. >> i think this should be looked at through a non-political lens. hillary clinton either lied to the f.b.i. or lied to congress. we want to hold her to the same standard we would hold anybody else, including professional bay ball players. i think it's important to acknowledge they are doing their job. we may not see political results of that. obviously perjury is a difficult charge 0 prove. if after everything james comey laid out isn't going to get her indicted this won't either. but it is important that they do their jobs as chairmen of these committees that are responsible. kennedy: she should have asked her about her steroid use. the party panel returns a little later. an olympian shooter warns her sport is in danger. first, are interest rates going up soon? and will that have a deleterious effect on the market? peter barnes had a conversation kennedy: peter barnes stat down with me for an interview with the new york federal reserve president who hinted a rate hike is still on the table for september, which is just next month. here is what willi

an incredible group that is very discreet and i don't think we should look at that through a political lense should not read into that because they take everything seriously? guest: i will say this. the idea people have been parading around on cable and network tv suggesting donald trump was calling for any kind or jokingus action about it i think is very disturbing to me. it just goes on and on. donny: i think it's accurate. it was a bad joke. guest: can i ask you a question as a woman? world is elizabeth warren thinking? why do certain people get away with saying things? mikeis a senator who after pence was nominated, saying they deserve each other, that they are small man and that donald trump is a pathetic coward. donald trump has called women sat higgs. how are you comparing -- guest: everyone thinks that's fine and when he tries to fight back against people like elizabeth warren -- donny: no one has talked about all the names he has called everyone. guest: the clinton people are spending zillions of dollars -- mark: i think you make a fair point about elizabeth warren. explain to peop

have to look at their past and what they've done and said and not all americans view things in a political lens like you do, where you can be on a different side of the aisle one day, come on cnn or on fox or on msnbc or whatever and you can talk crap about donald trump and then the next day you run his campaign. most people don't live in that sort of life. so they're looking at a person for what he said and done. they're not politicos. >> it's unfair to suggest and bring up the 1974 discrimination case, as if that was proven in a court of law that he was committing those actions, that's not true. that didn't happen. with regard to the central park five, it was horrible what happened to those young men -- >> no, no, let's talk about the central park five. >> in 1974, who didn't live in a segregated neighborhood? >> that didn't make it right. >> i'm not saying it made it right or wrong, but by you're judging somebody by today's standards. >> i lived in a segregated neighborhood. we were one of the first black families in a white neighborhood, it was tough. >> i'm not saying it's right, but you'r

an incredible group that is very discreet and i don't think we should look at that through a political lense should not read into that because they take everything seriously? kellyanne: i will not read anything into it because it is the secret service. i will say this. the idea people have been parading around on cable and network tv suggesting donald trump was calling for any kind of nefarious action or joking about it i think is very disturbing to me. i mean, it just goes on and on. donny: i think it's accurate. it was a bad joke. you could read it any other way. kellyanne: can i ask you a question as a woman? not in a bar. but you are welcome to come over, anytime. donny: thank you. kellyanne: what in the world is elizabeth warren thinking? why do certain people get away with saying things? this is a senator who after mike pence was nominated, saying they deserve each other, that they are both small and insecure man. manhood, donald trump is a pathetic coward. donny: donald trump has called women fat pigs. kellyanne: she is a united states senator. donny: how are you comparing -- kellyan

to maria's point, you have to look at people's actions, and not all americans view things in a political lensyou do where you can be on a different side of the aisle one day, can you come on cnn or on fox or on msnbc or whatever and you can talk crap about donald trump and the next day you run his campaign. most people don't live in that sort of life so they're looking at a person for what he said and what >>> it is unfair to middle school characterize what he has done. to bring up the 1974 case where he was committing the actions. that is not true. that didn't happen. with regard to the central park five. it is horrible what happened to those young men. it is horrible to -- >> any of us -- >> no, no, no. 1974, who didn't live in a segregated neighborhood? almost everybody did. >> that didn't make it right, andre. >> you're judging somebody by standards today. >> i'm going to do one more block with you guys. we'll get to the break. i lived in a segregated neighborhood. we didn't like it. we were one of the first black families in a white neighborhood. it was tough. just because it was that wa

donald trump has crusaded on, that made the least sense when you looked at it through a normal political lens years, the stuff that has upset people the most in the moment and that has seemed most inexplicable in terms of where it came from, for years, the place where he has apparently learned those facts and found uncritical cheerleading critical support for it, while the rest of the normal political world looked on baffled, was breitbart.com. after the republican convention this year, after house speaker paul ryan chaired the convention on trump's behalf and oversaw the nominating process and he spoke at trump's convention and got dragged kicking and screaming into formally endorsing trump for president. speaker ryan failing leadership test. paul ryan running scared in final days ahead of primary election. 11th hour, paul ryan scrambles to explain away trade policy effects on wisconsin workers. paul ryan bows down to nationalist populism as his career flashes before his eyes. his career was not flashing before his eyes. the guy running against him didn't even get 20% of the vote. but there'

to change the political lens, he went even further in september of 2015 announcing the proposal to increase the minimum wage to $15 for all workers. $15 per hour will be the highest in the nation and will herald a new economic contract with america and it's about time. there is the highest in every nation and to travel in less than a year. "the new york times" editors blog ran a headline in june of 2015 that summed up what seemed to be on the nations find disturbing wage, the new normal and this all happened in iowa and new hampshire. every great moment for justice in american history has begun with a seemingly implausible demand. it's an end to child labor when one in five american workers was under 16. the powerful industries in the losing power and income if women gained the right to vote. an eight hour day. they worked an average of 100 a week and the end to jim crow law in the passage of the civil voting rights laws medicare, medicaid and eventually obamacare to dramatically expand health care coverage. impossible, the fight for 15 has been called -- been called impossible and even in

an incredible group that is very discreet and i don't think we should look at them through a political lensver. i've traveled with them. i know what they're about. >> we should not read into the degree to which they're taking it seriously? >> i wouldn't read anything into it. it is the secret service. i will say this. the idea that people have been parading on cable and network tv suggesting that donald trump was calling for any kind of nefarious action against, criminal action against hillary clinton or joking about it, i think is very disturbing to me. it just goes on and on. >> i think it is accurate. >> that he is calling for her -- her demise? >> let me ask you a question, as a woman, not in a bar. you're welcome to come over any time. listen. what in the world is elizabeth warren thinking? why do certain people get away with saying snings this is a united states senator. after mike pence was nominated that they deserve each other. they're both small insecure men. calling into question their manhood saying yesterday, donald trump is a, quote, pathetic coward. she said donald trump is a

donald trump has crusaded on, that made the least sense when you looked at it through a normal political lensyears, the stuff that has upset people the most in the moment and that has seemed most inexplicable in terms of where it came from, for years, the place where he has apparently learned those facts and found uncritical cheerleading critical support for it, while the rest of the normal political world looked on baffled, was breitbart.com. after the republican convention this year, after house speaker paul ryan chaired the convention on trump's behalf and oversaw the nominating process and he spoke at trump's convention and got dragged kicking and screaming into formally endorsing trump for president. after all of that, trump came out and complimented the guy running against paul ryan in his home district in the republican primary this month. trump said he thought that guy was a great guy and running a great campaign. he said that he wasn't sure he would be able to endorse paul ryan. where did that come from? at breitbart.com in that time period, this is what was going on. speaker ryan fa

also the implications of this because, obviously, everything right now seems to be through the political lenshe cycle mark. several polls put clinton ahead of trump. we have a new poll giving her a 7-point lead. this, though, is a difference than before. she had a bigger lead before. so this type of distraction is not something the campaign wants right now. especially when donald trump has done a pretty good job of keeping negative headlines about his campaign and fumbles. >> this is a distraction. i do think it's probably doubtful that you and i are going to be talking about this 48 hours from now or certainly a month from now. >> you just jinxed us. >> i will say the poll you just cited really does show a very static and consistent race from all the totality of the polling that we have seen. to put that 7-point lead in perspective, 7 points of the margin that barack obama beat john mccain by in the 2008 race, which really wasn't a close contest at that point. so you needed to keep that in mind. that lead was 13 points right after the democratic convention and the republican convention reall

sensing the change in political lens,cuomo went further. fifteen dollars an hour the statewide in the nation and new economic contract to america and it's about time. nine months later. by november he put his money where his mouth was and established 15-dollar wage. that's a long way for a politician to travel in less than a year. "the new york times" editorial page, editor's blog ran a headline in 2015 that summed up what was in their mind. this all happened 2016 election got underway in iowa and new hampshire. every great moment for justice in american history has begun with seemingly and plausible demand. the abolition of slavery when the entire economy of the south was built on slavery and the u.s. constitution was built to ensure survival. end to child labor where one in five were under 16, women suffered when political machines, major relincoln own states and powerful industries feared losing power if women gained the right to vote. eight-hour day when full-time manufacturing and construction employees worked 100 hours a week, an end

the other thing about donald trump to learn is that he doesn't look at things through a political lens. i think senators and congressmen and governors tend to. it's very refreshing that donald trump speaks the way many americans speak. it's not always the perfect word because it hasn't been focused group and the pollster is not in his ear telling him what to say, how to think and who to be. at the same time he's enjoying conveying his thoughts in a way and wants to take that case to the people. he's also the guy who put political correctness on the campaign ballot this year. >> started out with 17 candidates, it's now down to one veter veterans. >> thank you very much, kellyanne. >> thank you for having me. >>> a new study why sitting could kill you slowly even if you exercise. we're going to stand up to are this one with dr. tara narula, a cardiologist, is in our toyota green room to look at the >>> a new look at a >> robert chambers convicted of killing jennifer levin in new york central park. this was his only interview. cu of killing a woman in new york central park. this is his on

the other thing about donald trump to learn that he does not look at things through a political lens. to. they can not help themselves. this is the first campaign and it's very researching that donald trump speaks the way that many americans speak. it's not always the perfect word because it's not postered and in the area but at the same time he is enjoying conveying his thoughts in a way. once you take that case to the people. he is the guy charlie that's really putting political correctness on the campaign ballot this year. >> started out with zps now down to one. >> yeah. >> thank you. we're going to leave it there. >> thanks for having me. >>> a new study on why sitting can kill you slowly even if you exercise. we're going to stand up for this one with a cardiologist that's >>> a new look at a >>> a new later. >>> the preppy killer robert chambers convicted of killing jennifer levin in new york central park. this was his only interview. >> am i a monster? no. >> 30 years after the crime. end of story? no. that's coming up on "cbs this morning." >> 3 after the crime. so when my t c

the other thing about donald trump to learn he doesn't look at things through a political lens. can't help themselves. this is his first campaign and refreshing that donald trump speaks the way many americans speak. it's not always the perfect word because it hasn't been focused in his ear telling him what to say and how to think and who to be. but, at the same time, he is enjoying convague his thoughts in awayne take that case to the people. he also is a guy, charlie, that is really political correctness on the campaign ballot this year. >> started out with 17 candidates' now it's down to one and he made a lot of political veterans. >> yes, indeed. >> we got to leave it there. >> thank you. >> kellyanne conway, thank you very much. >>> why sitting could kill you slowly even if you exercise. we will stand up with this with our cardiologist dr. tara narula who is in >>> a new look at a notorious caseee thr decade >> i'm richard schlesinger. the infamous preppy killer cued of killing a woman in new york central park. this is his only interview. >> am i a monster? no. >> 30 years a

i do think you have to stop judging donald trump through a traditional political lens. for a year now we've known there is nothing traditional political about him. >> what about what dana bush was reporting initially hearing about this frustration with trump and inner machinations of the campaign. then all of these staff advisors calling her around saying, no, no, no. a lot of times the trump folks are throwing media under the bus. he has plenty to talk about with hillary clinton yet he is taking to task this gold star family. it's wrong. >> after the week donald trump's had where he's made so many self-inflicted errors, if his staff is not frustrated, i'm frustrated. they should be frustrated. i can tell you something, despite their rallying and calling dana, they're frustrated. there is any way anybody in communications on the campaign is not frustrated when the boss doesn't take advice and goes after a gold star family. they are frustrated and they have a right to be. i think what's wrong is the story that paul manafort is not pushing back against trump any more, that

. >> i try to align my politics using intersectional feminist lens which means i made decisions on ifhis is good. >> what that binds me to the core belief that all individuals, men, women, and anybody who defines themselves should have access to the social, political, and economic equality. >> what make a feminist is i understand that if women are not free, i could not be free. as a gay man, really understanding that the struggle is my struggle. >> understanding that everything a person is equal. >> my feminism is a form of pay. faith. the faith to believe that women are whole, complete human beings have all the rights and privileges of every male human being on the planet. ♪ >> feminism is the social, economic and political equality of all genders. [applause] one of the great things about is the that it definition of what i have come to believe. times therelot of are startups when it comes to feminism. -- stereotypes when it comes to feminism. i am not mistaken. why would i be a feminist -- man hating, why would i be a feminist? one of the things i love about how feminism is transiti

truly totalizing kind of socialism, and so the trouble that i see looking at our politics now throughout that kind of lens is not that our politics is small but that it's totally disconnected from today's problems. there is a kind of left-right debate we can have that would be an american left right debate. not two radical ends but a protectsive sense of what to do about the -- progressive since of what to do and both would have something to contribute. one would be better than the other but we don't have that debate at all. that's not even what is going on. and in a sense the question of why that is was the question i was left with the end of the last book i wrote and led me to this one, because i think that the reason fundamentally is that neither of our parties, neither of our large ideological coalitions, is looking at the 21st under in its own terms, and if they did they'd actually both have a lot more to offer than they now have. and the leaders of both seem totally unaware of what they might have to offer the public. and instead of re-election is a choice between 1965 and 1981, and the public looks

to len about their politics, policies and legacies. all this month in primetime, every weekend on american history tv on c-span3. >> all week american history tv is in prime time featuring programs from our lectures in history series where we take you into college classrooms across the country. each night we debut a new lecture. wednesday it's native americans. at 8:00 eastern, we take you to dartmouth college for an overview of american indian history. at 9:20, the colonial west in the 1700s. that will be followed at 10:30 eastern with a lecture on the creek indians. that's wednesday night on american history tv primetime. >>> with the house and senate returning from their summer break next week, on thursday at 8:00 p.m. eastern, we'll preview four key issues facing congress this fall. federal funding to combat the zika virus. >> women in america today want to make sure that they have the ability to not get pregnant. why? mosquitos ravage pregnant women. >> today they turned down the very money that they argued for last may. and they

politics. including presidential elections. by examining stores stores through lens as the versus christianity, feminism and more, he provides insights that eliminate how star wars have become relevant for nearly four decades. you'll be invited to ask questions later in the program. you you can line up at the microphone in the center, following the program will be a book signing in the back and you can line up along the back wall and enjoy refreshments. we love to get your feedback on programming so complete the survey you received on the way and we would appreciate it. thank you for coming out tonight please welcome to cass. [applause]. >> so it is a thrill to be here, this is the debut of my discussion of this extremely improbable book. if you had told me a year ago that i would have a book on star wars i would say that it was more likely that i would become an opera singer. and the likelihood of that is really low. you have been given a hint of the origins of the project so i was a little bit more. a friend at a dinner inside the year suggested that my little boy,

white backlash" immigration, race, and american politics" they write this book is about race as much as it isin the unit there frequently noticed through a lens of race. the images are that of latino immigrants. marisa abrajano is an associate professor from the university of california san diego. also a senior fellow at the brookings institution. for research interest of the las political participation and the mass media campaign she is the author of campaigning the new american electorate of new faces and new voices. please welcome to san antonio doctor marisa abrajano. [applause] >> thanks for that kind introduction and thanks for coming. i just want to talk about the goal of the book as well as the main research question then so eloquently stated it is a central part of the united states via often thought about as a country of immigrants and today more than never it plays a messalians role of american politics. en demographically to make up 12% of the population and comes racial change that latinos surpass blacks the largest in the united states making a 17 part --% of the population and then they will lose majority status this demographi

he realized that politically this was not going to do him any good to have this picture next to governor wallace. >> there is the picture. you could see it was sticking by a long lens. jfk getting off the helicopter and greeting governor wallace. what was his reaction in june 1968 when rfk was shot? >> he really did not like robert kennedy. they had had a number of disagreements. they had met at some great length in the month preceding the standing in the schoolhouse door. once again, he used it to talk about the rise of lawlessness in america, but i do not think he was deeply touched by it at all. >> dan carter, in 1968, how serious did hubert humphrey take george wallace? >> humphrey worried about him because he saw him as potentially pulling votes. as time went on i think humphrey came to realize that wallace was going to be pulling boats from nixon. he did not worry about him as much. nixon is the one who came to be deeply concerned about him. as the campaign opened, nixon was so far ahead in the polls that it was only by the time you got to late september that he began to realize that humphrey was moving back a little bit, coming up in the polls, and what -- a

lens. but the white house is very prepared for political questions on the campaign trail.nd crucially, how is the president going to answer that question about iran and the timing and $400 million suspect we will be hearing from president obama on what could be a very political conversation. >> we certainly guessed that hans nichols at the white house. a short ride to the pentagon. richard engel is here in the studio. >> good to be here. >> i have a three-part question for you. preview the -- >> no math. >> yeah, sorry. preview the $400 million portion of what we're likely to hear. you have breaking news on isis from the region. and how has the fight against isis coming off jim mick la chef ski's point been a question. >> since this will be about isis, let's start with that. i i think he will have a lot of things to talk about on isis. the group has been getting hammered recently. very little attention. but in afghanistan, the isis headquarters, isis version of raqqa in afghanistan is currently under attack. hundreds of isis fighters have been killed. hundreds more are bei

he realized that politically this was not going to do him any good to have this picture next to governor wallace. >> there is the picture. you could see it was sticking by a long lens. jfk getting off the helicopter and greeting governor wallace. what was his reaction in june 1968 when rfk was shot? >> he really did not like robert kennedy. they had had a number of disagreements. they had met at some great length in the month preceding the standing in the schoolhouse door. once again, he used it to talk about the rise of lawlessness in america, but i do not think he was deeply touched by it at all. >> dan carter, in 1968, how serious did hubert humphrey take george wallace? >> humphrey worried about him because he saw him as potentially pulling votes. as time went on i think humphrey came to realize that wallace was going to be pulling boats from nixon. he did not worry about him as much. nixon is the one who came to be deeply concerned about him. as the campaign opened, nixon was so far ahead in the polls that it was only by the time you got to late september that he began to realize that humphrey was moving back a little bit, coming up in the polls, and what -- a

hillary clinton looks at the world through the lens of government should be everywhere and in everything. that everything is political. a natural consequence of progressivism is a blurring of the ultimately the erase you are of the public and private series of life. it's natural to flow from that that you would send a state department employee to work on -- with interests in the state department would give to the foundation and the things now, will this matter in the end? first of all, it's complex. second, it's very hard to demonstrate. you saw claire mccaskill denying it. a quid pro quo connection. that's always hard. third, there's a question, will the media drive this and finally, with the clintons responding, this is old news, the question is can they run out the clock between now and election day? my answer is probably. >> the clock has run out for this panel. when we come back, clinton and trump lay out competing visions for america's economic future. we'll drill down into their proposals on taxes, trade and >>> there is a myth out there that he will stick it to the rich and powerful because somehow he's reall

pat: if you see this through the lens of a client tried to do business in china, they are less concerned with the politicaltheir fundamentals and market opportunities. if we focus in on what is it that the clients are looking for, what is it they are trying to accomplish, everybody seems to have a bullish view about what to do and in many cases, how to do it. i would say there is no real change in sentiment from u.s. investment. scarlet: how about deciphering the political tea leaves within china? there is some tension between xi jinping and how they want to pursue reform of the economy, whether you focus on growth or taking the pain it out to the economy in a structurally better position. pat: when you have memories that china is in this process of becoming an open economy. this is not going to happen overnight. we have seen a series of steps and initiatives the chinese government have undertaken. they are not always gone smoothly. they have not always gone perfectly well. you have to -- what see underlying it all is the steady progressive march towards the open market. of course, if you will, is not goin

look at the war and the periphery and the lens of a person you can connect more with that period of time. >> you've not written a political book. it's more personal than that and yet the politics of genocide and the notion of the denial is present even today in the international relations. how do you analyze that and how does the controversy overshadow. there's the words armenian genocide. i tried to stay away from it as much as possible. i do want it to be recognized thaasmichael points for tellingy grandfather's story and writing the story is to educate others about what happened. one of the things that struck me the most. i wanted people to learn. there's a lot of primary information about it so i just chalked as a reporter wil look t the newspapers of the time and look at the back issues and you will see that it's chronicled in the world press. and so, yes anyway. he just wants to he'll. we don't want to stand around and march and demand. we just want our families to know what happened and be recognized. you >> i read a talk that you delivered last fall and realized some things are so nasty they should simply show the

lens of progressive. a progressive believes the government should be everywhere in everything, that everything is politicala natural consequence. there's a blurring of the distinction between public and private life. therefore it is natural to flow from that you extend a state department employee to new york to work on foundation business, foreign governments, with interests, and the state department would give to the foundation and things would get tangled up. will this matter in the end? first of all, it is complex. second it is very hard to demonstrate. you saw claire mccaskill deny it, quid pro quo connection is always hard. third question, will the media drive this, and finally with the clintons responding this is old news, the question is can they run out the clock between now and election day. and my answer is probably. >> the clock has run out for this panel. we're going to take a break. when we come back, clinton and trump layout competing visions for america's economic future. we go into the proposals on tax and jobs when we come back. >>> there's a myth out there that he will stick it to the ric

lens of progressive. a progressive believes the government should be everywhere and in everything, that everything is politicalnatural consequence of progressivism is a blurring of, ultimately the e raise your of the distinction between public and private spheres of life. therefore it is natural to flow from that you send a state department employee to new york to work on foundation business, foreign governments, with interests in the state department would give to the foundation and things would get tangled up. now, will this matter in the end? first of all, it is complex. second, it is very hard to demonstrate. you saw claire mccaskill deny it, quid pro quo connection is always hard. third, there is a question, will the media drive this? and finally, with the clintons responding always this is old news, the question is, can they run out the clock between now and the election day? and my answer is probably. >> the clock has run out for this panel. but we're just going to take a break. when we come back, clinton and trump lay out competing visions for america's economic future. we'll drill down into their prop

len an islamic cleric who lives in exile in pennsylvania, gu llen denies it but the turkish government is deny -- demanding his extra daition and many believe the u.s. supported the of attacks and political upheaval, next week vice president swroa biden will visit the country to try to repair relations with one of america's most important allies in the fight against isis. elaine? >> quijano: holly williams in istanbul, thank you. after more than two weeks in rio, the summer olympics come to a close. teamu sa is heading home with the most medals. ben tracy is covering the games for us in rio. >> reporter: it was go women's basketball team. they dominated spain and kept teamu sa's 20 year long winning streak alive. as expected, the men's basketball team won its own gold today fok knocking off serbian. american shocker stevenson,-- shakur steven sorn punched his way to silver in ban tamweight boxing. but the only competition that seemed to matter in rio this weekend was soccer. the host country beat germany it pride after a humiliating loss in the 2014 world cup. now all that's left is the closing ceremony. four-time gold medalist simone biles will carry the flag for teamu sa. >> i'm very h

lens of a person and you can connect more. >> is going to ask you, this is much more personal. and yet the politics of genocide, the notion of denial is present even today , how do you analyze that? >> it haunts just the words. i have tried to stay away from it as much as possible. i do want it to be recognized. my whole point for telling the story and writing the story is to educate others about what has happened and they can just read. i don't read armenian. i am probably going to mangle some names. for me i just wanted people to learn. so if you look, i really didn't -- contested. the must not be a lot of information about it. however shocked as a reporter. look at the newspaper of the time. look at the new york times and you will see that it was chronicled. so anyway -- >> and yet it disappeared off of our consciousness. >> absolutely. the politics is the hardest part. we just want to heal. we don't want to have to stand around and demand. we just want our families and what happened to be recognized so that we can heal. >> i have been preparing for today and read a talk to you delivered last fa

politics don't agree with yours. >> we can do that in this country. myself included, i go to collin kaepernick's twitter feed, it's all race, through the lens of white supremacy he think his coaches are white supremacy? everything through race. this is a guy with a complicated racial past. his father was white, father black, raised by black parents, if he's frustrated by police brutality, there's other ways to do it. don't pin it all on that flag, though. because there's so many men and women black, white, otherwise giving their blood for this country. that's how fans feel across this country and that's why you're seeing what you're seeing with the jersey. trish: i get it. thank you so much for being here. >> thank you. trish: more intel after this. see you in two trish: all right, everyone, donald trump is set to unveil his immigration policy in a speech in arizona on wednesday. there are about 11 million illegal immigrants in our country right now. what would you like trump's immigration policy to look like? like my facebook show page at trish intel and tell me what you think. meanwhile, don't forget to follow me on twitter at trish underscore regan. we alw

lens. you will meet iraqis and afghans, and marines and soldiers. that's the most accurate mirror. it's not a us versus them book in terms of the politicale of the issue, and the military side of the issue. the fact that i have some military friends here, i think attest to the fact that we did our best, and i think that the tribal warfare that goes on, in washington, in conference room, really undercut us. these are the people whose home front continue to be our war front. as we read books, and engage in discussions about these wars we should keep that in mind. i want to switch to the photos in the book. it's not a picture book. but the pictures are a very important part of the reading experience. my editor, and the great team up in new york, who helped me go three 500, and we bolted it down to 95. we used about 3, 4 department of defense photos. so they were specifically picked to be previewed for the stories and i always look at the photos first and hopefully some of the photos will stay with you. a few. there's a photo of fallujah, and it is being cleared, again, this time by the iraqi government, with our air power. if you look at th

. >> if you think of this through the lens of a contract to do business activity in china, they are less concern of what is happening in the politicalmentals and market opportunities. focus in on what the clients are trying to accomplish, everybody still seems to have a very bullish view on what to do, and in many cases, how to do it. i would say there is no real change in sentiment from u.s. investment. about deciphering the political tea leaves within china? there is some tension between the leaders and how they want to pursue reform of the economy, whether you focus on growth or utking the pain now to p the economy in a structurally better position. >> china is in the process of becoming an open market economy, so this will not happen overnight. we have seen a series of steps and initiatives that the chinese government have undertaken. they have not always gone smoothly or perfectly well, but when you have to see underlying it all is, nonetheless, a steady progressive march toward an open market. that course, if you will, will not be one that we change. you will continue to see the chinese government work toward an open market, t

one of the challenges hillary clinton has is she's been in politics so long, has so many of these relationships -- >> but it's a lens on how she will be as president of the united states. >> that's the question is raises for folks. is that the sort of person i want in the white house. a lot of people say yes. a lot of people say no. pchblts thank y >> thank you, guys. >> maggie, sarah. mr. bump, thank you. in fact, stick around. we have more we want to talk to you about. later on this morning, we'll talk to trump's campaign manager, kellyanne conway. she's in the news a lot. she's trying to soften the image. she's trying to do more than a campaign manager usually does. we'll check in with her at 8:00. >>> also, up next, more of anderson's interview with hillary clinton, including her strong response to donald trump's attack on the clinton foundation. that's next. (announcer vo) who says your desk phone always has to be at your desk? now, with one talk from verizon... hi, pete. i'm glad you called. (announcer vo) all your phones can work together on one number. you can move calls between phones, so conversations can