polter? >> board members, i asked for mr. kennedy intent was and i am not entirely clear. it seems to have something to do with the lost square footage, with the 3-foot set back. and property taxes and i am not quite clear as i can make it. i apologize. >> another thing that the zoning administrator brought up was that this building's narrow width does not, or is much more narrow than the entire width of the rear patio area that they are talking about. so, the impact of this on the patio is really greatly reduced, if you look at it in plan view. there is, we are talking about something on the order of 40 percent of this entire width of that patio area is going to be impacted by this very narrow building. and secondly, the issue of people having just moved in, whether or not that was the tenant or the property owner that spoke, or the appellants themselves, in today's letigeous society, i am sure that they were made aware of this by the realtor whens they bought their units, not this building was permitted originally in 2008. so, for them to not know that this building was