i ask that you vote for the rebuilding of c pmc. thank you very much >> are there any additional speakers? >> good afternoon. i'm with the coalition of san francisco neighborhoods and i want to make my own comment. i would support the san franciscans for health care housing, jobs, and justice and their call for a lateral monitoring because it becomes obvious if you look at the history surely that history is very important. we have to learn from it and for that reason alone we have to have closed monitoring like the involvement with the community. another thing is the mental health services. i'm disappointed their

c pmc has been supportive of the services. rebuilding the hospitals is crucial to serve our seniors in the community as a whole. natural disasters are unpredictable. we need hospitals with strong infrastructure that could withstand earthquakes. and so on behalf of the 36 hundred seniors i ask you and earthquakes don't wait for anybody. this process has taken looked at. thank you >> i'm rose i'm the president of the board of the apa services. we have worked together for over a decade to support the clients and the tenderloin is ready for a new hospital. please move quickly in approving this project. thank you >> good afternoon. i'm a resident and homeowner in the san francisco mission neighborhood. i'm the director of nursing at the pacific gnaws of c pmc. the time is now to rebuild that. i oversee patient care operations on a daily situation. imagine raising your family two. folks in a small place and trying to keep a high traffic utilization space free and no place for our computers. the c pmc was built at that time when pati

and other professional and union portions would be interested in the ongoing process surrounding c pmc so i'm supportive of the addressed process. also in terms of parking usually not a big parking person but if we're going to have the garage we should have it open. my farther pet peeves is when i go to whole foods there's a parking lot neck door is virtually unparked it's a church parking lot. so, so see it sort of sitting there vacant is sort of american people irritation. so i agree with the fellow commissioners. and i don't remember we'll going gone through the environmental impact that treats the tommy's issue but the new buildings and whether or not there are any provisions for protects during construction. and i don't remember that. particularly. yes, ma'am one project that's this big the adjacent project across the street there somebody been a potential impact to the those historic buildings mainly through vibration apparently i know the construction method whether there's any pile drilling or my drilling activities and during demolition. i'm sorry i don't remember >> commissio

i'd like the motion that c pmc is to maintain their current psych beds whatever gnaws campus >> that's fine. >> it's actually not on their campused but -- >> i'm not prepared to agree to that at that moment. >> that's my amendment and the board can vote think it as a recommendation to the board. >> commissioner. >> can i ask the representative from d h formulation you're ready to commit on that? >> we acknowledged the -- and we know from our own experience is maintaining the constricting psych beds is a difficult thing to do but i'm not prepared to make a position on that that. >> well difficulty doesn't have anything to do in the there a need for it? i understand the need we had a meeting we couldn't get into the police sections of the mental facility but there was a lot of discussion about the great need for more community based services but at the same time the emergency room is over flowing so nights not just community stuff. there's a real need for something to take place in the hospital situation. that's all i'll saying >> i can give you a little bit of experience i know the c pm

i would underscore our certain that c pmc is not including the type type of health needs. we're concerned about the

we want to make sure that the good faith and good intentions of c pmc health are catered forward. we want to true but we look at the behavior of the other areas they haven't loopholes kept to their agreement. sadly when they acquired the psych unit there was a deal with the city attorney but they closed that unit that. this building as no psych beds. but the needs of the community this agreement needs to be verified we need a collaborative agreement >> thank you. >> thank you. next speaker, please >> i'm a resident of districts 5. we're very glad to see a 1 and 25 beds on the table, however, our psychiatrists are very, very concerned at the fact that those two buildings the hospitals will have zero psych beds. unfortunately contrary to the comments the patients the mental health patients is not the same population you're going to get in the psych unit at sf general. navigate we've he taken several of the planning commissioners here and had physicians explain to some of the commissioners on the board that the psych needs are very, very intense. the psych unit still goes on diversio

we would like to work on the terms and what c pmc is interested in refinancing some of the terms. also involving the community the errors like the one that mr. rich talked about in terms of the workforce. there's 2 hundred and 25 pages here. and i get it. you know, it's just an unusual process. but thank you. i mean, we see people here not involved necessarily in the the night grit negotiations right so there is this broader community. we have nothing against involving the broader community. >> one question for mr. rich. i guess to get to that .2 potential committals. would it be possible to specifically call out s fha j to receive they will receive the city report and we'll forward the cb mc pooling upon receipt. so the planning department of public health has many ways to look at this and i'll defer it to the gentleman to be able to do that. we have situations where we notify people's of sequa action because this that doesn't involve hundreds and hundreds of actions it should be okay to notify people of the changes it should not be a problem. >> if we specifically call those out

i would underscore our certain that c pmc is not including the type type of health needs. we're concerned about the elimination of the psych mental health in the hospital >> we have 5 more speakers so if your name was called. it's a little bit more confusing there's a lot of seniors that are not in the room by it's important to know that $9 million was fund for 19 labs all over the city for seniors and persons with a disability and that resources has been given to the city of san francisco and now it's up to the city of san francisco to maintain the commuters and if the commuter fwlaeksz the senior center there will be no fund to correct this. just envision user without any technology because the seniors of the tenderloin their technology is in the senior center. thank you >> your name was called next speaker. >> i'm the director of the community services better known as the center for outcome reach. we might be ground zero for the substance year but year after frigging year i come to fight for our services. those services are support by general opportunity dollars and eve