pooling on roads and local flooding are plausible today so take caution nai streets. high temperatures will hold in the upper 80s with lower 90s morning rain chances are now in today's gma first look-- new details on the boat crash that killed miami marlins pitcher abc's steve osunsami has the story. < in this morning's gma first look, the families of ace pitcher jose fernandez, and his support his friend and he died being a really good friend...(crying) so far, authorities are blaming only speed for the crash that sent fernandez's speedboat hurling into the rocks early sunday morning. nats "thy vessel by the way - the boat struck the jetty" but friends are revealing that fernandez was very upset for some reason. grfx in these text messages, between rivero, who's with fernandez at the time, and will bernal, a friend in town, bernal is begging them not to head out on the boat. "try to keep him close to the shore if you go out, trust me it's not my time yet, i know him what i said" we'll have the latest on the mystery coming up at 7am - with your gma first a fight with

pooling on roads and local flooding are plausible today streets. high temperatures will hold in the upper 80s with lower 90s expected by tomorrow and holding until sunday. rain chances do pick up to 25% for tomorrow too but friday morning rain chances are now out of the forecast. mainly sunny skies will be back just in time for the weekend but it will come at a small saturday night winds should reach a breezy 10-20 mph but by sunday morning and through the day, 15 to 25 mph winds will be common along with gusts up to 35 mph. monday yields even stronger winds with gusts possible up to outdoors sunday into monday. as the winds subside monday night, cooler air rolls in and high temperatures will fall to dozens of people in seattle are damaged by fire. take a look at the intense flames. smoke could reportedly be seen for miles. one resident says no alarms went off in the building, so she ran throughout the building thankfully, no injuries were reported. the red cross says 44 people were displaced. the cause is under investigation. turning to mississipp

so there's a plausibility test there. a plausibility problem right now for donald trump. that's something he has to address at this debate. how about this, as well. the question, does the candidate not respect ordinary americans? hillary clinton's numbers not good there. 48% say she does not respect ordinary americans. the trump campaign has been trying to drive that message home focusing on her deplorables comment. but look at the number for donald trump. 60% of americans say he doesn't respect ordinary americans. that's a challenge for him. how about and this one. we don't see numbers like this in presidential races, but we do this year. the question is, is the candidate racist? half the voters right now say that donald trump is racist. just 21% for hillary clinton. of course, with the news in charlotte this week, the news in tulsa, the issues of race and policing, likely to come up in this debate. that number probably worth keeping in mind, as well. so some of the numbers to have in your heads as we head to the debate. right now, we're going to head over to the "hardba

pooling on roads and local flooding are plausible today so local flooding are plausible today so take caution navigating surface streets. expected by tomorrow and holding until sunday. expected by tomorrow and holding until sunday. rain chances do pick up to 25% for tomorrow too but friday morning rain chances are now out of the forecast. ma just in chances are now out of the forecast. mainly sunny skies will be back just in time for the weekend but it will come at a small gusty price. winds will be picking up through the weekend saturday night winds should reach a breezy 10-20 mph but monday yields even stronger as the winds subside monday now to the beauty queen mentioned in the trump-clinton debate... the former miss universe who claims trump called her miss piggy is speaking out.. this is after trump doubles down on criticism of her weight... abc's amy robach has more.... she was once named the most beautiful woman in the world? nats - miss venezuela wins in 1996 (f0083-458) now -- twenty years later - former miss universe alicia machado is back in the spotlight -- this time, find

so there's a plausibility test there, a plausibility problem right now for donald trump.t's something he's got to try to address at this debate. how about this as well? the question, does the candidate not respect ordinary americans? well, hillary clinton's februnu not good. 48% say she doesn't respect ordinary americans. the trump campaign has been trying to drive that message home by focusing on the deplorables message, but look at donald trump. 60% of americans say donald trump doesn't respect ordinary americans. the question is, is the candidate racist? half, half of voters right now say that donald trump is racist. just 21% for hillary clinton. of course, with the news in charlotte this week, the news in tulsa, the issues of race and policing likely to come up in this debate, that number probably worth keeping in mind as well. some of the numbers to have in your heads as we head to the debate. right now, we're going to head to the "hardball" roundtable. mckay coppins, dean zano is a scientific, and we have a national reporter for bloomberg. i'm going to keep talking

so there's a plausibility test there. a plausibility problem right now for donald trump. that's something he has to address at this debate. how about this, as well. the question, does the candidate not respect ordinary americans? hillary clinton's numbers not good this. 48% say she does not respect ordinary americans. the trump campaign has been trying to drive that message home focusing on her deplorables comment. but donald trump, 60% of americans say he doesn't respect ordinary americans. that's a challenge for him. how about and this one. we don't see numbers like this in presidential races, but we do this year. the question is, is the candidate racist? half the voters right now say that donald trump is racist. just 21% for hillary clinton. of course, with the news in charlotte this week, the news in tulsa, the issues of race and policing, likely to come up in this debate. that number probably worth keeping in mind, as well. so some of the numbers to have in your heads as we head to the debate. right now, we're going to head over to the "hardball" roundtable. mckay co

so there's a plausibility test there. a plausibility problem right now for donald trump.mething he has to address at this debate. how about this, as well. the question, does the candidate not respect ordinary americans? hillary clinton's numbers not good this. 48% say she does not respect ordinary americans. the trump campaign has been trying to drive that message home focusing on her deplorables comment. but donald trump, 60% of americans say he doesn't respect ordinary americans. that's a challenge for him. how about and this one. we don't see numbers like this in presidential races, but we do this year. the question is, is the candidate racist? half the voters right now say that donald trump is racist. just 21% for hillary clinton. of course, with the news in charlotte this week, the news in tulsa, the issues of race and policing, likely to come up in this debate. that number probably worth keeping in mind, as well. so some of the numbers to have in your heads as we head to the debate. right now, we're going to head over to the "hardball" roundtable. mckay coppins, a s

. >> he doesn't need to win, he .ust needs to seem plausible they just needed excuse to vote for him,e them an excuse. mark: explain why the electoral college assumptions have changed over the last couple of weeks about whether he has a plausible and realistic. , it's aemocrats of ohio state that has gone for democrats in the past. if pennsylvania ever started turning in donald trump started browsing the center part of the state, who knows. iowa,you think ohio, and you take the prospect of winning north carolina and florida, which are tossup states right now. >> how much does clinton's organization in florida give her? you could save you and these he has him for donald trump may give him a point or two. john: donald trump's people realize if they don't win north carolina and florida, there is no other states to get him there. tossups, which still means hillary clinton is the favorite. have a believe there is a huge group of voters that have been disengaged for a long time and maybe they will come after donald trump, but i agree with you. it's not going to make north carolina competiti

is he going to be seen as a plausible commander in chief, a plausible president by the millions of people that are watching this. can they see him sitting in the oval office at a time of national crisis, addressing the nation? that's the bar he has to begin to clear tonight. >> haven't they answered that question? explain to me this massive swing we have seen in the polls. a couple weeks ago, we wusaring look at math. there's no way he can find a path. now look at these numbers. what do you think of them? >> when you think about a presidential race, stephanie, there are a couple unequal moments. the vp picks, the convention speeches, and then the three debates. so donald trump didn't have a very good convention. hillary clinton had a great one. donald trump had his bad in august as a candidate for president has ever had in a general election, and hillary clinton's september has been just as bad. they come into this race in a divided nation, in an even race. with an advantage slightly to hillary clinton, when you look at the electoral map and you look at the demographic advantages that any

. >> it isn't plausible. somebody with her background, experience, training, she's an attorney with 25 years in government. suddenly she has selective amnesia? it's not plausible, not >>> well, it is labor day weekend, and it didn't get off to a great start for travelers who were trying to head out of the valley today after a truck fire closed down the i-17 for quite some time. take a look at the scene this afternoon. right near the i-17 and black canyon city, miles and miles of traffic backed up, up to 15 miles. after a truck that was hauling a flatbed trailer caught fire, and that caused the authorities there to close down the northbound lanes of the freeway. the good news is tonight the road is back open but traffic was still the evening. hopefully it's clearing up by now. luckily, the fire didn't spread too far, and the truck was completely demolished. >> i had just enough time to get it over, and then i couldn't get it all the way over, so i had to shove people off the highway to get the trailer and truc

pooling on roads and local flooding are plausible today so take caution navigating surface streets. high temperatures will hold in the upper 80s with lower 90s expected by tomorrow and holding until sunday. rain chances do pick up to 25% for tomorrow too but friday morning rain out of the forecast. winds will be picking up through the weekend into the next workweek. saturday night winds should reach a breezy 10-20 mph but by monday yields even stronger as the winds subside monday night, cooler air rolls in and high temperatures will fall to the lower 80s. invasion in the north east part of the valley. police tell us a group of three to four men forced their way into a home near lake mead and nellis around 1 a-m. the men assaulted two people...then left the house. no word if they got away with any property. police are in that area investigating. 13 action news reporter parker collins is headed to the scene...he'll have a live report at five. vm this morning we're learning more about the victim who was starbucks. that's 41-year-old aleksander khutsishvili on your right...his friends c

it was about change and she is not a plausible change agent. clintons entered history as agents of change. she now has to make the case but she is an agent of stability. charlie: change is not a pathway to the white house. john: that is application has to make. when she says he doesn't have the temperament, she is thing i can be trusted with the codes and can get off the helicopter and handle a crisis. i am stability and he is not worth the risk. charlie: what did you think about the gambit that he will make his tax returns available when she gives up her e-mails? ed: i think that was a clever way of getting her to feel comfortable on e-mails. on whether or not she came across as more likable, i did watch her body language. i never comment on her fashion or body language but she did smile quite a lot and she didn't screech or shout. as some of her critics have alleged. there were a couple of critics of the red pantsuit that she came across as warm and humid because trump helped her to do so. he was really rude and "wrong"ting and saying over he

that's a slightly more plausible way for her to get involved. no reports of that happening yet.uropean central bank governing counselor commenting on the banking situation saying he doesn't believe europe phoenix new banking crisis. he did suggest the financial sector is in a transitional phase. says he doesn't want to overdramatize it. he isn't commenting on the troubles deutsche bank is face. but he said it's important to consider all consequences before letting any financial institution go bankrupt. >>> switching focus, i can't believe this is the less big of the two banking stories. let's go to wells fargo. of course the ceo john stumpf face a second hearing in nine days. he agreed to important fete $40 million of his pay. 2 million fake account number could be 75% lower based on their latest internal investigations. the full board is being investigated internally not just executives like him. he has spoken to warren buffett once. but as becky quick reports it was not a negative conversation. but the focus overall of yesterday was once again on the tone of the hearing not th

did not reviewr determinationtion for whether it was logical and plausible.sion maker she was reviewing it whether there was a substantial credibility of harm, which requires more than the classification standard under the executive order, which requires a reasonable expectation of serious damage for secret items. casenk, in terms of the that's more applicable here than press-enterprise, is the mcge hee case that judge williams cited. that case specifically dealt with the separation of powers problem between the first amendment and classified information. in that case, the court still applied the determination of whether the information had been properly classified. that was a case where the individual -- it was a prepublication review case. the court recognized they had even greater amendment rights, but still recognized -- greater first amendment writes, but still recognized it should be reviewed for proper classification. if press-enterprise -- >> is it true that, because the attorneys for the intervenors did not have security clearances, they have never s

that sounds plausible. . how about another possibility. >> just lsafety. the chances of edward being hit by a car is far greater than george. >> very true. i want to point out this is britain: even in 1926, he would have been in danger of being hit by a car in america, but in britain, cars were rare. his danger of being hit by a car was not high. you can see that changed. jack, you know, his parntd par concerned and rightly so about him getting hit by a car. i want to point out as a parent i'm not advocating anybody let their child walk 6 miles away from home unescorted. i think that's nuts. it's not an attempt to defend that. it is a claim perhaps this has gone a little far. 300 yards, we practically disabled our own children when we can't go more than 300 yards. there's also safety, ab durkss or attacks of kinds. there's more. it has to do with the geography. let me offer a geographic point. this is a street plan or aerial view of a typical american subdivision of the late 20th century. i think you can see that if for example you lived on the cul-de-sac

the plausibility of the challenger when there is an incumbent. hillary clinton, if you squint, seems like an incumbent, but in this case, it's an open seat. and so, i mean, yes, everybody makes a big deal out of the first debate every time around. but this is different. the stakes do feel higher. i mean, number one, biggest picture view, we've never had a woman in a presidential debate before. we've also never had a major party candidate in a presidential debate who has no political record, no record of public service, no record of military service, whatsoever. we've never dish mean, we've never seen hillary clinton and donald trump together. we've never seen donald trump debate a single opponent, as you mentioned, in your lead-in there. there's a lot that we haven't seen tonight, but because of the unusual nature of this pairing, i think, because of donald trump's unpredictability, we've got yet another wild card in this, which is that somewhere between 80 million and 100 million americans will watch this. we could have a super bowl-sized audien

he didn't have to beat hillary clinton, he have to pass a plausibility test. i think you missed an opportunity and this is what bob referred to. those people are with him. they thought he did just fine. do something to reach out to suburban white women? appeal?pand his i think in the end when you "first up step back from it. -- i think hillary with the wayell she went after the birther issue. that is a problem. one of the key moments was his exchange about the tax returns. he has been able to posturing in this campaign as a working man's billionaire, as a brash political outsider. when he seemed to almost encourage the idea that he pay , it playedome tax into clinton's argument that is not an outsider it comes out of the republican mainstream tax protect the wealthy. charlie: where does he go from here? >> when i was in the spin room last night, i huddled for a bit with rudy giuliani. what is the plan for st. louis? they said he wants to take the gloves off even more. fight.ural job is to to bill clinton, his problems, she wants to make this more deeply person

it's not plausible. it's not believable. >> reporter: clinton told fbi agents she could not recall when she got a security clearance. clinton could not recall briefings on the handling of classified information or special training for the u.s. government's most closely held secrets. the same week clinton became secretary of state, she signed two non-disclosure agreements where she said she knew the rules and that violating these agrumts could result in criminal charges. clinton also told the fbi that she could not recall the details surrounding the 2009 setup of the clinton e-mail.com domain, whose servers were housed at their chappaqua, new york, home. clinton said the personal e-mail account was a matter of convenience. fbi agents do not appear to press clinton on the issue, further reinforcing republican criticism of the fbi director and the investigation. >> remember james comey said she was not indicted because he didn't have sufficient evidence on the issue of intent. she said she did it for conven

that sounds plausible. how about another possibility here? wade. >> just safety. >> explain. >> the chances of edward being hit by a car is far greater than george. >> very true. now i want to point out this is britain. even in 1926, george would have been in danger of being hit by a car in america, but in britain, cars were rare in '26. so his danger of being hit by a car was not high. but you can see that that changed. jack, his parents are concerned. and rightly so, about him getting hit by a car. i want to point out, by the way, as a parent, i'm not advocating anybody let their 8-year-old walk six miles away from home unescorted. i think that's nuts. so this is not an attempt to defend that, but it is a claim that perhaps this has gone a little too far because 300 yards, we've practically disabled our own children when they can't go more than 300 yards. so there's safety, including traffic safety. also fear of strangers or abductions or attacks of various kinds. there's more, and it has to do with the geography. herbert mentioned a geogra

she's not a plausible change agent. she actually here, in the irony of history, the clintons entered american history as an agent of change. she now has to make a case she's an agent of stability. >> rose: interesting. so change is not necessarily a pathway to the white house because she can argue against him stability is more important. >> that's the case she's got to make. when she says he does haven't the temperament, what she's saying is i can be trusted with the codes, i can get off the helicopter and handle a crisis, i am stability, he is not worth the risk, that's their argument. >> rose: ed, what did you think about the guam but he tried to say, listen, against the advice of my lawyer, i'll make my income tax returns available if she'll give up all of the e-mails she deleted, if she could. >> well, i think that was a relatively clever way of getting her to sort of feel uncomfortable on the email issue. on whether she came across as more likable or more human, i did take her husband's advice a couple of times dur

the question she asked, have they given me a logical and plausible reason, is the same thing this court has done in other cases. it was a camel case under foia, where the affidavit did not properly establish why something was classified. what the district court judge here did, and set on the factual record, was it doesn't make sense. i want to go back to judge williams' question. why is it the press-enterprise standard? shouldn't we just say it is properly classified? the standard for classification at the lowest level, basically just says -- if there is a reasonable expectation that some harm could happen. damage to national security, but just some reasonable expectation of some sort of harm. it's almost an invitation to speculate. what the first amendment requires is more than that. that's what the teaching of resin apprise -- of press-enterprise ii was. >> i'm glad you raised this. the press-enterprise ii findings demonstrated that the interest in question would be prejudiced. so, prejudiced itself is a variable term. it could be prejudiced extremely or prejudiced at the margin. and

its not plausible. its not believable." " the bureau made the information public in response to numerous freedom of information act a man has been arrested in connecticut--- accused of phoning in a threat to the new sandy hook elementary school on the first day of school. the new building replaces the building that was demolished after the 2012 shooting that left 20 people and six educators dead. police say pierre beauvil called the school's main office a couple weeks back asking when the first day of school was... when they told him-- he called back and made a threat. 49 people were killed and dozens pulse nightclub terror attack. now we are hearing more of the 911 calls of family and friends of those inside the club during the shooting rampage. cnn's brynn gingras reports. caller: "i told him just to stay quiet and hide in a corner or something." heartbreaking 911 calls released of family and friends distraught as the pulse nightclub attack unfolded... knowing their loved ones were trapped inside - di

you always look at that plausible test they talk about when voters go into the voting booth can they see the candidate sitting there and performing the job of president. did the president of mexico do donald trump a favor in that regard? >> i'm scratching my head over that one. he has one of the lowest favorability in mexico. that made to sense to me quite frankly. but speaking about trying to be macho and being a man that can go toe to toe with someone, donald trump was facing the president of mexico and didn't have the guts to ask him to pay for the wall. yet he says i'm going to make them pay for the wall after crossing the border. we keep treating donald trump like a traditional candidate. he is not. he is not someone that we have ever seen in modern times. the way he knows how to rile up a base, the way he knows how to talk in code and blow racial whistles so that all of a sudden everybody knows exactly what he's saying, but he doesn't have to say it out loud is incredibly dangerous. we have to stop treating him like an actual candidate. there's a reason there are over 100 repub

>> it's a theory at this time but i think plausible. >> reporter: if that theory turns out to be true we can expect to see more of these monsters roll into the valley, turn the sky brown, polluting the air and wreaking havoc on our cities and streets. >> now st. louis rams are dust control regulations for working farms but not abandoned farm land and it looks like that's more days of monsoon season left and the rainfall numbers are below where they should be. the storm we're going to see this week could add to that. we started off at 62 degrees this morning, 90 for the high. a pocket of dry air over arizona for us right, now. all eyes are on the area of low pressure just to the south and over mexico right now. this is going to move up towards the north a so all the moisture is going to start to move up into our area. remember that we had the storms last thursday. that was part of this system so it's going to continue to impact ourcitycenter.com weather pattern as we head into this next week. this is what we're going to be seeing. tomorrow, sunny, dry, temperatures warm. heading into m

and one of the guys who was best at wielding this brush was thomas jefferson who managed to plausibly cast his federalist opponents in the politics of the 1790s as people who were out to restore aristocracy and monarchy in the country. they were not, but he could plausibly present them as so, and this was then quite devastating to their political prospects. i promise the rest of my answers had been shorter. [laughter] kathleen. >> [inaudible] everybody and all the institutions -- [inaudible] involved in this, what did you say about the church, the clergy -- >> well, i can't say too much, because i'm going to give another talk which you've invited me to give, which is very much on that topic, so i'll give the concise version. it is that in some ways religious life anticipates this republican culture, i argue, in that there is a major movement within protestant denominations beginning back in the 1730s which argues in favor of individual choice. that every believer is individually responsible at the end of days. and, therefore, no individual can be bound by some sort of parish commitmen

that plausible information i was look a prior medical records 65. she may run low. she was also said to be on medication ant histamine that is decreases your ability to tolerate heat. she was standing for are prolonged period of time wearing dark clothing sick potentially with pneumonia. it would make plausible sense that she could have gotten dehydrated that's what caused the collapse. >> and she keeps a crazy schedule. she does. how serious is pneumonia for 68-year-old woman? again looking over her medical records that were released last year, i mean she had thyroid issue and anti could ago lentz and blood thinners because she's clots in past she doesn't significant cardiac history in this tickler it said calcium scoring a calcifications around coronary arteries was 0. she would mean a low risk there again low blood pressure, and so, for 68-year-old in her condition i would say the someone who may have diabetes and other problems. later on sunday that same day she was seen looking and feeling better. is it normal for symptoms to come and go that quickly. i'm going

you always look at that plausible test they talk about when voters go into the voting booth can they see the candidate sitting there and performing the job of president. did the president of mexico do donald trump a favor in that regard? >> i'm scratching my head over that one. he has one of the lowest favorability in mexico. that made to sense to me quite frankly. but speaking about trying to be macho and being a man that can go toe to toe with someone, donald trump was facing the president of mexico and didn't have the guts to ask him to pay for the wall. yet he says i'm going to make them pay for the wall after crossing the border. we keep treating donald trump like a traditional candidate. he is not. he is not someone that we have ever seen in modern times. the way he knows how to rile up a base, the way he knows how to talk in code and blow racial whistles so that all of a sudden everybody knows exactly what he's saying, but he doesn't have to say it out loud is incredibly dangerous. we have to stop treating him like an actual candidate. there's a reason there are over 100 repub

you always look at that plausible test they talk about when voters go into the voting booth can theyee the candidate sitting there and performing the job of president. did the president of mexico do donald trump a favor in that regard? >> i'm scratching my head over that one. he has one of the lowest favorability in mexico. that made to sense to me quite frankly. but speaking about trying to be macho and being a man that can go toe to toe with someone, donald trump was facing the president of mexico and didn't have the guts to ask him to pay for the wall. yet he says i'm going to make them pay for the wall after crossing the border. we keep treating donald trump like a traditional candidate. he is not. he is not someone that we have ever seen in modern times. the way he knows how to rile up a base, the way he knows how to talk in code and blow racial whistles so that all of a sudden everybody knows exactly what he's saying, but he doesn't have to say it out loud is incredibly dangerous. we have to stop treating him like an actual candidate. there's a reason there are over 100 republi

steadiness and the american people need to see someone, if he's going to be successful, who is a plausible commander in chief. >> reporter: and underscoring the stakes, our new polling shows 34% of americans say tonight's debate will be important in deciding their vote. savannah? >> hallie jackson in the spin room, starting us off. now for how hillary in she is an experienced debater, comfortable with the ins and outs of policy, but her challenge tonight, to address issues of character and trustworthiness that have dogged her throughout this campaign. here's nbc's andrea mitchell. >> reporter: hillary clinton bracing for the biggest moment of her political life, aides say leaving nothing on the table. even today a last-minute prep session, after late-night mock debates all weekend. rehearsing at 9:00 philippe reines, a scrappy new yorker playing donald trump. >> you have 90 minutes and it's just a moderator and two of you on stage, you can run but you cannot hide. >> reporter: even with 40 debates under her belt, tonight's challenge for clinton, not knowing which trump will show up. so tod

movement and many other far right groups are operating in this region, you have to think that's a plausible theory. police say they see a connection with the upcoming celebrations, celebrating the reunification for germany happening over the weekend. they say there could be a link to those festivities as well. >> that is going to worry a lot of people when they hear that. what are authorities doing and how are they responding to what could be a heightened security threat or terror threat? guest: there are concerns. there are many demonstrations by our right groups plan over the weekend. there is a security sensitivity around this with chancellor merkel and so that's the kind of event that brings in many protesters. police have stepped up security and brought forward security measures that were planned and begun them this evening. they sealed off parts of the center of the city and introduced controls on the street and put more patrols out on the street. this mosque is a very important focus of sensitivity. brent: simon young in the eastern german city of dresden. time to talk business. time

so merely by being normal and plausible he can win the debate. >> i can't wait to watch it.ait. and then i'll talk to you guys on the other end of all of this must-see tv. thanks for talking with me. >> thank you. >> thank you, have a good one. >>> to today's battleground america tour. we're looking at the critical state of north carolina. the race is close there. nbc's chris jansing spoke to a roundtable to see what people there think of trump refusing to release his taxes. >> shows public trust, i'm reaching out, i'm disclosing information that the public may want to know. >> should donald trump release his taxes? >> absolutely. >> it's something everybody's done in the past. >> absolutely. that makes no exception for him. i don't see why he would feel the need to withhold them. what's the purpose of not releasing them? that's where you kind of call the question as to what are you hiding if you don't want to put it out there. you want to talk about everything else but we're not talking about your personal income or your business income. >> who thinks donald trump might be

is it even a plausible way to imagine how that could legitimately occur? no. no.other words, what we are dealing with here is crockery. we are dealing with people who would learn how to market policy for private benefit. now, back to the democratic party so i can lay a context for this, the democratic party began , not only as the party of indian relocation, but as the party of slavery. this requires a moment explanation because clearly democrats did not invent slavery. slavery has been around since the dawn of mankind. what the democrats invented is something called a positive good school of slavery. in other words, the democrats invented the idea that slavery is good, not merely for the master, but also for the slave. this is kind of unbelievable. historically people who defended slavery said slavery is the function of her brother regrettable necessity, dirty work to be done and someone has to do it and that's why we have slaves. the democrats came up with the idea that slavery benefits the slave. and i say this because there is an echo today in the way that dem

her background and training and 25 years in government and suddenly has selective amnesia it's no plausibler believable. >> is it believable. i don't know. bob to your point about lik likebility this came out this week if viewers did not hear about. it the fact according to this "washington post" poll her unfavorbilitys are highest they've been in her entire career. this sort of things does not make you more likable or trustworthy. >> this is baffle about this because on republican side you have a candidate that seems to go out of his way to cause problems for himself on almost a daily basis says things that have spent days of them trying to repair the problems they create on own side. on democratic side you have drip, drip, drip, almost every day. every time they tell us something about this salt emails or -- we get more stuff like this so bob, at least it leads to this question is hillary clinton doing more damage to hillary clinton than donald trump is. >> i think so and i think one of the most ridiculous things is cycle is that her interview was not recorded. apparently that's fbi polic

hillary clinton makes an it's really ironic when you think about it that the woman has the more plausible case to be the more credible commander-in-chief given what said himselfhas and given the fact that as in but evendwater's case, more so, you have military figures and not just military figures, but senior figures from past republican administrations coming out and saying they for him, they will vote for hillary clinton. gwen: and yet, dan, you had a project in the "the washington post" this week about what people believe in all 50 states. we read polls and don't know which is true but i think what is true after labor day is the be tightening ever so much? dan: i think it has tightened somewhat since the conventions. happened after the convention was she got a bigger bounce out of her convention thattrump got from his and gave her what appeared to be an expanded lead. to settle down and i think we're waiting really for the round of polls that we'll coming over the next week or so to give us a fuller sense of where we are after labor day but number of a battleground states that are clos

everything i just showed you is going to take a lot but it's plausible he could get there. he would still need more. he would need to do something maybe in colorado, maybe in wisconsin. maybe in pennsylvania, maybe in new hampshire. those would be the four most likely targets but those are reaches. if trump locks down the red state, wins the obama states and gets one more, that's what you need to make happen. >> to your opening proviso, nicolle believes these numbers are on the move because we live in changing times and what a week this has been. >> do the demographics nationally defy what's happening in the states where he's stronger? are women more attracted to him? i don't mean that especially with him. are women more drawn to his candidacy in nevada and florida than they are nationally? >> it's not just gender. it's class, it's economic class. we talk about that divide we see college white, non-college whites. iowa is a perfect example. >> he's been ahead in iowa for months. >> here's a state, obama won by 10 points in 2008. he had no problem carrying it in 2012. in 201

people on both sides of the debate would agree that's not a plausible, realistic thing that's going to happen. so there are much more pressing questions, some of which donald trump addressed in his speech. such as how we're going to handle the folks who are already here living legally, how we're going to process people in the future, and how we're going to secure the border from new people coming in. gwen: deportation is not an unimportant thing to work out, exactly what happens to 11 million people, how many are considered to have criminal records and whether it's possible or affordable to do this. >> whether it's practical to do. when you're talking about 11 million. trump keeps trying to tiptoe around that. he said what we do with the 11 million people is not the most important issue here. i'm sorry, congress has debated that issue for about the last 10 years that kind of is the most important issue. what he ended up doing was trying in the fine print to soften what he had said, which is we're not going to deport apparently all 11 million in the first week, which was never remotely

to me. >> i need better than plausible. >> well then i defer to the court's interpretation on that issue. i need to understand what's going on here. i understand what saying is potential discrimination, in addition to purposeful discrimination injury there might be fewer results were you have to show injury. the question that she's posing is what's the difference if you don't have two different claims mark. >> i'm sorry, the only thing i can say say is that if you prove purposeful discrimination, that puts you in line to get this other remedy where the state is now under equivalent preclearance for the court. that is a benefit to the plaintiffs. i would say there is precious few cases where purposeful discrimination has been found by district court in these types of cases, much less where the district court has found it was not purposeful discrimination relying upon extensive findings and then the case was reversed by the appellate court. intentional discrimination is the quintessential issue of fact that relies upon the credibility of the witnesses in analyzing all of the. >> i agree wi

as signals were almost the only plausible source that could detect military preparations within the soviet union and the biggest challenge in november 1948 the soviets abrupted change in all of military systems and it was unprecedented development that washington and london briefed that the soviets were about to talk a military attack on the west. new soviet codes proved far more challenging and, indeed, most of the high-level soviet codes would remain unbroken probably in 1979 when super computers and advanced mathematical researched what one nsa paper referred to height of american in the cold war around the time of soviet invasion of afghanistan. nsa brought in outside panels of leading mathematical and experts to review the state of the russian possible and possible solutions and evaluations are almost nothing of a tale and pes missism. no national strategy should be based on the hope that we will be able to read -- the rest of the sentence was redacted but it was pretty obvious it was referring to high-level encrypted traffic. at one point in the 1950's, nsa had five purpose computers