pomerantz is a real person of interest.about why and hot how he might be useful? >> so i actually don't think he will be as useful as they would like him to be. so a few days ago, trump's team served a subpoena without notifying alan bragg's team or even asking for authorization from the court to serve a subpoena on a third party, and served it just a few days ago and is asking for a number of things, and ultimately, mark pomerantz, when he was running this before alvin bragg came he was the special assistant district attorney running the investigation. you know, presumably he has a lot of information, email's, a lot of memos that he wrote. in his view of the prosecution but all of that was turned over to the da, when he resigned quite some time ago and as the da points out, look, we've talked to him and said, do you have anything on your personal devices, do you have anything that we don't already have an in their opposition to the subpoena, they lay out, look here's all the efforts we made to get him, here's his affirmati

pomerantz!own by all other law enforcement authorities, and is not a crime. "happy easter --" okay -- everyone!" there you go [ laughter ] got it back there right at the end. the worst part, stole that from a hallmark card. [ laughter ] the next post was even worse. "also grandson who is hardly very grand took bite of chocolate rabbit even after i had called it, which is both wrong and sick. and when i threatened to sue him for his jelly beans as restitution, eric "ericy" trump told me to chill. when i asked him how he would feel if someone ate his chocolate rabbit on easter, he said he never got a chocolate rabbit on easter. take it up with your dad, i said, to which he said, you are my dad, to which i said, i thought don junior was my son, and he said you can have more than one. pomerantz!" [ laughter ] that -- by the way, like i think three sentences in before they were like, this one's not real. every day is april fool's. that easter rant may be the most deranged thing trump has ever posted

in fact, pomerantz, he wasn't even -- we subpoenaed him, and he fought it.udge, the court says, no, you have got to come testify. so he comes testifies and takes the fifth umpteen times. it's all a political. and, again, as a eric trump said earlier, i think the country sees. maria: well, that's what i wanted to ask you, is that resonating on people. whether or not what you're saying is right, that there's no crime, we can't figure out what the crime is, or president trump is in court every day all a day long, and he's sitting there. and hen you've got joe biden on the other side of the screen campaigning in all of these swing states. after a while does this resonate in the psyche of american citizens and voters that they just assume one guy's bad, one guy's good? >> well, yeah, i think we're way past that because they've seen this weaponization of government. they've seen this lawfare, and they've seen just the escalation of attacks on president trump all the way back to '16. they spied on his campaign, then it was the mueller or investigation, then it was

. >> brian pomerantz is an attorney representing dikes. he says those notes also included purportedly race neutral reasons as to why jurors were tossed. >> so these aren't notes that just are showing we don't like this juror for this reason. they it was a scheme to be able to get away with it. >> he provided at least one rationale as to why prosecutors may have chosen to exclude jewish jurors. >> there was a belief at the time that because the gas chamber was what was used in california, that jewish jurors would not want to send people to the gas chamber, pomerantz said it took price, a progressive da who ran on a platform to reform the criminal justice system, to bring these allegations to light. it took pamela price to bring this about. it should have happened in previous administrations. the attorney tells me. >> one of those prosecutors is now an alameda county superior court judge in oakland. henry lee ktvu, fox two news. >> now we go to hillsborough tonight where police there are investigating a stabbing that took place at a skate pa

look at what pomerantz did. that is bad stuff. look at the last trial. he got caught lying. when are they going to look at that? just a few blocks away, they had a trial with letitia james. it is all coming out of the white house, by the way. the judge did not know anything. he says supposing it goes down. it does not go down. i put up $175 million in cash. we have a bonding company. they tell him the bonding company is not good. they also have $175 million in collateral. the judge did not know anything about it. he did not know what the $175 million catchment. he had no idea what anything meant. he charged me hundreds of millions of dollars for somebody totally innocent. if you look at what happened today, it should have gone to the business division. if you look at the numbers, they are underestimated, i underestimated. it is the opposite of what they said. they did it for their own narrative. they valued other assets to build the narrative. i have a complete record of what happened. he had no idea what was going on. did not understand the most simple context. this is the

what pomerantz did. that is bad stuff. when are they gonna look at all the lies that cohen did in the last trial. can't lying in the last trial. he caught lying. and what are they gonna look at that. another subject because, just a few blocks away, they had a trial, $175 million. that is letitia james. it's all coming out of the white house, by the way. the judge engoron. the judge didn't know anything. he didn't know about the security. he said -- it doesn't go down because its cash. i put up $175 million in cash. we had a bonding company do it. he challenged the bonding company that maybe the bonding company was no good. well, they are good. they also have $175 million of my collateral. the judge didn't know anything about -- he didn't know what $175 million cash manager. he had no idea what anything meant. he had no idea what he did in the trial. and he charged me hundreds of millions of dollars on something where i am totally innocent. but if you look at what happened today, judge engoron should not have done that. he

pomerantz is a person of interest here. can you talk to me how and why he might be useful to the trump side of things? >> a few days ago trump's team served a subpoena without notifying alvin bragg's team or asking for authorization from the court, which is what a defendant had to do in a criminal case to serve a subpoena on a third party and served it a few days ago and is asking for a number of things, and ultimately mark pomerantz when he was running this before alvin bragg came, he was the special district attorney running this investigation, presumably he has a lot of information, a lot of e-mails, a lot of memos that he wrote in this view of the prosecution, and all of that was turned over to the d.a. when he resigned, you know, quite some time ago. and as the d.a. points out in their papers, look, we've talked to him, we've said do you have anything on your personal devices, do you have anything we don't already have, and in their oppositional subpoena they lay out, look here are the things to get to him, here are hi

the judiciary chairman jim jordan says that x new york prosecutor mark pomerantz put pressure on alvin at the trial saying we still don't understand what the crime is in the threatening years and years in prison for donald trump, what is the crime. >> we talked about this when the indictment came down. it's got no clear, 34 counts but all goes to a felony to get under the statute of limitations. based on the second crime the alvin bragg has still not hallucinated. that's a real problem. in the sense donald trump still doesn't know specifically what is charged with. the reason for that, the secondary charge is the one that is really problematic. it's a federal election charge. alvin bragg has no jurisdiction. the case law in new york says you cannot use a federal statute to bump the state charge that's the way the state law goes. real estate you have to rely on a tax charge or something but the problem with that why didn't he charge it he has jurisdiction over that, the examination of this and why it was brought forward really has merit because the case is almost certainly not going to

s office when mark pomerantz presented it.ut the question is, do wey believe that for a candidate to either want to pay extortion money or hide some fact that may be unpleasant from the public that that is really election interference? but the probleaim m is we don't' what they claim the charges. we don't necessarily get to the misdemeanor because that requires intent to defraud with the wa y things are booked. you can be sure president trump didn't direct elvis was to behat booked. e if you got to that, they haveo prove they did that with intent to commit another crime. without the grand jury charging what the other crime is t committed is impossible to defend. let's say through this witness helpit is to cover up some sala fact to help himself in then electionfi. but another witness, it is really campaign finance violation and another ona e say, no, a tax violation. a defendant doesn't have to hit a moving target all the time. today's testimony perfectly highlights what many of the problems are but this case. by the way, woul

president trump the department just as goes to the da office to go after president trump and mark pomerantzs the same thing it was all about getting trump, in fact, these are the guys who said we can put michael cohen as our star witness one thing that probably bothers me the most about this case right now is the fact that they put a gag order on president trump former president current republican nominee for president of the nine states likely going to be the next president i certainly hope he is he is not allowed to talk about michael cohen is a convicted perjurer guy who came in front of congress in life six times in one congressional hearing he is allowed to say whatever he wants? but president trump has a gag order from this judge this obviously partisan judge whose daughter works for every democrat you can thank of this is what is so unfair it's all driven by politics the whole plan here is to keep biden in the basement because he can't talk anybody then keep biden in the basement and trump on trial that's what the democrats are trying to do that their whole plan because they know pre

david pomerantz, sophomore at columbia university. we have spoken in the past and talked about hostages and all sorts of things. we're in a different lane right now and i wish on this passover that it were different. please tell me what you were experiencing on the campus of columbia. >> sure. first thanks for having me and thanks for doing this segment. it is important the entire country is aware of what is happening at columbia and campuses across the country. what i am experiencing now is a state of chaos, disorder, the university is no longer become a place where students can learn and study and prepare for finals. it has become the home of these rapid anti-israel protests. we have an encampment which is filled not just with students but with outside agitators. i was talking to a columbia public servant agent yesterday they can guarantee for a fact people inside the tents on campus not students, no affiliation with the university, who are chanting to attack and kill jewish students. >> harris: david, that's particularly a problem

brian pomerantz is an attorney representing dikes. >> he says those notes also included purportedly race neutral reasons as to why jurors were tossed. >> so these aren't notes that just are showing we don't like this juror for this reason. they it was a scheme to be able to get away with it. he provided at least one rationale as to why prosecutors may have chosen to exclude jewish jurors. there was a belief at the time that because the gas chamber was what was used in california, that jewish jurors would not want to send people to the gas chamber, pomeranz said it took price, a progressive da who ran on a platform to reform the criminal justice system, to bring these allegations to light. it took pamela price to bring this about . it should have happened in previous administrations, the attorney tells me. >> one of those prosecutors is now an alameda county superior court judge in oakland. henry lee ktvu, fox two news. >> new information now on a stabbing of a parishioner at saints peter and paul church in north beach, san francisco. police identified 25 year old marco asauliuk as the su

that at been observed carolina chapel hill and then you come here to new york city restaurant david pomerantz is a soccer are here. is not having her grandmother nypd are not moving because the school hasn't called them to. using others point out these are what happened inside of that hamilton hall that the nypd to move in? >> absolutely. have an oblation to last night, i called nypd as -- alerting them that an ongoing right was in process, students were being assaulted a group of mobsters had taken hammers to destroy the windows and you just show your viewers for the nypd has no obligation to show up and resolve this. >> who's in charge here? a student if you like your you walk on campus or the presidents, minouche shafik? what you think has the power? >> last night it was certainly not minouche shafik, it was the mob. ahmad was in charge, tomato -- there was no public safety presence at, call for the police went unheeded, minouche shafik has to do her job and bring order to this campus. it's out of hand. >> you think she should step down? she's given the student protesters quite a lot of tr

the deal, one of them read michael cohen's book, another individual said that they had read mark pomerantz'sok inside. i want to let you meet another dismissed juror here, who i just met a few moments ago this is mark. you're one of those individuals, correct me if i'm wrong, you rose your hand and you said you would not able to be fair and impartial. how did that play out? >> we were summoned and the judge read all the particulars of the case, how one was supposed to evaluate the law, and the evidence, and then he said, you know, if there is a reason that you don't think you could be impartial, or that you could be perceived as biased, that you should raise your hand. so, i raised my hand because i was certain that even if an intellectually i would be capable of being unbiased, because i satirized mr. trump often in my art work, that this would come to light and that were i to be seated on the trial, a, it would be dishonest for me to withhold that information, but there is -- there would be no way that blanch, not going is rely on the kind of -- kindness of strangers would allow me to be o

question 35 and 36, have you read or listened to the books or podcasts by michael cohen, mike pomerantzthe defendant, donald trump? just hours ago, the judge in this case denied one of trumps any requests for delay, directed to trumps, that there had been too much publicity for a fair trial. considering there are still several issues outstanding, including for a motion for the judge to recuse himself, there remains a lot of that could happen between now and 9:30 monday morning. me is charles coleman, former prosecutor, no civil rights and criminal defense attorney and barbara mcquaid, who served as u.s. attorney in the eastern district of michigan, author of the book "attack from within," barbara, i want to start with you on the motion that, the adjournment motion that was filed by trumps lawyers basically saying there is too much pretrial publicity to have a fair trial. and, here's the order from judge merchan. defendant seeks a further adjournment of trial in light of pre-judicial pretrial publicity, which is substantial, ongoing, and likely to increase. the remedy defendant six is in

. >> brian pomerantz is an attorney representing dikes.se notes also included purportedly race neutral reasons as to why jurors were tossed. >> so these aren't notes that just are showing we don't like this juror for this reason. they it was a scheme to be able to get away with it. >> he provided at least one rationale as to why prosecutors may have chosen to exclude jewish jurors. there was a belief at the time that because the gas chamber was what was used in california, that jewish jurors would not want to send people to the gas chamber, pomeranz said it took price, a progressive da who ran on a platform to reform the criminal justice system, to bring these allegations to light. >> it took pamela price to bring this about. it should have happened in previous administrations, the attorney tells me. >> one of those prosecutors is now an alameda county superior court judge in oakland. henry lee ktvu, fox two news. the jewish holiday of passover started tonight at sundown in san francisco. >> chabad of the neighborhood synagogue hosted a pa

posted on his social about a potential witness again, asking whether the former prosecutor mark pomerantzted. joining me are my guests. adam, i've got to start with you. 18 years, you were with the d.a.'s office in manhattan and you happen to know juan merchan. >> we started in the office 30 years ago. rookie prosecutors together, and, you know, always judge merchan was a very serious prosecutor, serious guy in the office. and went on to take the bench a number of years ago, and has a great reputation as a judge. >> so to see judge merchan today saying to a lawyer, and you're a practicing law year right now too, to say you are losing all credibility with this court, what did you immediately think? >> well, you said it, right? words that as a lawyer in the courtroom, you never want to hear directed at you. you're pretty happy if they're directed at your adversary. so i think, look, you've been in trials. you know, people get frustrated, they get impatient. defense lawyers have to make arguments for their clients, and i think that judge merchan got frustrated and addressed that to the defen

another asks if they have read either of mark pomerantz's or michael cohen's books about the case. are these your typical jury questions? >> some of them are. let's say two corporations are going to trial against one another in a civil trial that had a jury. it would be typical to have questions, have you or any member of your family or close friends worked for corporation a or corporation b. it is typical to ask, do you know any of the lawyers here, do you know the law firm that they come from? those kinds of questions are typical. what is less typical here are the things about the jurors' political beliefs, not beliefs, but how strongly they feel those beliefs. they're not asking people, are you a republican or a democrat, who did you vote for, judge merchan said he's not going to ask that. but they're testing the intensity of feeling by asking things like, have you volunteered, what kind of media do you consume, how regularly do you consume it, right? they're trying to sus out are these people who can be fair, not do they have an opinion, but can they set the opinions aside and

. >> brian pomerantz is an attorney representing dikes. he says those notes also included purportedly race neutral reasons as to why jurors were tossed. >> so these aren't notes that just are showing we don't like this juror for this reason. they it was a scheme to be able to get away with it. >> he provided at least one rationale as to why prosecutors may have chosen to exclude jewish jurors. >> there was a belief at the time that because the gas chamber was what was used in california for that, jewish jurors would not want to send people to the gas chamber, pomeranz said. >> it took price, a progressive da who ran on a platform to reform the criminal justice system, to bring these allegations to light. >> it took pamela price to bring this about. it should have happened in previous administrations, the attorney tells me. >> one of those prosecutors is now an alameda county superior court judge in oakland. henry lee ktvu, fox two news miramonte high school in orinda went into lockdown in response to a security threat. >> today, school off

mark pomerantz, who is pushing this case, saying was, we got to go after trump. alvin bragg simply to go after. e on and he's the one who persuades alvin right to do it, no tsistan he's assistant d.a., but only after he resigns, throwstemper a temper tantrum, does a media blitz and most importantly, writesa a book where he lays it all out, how he was out to get the president from the get go.wt that's what promptedd alvin bragg that franklyg he and donald trump announcing that he was going to run for president. that's what prompted run fog to bring this ridiculous case. and pomeranz called it the zombie case because it was dead, gone and buried. and then the statuteause is of limitations passed anyway. you talkmitation about as well. how is it what do you consider the third highest ranking official by biden' s to beto a pretty prestigious job? woul d you it that would that be okay? sure. why did this guy move from that job? to giv from the opening argumens and work on this case in a d.a.'s office in the state of new york? why would you give up that biga? job? >> s

president, a recent article by peter pomerantz start this way. after they beat azakian so bin laden that blood came out of -- so bad that blood came out of his ears, after they sent electric shocks on his genitals, the russians began to interrogate him about his faith. when did you become a baptist? when did you become an american spy? assat tried to explain that in ukraine there was freedom of religion. you could choose your faith. but his tortureres saw the world the same way as the kgbd. an american church is a front for the american state since soviet times. that's the end of the quote, mr. president. since soviet times, russian orthodox church has been used as a tool of the state so russians, assume protestants in ukraine are american agents. the world was horrified after the kiev suburb of bucha was liberated revealing that civilians had been massacred simply for being loyal ukrainians. but bucha is not an exception. in every part of ukraine that russia has occupied, civilians have been murdered, women systematically raped and christians no