entities are not subject to the policy requirement but foreign entities are subject to the policy requirement has been the background law in place for 15 years and that has neither setback the extraordinary success of the program nor created or is he noted in his powerful dissent any actual evidence of hypocrisy or confusion a message for respondents themselves. >> mr. michelle take a minute to wrap up please. >> thank you mr. chief justice, i do think this case ultimately in its current iteration can be resolved on a straightforward basis that respondents themselves long accepted, that the policy condition of permissible exercise in the spending power at a foreign recipient that lack and not add to domestic recipients that have first amendment rights and all the respondents have run their position. >> thank you counsel. >> mr. chief justice amanda please a court, the undisputed record show that the u.s. respondents themselves suffered first amendment arms when the policy requirement is imposed on the foreign affiliate. they sure brand, name, logo invoice and they speak as one, make speech an

responded itself should have a policy. another place to look in the record is at ja375 and 390, where the pathfinder organization talks about u.s. funding criteria that requires them to work through local affiliates and locally incorporated entities. chief justice roberts: justice alito? justice alito: i agree with your client's position when this case was before us previously, but what concerns me today is not so much the immediate impact of a decision in your favor, but where it would lead. i am concerned that it will force congress either to withhold foreign aid entirely, or to allow foreign aid to be used in ways that are contrary to the interests of the people of this country. let me give an example. suppose the united states provides grants to domestic entities and allows them to make sub-grants to foreign schools for the purpose of promoting education in countries with weak educational systems. suppose congress specifies that any foreign entity that gets a subgrant must have a policy denouncing terrorist attacks aga

object to that policy requirement. we don't want to have to impose it on our clearly identified affiliates. respondentsg u.s. to have to engage in doublespeak. if they do that and attempt to disavow that pledge which is attributed to them they will lose their funding for the global network. justice roberts: justice gorsuch? totice gorsuch: in response justice ginsburg and justice thomas, you indicated that the primary harm your client has suffered is the risk of attribution, mistaken attribution of a foreign affiliate's speech to the domestic entity. sounds a bit like an alter ego argument that the ordinary listener will be confused and attribute the speech of foreign affiliates to domestic entities. at the same time i assume that you would resist any effort to pierce the corporate veil from those foreign entities and impose liability on the domestic entity. it and whenect is should we attribute speech for actions of foreign affiliates to the domestic entity? why would we pierce the corporate veil sometimes but not all

entity applies for a grant it is not subject to the policy requirement. when a foreign entity applies for a separate grant, separate of any affiliation it might have with a u.s. entity, -- justice alito: the u.s. entity gets the money and wants to make a subgrant to a foreign entity. if i understood your position, whether or not the foreign entity can be required to endorse the policy depends on whether it is legally distinct from the u.s. entity, is that correct? mr. michel: that is correct. in the subgrant relationship that condition would attach to the foreign entity as the subgrantee of the u.s. entity. justice alito: if the u.s. entity is a trust, how would we determine what is legally separate -- what foreign entity is legally separate from a trust -- a u.s. trust? mr. michel: i have to confess, justice, we have not confronted the trust question. i don't have a ready answer for that. i think that in the 17 year history of the program there has not been any difficulty in telling apart foreign organizations from domestic organizations. we are happy to

i'm wondering, i have a question when we can address the policy coming up such as the bias policy and what is the proper time on the agenda to speak to that? >> clerk: that will be line item 5. >> caller: so you call for line item 5, correct? >> clerk: correct. >> caller: okay, thank you. >> vice-president taylor: there's one more issue and then yours, the bias. >> you have zero questions remaining. >> operator: that is the end of the callers. >> clerk: thank you. >> vice-president taylor: great. commissioner hamasaki. >> commisioner hamasaki: just to briefly follow-up on chief public defender rogers' point and acknowledge -- i mentioned it before and commissioner taylor mentioned it before, but the public defender's office was one of the early voices for a long time speaking out on this issue and so thank you for continuing to push hard. that's how positive change happens in the commission and in the community. so i apologize for leaving you out of that earlier. but thank you for your advocacy around that issue. >> vice-president taylor: next line item, please. >> clerk: next line it

thank you. >> my last job in government director of policy planning i said i do you policy planning notpredicting i don't know what the trump term would do if it is an extension of the first term with decent changes on climate course of events it is conceivable and with the cost of climate change and with china to have extremely generous rhetoric at one level and those behaviors and some are overly generous but we very that overall thrust right now is negative and then to reinforce that. so to take real diplomatic intervention to improve the us chinese relationship from china. but in terms of climate but is limited. the middle powers the europeans. set those standards and principles. and with that military might. and with that progress they want to make. and with those phases to be indispensable powers to sound arrogant. it is a part in the united states find a way back. >> we get you to elaborate. in the book you go quickly through having to offset carbon capture and what kind of direct policy recommendations would you make? >> we need to do much more at home so in terms of the regulat

we are taking into consideration the relevance and fiscal policy an important policy. i would not say at all that policy higher levels are going to determine our monetary policy at all >> let's bring geoff into the conversation it is interesting to hear there around fiscal policy not only on the national side but at the european level with the commission to present their proposal for the eu recovery fund he said on the one hand that fiscal policy isn't going to affect the bias. as we've heard from madam lagarde, there clearly is a push to take more of a burden here. what was your take on the vice president's comments this morning? >> absolutely. it is something we've heard over and over again, haven't we since the gfc in 2008. it was mario draghi beating the drum andencouraging government to embrace governments and reforms and create more head room for exactly these kind of eventu eventualities to meet these crises we have this crisis many governments fixed their roofs. we are in the die lema where the ecb is left holding the ring here to try and keep down borrowing co

no policies. lots of empty rhetoric. no policies. without the actual policies, mr. president, whistle-blowers are vulnerable. and when they tell the truth and push for accountability, they suffer. every day donald trump steps up his attacks on, which on inspectors general, on the whole system of accountability that has traditionally been bipartisan. congress has pushed back, passing laws to protect whistle-blowers, but the laws have to mean something for the sake of whistle-blowers and the rule of law. congress should not reward those who ignore the law and leave whistle-blowers vulnerable. that is what mr. evanina has done for six years. that's why i cannot support his confirmation. he has defied the law, failed to protect whistle-blowers. i'm going to state the obvious. when the congress passes a law, it's got to be implemented. when congress directs the congress to protect whistle-blowers, that's something that is priority business. in 2014 this body tried to protect whistle-blowers. a law was passed. mr. evanina has ignored it all these years. that's just not ac

, not monetary policy that does that. in short, that if we cut off fiscal stimulus to small, too soon, it is a supply issue. that said, there are concerns people raise about fiscal policy in the future. even though all reasonable fiscal hawks know we should be spending right now. what does fiscal responsibility look like a year or two down the road? especially if we still have 10%, 8% unemployment? how should we -- obviously this is for elected officials, but what type of principles which you want them to be thinking about in terms of the recovery of the economy? when i was at bank of england i got into a public tiff with the governor. governor king thought it was the role of the bank and the governor to lecture the parliament about fiscal responsibility. i didn't. chairman powell: we don't play a formal role in fiscal policy. meaning that, we wouldn't take a position, i wouldn't take a position in supporting a particular bill. i might answer questions privately from members, but it is not our role to supervise congress.

foreign policy in a future oriented way, in ways not many do. chris, thank you so much for coming on the program. question,e opening since i know you think long-term and not short-term is -- we are in the middle of covid. i'm interested in what you are thinking about in terms of where the u.s. may be in terms of our position in the world, five years from now, after we presumably have a vaccine and this is in the rearview mirror. there will be tremendous economic on it and global displacement. -- economic carnage and global displacement. i am wondering your thoughts? sen. murphy: it is great to be here with all of you, great to have this conversation with governor dean. it is possible to lead a fulfilling life without running for president, contrary to popular belief. i am grateful to get a chance to do this job on behalf of the new haven community and connecticut. thanks to the jackson community. it is a big question. the most important one. the covid-19 crisis has taught us lessons about the importance of interdependence cooperation with allies

said we object to having that policy, we would like to be in charge of our own policies, and we think it violates our first amendment rights to say we are not eligible for this money unless we have the government policy. the supreme court by a six-to vote said that is right -- by a 6-2 vote said that is right. the case went back down to the lower courts and the grantee side said wait a second, it is not just us. we have foreign affiliates who are receiving the money as some grantees or contractors with us. we think they should not be subject to the policy either, because what sense does it make for us to say we will not be pushed around by the government on policies, but the grantees will have to. same logo, same brand, same name, we think that violates the first amendment. the lower courts a great -- the lower courts agreed. as to affiliates sharing the namebrand, it violates the first amendment. the government said hold on a second, there is a long-standing line of cases that the court has recognized saying foreign entities operating abroad do not have constitutional rights. the dom

firmly act on the party's basic theory, line and policy. strengthen our consciousness of the need to maintain political integrity, think in big-picture terms, follow the leadership core, and keep in alignment with the central party leadership. stay confident in the path, theory, system, and culture of socialism with chinese characteristics and uphold , general secretary xi jinping's core position on the party central committee and in the party as a whole, and uphold the party central committee's authority and its centralized, unified leadership. carry out covid-19 control and promote economic and social development to fulfill the targets and tasks for completing the building of a moderately prosperous society in all respects. while carrying out regular covid-19 control, continue to follow the general principle of pursuing progress while ensuring stability, apply the new development philosophy, pursue supply-side structural reform as our main task, and draw momentum from reform and opening up to promote high quality development. make progres

i'm wondering, i have a question when we can address the policy coming up such as the bias policy and what is the proper time on the agenda to speak to that? >> clerk: that will be line item 5. >> caller: so you call for line item 5, correct? >> clerk: correct. >> caller: okay, thank you. >> vice-president taylor: there's one more issue and then yours, the bias. >> you have zero questions remaining. >> operator: that is the end of the callers. >> clerk: thank you. >> vice-president taylor: great. commissioner hamasaki. >> commisioner hamasaki: just to briefly follow-up on chief public defender rogers' point and acknowledge -- i mentioned it before and commissioner taylor mentioned it before, but the public defender's office was one of the early voices for a long time speaking out on this issue and so thank you for continuing to push hard. that's how positive change happens in the commission and in the community. so i apologize for leaving you out of that earlier. but thank you for your advocacy around that issue. >> vice-president taylor: next line item, please. >> clerk: next line it

there are 50 different choices about policy. one is the right to regulate interstate commerce, which is the movement of people and services across state borders, which is of some use in this pandemic, especially if you want to stop people from coming into the country that might bringing -- be bringing coronavirus with them. we see congress's power to tax and spend for the general welfare. is takingw congress trillions of dollars now and pushing it out to support state policies by more generous unemployment compensation, by purchasing equipment, medical supplies, by providing expertise, and by encouraging research and develop of a vaccine. 50 downside is that you have governors making up their own policies. defenses for good that system. it may not act quickly, but it doesn't make mistakes quickly either. it is a risk-averse approach to government where you have trial and error. you have laboratories of democracy which allow for experimentation. we will see how things go here versus texas or florida, and other states can adopt th

and you're setting policy and i would urge you to make sure that any policy adopted includes an organizational performance approach to evaluate the impact of any policies, practices, and procedures aimed at reducing bias within the department as set forth in the department of justice's recommendations. and i would urge that every policy and approach your body sets is done with the goal of maximum transparency to protect the people's right to know. thank you very much. >> vice-president taylor: thank you. i was on mute before but i was asking director henderson to follow up with the caller who had the complaint. so when public comment is over i want you to announce your number and how to get in contact with you. >> operator: you have zero questions remaining. >> operator: that concludes the members of the public in the queue for this item. >> vice-president taylor: great. director henderson, make sure that the public knows how to get in touch with your office. >> absolutely. they can contact the office, the phone number is 241-7711. or they can find us directly at dpa, and go online and contact

host: you are the senior vp for public policy. we have you on the camino caters -- we have you on to talk about public policy issues. in recent testimony in the senate, you are quoted as saying, google has conditioned consumers to expect for the best and most relevant results from around the web, even though they no longer were by doing so. google physically demoted non-google results even if they contained information with higher quality scores. what does that mean? luther: yelp and google have had a long and complicated relationship. today in my role i educate policymakers in the united states, in terms of state attorneys general and the department of justice, but also the european commission, the antitrust authorities in australia and brazil and turkey, that a website that we once trusted and relied upon to match consumers with the best information from across the web, when they came to google.com. it is no longer doing that. today the majority of traffic that goes to google ends up either terminating on google are going to goo

and so there's a number and they are board policies 5116.1, safety policy and number 500, accountabilitynumber 4003, lactation accommodation, 5022, student and family privacy rights, 5131, student conduct and number 6143, courses of study and number 6178, career technical education and number 5117, interdistrict attendance and number 0420.4, charter school's authorization and 0420.42, charter school renewal and number 0420.423, charter school revocation and number 02.1 charter school oversight and number 5142, safety. all policies removed and seconded at a prior meeting. rule's committee was met yesterday and we'll have a report out from commissioner lamb who shares that committee. >> president sanchez, just one note that board policy 511.61, safety transfer process was amended after this agenda was processed at rule's committee and in accordance with the committee's direction, the following sentence is being added. the definition of a description of the investigation process incidents are described in board policies 5131.2 and administrative legislation 31.2 and i wanted to note that wa

relations committee he's emerged as the leader of global affairs articulating a forward thinking policy for the united states. an outspoken proponent for international human rights and american leadership abroad as many of you know the senate has been in session the past two weeks. it is in session i believe as we speak. we are deeply appreciative to senator murphy for taking the time to join us. now perhaps you can kick off the conversation. >> sure. thank you very much for taking the time. i know that you have votes shortly. we will try to get right down to it. just to embarrass the senator, he was my candidate for president. he chose not to run for a variety of good reasons, and that i am incredibly glad to have him here and honored and incredibly pleased to be interviewing somebody who is one of the up and coming stars in the democratic party, especially in the area which is what jacksonville is about. this is a person that whatever he chooses to do, will be be leadinleaving the foreign-policd speaking of the foreign-policy in a future oriented way and in a way that not many people

they never really thought about the immigration policy. a lot of people that are not aware because he was obvious about what he was doing and why that they realized that it was a problem. they cut funding to those that have certain criminal convictions so during the riots and the deportation of the administration they decided to fund the system into the stew to the organizing to create the funding and ensure the basic rights that the federal law doesn't recognize. what does the administration do, they make the decision that they don't deserve to have a lawyer we sat there saying why are we having this conversation in new york city and about why the public defense is important to everyone. why it harms the whole community to the deportation proceedings and the language about public safety coming from somebody that is. at the moment it became clear to me we needed to come to a baseline understanding whites racist and harmful and we needed that understanding to include. to provide mutual aid and working to stop collaboration between the local

and president trump's policies before the, the pro-growth policies led to one of the strongest economiest america's ever had. we had the lowest unemployment rate in over 50 years. everyone in america was on a trajectory to do really well before this, so a lot of the policies the president put in place beforehand will remain in place. but, again, president trump was able to build the economy to a great place before, and he'll be able to do it again. i think also putting in place resiliency, we want to make sure we're not relying on other countries for our materials, for our supplies and making sure that we emerge much stronger than before. so president trump is looking at a lot of policies. he's very flexible in the way that he thinks about problems, and he'll be creative to do it. he knows what he needs to do. he wants to get america back to work in a safe way, and his hope is, you know, it'll take us some time. the third quarter, he thinks, will be a transition, but he thinks the fourth quarter and next year has the ability to be spectacular. gerry: is the president open to more support

renewed testing policy but should they be looking north rob. for inspiration on how to deal with this virus. at the start of this week the united kingdom of conducted the 60 votes and test for corona virus per 1000000 of its population germany a tested twice that number of the smaller countries norway and new zealand were on a par with germany but all of these countries are left feeling in the wake of the tiny pharaoh islands of a population of some 50000 they have tested and trace our own one 5th of the entire country under one roof mostly stump virus i'm no joined from the favors by former minister christina her force member of parliament christina half or so can i quote you back to march if when the fairway islands were confronted with in terms of your population the size quite a number of cases of cholera virus some theft in one day how did you set about tackling the violence and get to a situation where no you've got to almost eradicate it yes luckily it seems like the faroe islands are among the 1st nations to be able to stop the wire iri

it is a policy reaction in our case where we had room to maneuver in monetary policy, in the interestate policy, and we have -- utilized -- we have utilized that room to maneuver. you utilize the fx market? oystein: the answer is yes. march, where we were all hit by the virus and the downturn, we act did -- acted to reduce the policy rate and introduced liquidity measures. market with significant region krona and if you go for 20 years -- norwegian krone, and if you go for 20 years, we are ready to be in the currency market to continue to have the market functioning. we have done that to a limited extent, and you can find the numbers in the report we published today. tom: thank you so much for joining us today. lead theou conversation is wonderful. you discovered oil in the north sea in 1969. the interdependencies of your central bank effort at the sovereign wealth fund and oil production, it is original and extraordinary. in this pandemic, is that delicate balance at risk? is there a risk that norway upsets the prosperity that has been generated since 1969? oystein: my short answer i

the fiscal policy is key. the health care policies are central. ubiquitous testing.ontact tracing. good procedures. i'm one that is a little concerned, we are doing more testing in texas, but i would love to see in national initiative manhattan project to really emphasize testing and quick testing in front of stores, restaurants, other facilities, so people have more ,onfidence that when they go in they are not walking into a situation where they could be at risk. i think until we have that, my concern is there will be limits to how fast we can recover. without certain types of activities, it will limit our gdp growth and will mean the unemployment rate will be more elevated than it would be otherwise. without't let you go asking you about oil. you might as will be the central bank of oil, as far as most people are concerned. how any companies might go bankrupt if oil stays under $40? the kansas city fed said when it was under $30, they acted 40% bankruptcy rate. is that realistic? >> it might be. what is happening is happening as we are seeing in texas and we are se

pedimos que tengas prudencia porque si sigues caminando a la séptima calle vas encontrar el cordón policialstán lanzando rocas a la policía cuídate mucho y regresamos contigo más adelante es como funciona el cordón policial antimotines de ir cerrando las manifestantes para que se vayan lo hacían por megafono diciendo que se retiren para que la zona quede libre >> hemos visto diferentes ángulos cada uno de lado opuesto mostrandonos las patrullas listas antes de llegar al cordón policial y claudia donde muchos están retrocediendo yéndose de la zona no lejos de ahí nos acaban de informar que san josé esta bajo cierre preventivo y qué nos tienes flavio? >> se escucharon detonaciones no se escuchanada pero la policía se acercó más a sus motos se escuchaban detonaciones vimos gas asumimos que son gases lacrimógenos nadie ha salido corriendo sí escuchamos detonaciones ellos se fueron a la multitud vemos a gente de santa clara que están en uniforme verde están intrigados por este tipo de violencia pero la mayoría de las personas están enfrentando a la policía tienen sus pistolas armas de fuego pero

policy machine, not policy predicting.i tent know what a second trump term would do whether it would be on extension of the first term, might there be some changes on climate because of events. it's conceivable. i'm not going to say it's obviously likely but it's conceivable that some of the costs of climate change became pronounced enough. with china you have had an odd combination of extremely -- waste the word -- generous rhetoric at one level, and some behaviors which are both -- some urgentous, some are not oare or overly generous. i don't know. i can't dissenior a pattern but i worry the overall thrust right now is negative and the pandemic is reinforcing it. it would takereal diplomatic intervention to improve the u.s.-chinese relationship not just from us but also from china. i'm not sure i understand your second question but in terms of climate if we didn't change -- could the rest of the world do things? sure but it's limited. middle powers, the europeans, some of the asians, can i think set certain standards, se

, but evangelicals also at times went against reagan era policies. with romania, for example, where the reagan administration sought to have a differentiation policy and extend trade, evangelicals were uncomfortable with that given the ongoing religious persecution there. there is interestintg activism that happens. these views, which were for promoting religious freedom in the soviet union and other totalitarian states, at times as friendly to their objectives. this is where things get interesting. this perception enabled evangelicals to interpret state violence and authoritarian countries as acceptable and sometimes even desirable efforts to combat this spread of communism and therefore prevent religious persecution. this is where we see support for genocidal dictators in places like guatamala being framed in human rights and religious freedom. support for constructive engagement, the reagan policy of constructive engagement in south africa as an effort preventing the spread of communism and religious persecution, to protect christian south africa.

single policy prescription would we be offering to the the chancellor as. a way of helping to come out of this economic crisis and poor policy option do you believe the scottish government should be pursuing to assure that the if but new thinking to meet these different times well the policy that has bubbled up or is not is now brasil basic income yankee be yours a sense get rid of all the old baggage and a bureaucracy of of the different welfare systems to show work anyway which people too busy trying to you know so in order forms and which are means tested let's just have a basic income that everybody gets which takes care of basic needs and that in a sense save your money to get rid of all of the bureaucracy and it saves you a lot of the mental health problems of current people through these hoops and actually creates you know a kind of. civics coming together so that people can begin to concentrate on rebuilding the economy thinking you are used to rebuilding the economy and so on so i think universal p.c. income is going to become the issue that we wil

again, these policies were not reinventing the wheel. we were taking advantage of things that had worked in the past. in particular we expanded the ability of businesses to use net operating losses or as we call them in tax jargon, n.o.l.'s, just like congress did in 2002 after 9/11 and in 2005 for taxpayers affected by hurricane katrina, and again in 2009 after the financial crisis. those were actually bipartisan relief efforts, just like the cares act. and these provisions are temporary. they're designed to terminate after the recovery is in full force. while it seems longer, you have to remember the cares act was enacted just over seven weeks ago. in that time treasury has distributed economic impact payments far faster than expected. americans have received approximately $140 million economic impact payments worth $240 billion. over three and four tenths million small businesses have been approved for $500 billion in loans under the paycheck protection program and businesses of all sizes have started to use the tax tools that we prov

unfortunately it fits the policy of the u.s. administration undermined old agreements in the sphere obama's control. but it's not just russia has consigned by this of course had the gun skies treaty is a major a crucial one a state of control i mean it ensures transparency trust and peace between staci 5 countries has that wanted out to conduct a nod to the qantas its flight each of those territories so that the other case they can see this is a massive but trailed they see this as still a hugely beneficial course that must be kept alive at all costs it's probably on surprising that this decision was met by the international community with a great deal of concern and of course they had that it could well deal and major blow to the security we reiterate our concern regarding the erosion of the us russia arms control regime i think we can stress enough that this arms control regime has provided security benefits for the entire its entire international community by constraining strategic arms competition ending such agreements with

i think this will affect the foreign policy of so these and their you know any or all they will play in the future that egypt but the major thing when it comes to washington riyadh we may in some change we may witness some changes but this will be very very very slow and it will need a lot of efforts from both sides ok to rely basically on pushing their. dissent man sort of nations in particular ok mohammed very briefly because we're heading towards the end of the show do you get the sense where you are into iran that as far as the governments are concerned there is an appetite or not for what would be perceived in washington as more threatening behavior towards their friends in saudi arabia well 1st of all i'd like to point out to that the united states has been using the virus as a weapon against the iranians through the sanctions so and despite that the situation in the united states has catastrophic and the situation in iran is much better and with regards to the spreading of the virus iran has far fewer flights whether to china or to europe and the chinese the europeans or the a

to me it seems like a reasonable policy. because again if you think about new york city where we were rushing graduates of middle school right out of med school right to the front lines, they are not going to be fully trained. they are not doing the residency and internships yet. they might've only seen a procedure with the ventilator once but twice and maybe never did it themselves, but it might import of someone there rather than no one because of the under capacity of the hospital system for the wave of cases that came. if you don't have that kind of immunity, you are creating a huge incentive that prevents society from marshaling its resources. think about the next pandemic. i hope this is the last one for the next century but suppose there is one in five years from now. can you get doctors to come out of retirement and volunteer again? can you get nurses and first responders, right, rush right away to the emergency? you are going to impose this kind of liability concern in the thinking of people under conditions when we

did eisenhower really have an effective policy? or what was his view with respect to the middle east and asia? i mean, he seemed to understand europe well. he kind of left it to his successors to deal with -- nixon dealt with moving china away from the russian war bit. there is where the middle east was moved in a more pro-american way. did eisenhower just not care much about that part of the world, other than in suez and ending korea, or did he -- >> that's an excellent question. you're asking me about pretty much the whole of the world there, so let's see if i can very quickly summarize. for most of the policymakers of the period, the priority was very much europe. maybe it was excessively europe, but that was very much europe. eisenhower's view on east asia, on china -- at that stage, china, mt. setoning was closely aligned with the soviets. western intelligence wasn't picking up the strains between them. 1954, for example, the soviets refused to sell the chinese submarines. in 1958, the chinese refuse to put up transponder stat

no policy. lots of empty rhetoric, no policy. without the actual policy mr. president, whistleblowers are vulnerable. and when they tell the truth, and the push for accountability, every day, donald trump steps up the tax and on the whole system of accountability. that have traditionally beenre bipartisan. chris has pushed back passing laws to protect whistleblowers but though have to mean something. for the sake of whistleblowers and the rule of law. congress should not reward those who ignore the law and leave the whistleblowers vulnerable. that is what this and has done for six years. this i cannot support his confirmation, he has defied the law, filled to protect the whistleblowers predict. >> i'm stating the obvious, is that to be implemented. thate- is something that is priority business. in 2014, this body tried to protect whistleblowers party. the law was passed. he has exhorted all of these years. that's not acceptable. and now, with donald trump and the administration feeling publicly attacking whistleblowers conducting unremitting assault on the wh

monetary policy. >> we appreciate you being with us lawmaker with the fdp. annette, thank you for sticking around for that interview. >>> let's get a check on the treasury the two-year treasury hitting a record low we also saw fed fund rates pressure in a pressure environment. this is one place they determined not to go but they think is not out of the realm of possibility. you have a look at the bulk. the two-year at 0.2% 10-year at 0.4%. >>> looking at the tech heavy index yesterday. significant day for the nasdaq inching into positive territory for the year that was helped in large part by gains by facebook, amazon, and apple. at one point, down 25% year to date things have turned around. investors have flocked to these tech giants and taken money out of other cyclical parts of the market shares of uber trading higher after the ceo said requests are picking up again after bottoming out in april after posting $2.9 billion loss in the loss of business but reported a surge in uber eats business let's get to karen for more. why were investors so willing to lo

grading policy. we recommended what the district's concerns perform most of our recommendations, to me, one of the more significant pieces of it was not the grading but any grading policy must come for a strong commitment to how students will be supported how students are closed, not just academically but in every other way, too. this plan should be a top priority and implemented quick quickly. and so some that, we need to know and to work together to develop that plan, what is going to happen. i do want to mention that one of the points in the presentation seemed to be dichotomy of which is grade versus standardized test scores. i would submit that neither within of those helped to complete stories, either together or apart. we're long overdue for this discussion with grading and i'm so sorry it had to happen under such terrible circumstances, but i'm glad it's happening. and finally, i want to say two more things. one is i appreciate the recognition that teachers do have a right to grade students a

from a policy perspective. think having some investment grade exposure makes a little bit of sense for the portfolio space.t our global nejra: i have heard that from quite a few people. interesting. regina taylor from invesco asset management stays with us. in taiwan, a semiconductor plans to spend $12 billion building a chip plant in arizona. tsmc plans to complete construction of the factory by 2024. it makes semiconductors for names like huawei and apple. any shift in european production will be part of broader discussion between the two companies. may come when nissan unveils its three-year plan on may 28. renault has also promised to share cost cuts this month. a vaccine from santa fe. the seduction from the pharmaceutical companies chief executive has sparked outrage and france. the french president plans to meet with company officials next week. that is your bloomberg business flash. google's former chairman eric schmidt says china should have alerted people more quickly about the spread of the virus. he

we are not going to push around but the policies are going to have to. same logo, same brand, same name. the lower court will agree with as to the affiliates that are sharing the same name logo brands the government then says hold on a second there is a long-standing line of cases the supreme court is recognizing it operating abroad. the day can't be under the umbrella of the first amendment for domestic entities can't be forced to take the pledge, but the government's case is the foreign affiliates relax the rights and shouldn't be able to claim them. they said that there are two violations of the first amendment rights of the u.s. respondents. it takes the pledge that it won't support its actions are attributed to. big u.s. entity from contradicting the pledge on its own dime to use the phrase from chief justice 2013 opinion making it impossible to disavow the message without doublespeak and using the phrases" in from chief justice roberts opinion. the first amendment rights are being violated. >> from the layman's perspective, the first point is basic

our global academics and policy editor -- economics and policy editor. out of south korea, nightclub related coronavirus cases. as of noon yesterday, there were 54 of them. they are reporting at the moment they have 79 related to nightclubs in the capital did that's where we are at the moment -- in the capital. that is where we are at the moment. haslinda: and we have the pca retail isna's april down 5% year on year. it fell about 5.5%. globale have ubs management dominic schnider with his outlook on commodities. later, karen harris joins us for what to expect when economies exit. this is bloomberg. ♪ ♪ you are back with impaired markets. commodity investors -- bloomberg markets. have beeninvestors watching demand. it is toouest says early for broad commodity exposure. dominic, great to hear from you. let's start with gold. it has been a bit perplexing. when we have a situation, a pandemic, you would think there would be a rush to precious metals. it has depreciated a bit but not like what we saw in 2008 and 2009. dominic: you need to look at it from two

is a big issue in regard to how much she wants to do on eamon tarry policy side. how much does that factor into the ecb moving forward that the more they do, the less fiscal policies need to do? >> i don't think they are concerned with that at all certainly mario draghi wasn't. i think i have a degree of sympathy for mrs. lagarde because draghi left her with a situation where she had effectively no choice but to move further into unlawful territory. now is the ecb concerned about moral hazard that is estimate and we've already seen the consequences. the ecb isn't concerned about it they have taken a decision long ago under mario draghi in 2012 that it will support the euro no matter what the cost and that it will essentially support the unsustainable borrowing levels of italy and other countries this is the new phase of history in money printing. in the whole of economic history, there isn't a single instance where massive money printing came a good end and it won't in the eurozone either >> i thank you i want to thank both of our panelists this morning senior res