in which we get plugs out of records. 78 years. there are two things to catch from this. one, is first of all, the vulnerability of the relative moderate increase of flow in the colorado. a ten percent increase in flow. changes the number of years with uncontrolled spills, floods, from six out of 78 in the data case to 16 out of 78 years some more than doubles the ten percent increase, more than doubles the years you have uncontrolled spills and different colors, blue is little spills and most are red the big ones. sorry the smaller one. you don't get really big spills undercurrent conditions. but when a 20 percent increase in flow your getting more inflows. the system is sincetive to climate. the second important point here is, this whole project. assessing the risk, assuming we operate the system the same way thomas we operating today, we were told when we proposed the project we could not change the operating rules that reservoirs and could not change

when one sees the scientific community like a herd of wild beasts, it's plausible to ask are they going someplace or fleeing from someplace? i think the answer is they are fleeing from an idea they reject for a variety of reasons. not only is the inquiry about atheism not necessary in terms of the history of social thought, it's not necessary in terms of the outlines of scientific thought, but there is a last question to be addressed, perhaps the most important for you and me. because it was asked, what compels the electron to follow the laws of nature? good question. i don't know. one who presided over the destruction of churches and synagogues throughout europe and was the master mind behind the extermination of the jewish people asked a similar question in 1944 when confronted with the treaty obligations the germmans adopted. he asked pregnantly, after all, what compels us to keep our promises? more relative is very often derived as unhappy consequence of atheism. i don't think moral relativism is particularly a deep issue, but i do think the issue, i do think the issue of what compe

i think that one of the theories i think is quite plausible is that she stopped on sunset boulevard to make a left on whittier and there's this thing called a bump and rob. maybe someone came and bumped her. maybe they tried to get her to come out of the car and rob her. maybe somebody went to her driver's side window and there was another person on the passenger side. i think there must have been at least two people in the shooter car and maybe -- she wouldn't get out of the car. maybe she started going and they shot her. the guy on the passenger side shot her. >> stand by, guys. we're going to talk to ed lozi, he knows her. he worked with her. there are also theories about tensions in beverly hills because of the shifting demographics there. we'll talk about that in just a moment and we'll hear from ed lozi who knew her very well. our special investigation called murder in beverly hills is going to continue. we want you to be part of this discussion tonight. send us a message. logon to twitter or facebook or check out our blog. look for us on faoursquare as well. ♪ ♪ [ male announcer

solutions like the flat tax, but there's always a well known solution to all human problems, neat, plausibleand totally wrong. you've got to keep some. that would include things like the earned income credit for working families. it means most working families making less than $30,000 a year wouldn't pay any income tax at all. it makes it progressive and fair. >> you've spent a good part of your career going over the 100,000 page tax document that we all have to file through. we neede needed accountant to dr taxes. >> it's 15 times the size of the king james bible. it would drain the swamp of corruption in d.c. where lobbyists live and breathe. to downsize the tax code would unlock a lot of economic activity in the country. no surprise the two top tax writing committees in congress get the most in political donations. they've turned the tax code into a tangleled barbed wire that hus americans every day. >> it would be easier for all of us, wouldn't it? >> sure, david. if everybody put down the doughnut, we'd probably have a healthier country. some things just aren't true in the real world. r

they need plausible deniability.r the iranians they want to remain a mysterious force and i think that it was actually a brilliant operation. absolutely brilliant. >> roger, i hope that i'm not catching you cold to this but to the extent that we were playing a role would it be legal? >> whatever role that we played would be legal because there would be done under covert authorities. the issue always is whenever you launch an attack in cyberspace, their traditional covert authorities, the traditional way that we do covert action doesn't pertain because i said this was a cyber precision-guided mission that is true but still collateral damage associated with it. you can't control things when they are launched in cyberspace. i guarantee if the u.s. government did have a role and i wouldn't be surprised if it did, that this was very much covered under existing authorities. >> on one hand, to the extent that this is the way that it played out, and if it were successful and spared either the united states or israel from lau

. >> reporter: sam legrone says conspiracy debunkers say the most plausible explanation is that this was a jet train and its contrail distorted by atmospherics. >> you are hoping the mystery gets solved? >> absolutely. it's been driving me nuts all day. >> reporter: it is driving a lot of people nuts because they don't know what this is. the faa says they have no unusual sightings to report during that time. norad says there were no scheduled launches and that there was no foreign military missile. they are claiming that the bubble was never in danger other than though they don't yet note what this is. so it is still a mystery even this morning. >> thank you. >>> officials say nobody had a license to launch a commercial rock net that area on monday. >>> we have the latest now on the alleged plot to bomb the d.c. metro system. the virginia man believed to be involved had his say in federal court. farooque ahmed pleaded not guilty to charges that he provided material support to terrorists and helped plan an attack on four metro stations. ahmed waived his right to a speedy trial. his tr

. >> couric: dallas fans waited and debated over which of the plausible suspects had pulled the triggerber of bamboozled oil barons. >> i'll get you for this if it's the last thing i do. >> couric: the j.r.'s neglected long-suffering wife sue-ellen. >> which slut are you going to stay with tonight? >> whoever it is it's got to be more interesting than the slut i'm looking at right now. >> couric: to keep even the cast and crew guessing, all of them were filled taking a couple shots at old j.r. >> take that you son of a (bleep). >> couric: but larry hagman had the last laugh. everyone from miss ellie to the makeup artists had a shot at shooting you. >> that's true. id everybody to shoot me until the end when i pick up a bottle of gin and i say "missed" and i'd rigged it up so water kept squirting out of it. >> couric: meanwhile, the who shot j.r. frenzy was front-page news, gracing the covers of magazines from "tv guide" to "time." at this point, what was bigger, your ego or your paycheck? >> it was about half and half. (laughs) . >> couric: but both were about to get bigger. seeing an o

it's just not a plausible scenario for him. >> back to mark. get the republicans to agree to anything short of a complete extenuation of the tax cuts, even for the wealthy? can he get them to agree to anything short of that or they'll say, no, mr. president, we're not going to give you the vote in the senate. you're not getting the 60 votes. you're not going to get to just to people who make 250. you have to get it all or they won't approve the vote. suppose they do that. >> i think he's lost the possibility and the leverage to get them decoupled. to have an unequal extension. i think the best he can hope for is a short-term mirrored exemption -- extension for everything. and if he gets that, that's just a place holder. he needs to fight another day. but he can't be all about battle. he has to use this as an opportunity to figure out how he's going to deal with this new political normal with republicans, not in the majority in the lame-duck session but effectively with the upper hand now and in the majority in the house in january. >> let me go

not so much her values that make people feel she might win but worry too many don't see her as a plausible president. even fellow fox news contributor karl rove citing palin's new mini series on t.l.c. questions whether she has the gravitas to be elected. >> bret: karl rove had a quote recently. i'm not certain how it fits in american calculus and helps me see you in the oval office. yeah, i don't know how ronald reagan was seen in the oval office, having come from a career in television. hmm, karl. >> bret: do you see a connection to reagan? >> reagan was criticized for being an idealogue. for being too superficial, idealistic, too optimistic. a bit too independent. i see a comparison in maybe some of our record. but nobody can be compared to ronald reagan. >> bret: a better comparison for palin-white house run might be the campaign of the man she'd look to replace. senator barack obama was a relative unknown four years before he ran. he had less than two years experience in high office. palin does have executive experience. she quit before the end of her first term as governor saying the

. >> reporter: he says conspiracy debunkers say the most plausible explanation is that thises with alane and its contrail distorted by atmospherics. >> as someone who covers this, you are hoping the mystery gets involved? >> absolutely. it's been driving me nuts all day. >> reporter: the faa took i look at its radar images from that day. it says there were no unusual sightings. norad says no schedule launches and not a foreign military missile. and they also tried to reassure the public by saying there was no threat to the u.s. homeland so this is still a complete mystery this morning. >> weird but a lot of people talking about it. thank you. >>> the tom delay money laundering trial picks back up this morning. under texas law, corporate money cannot go directly to political campaigns. some courtroom observers are beginning to question the strength of the prosecutor's argument. >>> the chandra levy murder trial continues this morning after a six-day hiatus. jurors will like hi hear -- will likely hear from other inmates. the six-day break in the trial had been scheduled because of a c

seemingly the plausibility of people who have such stronge wh faith of being able to bee of b tolerant. so if it weren't making thatg case that even for those with this faith in the afterlife -- >> well, certainty is dangerous. there are no good reasons to be danger certain. anyone who is pretending to be certain about the afterlife isyt lying to himself or herself. afi it is just not -- given that we have incompatible certainties ce the religion's actually teach different things. it varies in some non negotiable weight. these have shattered our world. hundreds of examples of this. a very clear one is that ifbuta you're really going to believe i christian you have to believene. that jesus was divine. it says in two places and the pe curve on that if you think jesus was divine you're going to spend eternity in hell. this is a coin toss. toss >> for a huge portion of the population. i think there is probably an ven broader or a lot larger portion of the population for whom the real deal breaker is this sense, this universal sense of hope in something waiting for us after a life of strugg

about the expectations of their voters and trying to come out in january with a series of small but plausible solutions and they've got a strategy whether they control their base remains an open question. there will be tough votes. the democrats could pass them to pass two budgets in the coming year and the debt-limit legislation in the spring allowing the tea party people not want to vote for though it will bankrupt the country and i think they've developed a strategy at the leadership level. >> the dead commission comes out with a report if they get a majority or 14 out of 18 members of the commission on december 1st. if they come out withrestin on lo-term entitles with the age of social security recipient or the ben fit level or whatever and if they get that kind of cover from the president's commission with bruce reed and allen simpson endorsing it and the president endorsing the tea party people can find common ground for long-term debt solution. i think you can get a majority. it's a delightful umbrella to get out from under the umbrella. it will take a lot of heat and a real proposal a

it sounds great and it makes a plausible argument, but in the end, it doesn't work out. >> rick: david, i want to ask you real quickly before we wrap up, take out your crystal ball and if you were to look ahead christmas 2011, a year from now, what are we going to be looking at here? >> i think we'll be looking at something better. i got to tell you, my crystal ball is not that clear. it's pretty fuzzy. to look out that far is very, very difficult. the smartest of us out there, bernanke can't do this. it's just not there. we can see a few months at a time. that's the best we can do right now. >> rick: so let's take us into the first quarter then of 11. >> much more confident on that. i think the first quarter of 11 will be very strong. we're seeing it -- we're certainly seeing it in industry. the numbers are fantastic in certain areas of industry. you see it in commodity prices rising, they're rising for a reason. money is being spent. it's not just about us. world wide economies, emerging economies are very strong and that will translate around the world. i'm encouraged there. >> rick

they need plausible deniability. rairanian, they want to remain a mysterious force. >> roger, to the extent we were playing a role, would it be legal? >> whatever role we played would be legal because it would be done under covert authorities. the issue always is when ever you launch an attack in cyber space, the traditional covert authorities, the way we do covert action doesn't pertain. there are still collateral damage associated with it. you can't control things when launched in cyber space. if the u.s. government did have a role and i wouldn't be surprised if it did, this was very much covered under existing authorities. >> to the extent this is the way it played out and if it were successful and spared the united states or israel from launching an attack, i applaud it, but it raises questions of our vulnerability. i know you and richard clark have published on that subject cht. >> the difference is often the click of a key stroke. you're seeing the department of homeland security saying, are there vulnerabletie

. >> reporter: sam magrone says conspiracy debunkers say the most plausible explanation is that thisjet plane and its contrail distorted by atmospherics. >>, i mean, you'd like to know what it is right. >> absolutely, it's been driving me nuts all day. >> wow so this is a complete mystery. >> right now it is, laura. the faa recorded some images in the california area and say they couldn't pick up anything they couldn't identify so it's a mystery to the faa and they apparently did not issue any licenses for any commercial rocket launches so they don't know. >> what you were talking about at the end of the package too, about it possibly being just an airplane. >> that's what some of the experts say, is that it's an optical illusion, that the plane is coming toward the helicopter camera and its contrail is illuminated by the setting sun which gives it the weird look making it look like a rocket or missile. >> interesting, thank you very much. >> maybe we'll find out tomorrow. >> hope so. >>> disparaging comments about her supervisor on facebook got her fired, but the national labor rela

now the government has forced tax pairs to buy these failing companies without any plausible plan fore government that plans to double the national debt in five years will turn gm around in the same time? again, on june 1, we heard this from republican national committee chairman michael steele -- no matter how much the president spins gm's bankruptcy as good for the economy, it is nothing more than another government grab of a private company and another handout to the union kroen knows who helped bank roll his presidential campaign. this is the real change president obama has in mind for america -- government ownership of our economy, financed with irresponsible and reckless government spending and debt and no jobs to show for it. other republican lawmakers called it a disaster, the president's, quote, war on capitalism, and, quote, the road to socialism. instead, about 16 months after the president used socialism to stop the bleeding of capitalism, this was the scene at the new york stock exchange this morning. the opening bell cut short for the sound of a roaring chevy camaro engi

have they done a plausible job of growing up as harry, ron, and hermione? >> i think so, yeah.e of luck that these three were cast from the beginning when they were young unknown kids. >> 11 years old, whatever they were, 12. >> and they have grown into the roles. i think it helps that they've worked with some of the very finest actors in the world in each of these mirrors, but you really feel like you know these people very well, these characters. the actors know the characters very well. and i found them completely believable. and the complicated things that started happening within their relationships and the tension between harry and ron and the way hermione is in the middle of the two of them. very dramatically compelling and very well played by these actors. i would love to see what they all do next after the harry potter. >> that's my question because we've seen harry. we've seen him on stage and didn't places. i'm drawing a total blank. daniel radcliffe. we've seen him performing and trying to branch out. emma watson is at school at brown, taking a bit of a brick to get

not plausible. the most plausible explanation is an increase in atmospheric co2. we know co2 has changed. that is not some assertion or supposition, we know that. what the ipcc found and reported on was the change in temperature due to greenhouse gases which is what you see in red was larger than the actually observed change in temperature was the horizontal black line. the greenhouse gas signal was offset. that is our best understanding by the cooling caused by these sulfate aerosols that scatter incoming sunlight and also change -- >> excuse me. the ipcc gives the range of perspective from sulphate aerosol at 0. a range from 0 to-2 watts for meters square. that gives you incredible wiggle room any time you want to make an argument. it is interesting to look at sulphate aerosol in terms of the history of science. the first book i ever read was the structure of scientific revolution and i recommend it to every one. it predicts that when a paradigm experiences anomalous data that increasingly strange explanation are brought forth. 1985 tom wiggly recognized in a pa

. >> so oprah, who campaigned for obama, thinks the perception is at least plausible? >> yeah, although i think he came out pretty well in that interview overall. you know, he had to know that these sorts of questions would come up. he brought it up himself in the book. and i think that we're raising these issues again -- i say "we" in the press, but it's in sort of a gauzy way. we're looking back at history and it's sort of interesting now and i think there's more affecti affection. there's no accident that every time a president leaves office he becomes more popular. >> he's out of the firing line. dana misses he kind of misses george w. lynn sweet, are journalists engaging in a bit of bush nostalgia? maybe he looks better after two years of obama? >> well, yes, and you have more information out there because now you're hearing things from his side and his perspective and that's only natural when you get his take on matter. you know, that there's that story that came out on how his abortion views were impacted by his mother going to the hospital and he sees the abort

i think the idea that she runs for president is plausible but the idea that she wins the republican nominations the presidency, with that reputation out there, it doesn't fly. this is a rock star, as sophia said, but not a presidential candidate. >> maybe you'll all come back and talk about next week after we see episode two. ma more is there to say? >>> tomorrow, i will be live on our nation's capitol, valerie plame and joe wilson, two central figures in the cia leak investigation during the bush administration. >>> thanksgiving a week away, and there's a new study that paints a bleak picture for millions of hungry americans. richard lui, you've good the latest info that came out in the last hour. where does that stand? >> right here it came out at 9:02 when we got it. it's shocking if you just take some time to leaf through the 60 pages of it. today in the united states it says here there are over 17 million children in households that are not getting enough good food to eat. that's a tick up from last year. and if you think about it, think of just five children that you know or that you hav

a deal if she hadn't been rescued and the americans had not been rescued, was there ever a deal plausible for her to be released or was there never going to be a deal? >> there was a lot of speculation of what was going on bhaind the scenes -- behind the scenes with ingrid and the government trying to get her released. canadians were involved, and ingrid's parents were very vocal. she was a public figure. they went everywhere to get someone to agree to a negotiation. they didn't want to see her rescued because it was dangerous, and many of the families did not want a rescue. ..going to do is a rescue. we are not talking to the farc on this case, and so because ingrid's family had a lot of political poll in france and in colombia they were able to get a lot of meetings. however in the end uribe put a stop to any kind of sort of one-on-one negotiations. he would say okay will negotiate but, and i'm not blaming uribe. the other side was just as bad. the farc would say we want basically half the country to be to mobilize before we vote even talk to you. and so it was really ridiculous posturi

. >> any plausible person could. anybody taller than me could. so they are in trouble.and it's hard to win the presidency without winning ohio or the entire midwest. and they don't quite, i don't think they register that. >> lehrer: so you think he is at risk. >> i do. i really do. the more you look at the results one way to read it is that the outlier was 2008. that what has happened now is it swung back and there is a republican coalition there. and that would make it hard for him to win though people-- those people back in 2012. >> lehrer: we have to leave it there. mark, david, thank you both very much. >> brooks for president, ohio? >> lehrer: you said it, i didn't. >> woodruff: again, the major developments of the day: the private sector added nearly 160,000 jobs in october, the most in six months, but the unemployment rate remained at 9.6%. and attacks on two mosques in pakistan killed more than 70 people. and to hari sreenivasan in our newsroom for what's on the newshour online. hari. >> sreenivasan: we talk to a reporter in indonesia about what it's like living

it's just not a plausible scenario for him. >> back to mark. can he get the republicans to agree to anything short of a complete extenuation of the tax cuts, even for the wealthy? can he get them to agree to anything short of that or they'll say, no, mr. president, we're not going to give you the vote in the senate. you're not getting the 60 votes. you're not going to get to just to people who make 250. suppose they do that. >> i think he's lost the possibility and the leverage to get them decoupled. to have an unequal extension. i think the best he can hope for is a short-term mirrored exemption -- extension for everything. and if he gets that, that's just a place holder. he needs to fight another day. but he can't be all about battle. he has to use this as an opportunity to figure out how he's going to deal with this new political normal with republicans, not in the majority in the lame-duck session but effectively with the upper hand now and in the majority in the house in january. >> let me go to this other question. the other day the debt