. >> "poltergeist." craig: i like him. he was in "poltergeist." i like him. he was "coach." craig newton. >> newton? craig t. nelson. craig: he is going to hate me. you know why? we're best friends. >> are you? craig: there is a bunch of guys, we're all called craig and we go, we get together every year, we go up to the woods and take all of our clothes off and light a fire and cry because our dads didn't love us enough. >> this is why you have me on because i'm naive because i'm like wow, that sounds like a really fun trip. good for you. craig: you're not that naive. >> i was going there with you. i mean, i would never go there with you. craig: you'd never go to woods with me? >> a bunch of craigs? what's happening now? and your snake! craig: why are you hating on the snake? why? >> it is -- i love your snake. i see it every year. [laughter] but it's just -- it is so cold. your snake is cold. craig: well, warm it up then. [laughter] that's right. get your hands around it. give it a good rub. that will warm it up. >> it is freckled. craig: it is freckled actually. how did yo

poltergeist. yeah, or do they? okay. we're gonna talk about that. a fellow by the name of aristotle, who was a giant for the human intellect and the advancing humankind, way back fourth century b.c. classified many things and brought knowledge to a very, very high point. but aristotle made some mistakes-- and not to emphasize his mistakes, but one of the mistakes aristotle made was that if something's moving, again, there gotta be a reason for it. things don't move of themselves, and so we said if something moves, it's because there's a force pushing or pulling. these things started moving, you'd look for a force, wouldn't you? aristotle also. and so he made that one of the dictums, that if something's moving that doesn't ordinarily move, then there's a force acting. and, boom, that was carved in stone in the medieval years. but it bothered some people, because, take for example a cannonball shot from a cannon. here's a cannonball, okay? you put that inside the cannon, what makes the cannonball move? well, you got some gunpowder back here. you ignit

. >> it's like that moment in, you know, poltergeist, they're here! it was a very -- it's very disturbing -- >> it's what people would have called, you know, the exorcist. all of that stuff. it is that, but there's a name for it. it's schizophrenia. >> dr. phil: we're talking about, first off, a very intelligent child here. >> absolutely. >> dr. phil: her delusional system, her hallucinations are very well articulated. calalini is her whole other world. >> yes. >> dr. phil: she has 400 the cat, wednesday the rat, blink the beagle, a 12 girl, a 11 girl, midnight the cat, emily 64 a cat, saturn the rat, 34 a bird, 100 degrees, which is a girl. 200 the rat, magical 61 the cat. carniverous numbers and the nothing. she will never get one wrong from the other. it's well-articulated and very well entrenched. susan and michael decided to have another child as a companion for jani because of her struggle to make friends. take a look. >> i agreed to have another child because we couldn't find another child that jani could relate to. >> she's got all these imagi

your piece "haunted by hillary" reads in part, like a poltergeist in a pantsuit.itical conventions, but not the only one. both the republican gathering in tampa and the democratic conclave here were almost as fascinating for what and who were missing as for what and who were present. for the appearances that didn't happen or that occurred only briefly or belatedly. the democrats lacked not only hillary but also in the beginning god. to some party stalwarts, that's probably a statement of the utmost redundancy. hillary is god or at least a holy ghost. she is the phantom of the conventions, but everyone's looking at her straight ahead. >> everybody was talking about >> everyone was talking about her. part of it was because bill was there speaking obviously and people were wondering, is he teeing uphill ri for a 2016 run. i think people are so unexcited about this run. i think there's a little bit of wish that we had a different set of candidates this time around. >> is it silly to ask the question, will she or won't she when you're talking about a clinton? >> well,