in in the case of poltava gzk , ore was crushed by these minerals, so the company paid rent with it.o , the defense side has a question about why there is such a significant difference in the amount of pledges, in particular, it was much smaller for the chief accountant. the first suspicion in this case was reported more than 10 months ago to the chief accountant, and what do you think, the chief accountant received a bail of uah 20 million, the same fact, the same case, 10 months have passed with us, chairman of the board viktor viktorovich is informed notification of suspicion, they ask for almost the same deposit as... the chief accountant, but we get a contrast and get the final deposit amount of uah 650 million. bail in the amount of 650 million for the head of the poltava gzk is a record and disproportionate to his property status, the defense side notes, and the company's financial condition, taking into account the blocked accounts, will also not allow for a bail. from the point of view of the amount, it is certainly not a huge amount, not for me personally, i have such. ther

in the case of poltava gzk, ore was crushed by these fossils.efore, the company also paid rent with it. the defense side also has a question as to why... such a significant difference in the amount of pledges, in particular for the chief accountant, it was much smaller. the first suspicion in this case was reported more than 10 months ago to the chief accountant, and what do you think, the chief accountant received a bail of uah 20 million. one and the same fact, one and the same thing. it's been 10 months, the chairman of the board , viktor viktorovych, is notified of the suspicion, they ask for almost the same bail as the chairman. to the accountant, but we receive a contrast and receive the final amount of the pledge of uah 650 million. bail in the amount of 650 million for the head of poltava gzk is a record and disproportionate to his assets state - the defense side notes, and the financial state of the enterprise, taking into account the blocked accounts, will also not allow depositing a deposit. from the point of view of the amount, it is

the period when krypyvna began to consideration of the case regarding the alienation of shares of poltava gzkional company ferexpo in favor of kremlin businessmen babakov and ginner. in the end, the northern commercial court of appeal, and in particular lyudmila kropyvna, legalized the raider seizure of assets. this decision was later overturned by the grand chamber of the supreme court. then how did he start investigating where the judge got the funds for the house that was sold for 1 million dollars and whether? was a bribe. kropivna believes that during the search of her estate the detectives made a violation and appealed to corresponding complaint to the supreme council of justice. the third disciplinary chamber of the supreme council of justice finally dismissed the judge of the poltava district court, larisa bogomolova, who is suspected of treason due to her alleged cooperation with the russian fsb. according to the law enforcement officers, she called on the employees of the berdyansk district court, where she used to work, to support the russian occupiers and to cooperate with them, a