plutonium. plutonium. pu2. and you know what plutonium will do? plutium as welasnium35 ll undergo fission when a neutron taps it. d so this is used for power production. u235, used for power production. historical, when the bombs were dropped ck in world war ii, the bomb that devastated hiroshima was a uranium 235 bomb. you know how much uranium 235 was left after the bomb s detonated? almost none. the united states shot its arsenal, one bomb, none left to speak of. you know what the bomb that hit nagasaki was? plutonium. plutonium. does the same thing. plutonium is made from uranium 235--238, very plentiful, but you got to bombard it with neutrons so you can make it. you can make plutonium. now, why do we get this 200 million electron volt? that's what i want you to know. you--all you guys know that uranium splits into elements and you get a lot of energy off, and you all know that the neutrons will cause new reactions. niceroony, that's junior high school knowledge, yeah, anyone takes a science course. what we wanna know is why all that energy,

there's no such thing as plutonium for peace. fact this reactor remains under construction, the fact that they continue to have all of the facilities that they need to continue the collection of material while the western powers now give up any sanction leverage that they will ever have in the future. you'll never get five nation, two of which are russia and china, ever to go back into the sanction business again. as far as i'm concerned this may turn out to be swimmingly successful. in 1994, clinton said the same thing. >> wow. that really kind of says it all right there. that's an image we have vong st in our minds. major general bob scales on the line with us now. i'm hooked into social media. people can hear me clicking. they want me to get a new school keyboard. i should do that. i don't know if this would have been the context. i'm seeing so much of it mentioned. i'm wondering why he wouldn't. do you think that came into the process? >> absolutely not. this is echelons above anyone. >> what do you mean by that? >> what i me

these convaults a herry of plutonium.hey sound arafats blood and urine was stained with the pure loan yum 210. >> but this latest test was on his flesh and bloans. buried since his dead in 2000ur. the sa samples were gathered whn his bodies with unearthed last year three teams took sam else. aure yan team carried are rout out carry a test.the french resa secret. but as three investigating 345g its though now have new evidence ant the looming question beyond you of that is whether the sale shifts the case to the national criminal court. pramentsdz then miss air adequate and her daughter will bring suspects to the trial and learn once and for all not what killed yasser heir fat, but who. >>> engineers in japan are preparing to remove fuel rods from the puke sho bounding fuku. >> it's the most dangerous operation to decommission the plant as erica woods reports now. >> reportersnreporters and joure given a tour to the puk fukushia plan. if could be gist as at the just if it goes wrong of. >> wear the mass being makes the wor

the problem with that reactor is that it produces or could produce very nice plutonium for a bomb. for example, in weapons programs around the world these heavy water reactor have been used to produce pleproduce plutonium. all the while iran has been building this other plant that could provide a different route to the bomb. >> and getting more expertise, and getting better at doing this? >> right. >> you've been listening to our guests. >> mm-hmm. >> and is there a version of an agreement that could come out of those particular parties getting enough of what they want, israel and iran? >> iran is member of the treaty, and so iran has made this all along that it has a right to enrich and to have this heavy water reactor. it has a right to make highly enriched uranium for use of fuel. now they have broken a lot of their obligations. >> so they haven't been playing by the rules of a treaty that they signed. >> absolutely. but when you look at the future i think it's unrealistic to ask or to be able to get iranian agreement for no enrichment, no heavy water, no heavy water reactor. in

and more weapons grade plutonium.of reactors that india used to build its atomic bomb which it called a peaceful reactor and a peaceful bomb. so with normal white water reactors you cannot use that plutonium to build reactors. but with the kind advocated by this film you're producing weapons grade plutonium. that's why the clinton administration killed the program to build these reactors in 1994 in this country. they create more weapons grade plutonium. and the idea that you can -- one of the ideas behind the film is that well these kind of reactors actually feed on themselves and create their own fuel and you can use all the nuclear waste from the existing nuclear power plants and put in these reactors and they'll eventually process it. you have to operate them for hundreds of years in order for them to devour the nuclear waste that exists. >> i would give you the last word, robert stone, but you'll have the last word tomorrow night when your movie airs as this time tomorrow night. a fascinating debate, robert kenned

when we look at the iraq iraq plutonium reactor, the reactor moving towards the production of plutonium be honest, that bewilders the world because it is ultimately to create the type of plutonium that gives it a track towards nuclear weapons. at the conference at the museum, quote, netanyahu can't judge an iran deal because it's not even done yet. should we give veto power to israel over this negotiations? >> no, i don't think we should give veto power to anybody in the world. my perspective is what is in our own national security interest on the iraq plan, yes, it's not finished but if doing the interim period from the public reports you allow them to continue to construct a move towards conclusion, a conclusion that one's fuel makes it no longer a target to dismantle and pathway to nuclear weapons, that's problematic. it seems to me they can cease their construction during a constructive negotiation period without losing any opportunities for the future of an agreement cannot be achieved. the insistence on marching on its construction is worrysome because it's only march can lead to

the nature of that agreement was that they would stop the plutonium reactor. in return, they would get various concessions. different,gimes are but north korea is a bizarre dictatorship that relies entirely on support from one country, china. beenood aid that it has able to cage out of the united states over the years. discussingat we are now with iran is quite different. the nature of the sanctions is quite different. i do not see that they are comparable. at some point, yes, we made promises to build reactors. situationse that being the same and i do not think it is appropriate to make that comparison. we have to take each case on its own merit. we have to make sure we have verification and this is something that is built into this. the north koreans kicked out the iaea. to this day, they have not permitted the kind of inspection that iran has routinely. we have a better sense of what the iranians are up to. the iranians are not as far along in terms of their ability to build weapons. the north koreans have than working on their plutonium program starting in

what are they going to do with the heavy reactor that could produce plutonium.e sure they don't have any other hidden sites with regards to enrichment. there are a lot of conditions, a lot of steps that have to be put in place to make sure that they indeed are serious about eliminating their nuclear capabilities. >> schieffer: mr. secretary, you seem especially skeptical of the iranians, why is that? >> you know, my experience is that the iranians not only obviously promoted terrorism, but they directly engaged in terms of conflict. the iranians actually shot down one of our drone planes that looks over that part of the gulf. and we sent a clear message to them. that we were going to have f16s be able to accompany our drones and if they try to go after our drones again we're going to shoot them down. and they backed off. so, i think it's important, the lesson i guess i draw from this is you better operate from a position of strength if you want to deal with the iranians. >> o'donnell: we'll hear more from bob's interview later in the broadcast. we'll be right ba

iran will halt work at the plutonium reactor.ew inspections provide access to the nuclear facilities and allow the international community to verify whether iran is keeping its commitments. these are substantial limitations that will prevent them from building a nuclear weapon. they cut off the most likely paths to a bomb. meanwhile, this will create time and space over six months for more negotiations to address concerns about the program. because of this agreement, iran cannot use negotiations as cover to advance its program. on our side, the united states and our friends and allies provided modest relief. we will refrain from imposing new sanctions and allow the iranian government access to a portion of the revenue that they have been denied through sanctions. but, the broader architecture of sanctions will remain in place and we will continue to enforce them vigorously. if they do not meet their commitments, we will turn off the relief and ratchet up the pressure. over the next six months, we will work to negotiate a comprehe

the news media is really quite bogus and the reason is that iran has no ability to reprocess the plutonium that will would be produced by such a reactor and indeed has even already made it clear in the talks that is prepared as part of a deal to have arrangements where the where by the the plutonium would be removed so that it can even be reprocessed so this is really a bogus issue ok that's one of the reasons why the french intervention all right gentlemen waiting and on the word bogus here thank you very much many thanks to my guests in washington and. paris and thanks to our viewers for watching us here in our deep see you next time and remember cross talk. exactly what happened that day i don't know but a woman killed. piers later is when i got arrested for. for a crime i did not do. we have numerous cases where police officers lie about polygraph results. and people to try to the police officers don't beat people anymore i mean it just doesn't happen really. in the course of interrogation why because there's been this is like meant no because the psychological techniques are more effe

going to be a bad agreement again as you mentioned it not only on the iranian agenda but on the plutonium agenda one of the issues that was raised by a lot of abuse is that we were very afraid of the. reopening of the reinforcement of the iraq plants which is not about now only on one time and you know many man you well imagine iran's just signed in. another agreement with the i.a.e.a. for more and more inspections the most inspected country in the history of the i.a.e.a. so i'm sorry with the for the french position is just nonsense ok i'm sorry gareth you want to jump in go ahead i'm not defending and i know i know you i know you know i know you're not going anywhere i know you're not defending it ok let's make that clear go ahead gareth jump in. i was going to a peter i was going to address the question of the use of force because i think that there's a danger that the israelis can convince at least some people in the international community that it is serious about an attack and that that is going to exert some influence on the talks and that would be extremely unfortunate because i a

going to be a bad agreement again as you mentioned it not only on the iranian agenda but on the plutonium agenda one of the issues that was raised by a lot of abuse is that we were very afraid of the. reopening of the reinforcement of the iraq plants which is not a vote on the imams i mean you know many manuals i mean you don't iran's just sign . and another under even with the i.a.e.a. for more and more inspections the most inspected country in the history of the i.a.e.a. so i'm sorry what if the french position is just nonsense ok i'm sorry gareth you want to jump in go ahead i'm not defending and i know i know you i know you know i know you're not going any and i know you're not defending it ok let's make that clear go ahead gareth jump in. i was going to peter i was going to address the the question of the use of force because i think that there is a danger that the israelis can convince at least some people in the international community that it is serious about an attack and that that is going to exert some influence on the talks and that would be extremely unfortunate because i am

the news media is really quite bogus and the reason is that iran has no ability to reprocess the plutonium that will would be produced by such a reactor and indeed has even already made it clear in the talks that it's prepared as part of a deal to have arrangements where the whereby the the plutonium would be removed so that it can't even be reprocessed so this is really a bogus issue ok that's one of the reasons why the french intervention all right gentlemen way to end on the word bogus here thank you very much many thanks to my guests in washington and. and thanks to our viewers for watching us here in our deep see you next time and remember. the a. margy dot com is launching a special project to mark the appalling scale of violence in iraq. we want you to know. if you. got the opportunity. to start to construct your own. kids don't want to be a bit. don't want to meet gangsters you don't want to be drug dealers they don't want to blow with all the time that a kid came before he can see. you just meet the boat is there i was like oh probably going to hook. up with the wrong clue. but i

to do with the construction of heavy water -- that would presumably allow the iranians to produce plutonium needed in the making of atomic homs. -- atomic bombs. the other problem is the uranium that iran has taught isles in the recent years. they want to bring that down to 5%. so the french want to be sure that the stock at 20% is handled in one way or another so it can no longer be enriched to go to 80%. it was definitely the french who were against it. however, what also has to be added is that diplomats are saying that other members were a little bit uneasy about the speed of this agreement and certainly the gulf states, not to speak of israel, very and easy about what was happening. they can all be placed on the french. the french argue that this is the moment to make maximum demands on tehran. number one, tehran wants the sanctions lifted. secondly, president rouhani has really placed his political life on this. this is probably another defeat for him and he may not have much time to come to an agreement. so we have to be in the but careful about how long this can be relayed -- be del

well to make nuclear fuel for power stations you need to enrich to uranium or plutonium and all come back to that to about two percent but generally the five percent is it is used as the top level that allows you to conduct utilization which is slower release of nuclear energy by stressing atoms took her by power huge amounts of homes except. in order to produce nuclear fuel two for the nuclear weapons you need to enrich to eighty percent in a bar to create a space in the atom very high rates very quickly to provide the devastating effect so basically by limiting it to five percent in my opinion so uranium that prevented the west now as well israel has been very angry about this and it has actually come out and said that allowing iran to continue enriching uranium even at lower levels brings it closer to nuclear weapons capability isn't there any small amount of truth in that. well our i've recently been in israel and i absolutely understand the position but prime minister netanyahu and the israelis are taking on this hour that could be key to this and it has been mentioned previousl

that would give it a plutonium path. we could have done betr.elissa: that is an argument we have heard from a lot of science. do you disagree? >> i disagree, although i think that the point to specific invalid. we have to make sure our long-term deal does dismantle most centrifuges, prevents the plutonium produced in reactor from evebeing completed and get some of the low enriched uranium out. but we have to acknowledge the 20% is now apparently going to be rendered inert or unusae. that is a good tng. also, 6 billion in unfroze assets were 7 million, it is real money, but it is also 1 percent of the gdp for one year which means there is no long-term economic recovery. there will have to prove if it is serious that it is willing to do some really serious things. if you can debate whether they got more than they gave. i won't even stronger disagree, but i think that the important issue here, it is only a six month interim deal commando rera trying to do is set the conditions. 6 billion will not give them a lot of long-term help if they fail to co

the iranians already have 100 pounds of enriched plutonium. time is of the essence, and yet the talks in geneva which looked so promising when senator kerry and others made their way to general near have. >>> we're going to have all this with k.t. mcfarland coming up. >>> jonathan martin set to meet now with the nfl's special investigator this next week. the informal will be looking into allegations that the dolphins guard ritchie incognito and others harassed martin. incognito was suspended shortly after martin quilt the team. the league is also vinvestigatig whether the team knew of the bullying and mishandled the entire matter. >>> why british investigators are questioning a newspaper editor. and get ready for a lunar light show involving a comet and the sun. there's a preview. it's out of this world, we're going to tell you where the olympic flame is burning bright. as a business owner, i'm constantly putting out fires. so i deserve a small business credit card with amazing rewards. with the spark cascard from capital one, i get 2% cash ba

. >> in order to work nuclear weapons require highly enriched uranium or plutonium. uranium is found in nature. >>> at times the video resembles an introduction to nuclear physics, explaining how uranium is enriched and what plutonium is, and why, as a result of the deal, iran will be unable to produce a wepan. he explained what the deal means for sanctions. let me tell you what the first step does not too. some are mutting out misinformation. i want to be clear. it does not lift the current architecture of our sanctions. >> some in congress are not persuaded. >> i do thing with my heart and soul that iran is a threat. >> occasions are that when they returned from the holiday members of congress will deliver bipartisan sanctions only if it does not live up to the deal. not an immediate tightening of restrictions. >> we cannot commit ourselves to an endless cycle of conflict. tough talk may be easy to do politically. it's not the right thing to do for our security. >> the administration asked iran for help. finding an american that disappeared on an iranian island in

they call it "a breakout" to take the uranium and plutonium and turning it into a nuclear weapon. under the provisions of this deal, they would halt enrichment of uranium above five %. they would dilute at a time uranium they have 20% and make that inoperable. there will be no additional 7 triv fuse. that a great deal of criticism. many people who are against this deal called it a sucker's deal believe the centrifuges would have to be destroyed in an interim deal. there is something called a heavy water reactor that could produce plutonium at a place called iraq within iran and within the provisions of this deal, that facility will not be brought online. secretary john kerry made the rounds of some sunday shows this morning. what he was trying to emphasize was there are very intrusive inspections now that will be going on over the course of the in connection six months as these powers try to negotiate a more comprehensive deal. >> we do that with eyes absolutely wide open. we have no illusions. you don't -- you don't do this on the basis of somebody's statements to you. you do it

he mentions the plutonium program. we are talking about working to halt the progress of that plutonium program. we talk about making limits on the enrichment capacity, how to address the stockpile, neutralize a portion of it. we are getting at those concerns in the first step of the agreement and it's a common sense question. why wouldn't you want for the first time in a decade to halt the progress of the program while you have a negotiation. we think it would be far more destabilizing to allow the iranians to move forward with their program as we have negotiations. >> ben rhodes, thank you for joining us. we appreciate it. >>> when we come back, the president's terrible horrible no-good very bad week is coming to an end. but will his administration's quote, fumbling of the obama care rollout cost the president more than just some personal embarrassment? >>> later, even an academy award winning man like matt damon can have trouble getting attention when he wants it. ahead, damon tells me why he needs your help on his l

it can produce plutonium as a by-product, however it is important to note that it is not ready yet, this reactor. it won't be ready until ear eary early 2013. and it thought be possible to divert this kind of blew tone yum to weapons materials unless you stop those kinds of safeguards. so it is a contagious issue that might also be a little bit exaggerated because of this lack of trust that exists in these negotiations. a lot of problems is the intention behind the state behavior. it's very difficult to separate the energy uses from political uses. many hours have been spent here in geneva, and it's been really positive. it's the first time they've talked about this seriously. this is a positive sign even if we don't get an agreement out of it today or tomorrow, it's a great achievement to have these negotiations. >> iran has been known for its strict regime but now there are some changes. after being elected hassan rouhani has been showing openness not only in politics but at the country's borders. >> reporter: in iran there is a list and ton are those that range from the criminal to th

plantves a plutonium unmolested and plutonium has only one use, and bombs. it is a bad deal and it has to be killed. >> we realize we have been misled and it was a mistake to include him in our report. for that, we are very sorry. minutes" not "60 finest hour. the source was a british security contractor who had given differing accounts to his superiors and the fbi about his role in that rate. how does a venerable program get caught in a trap like this one? >> this is every journalists' nightmare. sometimes you say to yourself, this is too good to be true and it is too good to be true. when you're dealing with a mercenary, that is what this guy is is is a mercenary, all your red flags should be up. i can only conclude because it took them an awful long time to retract it. but they really did not have enough sources other places to find out if it was too good to be true. in theused to be security business. they should have checked with the fbi. in the business of journalism, i think we all share this. this is a hazard of a one source story. ,f you go with one

agreed to halt construction of a heavy water reactor, it could have provided them with a source of plutonium for a nuclear weapon. in turn, the major powers will partially lift a trade embargo. >> it's the heart of the possible, which is verifiable and clear in its capacity to make the region safer. >> saxby chambliss issued a warning about the iranians at their word. >> i just don't see this movement in the direction of preventing iran from developing a nuclear weapon at all. >> in the past, iranian leaders have threatened to wipe israel off the map and pro israel lobbyists have been pushing members of congress to take a tough line. benjamin netanyahu called the deal a historic mistake. u.s. president barack obama got on the phone with him to offer his reassurances. obama told netanyahu that the major powers will pursue a lasting peaceful and comprehensive solution and israel has good reason to be skeptical about iran's intentions but wants u.s. and israeli officials to begin consultations on the deal immediately. those who follow the talks have doubts of their own. one specialist on middle

plutonium or urani in there. he got the call from the chief eaier this rning to get down here ap because batm needed him to help. he and tman showe up in the bat mobile, and just in theick of time, they re able to dismantlehatever that device was, that riddler set up for this poor woman and save her before the cablear came o down the street. like isaid, tre were probably at least 500 people here eering him on the whole way. >> happy to out here. why did you want to come out he? family. to suprt miles and his >> it was fun. it was so much fun. he cam alive in his little mask. he was so batman in that moment, and we got to see him right up close. probably had a wonderful mil morning, and it's going to get crazier. we h so many peoe show . that's what san francisco i about. >> we are back out here live where justoments ago batkid took off. u're not goingo believe this. there'another crime takin place, and, again, rider is behind it. we understan tt he is robbing a bank in the financial district. batkid is o his way

there's a plutonium based reactor in iraq. there is concern that if it gets completed. uranium based -- so why do you think that that isn't a problem, because the french seem to be saying, we can't allow them to keep working on this plutonium based reactor because once it's established, there's no going back. >> the reactor is behind schedule, it won't come online until the end of next year, then you put the fuel in it and some plutonium is produced, but that takes at least another year. then you've got to take that fuel out and reprocess it. iran doesn't have a reprocessing facility. so it's a problem three or four years down the road. in this interim step,er rang has apparently agreed suspend construction of this reactor. so it's a problem you can deal with, but it has to be dealt with later. let's freeze the key parts of the program now, stop them from enriching uranium to 20%, lengthen the fuse in any breakout scenario. >> what about france and others that are objecting, israel, what do you think that tells us? >> it's not clear exactly what the israelis are doing?

from stopping uranium enrichment completely but only suspend it for six months, and no agreement on plutonium in richment. the french foreign minister was holding fast, saying he does not want to be part of, quote, a kon game. >> there's a lot of concern on that topic, eric. we'll talk about that and much more. i'm jamie colby. despite the failure to come up with anygreement, both sides say progress made between iran and six other world powers has occurred. according to secretary kerry, time remains of the esngs. >> the window for diplomacy does not stay open indefinitely. and we will continue working to find a peaceful solution because we believe that forceful diplomacy is a powerful enough weapon to diffuse the world's most threatening weapons of mass destruction. >> peter is live in washington with more on that. good morning, peter. >> good morning, jamie. now comes a cooling off period because diplomats didn't make a deal this weekend, they're going to go their separate ways for ten days and regroup on november 20th and see where things stand. the western powers negotiating with iran want

the heavier more tender yet that they could ease to use that as the teacher extract weapons grade plutonium caught a picture taken at it we don't much of our work already. made progress on about ninety percent of the issue. they're only one or two important matters that remain. therefore we need to continue negotiate. she tells have spent four days to get back. and then save the presence of non profit entity and he suggests that oaks and beats that make or break stage. the land like a therapy team for more help for some of the most vulnerable survivors of time than honey and they say more than a million children in the philippines and risk of malnutrition. officials for the unicef save more and more children in the disaster area said oh like you to the undiminished. they say one point three five million and a shared by other means of not guilty enough to eat and a cynical what this must examine children quickly get into treatment they need to now it's not just a matter of true. illnesses such as diarrhea for huge impact the situation in the disaster area is extremely severe because malnutri

iran would reduce its highly enriched stockpile, stopping centrifuges, stop building a plutonium reactionor and allow daily inspections. in return the white house gets what it calls modest sanctions releex $6 to $7 bon international banking and the embargo on its oil exports continue for now but the agreement has united arab states like saudi arabia and israel who say iran cannot be trusted. prime minister netanyahu condemned the deal. >> this agreement has made the world a much more dangerous place. >> reporter: president obama called netanyahu today but the two leaders disagree on the threat and the goal. obama pledges to stop iran from getting a nuclear weapon. netanyahu wants to stop iran from even having the capability to produce one and many in congress agree with israel. >> we're accepting a signal to iran that they can continue to go ahead and by talking and acting like they have good will, can get away with at least nuclear weapon production capability. >> reporter: the geneva agreement came together only two months after president obama first talked to iran's president rouhani on

heavy water reactors make it easier to extract plutonium which can be used for making a bomb a high ranking iranian government official told nhk that the parties may be in agreement on saturday china's state run media has reported on the first patrol by its air force after giving eating in air defense identification zone in the east china sea the zoning codes to think of the island's controlled by japan. china central television reported on saturday and that the patrol involved recognizance plains early warning aircraft and fighter jets. chinese defense officials announced the zone on saturday when they said the aircraft entering its most around notified chinese old forties of flight plans and obey instructions the ministry warned of emergency defensive measures if the instructions are not follow. ten is declared zone called the overlaps that of japan. officials explained that the intent to seek god's sovereignty and territorial and in their states observers say china is ratcheting up pressure on japan to acknowledge a call that of sovereignty over the sink of islands which china and taiwan

philip meyer six kilograms of plutonium by the end of next year which is enough to make one nuclear bomb. south korean military officials also reportedly believes that north korea's capabilities to miniature eyes keep their weapons have improved significantly over the past seven years. ever since its first new contest in two thousand and six. although the south korean government says another test doesn't appear in an end to some experts say it may come sooner than expected. perhaps at the end of this year or early next year. and then me a senior south korean official says there will be sometime before the six party member nations returned to the negotiating table for talks on the new polarizing than or that special at the foreign ministry told reporters on friday that the six party member nations to korea united states china japan and russia agree on the need for specific conditions for resuming the multilateral dialogue but they remain divided on but those conditions should be the second most important thing for solace to ensure that the north is i'm able to prove its nuclear capability

why would we allow no delay on the plutonium reactor? why would there be no stop in missile testing. let's face it, what do they want the missiles for? who is attacking iran right now? and yet we would allow them to continue to test missiles, the delivery system for a nuclear weapon? no stop in terrorism? who is the exporter of terrorism? it's iran who exports terrorism to lebanon? it's iran. through hezbollah. who exports terrorism in syria al-assad has killed over 100,000 of his people. it is iran. imagine iran with a nuclear weapon. and the terror that would be exported once they have that nuclear weapon. and no stop in the human rights abuses. all this they get they get a plutonium reactor, 3,000 new centrifuge the enriched uranium for a bomb. while we were over in israel this last week, we heard from the prime minister that there are well over 18,000 centrifuges running today. the first level of purity that is reached in uranium is 3.5%. the second level that is reached is 20%. from there it is a hop and a skip, literally, only week

reactor an unfinished facility that if it became operational would provide iran with an alternative plutonium path to nuclear weapons and to ensure that these commitments are met iran has agreed to submit its program to unprecedented monitoring for the international community this first step will provide the most far reaching insight and view of iran's nuclear program that the international community has ever had this first step. let me be clear this first step does not say that iran has a right to enrichment no matter what interpretive comments are made it is not in this document there is no right to enrich within the four corners of the n.p.t. and this document does not do that rather the scope and role of iran's enrichment as is set forth in the language within this document says that iran's peaceful nuclear program is subject to a negotiation and to mutual agreement and it can only be by mutual agreement that enrichment might or might not be able to be decided on in the course of negotiations so what is on the other side of the ledger here again there been a number of premature reports th

bank officials say could produce plutonium for weapons use. he ran however with the sedan that is real crime is invention in a tent and they recently met french president onslow not understand not to ease sanctions against iraq the outlook on the upcoming negotiations we have referred to edina incendiary and have spent on iran's nuclear program and nonproliferation chisholm research associate at a london think tank the international institute for strategic studies. and she's joining us from calvert a thank you very much miss this fun caring for joining us in which explain what the stumbling blocks are to achieving an agreement. and it seems that there are two main stumbling blocks here one is the one that you mentioned the iraq plutonium within eighteen weeks as they would like iran to stop construction on and the second seems to be around enrichment capability the question is and how much enrichment in iran continue to do. and of course what's a kind of enrichment is that he obviously it's not allowed to do twenty pissed and so on can we cont

enrichment program or stop the development of a nuclear reactor that would be capable of producing plutonium the french foreign minister laurent fabius said that he could not accept what he called a fool's game in other words a weak deal with iran the big obstacle appears to be the future of iran's plutonium reactor at iraq which could provide a nother route to a nuclear weapons capability and this facility which is currently being built is due to become operational next year the talks will resume in some ten days and then we will see a fresh bid to end this current standoff live from tel aviv all of us live thanks very much indeed for that well let's take a closer look at the main negotiation points here world powers want to iran to hold all activities to enrich uranium at twenty percent they could then put in richmond at a level below weapons grade now iran should also limit the number of centrifuges and allow more monitoring of its facilities in return for the unfreezing of tehran's assets and the easing of sanctions were for more i'm now joined live by professor side mohammad marandi he'

reports say he runs government is not willing to dismantle centrifuges or its plutonium reactor. further proof for israel's government. anyone is on the way to nuclear weapons. a deal is reportedly close at hand. fuelling speculation that israel may be cutting it a secret deal with saudi arabia to take action against the nuclear you crying in the future if need be. stephanie fried cctv kennedy. light from the sub types we have to be up to take you to tell ron to get the reaction from there while the stool to convening in geneva. pam will be speaking to our porch along kenya. now the us and afghanistan have agreed on a final version of a crucial security pact outlining where and how many us troops can remain in afghanistan up to most foreign forces leave the country next year thousands of afghan tribal and political leaders sunday together in kabul with sweet to decide whether to allow us troops to stay after the twenty fourteen tore down all foreign forces. the last minute deal was reached just two days before they get into the bike the pact. it'll contain provisions to give us t

it could produce plutonium suitable for weapons. that reactor is at least nine months away from operation, and it probably would be another year after that before there's plutonium separated for weapons. we do need to address the arak reactor, but finding an interim agreement now that addresses some of the most proliferation concerns like the stockpile of enriched uranium is really more pressing. >> what do you make of this point that the idea was not even to have a permanent agreement but to basically buy all sides more time, have iran stall its nuclear program, and maybe ease some sanctions to that country? do you think that in itself was a good diplomacy move? >> i really do. we've been attempting to negotiate with iran over their nuclear program for over a decade. there's a great deal of mistrust, and i think taking some small steps will go a long way to showing both sides that they're serious about reaching an agreement while addressing some of the most serious concerns. for the united states that's the uranium stockpile, and f

they were building a plutonium plant. that's now frozen. i'm not saying this is the solution. it's not. this is a test of their intentions. the other thing to remember is, do you remember the last time iran suspended their program. let's take a look at history here. they suspended their program in 2003 only after america invaded iraq. they got frightened. they suspended the program. now they're suspending part of the program because the sanctions are hurting. i understand that people sigh, if the sanctions are hurting, let's keep them on. now they have begun to make the kind of concessions that we have demanded. another final point here in terms of winning, losing, remember this. this agreement, this is this temporary agreement is one in which the americans and our allies are going to agree to disagree with the iranians. they say we reserve the right to enrich. we say no you don't. we don't agree to that. that's what the next six months are going to be about. can we get them to say, okay. we give up the right to enrich. if they do then this administration can claim credit. mos

secondly, on plutonium plant, which is a finger in the eye.t has no other purpose than creating a second path to create a bomb. there is nothing in there of dismantling it. why have a heavy water reactor if not to produce a bomb? there is no talk of dismantling. the only element in the deal is that it can't inject the fuel rods, which wouldn't have been done until the very end any way. it stopped absolutely nothing. this is a program, this is an agreement that has not taken away a single instrument, has not shut down the plants that create the machines that enrich uranium. there is nothing that reduces, disables or inactivates its infrastructure. and we call this a way to stop them from acquiring the bomb? it's a farce. it's the west blessing iran as a threshold nuclear state, always on the verge a month or two away from a breakout and becoming a nuclear state. >> president obama spoke to israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu. it was described a lot different by the white house than israeli officials. israeli officials saying -- >> as we t

the deal also stops construction of a plutonium planned.llowing more access to inspectors. >> we need iran to provide information about the nature of its program. >> what iran does not have to do is tear down nuclear infrastructure. that's why israel opposes. >> it's a bat and dangerous deal, dealing with things that affect our survive ag. >> secretary of state john kerry hopes to secure a deal making the middle east more peaceful. >> more closer to achieving a diplomatic agreement with the iranians. >> even as negotiations gain momentum iran says there are some places where it simply won't bundle. last week the ali khamenei said his country will not compromise on red lines. the main point of contention, iran's contention that it has the right to enrich uranium. iran says it wants to use it for medical and research purposes, but that technology can produce nuclear weapons, which is why the world leaders in geneva want it to stop. trust is an issue. the p5+1 want iran to allow more people to get in there and inspect facilities. iran wants ec

no capacity to make a nuclear weapon, absolutely no ability to enrich anything and destroying the plutonium plant that is in iran. that's not adeal the u.s. thinks it can make and so the u.s. says to israel this is the best deal we can make, calm down, relax, we will make this as a temporary deal and in six months we'll do a long term deal that will address some of your concerns. >> it's not just israel, but saudi arabia syria lebanon all could be intacted by it correct? >> absolutely, we've also got strange bed fellows too. israel and saudi arabia both oppose this. what's not clear is whether it's going to have a positive impact on making peace with the palestinians and israelis. what's clear is that benjamin netanyahu will say, you didn't listen to me on iran, i'm not going olisten to you on the palestinians, i'm going othe go ahead with what i want to do and that makes peace more difficult. >> all right, nick, thanks very much. >> here at home the nation paused today to remember the 35th president of the united states, john f. kennedy was killed in dallas on this day in 1963. that city h