didn't even try to look for the only surviving terrorist, but he ignored the information, but anna politkovskaya calmly found him , for example. bundles of photos, where he is mounted under everyone, they are beautifully false, that is, there is a person among terrorists. that's exactly what i chose, so that we stopped dealing with these issues, the answer was because the ministry of internal affairs would grow up in you and lay the foundation in the heads of the russians to justify the second chechen war, an explosion in the corresponding moods in society was necessary, it was necessary to start the war, it was necessary to justify it so that the society did not have a question, i know that there will be no explosion, they dissuaded other politicians from entering into negotiations, it will make people panic, we will save everyone, the argument was that putin stood in the fact that now, eh, the muscovite is the sound of the position what is the truth, what according to the legal position, all responsibility for the situation is budgeted for the president. what is true, but the result? as he say

account the fact that well, they focused on the fact that neither the forum nor the murder of politkovskayawould be the days of death and we understood that it would not be very correct to do it as a separate event. yes, almost as a discussion. in general , we are not against it, but as a separate event is possible in this situation would be a bit incorrect and not because we don't respect politkovskaya's work or the struggle of belarusians, just a separate focus. yes, we don't focus so much on ukraine, so we don't do a separate event specifically about ukraine. so we focus on the world in general. we want to affect syria we want to get involved in the protests in iran, eh, and actually the manifestation. for us, it was a little too much, eh, but in principle, we did not receive that from the russians, but as a person who was one of the initiators of eh, the world ban of russians in culture, eh, which began on of the beginning of a full-scale invasion, they probably know that it is not worth talking to me. i want to say that the espresso tv channels are the information partner of the bookfo

like, for example, murder, they are politkovskaya about what the killers found, but this is not accepted's not necessary. this should be left behind the scenes. and maybe just the new york times. do you know that another high-profile murder is being prepared, another high- profile political bandera from the awning, as they said, a terrorist attack? they warn you don't do it 'cause it's out of control. or maybe the other way around. maybe some high-profile murder awaits us in the near future. the united states has already attacked this rake with the slomists, who were first declared freedom fighters. then they were declared terrorists, and then when it was it is necessary to again declare petrius useful material, yes, al-ka suggested, i use this to fight the igil, let me remind you that the founders were once called a wonderful fighter of soviet power. bin laden himself came out with laudatory reviews and then he was called cha dinads and the worst. what can happen to americans, in general, let's say very much, they treat moral relativists for them like that. a very blurry idea of ​​what

for example, there is a pelitkovskaya in the caucasus, a purely putin scenario after the politkovskayae is no information and but this was all planned for this as an example, and again, everyone had their own politkovska, they just don't talk about it, that's why i'm more than sure that he came in as a dictator, he was just playing the role of such a weak puppet in the hands of the oligarchs, but he definitely had a bloody dream about it my question is, of course, my paranoia now makes me ask, do you think, gentlemen, that putin is really so cunning and intelligent, that he maneuvered between all these figures and climbed the mountain through such cunning schemes, or was he just a protégé who got off the hook and began to settle accounts with those who set him up, what do you think, which theory is more to your heart's content, what is it called here, it's not about theory, first of all, there is a lot of literature, yes, no i will answer for those who want to understand it easily and pleasantly for themselves, there is a cool series, well , a documentary back, it’s how to become a dic

like, for example, they killed politkovskaya, because they found the killer. well it is not accepted.s not necessary. this should be left behind the scenes. and maybe just the new york times, knowing that another high-profile murder is being prepared, another high-profile bandera, and a tent, as they said, a terrorist attack? they warn you don't do it because it's out of control. or maybe the other way around. maybe some high-profile murder awaits us soon. the united states has already stepped on this rake, by strawmen, who were first declared freedom fighters. then they were declared terrorists, and then when it was necessary again declared useful material, petrius, it was suggested that i use it to fight the igil, let me remind you that the founder was once called a wonderful fighter of soviet power. bin laden himself came out with laudatory reviews and then he was called the dynamo disappeared and the worst thing that could happen to the americans, in general, let's say very much , they treat moral relativists for them like that. a very blurry idea of ​​what is good and what is bad