pollard spy

i what -- by what pollard gave to the israelis. think the justification was also for the life sentence, was that he had violated his plea agreement by speaking with wolf blitzer who went on to write a book about it. brian lamb: weinberger also, i do not remember it the exact legal details, perched himself in the iranhimself contra thing but was pardoned by george h.w. bush. what is your take on weinberger's relationship to saudi arabia and also george shultz and saddam hussein? sally denton: you know, there was a time, i think weinberger and george shultz represented a direct shift from the american government more toward a way from israel and the arab state. that was certainly felt by the israelis at the time, and of course the israelis were always skeptical, dating back to the 1940's, 1950's, 1960's in the era of boycott, and there was always some, a little bit of skepticism that the israelis felt toward bechtel. they were building throughout the middle east, but no projects in israel. brian lamb: do you think after your research

i'll put it in a little bit of a brief plug for pollard. pollard's four thick volumes are a vastly underused source. it's not quite a primary source, but it's almost a primary source in different ways. it's full of his kind of nutty ideas about a lot of things, but it is also wonderfully instructive about innumerable suggestions about the civil war. he is worth it. that's the end of my little commercial for pollard. i have no financial connection with that. wells and strong and pollard, i think, anticipated how most americans would understand the end of the civil war. in other words, they would put appomattox in a very prominent position in their understanding of the end of the war. an increasing number of scholars, however, have questioned whether lee's surrender should be reckoned a decisive indicator of the practical end of the conflict. t this builds on a phenomenon that has been present for a number of years and seeks to emphasize post-war violence in the former confederacy and the other conflicts enduring conflicts which are many and

somebody should do that with pollard. that's the end of my commercial for pollard. welles and strong and pollard anticipated how most americans would understand the end of the civil war. they would put appomattox in a prominent position in their understanding of the end of the war. an increasing number of scholars have questioned whether lee's surrender should be reckoned a decisive indicator of confederate national failure and the practical and of the conflict. this builds on a phenomenon that has been present for a number of years and seeks to empathize postwar violence in the former confederacy and the conflicts, other enduring consequences which were many and profound. within this chronological reframing, awarded not end at appomattox or durham station or appomattox, durham station, citronelle and new orleans. it did not and with those iconic military surrenders that came in a group. it continued through reconstruction, or through the jim crow era, or down to the present, the war that never ended. "time" magazine's cover a few years ago, it had lincoln on the fr

embassy in iraq, or the pollard spy case.se claims in the book and others are entirely false as is the underlying premise of the can bethat statement found on c-span.org. the campaign 2016 bus continues its travel to visit winners from this years student cam competition. nevada tosited sparks visit her third prize documentary on the wild horse population in the united states titled "wildhorse management." we met with student cam winners in new york, including a visit where theygo, recognized jackie power interesting cooper. joinedswoman judy chu friends, family, and classmates to celebrate second prize winners. special thanks to our cable partners for helping to coordinate these community visits. every weekday, be sure to watch one of the top 21 winning 50 a.m. at 6: eastern before "washington journal." oning up in two hours c-span2, tom price will discuss the fiscal year 2017 budget and his ideas for long-term budget reform. he will speak to the committee for a responsible federal budget. you will watch that live at 1:00 p.m

pollard spy the entire statement is posted on c-span's website for the q and a series. >> our live coverage of the presidential race continues tuesday night the new york state primary. join us at 9:00 eastern for viewer results -- motor results, voter results,-- viewer reactions. >> this month, we showcase our student cam winners. theme is road to the white house. issuesdents asked what you want candidates to discuss. one of our second prize high school winners are from silver springs, maryland. 10th-graders at montgomery blair presidentialant candidates to discuss juvenile justice reform and their video called wasted lives, a childhood behind bars. only countryll the that synthesis kids to die and that should never happen -- sentences kids to die and that should never happen. i don't think juveniles should be sent to an adult prison, even if they are treated in a criminal court. >> there are a lot in the system that did not pose a public safety risk and given the impact we know that commitment has on be usedey should only in situations where they absolutely have to be removed. >> these are

embassy in iraq or the pollard spy case and those another claims in the book are entirely false as ishe underlying premise of the book. the entire statement is posted on c-span's website or the q&a series. >> c-span's washington journal live every day with news and policy issues that impact you. come it up morning, supreme court reporter for usa today richard wolf reviews the oral , and thein the case director and senior fellow of migration policy reviews u.s. policy programs onto immigration trends and deferred action programs and we will be live outside the supreme court building talking about -- talking with people. be sure to watch washington journal beginning life monday and >> during this week's question time prime minister david cameron responded to questions about the panama papers. this is just under 40 minutes. speaker: questions for the prime minister. wendy: thank you mr. speaker. i visited to the manufacturing of the tower of london. with my right honorable friend agree with me that these businesses can in personal increase in personal tax allowances that came in this mon

sally denton: jonathan pollard had been spying for israel, as we all now know, and he had, among thehings he had given the israelis back in 1985, evidence of american companies building chemical plants in the middle east for israel's enemies and caspar weinberger became very interested in making sure that pollard did not get an easy sentence. brian lamb: you say neither the nnsa was not helpful or forthcoming? sally denton: it is actually an autonomous agency within the department of energy, and it is in charge of the maintenance of the nuclear weapons laboratory, which figures prominently in my book. brian lamb: why? sally denton: bechtel, the company i'm writing about manages most of the nuclear weapons complex at this point. there are 17 labs and i was focused primarily on lawrence livermore the weapons lab. , brian lamb: bechtel is what? sally denton: bechtel is the first major multinational company from the american west which is why it interested me because i am from the west, fourth generation nevadan and i grew up in the town that was their signature project way back in the 1

>> the dissenters and there are a few of them, evans and they wouldd pollard, point to wage growth asial down the road june. i think several of them suggested that two moves in 2016 are what we should expect. they are data dependent. it's up to the global situation. thinking, they have to normalize interest rates or else. they have an opportunity in terms of 200,000 plus jobs. it looks like a likely month to do one of those hikes. that was tom keene. still ahead, a friday edition. i face-off with the senior markets corresponded julie hyman. we are going to be talking about the european suppliers of apple and the reshuffle it's going on in the iphone 7. ♪ betty: it's time for our global battle of the charts. we look at some of the most telling charts of the day. you can access these on the bloomberg by running the function featured at the bottom of your screen. kicking things off his julie hyman. julie: i don't have a jobs related chart. not really. we areome economists say employment. we are pretty much at full employment. rocky, whys of chris look at the report at all? he is looking

chance of them last year pollard did not file patient was too proud to ask for help with her taxes untilthink i'm going down there is no other to help me or save me are grabbed me. i came to this place and they helped me. 10 seven their appointments available at sacred heart. for those who wait to the last minute, volunteers will be set up at the lundy post office on the 18th of they can get taxes done and now them off on the spot. san jose, and reuben ktvu fox2 news.

example in prez bisullivan, they assume that it applies on the one hand based on the decision in pollard and on the other one, they recognize that the interests don't apply. in order to fashion a remedy, a defendant has to show prejudice. and in addition, it takes in to account that the balance has shifted. that the person is no longer accused but convicted and his presumption of innocence has vanished. >> assume there's a prompt trial and a substantial delay thin sentencing and then there's an appeal. and the appeal results in a new trial. does the speedy trial act then apply when the defendant says, that my second trial was delayed? fr are there case on that? >> i don't think so, generally when the lower courts are applying delay, they apply due process. i cannot think -- >> if that delay were attributable to the state, it seems to me that there would be a speedy trial act violation in that connection. >> there may be, and lower courts when they are looking a delay or delay in sentencing, it's a similar test as far as the speedy trial clause is concerned when they are applying it prese

delay, the 10th circuit, for example, they assume that applies on one hand based on -- decision in pollard, but then on other they recognize if the interests don't apply, in order to fashion a remedy in a post conviction setting the defendant has to show prejudice. in addition, it takes into account that the balance has shifted. the person is no longer accused but convicted, and his presumption of innocence has vanished. >> assume that there is a prompt trial. they then a very substantial delay in sentencing, and then there is an appeal. an appeal results in new trial. does the speedy trial act then apply when the defendant says my second trial was delayed? are there cases on that? >> i don't think so. i think generally when courts -- lower courts are applying delay in the appellate context or resentencing context, they apply due process. >> because if that delay were attributable to the state, it seems to me there would be a speedy trial act violation in that connection. >> there may be. and lower courts when they look at appellate delay or delay in sentencing, it is a pretty similar test