what does pluralism do? so important in the social dimension. and of course, we're such an astute group, we've already jumped about five dimensions ahead. but let's not - let's just put it on the back burner and keep it in mind. now, looking at the hare krishna, a lot of people thought the hare krishnas were some kind of a new age cult when they seemed to emerge on the scene in the '70s, and part of it was just their aggressive proselytizing, but it's another very ancient form of hinduism. now, from the experiential dimension, we're going to meet shankara pundit, who's president of the hare krishna temple in the chicago area. and shankara, who was a seeker - he's an american, was in a rock band, looked for answers to life, picked up some books, picked up the bhagavad gita, picked up the literature from the hare krishna movement, and he found. well, he's going to talk about his own experience as a hare krishna, and so we'll listen to identity and relationship in his comments, but also the joy, the bhakti, the pleasure, the bliss that a hare krish

do very well in the caucus state. >> the majority or at least the plurality to win an election that and stacks of cash.dent obama is in the lead but that advantage could soon be swamped if it hasn't already by waves of gop fund-raising. the super pacs brought in $51 million in 2011. mitt romney raised $57 million for his campaign and while he spent millions already he also has that fortune of his to spending on the rest of 2012. and then there is the $30 million brought in my restore our future. he received a million dollars from the koch brothers. nearly $400,000 from executives at goldman sachs. $300 thousand dollars from construction executive and $400,000 from the wal-mart family. newt gingrich has raised some $15 million so far much of it already spent. myth's super pac has raised from $12 million but nearly all of that was spent in florida and nearly all of that was provided by one family. we're joined by nia-malika henderson. thanks for being with us. >> it's great to be here david. >> any incites on the romney campaign as tried to decide what mattered most? >> they are obviously feeling very, v

you're talking about this in referencing shooters, you're using the plural, police have only said that they have confirmation of one shooter. do know something differently than they do? >> hmm, well, i'm not sure if i'll be able -- well, i did not know that they had only confirmed one shooter. but from the reports i was hearing, there were two. >> and this is -- you heard from school officials? students who witnessed this? >> yes. >> and you were saying -- >> i don't know if i'm going to get in trouble for saying things differently from the police. i don't know. >> again, you described it as hearing plywood slamming. do you remember how many shots you heard? >> i heard about three before it registered as gunshots. and then it kept going. i didn't really stop to count the shots. i do remember it was multiple shots before it registered as something that was happening. >> jonathan sylak, i want to ask you to stick around. we're going to take a quick break and talk more on the other side. this is msnbc's breaking news coverage of the high school shooting in chardon, ohio. we're back with much more after this. i wouldn't do that. p

do believe is that he took two shortcuts. one was he said, hey, my opposition is divided so i can win with a plurality. i don't have to work hard at getting a majority. second i'll knock off my main opponent is and that is not working. >> greta: i think what is interesting, michigan because governor romney should win michigan. he won michigan before. his family hails from michigan. but santorum seems to be doing better in michigan. >> it isn't that important who wins michigan. what is important -- >> he can wrestle those votes away from romney. >> what important that he beat gingrich. if gingrich finishes 20-30 points behind santorum in arizona and in michigan, then gingrich is basically out on super tuesday. anyone that doesn't like romney goes for santorum. right now santorum's problem is not beating romney. that will come on super tuesday. she beating gingrich and he did a very effective job on tuesday. >> greta: super tuesday, santorum has a shot? >> he does. the issue is, can he defeat gingrich deviceively and get the moment and momentum, other does romney close the sale. you asked a good question

to see what iran is going to be doing with the nuclear weapon, when they get them it doesn't give us -- the options are not pretty. >> polls show americans by pluralitysn some cases substantial majority would favor military action to prevent iran getting nuclear weapons. that is the choice. not the choice between the world as is it today and a world after strike. but a world where iran has nuclear weapons. >> greta: it's hard to go backwards, too, one someone has acquired nuclear weapons. nobody goes backwards. >> not so far. we have the case of north korea as an example. as i say, it doesn't stop with iran. three or four other states in the rion will get nuclear weapons. that is what proliferation is. they inspire other nations to get the same. >> greta: a switch, united states warning our good friend israel. why? we will tell you. major general bob scales goes "on the record" next. also, a big oscar battle but it does not include george clooney and brad pitt. who is at the center of the oscar fight? stay tuned. alist. a complete multivitamin enhanced for what's important to me. vision. energy. prenatal. heart. [ man] new centrum specialist helps mak

do this. >> reporter: henry liebman is an immigration attorney-turned- real estate developer. everything he builds is financed with foreign money. >> the plurality is chinese. it's families that want to send a kid to school here. >> reporter: just four years ago, fewer than 300 chinese investors applied for these visas in the united states. now it's up to 3,000 a year. so why at 20 years old is this program just now taking off? >> it wasn't popular at all until the bust. it became one of the few source of financing. >> reporter: with more than 1500 investors at a half million dollars a pop, liebman has a lot of financing, enough to singlehandedly reshape the seattle area known as so doe. >> the vision here real simply put, this should look like south of market. >> reporter: it's not unlike what we saw in san francisco around at&t park. here's safeco field. and look at what's going on right across the street. there's a six-story office building going up funded completely by eb-5 investors. it doesn't end with the foreign investment private buildings. here's a new overpass on interstate 520 here in washington. it's a $4.8 billion project part of i

plural. recovery is thousands of people, individuals, families, groups, organizations, businesses, communities, regions, each organism in its own way having decisions to make and needing to be empowered to make those decisions and to do the things that they need to do to recover. and, you know, as a public agency you can be in the way of that or you can support it. and it's way better to support it. because what happened in santa cruz is everybody in city hall and the e.o.c. was stumped what to do next. their first thought was, ok, we can't let anybody in until we demolish all the buildings. well, that was a big nonstarter for the business community because their livelihoods depended on getting access to those buildings. so the long story short is after about a week of kind of floundering with what to do, the city kind of reinvented itself and that's when i got plunked in as incident commander and that really i think illustrated two things. one is that you have to reinvent your organization. even if you're well planned you have to reinvent things because you don't know who's going to be available, you don't know who's going to be stuck on the bridge, you don't know who's going to show up and you really don't know how

make up a plurality of the country and or really the key to what happens in the cells in the east and who have lots of support on the other side of the border with pakistan or instead of doing there if they recognized the karzai government which is really a northern alliance come made up mainly of was there. so what they did they struggled raul's basically supporting the government that the passions won. no no one has ever won a war with the passions and you don't have to go back very far i mean the british or the russians or whatever they're right back to the greeks and i'm on the bills no one wins that war so they started off on the wrong foot to begin with and then it's occupation you know t. lawrence lawrence of arabia had a essay they wrote in one thousand nine hundred called the algebra of occupation and he said he has six months and after six months. you know lose well it's been ten years and we're losing you know let's pull this a little bit out of afghanistan and kind of talk about the deja vu aspect of this a whole lot of people pointing to vietnam and iraq and mistakes the u.s. has made it time and time again but doesn't seem to be learning from now on the other

do that individually and in religious communities and organizations. they can have different views about the proper way of ordering marital relationships and sexual reproduction. that is good for the point of view of pluralism. the administration is trying to crush its by forgetting that when you make these announcements, you do not take into account people's consciousness. yet the trade something very basic fare -- each trade it for something very basic. >> we have microphone set up. >> i thought he raised a very interesting question. how did we get sharehere? only a couple months ago we had a principle that we would not use federal funding for abortions because of a violate people's rights. how did we get here? coercion and a deception. nobody wanted that health care act. the polling was 65%-35 -- 65-35. they force it to congress by bribing people, deception. the president agreed to pass this order. >> do you have a question? >> they are trampling on our rights. it is incredible peer in it is unprecedented. they are being deceptive. are they trying to pull the roof? that is my question. >> richard mentioned that what provision allow them to do this. they said the department of health and human services wo

plurality of catholics who go to church every week, including myself, support it. i just don't -- i just don't get what they're up to. and i think ---ion, what the bishops do to fight the idea that woman ought to be entitled to have contraception under their insurance plans with no copay seems like just crazy to me. >> and i think, also, the optics of this are not particularly good. we are getting -- i'll let you say it, maggie, since it's from your paper. you have the breaking issue, that carolyn maloney walked out of this, according to politico, walked out of these hearings. planned parenthood tweet showing all the men in the woman. the gop oversight hearing on birth control, what is wrong with this picture? it's all men. again -- >> very smart point, as you just said. >> and i'll let you take it away, maggie. but how, from both a political -- the political calculus and also the optic of this seem irrational. >> yeah, i think the way this was constructed, i think, exactly, as to your original question, is that is this a winner in a general election? it is a real risk in a general election. it is going to play much better with the base. and i think that t

doing. >> wow. >> there's a brand new poll out that shows a plurality of independents and republicans are againstgious poll right now this morning indicates 52% of catholics support it. >> look at that. we weren't going to bring this up. >> it's definitely not made up. liberals are taking that tact. >> by the way, andrea will go down to cpac after "the five" and reporting live down there for us. >> they should let her speak. she's good! >> we'll see. juan and andrea, thank you very much. spirited debate. >> meanwhile, today's kindergarteners learning reading, writing and weaponry? the homework work sheet that has parents outraged. are they overreacting? we're going to report and you are going to decide. and nascar legend daryl waltrip joins us live with a big surprise. he's bringing his coffee into studio e. just take a right. [ male announcer ] imagine facing the day with less chronic osteoarthritis pain. imagine living your life with less chronic low back pain. imagine you, with less pain. cymbalta can help. cymbalta is fda-approved to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. one non-narcotic pill

do that individually and in religious communities and organizations. they can have different views about the proper way of ordering marital relationships and sexual reproduction. that is good for the point of view of pluralism. the administration is trying to crush its by forgetting that when you make these announcements, you do not take into account people's consciousness. yet the trade something very basic fare -- each trade it for something very basic. >> we have microphone set up. >> i thought he raised a very interesting question. how did we get here? only a couple months ago we had a principle that we would not use federal funding for abortions because of a violate people's rights. how did we get here? coercion and a deception. nobody wanted that health care act. the polling was 65%-35 -- 65-35. they force it to congress by bribing people, deception. the president agreed to pass this order. >> do you have a question? >> they are trampling on our rights. it is incredible peer in it is unprecedented. they are being deceptive. are they trying to pull the roof? that is my question. >> richard mentioned that what provision allow them to do this. they said the department of health and human services would o

plural. >> reporter: it's hard to know. it's hard to know whether or not we're going to see any kind of improvement in their gdp which is what they need most. they need to do some very tough changes and becky points out this report from the troika. the tough changes that they need to do actually make the gdp worse. they need to cut everybody's salaries dramatically to be more competitive. when you cut salaries dramatically, what happens is this people can spend less money. the short-term effect is very tough. in theory once you cut salaries dramatically you get more job creation, right, because they will come in because the population is cheaper. but that gives more time. so in the short run, things are going to get tougher before they get better. >> michelle, you say look at this as a process not an event. what's the next step in the process? >> reporter: oh, well, we wait to see what happens with greece and whether or not they make the changes to the reforms that are going to make it easier to start a business. new construction, things that would make the economy actually grow will be the first round of business and then we wait to see what the market re

do that in religious communities or religious organizations. they can have different views about what the proper way of ordering marital relationships, sexual reproduction and that is good to the point of view of pluralism. the administration is trying to crush that by forgetting that when you make these kinds of public policies you don't take into account people's conscience you have betrayed something very basic in the fabric of our nation. >> now we would like to open it up to questions from the audience. we have a microphone being set up here. right over here, please. >> thank you. i thought mr. capretta raised an interesting question. frankly how did we get here and it was only couple months ago that we have this well-established principle in this country that we would not use federal funding for abortions because it would violate people's rights so how did we get here. you gentlemen have been very kind to two words come to mind, coercion and conception. nobody wanted the health care act. its polling was 65-35 against the act. they forced it through congress by bribing people, by deception. .. oversee a new definition of preventive health care services that would be applied to all health care plans

but we do know about the authors of the worm, without having caught them yet, is that they are tremendously sophisticated programmers, and the reason i use the plural, is it's clearly not one person, so much proficiency in so many different hards, hard to imagine one person would have that level of ability and knowledge in so maybe different areas. so the likely culprit is a group, well-funded, probably funded by organized crime, who set out to create a very large, very stable botnet which could be used as a platform for all manner of mischief,man making platform. >> if you look at the early indications of how -- strong tikes to fake antivirus, the keyboard check is really interesting because nobody wants to be arrested by local authorities for compromising machines in their country, and looking towards eastern europe to fine out what that looks like. it's one of those really interesting -- i agree, we referred the case to the fbi early on. they've been working the case for quite some time. i know they're working hard on it. i don't have any -- i don't have a picture of the guy. >> maybe i'm just enjoying the mystery too much. can you rule out the

what we do know about the author of the worm who without having caught them yet is that they are tremendously sophisticated programmers and the reason i used the plural is it is almost certainly not one person because the worm demonstrated such a high level of proficiency and so many different areas that it's impossible to mention that one person that would have that ability and knowledge and so many different areas that have the same time, so the likely culprit is a group well funded probably funded by a and organized crime syndicate who set out to create a very large, very stable botnet that can be used as a platform for all mischief, a money-making platform. >> and if you look at the early indications of how conficker is being leveraged, strong ties to the anti-virus and some type of affiliate program, the key word check is interesting because no one wants to be arrested by local authorities for compromising machines in their companies. we are looking towards eastern europe to find out what that looks like. but it's one of those interesting -- i agree we refer the case to the fbi yearly on. they've been working the case for some time. i know that

do you know that by having an election so that individuals, the total population, how could you run a presidential candidate when in states like california, york and illinois will come in with large pluralitiesprobably stolen pleurallities in those states to win for the democrats. host: i'm going to stop you there so we have time to respond and a follow from an earlier viewer who wants to know who are the major voters to fairvote.org. so on both points, electoral college, the president's re-election effort and your donors. guest: we are not a democratic stocking horse. our long-time chair and his 90th birthday is this week so i want to give a shout out to him is john anderson was in 1980, independent candidate for president and john was an independent, challenging the outside of the major parties and that really is a reflection of the fact that we are trying to put voters first and we look at the national popular vote, that's one of our several proposals and there's other groups doing terrific work on that you should check out. we're not saying that's our issue exclusively but that it is a nonpartisan proposal. if you every evidence look at any evidence, strong evidence, both marriage -- maj

what we do know about the author of the worm who without having caught them yet is that they are tremendously sophisticated programmers and the reason i used the plural is it is almost certainly not one person because the worm demonstrated such a high level of proficiency and so many different areas that it's impossible to mention that one person that would have that ability and knowledge and so many different areas that have the same time, so the likely culprit is a group well funded probably funded by a and organized crime syndicate who set out to create a very large, very stable botnet that can be used as a platform for all mischief, a money-making platform. >> and if you look at the early indications of how conficker is being leveraged, strong ties to the anti-virus and some type of affiliate program, the key word check is interesting because no one wants to be arrested by local authorities for compromising machines in their companies. we are looking towards eastern europe to find out what that looks like. but it's one of those interesting -- i agree we refer the case to the fbi yearly on. they've been working the case for some time. i know that