ultimately, through the investigation of the police of poorman, there was a gap in paperwork, so technically occupancy was never approved by the ec. it subsequently was shut down, and it was at that point that the police department requested a formal premises expansion, which rates before you today so that we allow for disclosure of what is happening and everyone the opportunity to speak on the matter. the license was reviewed by planning. it is an allowable use. the premises was posted for 30 days on the building and subsequently, there was a 500- foot malar conducted to the neighborhood. to the best of our ability, we feel due process has been served, and that brings us to today in the conditions we are proposing with this approval. >> thank you. -- supervisor chu: thank you, and in terms of conditions being proposed here, whether it is the hour or the noise, were any of these in place beforehand? >> no, they did not have these conditions in the past. supervisor chu: thank you. are there members of the public that wish to speak on this item? >> madame chair, commissioners, -- supervisors,